Disparities in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement.

Background: Multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) has been linked with improved survival for locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the existence of disparities in its utilization remains to be elucidated. Methods: All adults with PDAC were tabulated from the 2011-2017 Nationwide Cancer Database. Tumor vascular involvement was determined using the clinical T stage and CS_EXTENSION variables. The significance of temporal trends was calculated using Cuzick's non-parametric test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact of NAT utilization on hazard of two-year mortality. A logistic regression model was developed to determine factors associated with receipt of NAT. Results: Of 3811 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.8 % received NAT. NAT utilization significantly increased over the study period, from 31.7 % in 2011 to 81.1 % in 2017 (p < 0.001). NAT was associated with significantly reduced two-year mortality (Hazards Ratio 0.34, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.18-0.67).After adjustment, younger (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 0.97/year, CI 0.96-0.98) and Black (AOR 0.65, CI 0.48-0.89; ref: White) patients demonstrated reduced odds of NAT. Furthermore, patients with Medicare (AOR 0.73, CI 0.59-0.90; ref: Private) or Medicaid insurance (AOR 0.67, CI 0.46-0.97; ref: Private) had lower odds of NAT, as did those treated at non-academic institutions (Community: AOR 0.42, CI 0.35-0.52, Integrated: 0.68, CI 0.54-0.85) or in the lowest education quartile (AOR 0.52, CI 0.29-0.95; ref: Highest). Conclusions: We identified increasing utilization of NAT for BR/LA pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite being linked with significantly reduced two-year mortality, socioeconomic disparities affect odds of NAT.

National trends and outcomes of robotic emergency general surgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted surgery has seen exponential adoption over the last decade. Although the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery in the elective setting have been demonstrated, data regarding robotic emergency general surgery remains sparse. METHODS: All adults undergoing non-elective appendectomy, cholecystectomy, small or large bowel resection, perforated ulcer repair, or lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2008 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Temporal trends were analyzed using a rank-based, non-parametric test developed by Cuzick (nptrend). Using laparoscopy as a reference, multivariable regressions were used to evaluate the association between robotic techniques and in-hospital mortality, major complications, and resource use for each emergency general surgery operation. RESULTS: Of an estimated 4,040,555 patients undergoing emergency general surgery, 65,853 (1.6%) were performed using robotic techniques. The robotic proportion of minimally invasive emergency general surgery increased significantly overall, with the largest growth seen in robot-assisted large bowel resections and perforated ulcer repairs. After adjustment for various patient and hospital-level factors, robot-assisted large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.91) and cholecystectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.81) were associated with significantly reduced odds of perioperative blood transfusion compared to traditional laparoscopy. Although robotic techniques were associated with modest reductions in postoperative length of stay, costs were uniformly higher by increments of up to $4,900. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery appears to be a safe and effective adjunct to laparoscopy in minimally invasive emergency general surgery, although comparable cost-effectiveness has yet to be realized. Increasing use of robotic techniques in emergency general surgery may be attributable in part to reduced complications, including blood loss, in certain operative contexts.

Hospital-level variation in costs of elective nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: With the aging population in the United States, the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms is shifting to older ages. Given changing demographic characteristics and increasing health care expenditures, the present study evaluated the degree of center-level variation in the cost of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We identified all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for elective repair of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the 2017 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hierarchical mixed-effects models were used to rank hospitals based on risk-adjusted costs. The interclass coefficient was used to calculate the amount of variation attributable to hospital-level characteristics. High-cost hospitals were classified as centers in the top decile of costs. The association of high-cost hospitals status with outcomes of interest was examined. RESULTS: An estimated 62,626 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and 5,011 (8.0%) were managed at high-cost hospitals. Compared with non-high-cost hospitals, high-cost hospitals were more commonly large (52.6% vs 48.3%) metropolitan (78.3% vs 66.9%) teaching centers (all P < .001). The interclass coefficient found that 28% of the observed variation in cost is attributable to hospital factors. After adjustment, high-cost hospitals were associated with increased odds of gastrointestinal (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.90) and infectious (adjusted odds ratio = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.59) complications. Finally, the Elixhauser index (ß = +$2,700/unit; 95% CI, $2,500-$3,000) and open repair (ß = +$4,100; 95% CI, $3,100-$5,200) were associated with increased costs. CONCLUSION: We observed significant variation in cost attributable to center-level differences. Our findings have implications for reimbursement paradigms and the establishment of quality and cost benchmarks in the elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Trends and associated outcomes of fat embolism after trauma surgery.

BACKGROUND: Fat embolism is a life-threatening complication often occurring in patients with traumatic injuries. However, temporal trends and perioperative outcomes of fat embolism remain understudied. Using a nationally representative cohort, we aimed to characterize temporal trends of fat embolism and its associated resource utilization in operatively managed trauma patients. METHODS: All patients (≥18 years) undergoing any major operations after traumatic injuries were tabulated using the 2005 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients were stratified into those with fat embolism and those without. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were developed to assess the association between fat embolism and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of an estimated 10,600,000 hospitalizations, 7,479 (0.07%) patients had fat embolism. Compared to the non-fat embolism cohort, the fat embolism cohort was younger (55 [26-79] vs 69 [49-82] years, standard mean difference = 0.46) and more likely to receive treatment at a high-volume trauma center (42.9 vs 33.7%, standard mean difference = 0.19). Over the study period, there was an increase in annual mortality and hospitalization costs among the fat embolism group (nptrend <0.001). After risk adjustment, fat embolism was associated with greater odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 2.65, 95% confidence interval: 2.24-3.14) compared to others. Additionally, fat embolism was associated with increased odds of cerebrovascular, infectious, and renal complications. CONCLUSION: Among all operatively managed trauma patients, those who developed fat embolism had increased mortality, rates of complications, length of stay, and costs. Optimization of early and accurate identification of fat embolism is warranted to mitigate complications and improve resource allocation among trauma patients.

Impact of Safety-Net Hospital Status on Immediate Reconstruction Following Mastectomy: A Contemporary National Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy has been shown to improve quality of life and partially mitigate the adverse psychological impacts associated with the procedure. The present study examined hospital-based and patient-level disparities in utilization and outcomes of IBR following mastectomy. METHODS: All female adult hospitalizations with a diagnosis of breast cancer undergoing mastectomy were identified in the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Safety-net hospitals (SNH) were defined as those in the top quartile of all Medicaid or self-pay admissions. Patients who underwent mastectomy at SNH comprised the SNH cohort (others: Non-SNH). Multivariable models were developed to examine the impact of SNH status and patient factors on rates of IBR. RESULTS: Of an estimated 127,740 hospitalizations, 28,330 (22.2%) were treated at SNH. The proportion of patients receiving IBR increased from 46.7% in 2016 to 51.7% in 2020 (nptrend<.001). Compared to others, SNH were younger (57.9 ± 13.5 vs 58.3 ± 13.5 years) and less commonly White (45.6 vs 69.9%) (all P < .001). Additionally, SNH were more likely to receive unilateral mastectomy (67.1 vs 55.2%) but less frequently underwent IBR (37.7 vs 51.5%) (all P < .001). After adjustment, Black and Asian race, SNH, and bilateral mastectomy were associated with decreased odds of IBR. Increasing IBR hospital volume did not eliminate the observed racial disparity at non-SNH or SNH. CONCLUSION: There are disparities in rates of IBR following mastectomy attributable to SNH status. Future work is needed to ensure all patients have access to reconstructive care irrespective of payer status or the hospital at which they receive care.

Mortality and resource utilization in surgical versus transcatheter repeat mitral valve replacement: A national analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has garnered interest as a viable alternative to the traditional surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) for high-risk patients requiring redo operations. This study aims to evaluate the association of TMVR with selected clinical and financial outcomes. METHODS: Adults undergoing isolated redo mitral valve replacement were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database and categorized into TMVR or SMVR cohorts. Various regression models were developed to assess the association between TMVR and in-hospital mortality, as well as additional secondary outcomes. Transseptal and transapical catheter-based approaches were also compared in relation to study endpoints. RESULTS: Of an estimated 7,725 patients, 2,941 (38.1%) underwent TMVR. During the study period, the proportion of TMVR for redo operations increased from 17.8% to 46.7% (nptrend<0.001). Following adjustment, TMVR was associated with similar odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.82, p = 0.48), but lower odds of stroke (AOR 0.44, p = 0.001), prolonged ventilation (AOR 0.43, p<0.001), acute kidney injury (AOR 0.61, p<0.001), and reoperation (AOR 0.29, p = 0.02). TMVR was additionally correlated with shorter postoperative length of stay (pLOS; ß -0.98, p<0.001) and reduced costs (ß -$10,100, p = 0.002). Additional analysis demonstrated that the transseptal approach had lower adjusted mortality (AOR 0.44, p = 0.02), shorter adjusted pLOS (ß -0.43, p<0.001), but higher overall costs (ß $5,200, p = 0.04), compared to transapical. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study, we noted TMVR to yield similar odds of in-hospital mortality as SMVR, but fewer complications and reduced healthcare expenditures. Moreover, transseptal approaches were associated with lower adjusted mortality, shorter pLOS, but higher cost, relative to the transapical. Our findings suggest that TMVR represent a cost-effective and safe treatment modality for patients requiring redo mitral valve procedures. Nevertheless, future studies examining long-term outcomes associated with SMVR and TMVR in redo mitral valve operations, are needed.

Trends in the adoption of diverting loop ileostomy for acute complicated diverticulitis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Acute complicated diverticulitis poses a substantial burden to individual patients and the health care system. A significant proportion of the cases necessitate emergency operations. The choice between Hartmann's procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy remains controversial. METHODS: Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patient user file data from 2012 to 2020, patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for nonelective sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis were identified. Major adverse events, 30-day mortality, perioperative complications, operative duration, reoperation, and 30-day readmissions were assessed. RESULTS: Of 16,921 cases, 6.3% underwent primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy, showing a rising trend from 5.3% in 2012 to 8.4% in 2020. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy patients, compared to Hartmann's procedure, had similar demographics and fewer severe comorbidities. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy exhibited lower rates of major adverse events (24.6% vs 29.3%, P = .001). After risk adjustment, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy had similar risks of major adverse events and 30-day mortality compared to Hartmann's procedure. While having lower odds of respiratory (adjusted odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.83) and infectious (adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.93) complications, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with a 36-minute increment in operative duration and increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.57) compared to Hartmann's procedure. CONCLUSION: Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy displayed comparable odds of major adverse events compared to Hartmann's procedure in acute complicated diverticulitis while mitigating infectious and respiratory complication risks. However, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with longer operative times and greater odds of 30-day readmission. Evolving guidelines and increasing primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy use suggest a shift favoring primary anastomosis, especially in complicated diverticulitis. Future investigation of disparities in surgical approaches and patient outcomes is warranted to optimize acute diverticulitis care pathways.

Hospital Quality Mediates Impact of Care Fragmentation Following Elective Colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Readmission at a non-index hospital, or care fragmentation (CF), has been previously linked to greater morbidity and resource utilization. However, a contemporary evaluation of the impact of CF on readmission outcomes following elective colectomy is lacking. We additionally sought to evaluate the role of hospital quality in mediating the effect of CF. METHODS: All records for adults undergoing elective colectomy were tabulated from the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients readmitted non-electively within 30 days to a non-index center comprised the CF cohort (others: Non-CF). Hierarchical mixed-effects models were constructed to ascertain risk-adjusted rates of major adverse events (MAEs, a composite of in-hospital mortality and any complication) attributable to center-level effects. Hospitals with risk-adjusted MAE rates ≥50th percentile were considered Low-Quality Hospitals (LQHs) (others: High-Quality Hospitals [HQHs]). RESULTS: Of 68,185 patients readmitted non-electively within 30 days, 8968 (13.2%) were categorized as CF. On average, CF was older, of greater comorbidity burden, and more often underwent colectomy for cancer, relative to Non-CF. Following risk adjustment, CF remained independently associated with greater likelihood of MAE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.16, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.05-1.27) and per-patient expenditures (ß+$2,280, CI +$1080-3490). Further, readmission to non-index LQH was linked with significantly increased odds of MAE, following initial care at HQH (AOR 1.43, CI 1.03-1.99) and LQH (AOR 1.72, CI 1.30-2.28; Reference: Non-CF). CONCLUSIONS: Care fragmentation was associated with greater morbidity and resource utilization at readmission following elective colectomy. Further, rehospitalization at non-index LQH conferred significantly inferior outcomes. Novel efforts are needed to improve continuity of care.

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Emergent Colectomy for Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the acute management of diverticulitis remains controversial. Using a national cohort, we examined the relationship between operative approaches with acute clinical and financial outcomes. METHODS: Adults undergoing emergent colectomy for diverticulitis were tabulated from the 2015-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Regression models were developed to analyze the association between open and MIS approaches with major adverse events (MAE), as well as secondary endpoints. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between open and MIS requiring conversion to open (CTO). RESULTS: Of 9194 patients, 1580 (17.3%) underwent MIS colectomy. The proportion of MIS resection increased from 15.1% in 2015 to 19.1% in 2020 (nptrend<.001). Compared to Open, MIS patients were younger, equally likely to be female, had a lower proportion of patients with ASA class ≥3, and a higher BMI. Preoperatively, MIS patients were less frequently diagnosed with sepsis. Following adjustment with open as reference, MIS approach had reduced odds of MAE (AOR .56), ostomy creation (AOR .12), shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS; ß -1.63), and a lower likelihood of nonhome discharge (AOR .45, all P < .001). Additionally, CTO was linked to decreased likelihood of MAE (AOR .78, P = .01), ostomy creation (AOR .02, P < .001), comparable LOS (ß -.46, P = .41), and reduced odds of nonhome discharge (AOR .58, P < .001), relative to open. DISCUSSION: Compared to planned open colectomy, MIS resection was associated with improved clinical and financial outcomes, even in cases of CTO. Our findings suggest that whenever possible, MIS should be attempted first in emergent colectomy for diverticulitis. Nevertheless, future prospective studies are likely needed to further elucidate specific patient and clinical factors.

Prior bariatric surgery is associated with lower mortality and resource utilization following small bowel obstruction.

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a complication of bariatric surgery. However, outcomes of surgical intervention for SBO among patients with prior bariatric surgery remain ill-defined. We used a nationally representative cohort to characterize the outcomes of the SBO management approach in patients with a prior bariatric operation. Methods: All adult hospitalizations for SBO were tabulated from the 2018-2020 National Readmissions Database. Patients with a prior history of bariatric surgery comprised the Bariatric cohort (others: Non-Bariatric). Multivariable models were subsequently developed to evaluate the association of prior bariatric surgery with outcomes of interest. Results: Of an estimated 299,983 hospitalizations for SBO, 15,788 (5.3 %) had a history of prior bariatric surgery. Compared to Non-Bariatric, Bariatric patients were younger (54 [46-62] vs 57 [47-64] years, P < 0.001) and were more frequently privately insured (45.1 vs 39.4 %, P < 0.001). On average, the Bariatric more frequently underwent operative management, relative to Non-Bariatric (44.8 vs 29.7 %, P < 0.001). Following risk adjustment, among those surgically managed, Bariatric demonstrated lower odds of mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 0.69, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.55-0.87) compared to Non-Bariatric. Bariatric also demonstrated lower odds of infectious and renal complications. Furthermore, the Bariatric cohort had lower costs, length of stay, and non-home discharge. Conclusions: Patients with prior bariatric surgery demonstrated a lower likelihood of mortality, decreased complications, and reduced resource utilization, relative to others. As the incidence of bariatric surgery continues to rise, future work is needed to minimize the incidence of SBO among these patients, especially in the current era of value-based healthcare.

National analysis of racial disparities in emergent surgery for colorectal cancer.

Background: Racial disparities in access to preoperative evaluation for colorectal cancer remain unclear. Emergent admission may indicate lack of access to timely care. The present work aimed to evaluate the association of admission type with race among patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: All adults undergoing resection for colorectal cancer in 2011-2020 National Inpatient Sample were identified. Multivariable regression models were developed to examine the association of admission type with race. Primary outcome was major adverse events (MAE), including mortality and complications. Secondary outcomes included costs and length of stay (LOS). Interaction terms between year, admission type, and race were used to analyze trends. Results: Of 722,736 patients, 67.6 % had Elective and 32.4 % Emergent admission. Black (AOR 1.38 [95 % CI 1.33-1.44]), Hispanic (1.45 [1.38-1.53]), and Asian/Pacific Islander or Native American (1.25 [1.18-1.32]) race were associated with significantly increased odds of Emergent operation relative to White. Over the study period, non-White patients consistently comprised over 5 % greater proportion of the Emergent cohort compared to Elective. Furthermore, Emergent admission was associated with 3-fold increase in mortality and complications, 5-day increment in LOS, and $10,100 increase in costs. MAE rates among Emergent patients remained greater than Elective with a widening gap over time. Non-White patients experienced significantly increased MAE regardless of admission type. Conclusion: Non-White race was associated with increased odds of emergent colorectal cancer resection. Given the persistent disparity over the past decade, systematic approaches to alleviate racial inequities in colorectal cancer screening and improve access to timely surgical treatment are warranted.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement as a bridge to cholecystectomy for grade III acute cholecystitis: A national analysis.

Introduction: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT) is an alternative to cholecystectomy (CCY) in high-risk surgical candidates with severe acute cholecystitis. A subset of these patients ultimately undergo delayed CCY. We therefore compared outcomes of delayed CCY in patients with grade III acute cholecystitis who received a PCT on index admission, to those who did not. Methods: Non-elective adult hospitalizations for grade III acute cholecystitis that underwent delayed CCY were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmission Database. Patients who received a PCT during their index admission comprised the PCT group (others: Non-PCT). Outcomes were assessed for the CCY hospitalization. Entropy balancing was used to generate sample weights to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Regression models were created to evaluate the association between PCT and the outcomes of interest. Results: Of an estimated 13,782 patients, 13.3 % comprised PCT. Compared to Non-PCT, PCT were older (71.1 ± 13.1 vs 67.4 ± 15.3 years) and more commonly in the highest income quartile (22.5 vs 16.1 %, both p < 0.001). After risk adjustment, PCT was associated with reduced odds of respiratory (AOR 0.67, CI 0.54-0.83) and infectious (AOR 0.77, CI 0.62-0.96) complications after eventual CCY. Finally, PCT had comparable pLOS (ß +0.31, CI [-0.14, 0.77]) and operative hospitalization costs (ß $800, CI [-2300, +600]). Conclusion: In the present study, PCT was associated with decreased odds of perioperative complications and comparable resource utilization upon readmission CCY. Our findings suggest that PCT may be helpful in bridging patients with grade III acute cholecystitis to eventual CCY.

Association of Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation with Clinical and Financial Outcomes for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care consultation (PCC) has been shown to improve quality of life and reduce costs for various chronic life-threatening diseases. Despite PCC incorporation into modern pancreatic cancer care guidelines, limited data regarding its specific utilization and impact on resource use is available. METHODS: The 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify all adult hospitalizations entailing pancreatic cancer. Only patients with at least one readmission within 90 days were included to account for uncaptured out-of-hospital mortality. Multivariable regression models were used to ascertain the relationship between inpatient PCC during initial hospitalization and index as well as cumulative costs, overall length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, and number of repeat hospitalizations. RESULTS: Of an estimated 175,805 patients with pancreatic cancer, 11.1% had inpatient PCC during the index admission. PCC utilization significantly increased from 10.5% in 2016 to 11.6% in 2020 (nptrend < 0.001). After adjustment, PCC was associated with reduced index hospitalization costs [ß: - $1100; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1500, - 800; P < 0.001] and cumulative 90-day costs (ß: - $11,700; 95% CI - 12,700, - 10,000; P < 0.001). PCC was associated with longer index LOS (ß: + 1.12 days, 95% CI 0.92-1.31, P < 0.001) but significantly reduced cumulative LOS (ß: - 3.16 days; 95% CI - 3.67, - 2.65; P < 0.001). Finally, PCC was linked with decreased odds of 30-day nonelective readmission (AOR: 0.48, 95% CI 0.45-0.50, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: PCC was associated with decreased costs, readmission rates, and number of hospitalizations among patients with pancreatic cancer. Directed strategies to increase utilization and reduce barriers to consultation should be implemented to encourage practitioners to maximize inpatient PCC referral rates.

Care fragmentation is associated with increased mortality after ileostomy creation.

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy is the mainstay treatment option for various gastrointestinal conditions. Given the increased risk of post-discharge complications and high readmission rates that can be further aggravated by receiving care at different facilities (care fragmentation), further examination is necessary. We thus used a national cohort to explore the associations of care fragmentation among ileostomy patients experiencing adverse outcomes and increased hospitalization expenditures. METHODS: All adult hospitalizations for ileostomy were tabulated from the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Those readmitted within 90 days after discharge were included for analysis. Patients treated at a different facility than the original location where the index ileostomy was performed were categorized into the care-fragmented cohort. Multivariable regressions were developed to characterize the association of the care-fragmented cohort with postoperative outcomes, readmissions, and expenditures. RESULTS: Of 52,254 patients with ileostomy creation hospitalizations with 90-day nonelective readmission, 9,045 (17.3%) experienced care fragmentation. Following risk adjustment, those experiencing care fragmentation faced increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.54-2.12), cardiac (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.42-1.85), respiratory (adjusted odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.53-1.91), infectious (adjusted odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.43), and thromboembolic (adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.45) complications. Furthermore, patients experiencing care fragmentation were more likely to have increased hospitalization costs ($1,700, 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.5). CONCLUSION: Care fragmentation in ileostomy patients demonstrated an increased risk for mortality, postoperative complications, and increased hospitalization expenses. To mitigate risks for adverse outcomes, future studies should evaluate the impacts of inter-hospital communication with the goal of improving care continuity and optimizing healthcare delivery for care-fragmented populations.

Acute Outcomes of Cardiac Operations in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders: A National Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated atherosclerosis, inflammation, and valve pathology are known complications of autoimmune connective tissue diseases (AID). However, outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or valve operations among these patients remain underexamined. METHODS: All adult hospitalizations for elective CABG or valve procedures were identified from the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Autoimmune connective tissue disease was defined to include systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and other autoimmune AIDs. Entropy balancing was applied to generate balanced patient cohorts. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess the independent associations between AID and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of ∼1 652 573 patients, 21 019 (1.3%) had AID (23.7% SLE, 17.2% APLS, 29.5% PMR, and 29.6% other). Autoimmune connective tissue disease patients were more frequently female (60.8 vs 33.1%, P < .001) and insured by Medicare (71.4 vs 62.2%, P < .001) and presented with a higher comorbidity index (5.2 ± 1.8 vs 4.1 ± 1.8, P < .001). Further, AID less frequently underwent isolated CABG (39.0 vs 52.3%) but more commonly isolated valve operations (41.9% vs 31.0%, P < .001), relative to non-AID. Following risk-adjustment, AID was not linked with increased odds of mortality or cardiac complications. However, AID was linked with a greater risk of thrombotic complications, blood transfusion, and non-elective readmission within 30 days, as well as a +$900 decrement in hospitalization costs. DISCUSSION: Autoimmune connective tissue disease patients demonstrated acceptable outcomes following CABG and valve procedures. However, novel prophylactic care pathways should be developed and instituted to address greater thrombotic and blood transfusion risk. Further investigation is needed to identify factors contributing to greater non-elective readmissions among these patients.

National Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Type B Aortic Dissection Management at Safety-Net Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) are often underinsured and urgently admitted for open or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The present study evaluated the association of safety-net status with outcomes among patients with TBAD. METHODS: The 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all adults admitted with type B aortic dissection. Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) were defined as institutions in the top 33% for the annual proportion of uninsured or Medicaid patients. Multivariable regression models were utilized to assess the association of SNH with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost, and non-home discharge. RESULTS: Of an estimated 172 595 patients, 61 000 (35.3%) were managed at SNH. Compared to others, patients admitted to SNH were younger, more commonly non-white, and more frequently non-electively admitted. From 2012 to 2019, the annual incidence of type B aortic dissection increased in the overall cohort. Additionally, utilization of TEVAR at non-SNH increased significantly (2012: 6.5% vs 2019: 9.8%), while that of SNH remained similar (2012: 7.4% vs 2019: 7.9%). Patients undergoing open repair had higher mortality at both SNH (12.4 vs 7.8%, P < .001) and non-SNH (13.1 vs 6.1%, P < .001) compared to those receiving TEVAR. After risk adjustment, compared to non-SNH, SNH status was associated with greater odds of mortality, perioperative complications and non-home discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggests that SNH have inferior clinical outcomes for TBAD as well as reduced adoption of endovascular management strategies. Future studies to identify barriers to optimal aortic repair and ameliorate disparities at SNH are warranted.

Lymphatic Proliferation Ameliorates Pulmonary Fibrosis after Lung Injury.

Despite many reports about pulmonary blood vessels in lung fibrosis, the contribution of lymphatics to fibrosis is unknown. We examined the mechanism and consequences of lymphatic remodeling in mice with lung fibrosis after bleomycin injury or telomere dysfunction. Widespread lymphangiogenesis was observed after bleomycin treatment and in fibrotic lungs of prospero homeobox 1-enhanced green fluorescent protein (Prox1-EGFP) transgenic mice with telomere dysfunction. In loss-of-function studies, blocking antibodies revealed that lymphangiogenesis 14 days after bleomycin treatment was dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf) receptor 3 signaling, but not on Vegf receptor 2. Vegfc gene and protein expression increased specifically. Extensive extravasated plasma, platelets, and macrophages at sites of lymphatic growth were potential sources of Vegfc. Lymphangiogenesis peaked at 14 to 28 days after bleomycin challenge, was accompanied by doubling of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 in lung lymphatics and tertiary lymphoid organ formation, and then decreased as lung injury resolved by 56 days. In gain-of-function studies, expansion of the lung lymphatic network by transgenic overexpression of Vegfc in club cell secretory protein (CCSP)/VEGF-C mice reduced macrophage accumulation and fibrosis and accelerated recovery after bleomycin treatment. These findings suggest that lymphatics have an overall protective effect in lung injury and fibrosis and fit with a mechanism whereby lung lymphatic network expansion reduces lymph stasis and increases clearance of fluid and cells, including profibrotic macrophages.