Prognostic impact of the E/e' ratio in patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to evaluate the clinical implication of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 323 patients (age, 56.3 ± 14.1 years; 111 female) who underwent aortic valve replacement for chronic severe aortic regurgitation between 2005 and 2019. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was assessed by the ratio of peak left ventricular inflow velocity over mitral annular velocity (E/e'). The study end point was the composite of death and heart failure requiring hospital admission. RESULTS: The E/e' ratio was significantly correlated with age, left atrial dimension, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mitral regurgitation grade, and tricuspid regurgitation grade (all P < .001). During follow-up (1748.3 patient-years), death and heart failure occurred in 36 patients (2.06/patient-year) and 9 patients (0.53/patient-year), respectively. In multivariable analysis, E/e' ratio (per 5 increment, hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.71; P = .03), age (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.10; P < .001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.98; P = .002) were independent predictors of death and heart failure. The 5-year heart failure-free survival was 94.9% ± 1.7% in patients with E/e' less than 15% and 84.2% ± 4.2% in patients with E/e' 15 or greater (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The E/e' ratio was significantly associated with adverse outcomes in patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement and may be useful as a prognostic marker in such patients.

Prognosis of Unrepaired Ascending Aorta after the Surgical Replacement of Bicuspid Aortic Valves.

Background: The surgical threshold for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-related aortopathy is a matter of debate due to its uncertain etiology and prognosis. This study investigated the prognosis of unrepaired BAV aortopathy in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 720 patients (age, 60.8±11.5 years; 246 women) who underwent SAVR for BAV disease without aortic repair between 2005 and 2020 at Asan Medical Center. The clinical endpoints were defined as occurrences of sudden death, aortic dissection or rupture, and elective aortic repair. To estimate postoperative changes in the dimensions of the unrepaired aorta, the individual annual aortic expansion rate was calculated. Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the risk of aortic expansion. Results: The mean ascending aortic diameter was 39.5±4.6 mm, and 299 patients (41.5%) had a baseline ascending aorta diameter >40 mm. During 70.0±68.3 months of follow-up, the mean annual aortic expansion rate was 0.39±1.96 mm/yr, no aortic dissection or rupture was observed, and sudden deaths were reported in 12 patients (0.34% per person-year). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant correlation between the baseline ascending aortic diameter and postoperative aortic expansion (R2=0.004, ß=-0.84, p=0.082). Conclusion: In selected patients undergoing SAVR for a BAV (<55 mm), the risk of adverse aortic events was very low. As this observation contradicts current practice guidelines advocating for proactive aortic replacement in dilated ascending aortas measuring >45 mm, the study results need further validation by studies involving larger populations or randomized controlled trials.

Impact of valve repair on mild tricuspid insufficiency in rheumatic mitral surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Tricuspid valve repair for mild tricuspid regurgitation during rheumatic mitral valve surgery is controversial. We evaluated the benefit of tricuspid valve repair for mild tricuspid regurgitation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Among 1208 consecutive patients (52.6 ± 11.9 years) with mild tricuspid regurgitation who underwent rheumatic mitral valve surgery from 2000 to 2018 in 2 referral centers, 419 received concomitant tricuspid valve repair and 789 did not. The primary end point was the development of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Deaths were regarded as competing events. Secondary end points were death and heart failure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to reduce selection bias. Multivariable competing risk analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors of severe tricuspid regurgitation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in early mortality rates between patients with and without tricuspid valve repair (P = .26). During a median follow-up of 71.6 (interquartile range: 25.3-124.2) months, the primary end point was detected in 7 of 419 patients (0.25%/patient-years) and 28 of 789 patients (0.57%/patient-years) with and without tricuspid valve repair, respectively (P = .04). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points. After baseline adjustment, the primary end point was not significantly different depending on the addition of tricuspid valve repair (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.77; P = .39). In multivariable analysis, only the omission of surgical atrial fibrillation ablation (hazard ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-9.87) was significantly associated with the development of severe tricuspid regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid valve repair for mild tricuspid regurgitation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery provides no overt clinical benefit.

The fate of aortic valve after rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Deterioration of the native aortic valve function by a late progression of rheumatic disease is not infrequent in patients who underwent rheumatic mitral valve surgery; however, this phenomenon has not been clearly quantified. METHODS: A total of 1155 consecutive patients (age 52.0 ± 12.9 years; 807 female) who underwent rheumatic mitral valve surgery without concomitant aortic valve surgery from 1997 to 2015 were enrolled. The primary end point was the composite of progression to severe aortic valve dysfunction or a requirement of subsequent aortic valve replacements during follow-up. To determine the risk factors of the primary outcome, we performed the generalized linear mixed model. RESULTS: The baseline severities of aortic valve were none to trivial in 880 patients (76.2%), mild in 256 patients (22.2%), and moderate in 19 patients (1.6%). The latest 1062 echocardiographic assessments (91.9%; median, 81.2 postoperative months; interquartile range, 37.3-132.1 months) demonstrated 26 cases (0.33%/patient-year) meeting the primary end point during follow-up. Cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 10 years was 0.4% ± 0.3% and 7.4% ± 2.5% depending on the presence of mild or greater aortic valve dysfunction at baseline (P < .01). In multivariable analyses, aortic valve peak pressure gradient (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.20), aortic regurgitation degree (mild over none: odds ratio, 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-9.23), and time (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41) were significantly associated with the occurrence of the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: Progression of severe aortic valve dysfunction and the need for aortic valve replacement are uncommon in patients undergoing rheumatic mitral valve surgery. However, such events were relatively common among those with mild or greater aortic valve dysfunction at the time of mitral valve surgery.

Clinical benefits of concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: The maze procedure is the dominant concomitant surgery performed with mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Most clinical recommendations regarding the maze procedure depend on the individual maze expert centers. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of the maze procedure during MV surgery in a national cohort. METHODS: Using the national health claims database established by the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea, data on subjects with AF who had undergone MV surgery from 2009 to 2017 were reviewed. The outcomes of interest were mortality; occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; hospitalization for bleeding events; and the composite of death, cerebrovascular accident, and major bleeding. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed for baseline adjustment. RESULTS: Among 9501 subjects, the maze procedure was performed in 5508 (58.0%). In the PS-matched cohort (3376 pairs), the risk of the composite event was significantly lower in the maze group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.799; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.731-0.873) than in the nonmaze group. The superiority of the maze procedure was similar for individual clinical events, including death (HR 0.795; 95% CI 0.711-0.889); ischemic stroke (HR 0.788; 95% CI 0.67-0.926); and major bleeding (HR 0.749; 95% CI 0.627-0.895), but not for hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.984; 95% CI 0.768-1.262). In subgroup analyses of the composite events, these benefits were consistent among subjects aged ≥70 years or <70 years, surgery type (replacement vs repair), MV pathologies, and subjects with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4 or <4. CONCLUSION: The addition of the maze procedure during MV surgery provided protective effects in the composite outcome of interest.

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Ablation Lesion Sets.

Background: The lesion sets for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) that provide optimal outcomes have remained controversial. Objectives: We evaluated the effects of left-atrial (LA) ablation of AF compared with bi-atrial (BA) ablation on the clinical and rhythm outcomes, and examined the predictors for AF recurrence and permanent pacing in consideration of ablation lesion sets. Methods: Between 2001 and 2018, 1,965 patients underwent surgical ablation during cardiac surgery at our institution. Among these, 796 and 1,169 patients underwent LA and BA ablation, respectively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated after propensity score adjustment, with death accounting for a competing event. The probability of AF recurrence was estimated with the generalized estimating equations model. Results: The patients with BA ablation had morbidities greater than those with LA ablation. The probability of AF recurrence at 1 and 5 years was 13.9% and 37.1% in patients with LA ablation, and 11.2% and 30.1% in those with BA ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.61; P = 0.100). After adjustment, LA ablation was associated with a decreased risk of early death (<30 days) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31-0.96; P = 0.041) and new-onset dialysis (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.27-0.78; P = 0.003). However, the risk of overall mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.75-1.41; P = 0.878) and permanent pacing (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43-1.06; P = 0.091) was comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The risk of AF recurrence and adverse events was comparable between the 2 ablation lesion sets. BA ablation was not related to an increased risk of permanent pacing.

Exclusion versus preservation of the left atrial appendage in rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of left atrial appendage exclusion on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing rheumatic mitral surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1226 consecutive patients with AF (54.5±11.6 years; 68.2% females) who underwent rheumatic mitral valve (MV) surgery from 1997 to 2016. The left atrial appendage was preserved in 836 (68.2%) and excluded in 390 (31.8%) patients. Surgical AF ablation was performed in 506 (60.5%) and 304 (77.9%) patients with preserved and excluded left atrial appendage, respectively. For baseline adjustment, propensity matching was used. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 63.4 months (IQRs, 20-111 months), there were no significant intergroup differences in the risks of mortality (2.77% vs 3.03%/patient-years) and thromboembolic events (0.91% vs 1.02%/patient-years). In the 258 pairs of propensity-score matched patients, death (2.77% vs 3.03%/patient-years) and thromboembolism (1.36% vs 0.82%/patient-years) outcomes were comparable for both groups. In a subgroup undergoing ablation (n=810), there were no significant differences in the adjusted risks of death (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.32) and thromboembolism (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.18 to 1.26). In a subgroup not undergoing ablation (n=416), however, left atrial appendage preservation tended to have higher adjusted risks for death (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 5.13) and thromboembolism (HR, 4.41; 95% CI, 0.97 to 20.1). CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial appendage preservation did not seem to have greater risks of adverse clinical events in patients with AF undergoing rheumatic MV surgery particularly when ablation procedure is combined.

A Huge Pericardial Gossypiboma Causing Severe Cardiac Dysfunction.

Gossypiboma-a surgical cotton matrix inadvertently left in the body cavity-is a rare postoperative complication, especially after cardiac surgery. We report a patient who presented with severe cardiac dysfunction caused by a huge pericardial gossypiboma that was detected 30 years after the previous cardiac surgery. This case delineates the serious medical consequences caused by pericardial gossypiboma and suggests considering gossypiboma as a differential diagnosis of a pericardial mass in patients with a history of cardiac surgery.

Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Scarce data have been reported on the efficacy of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve replacement. METHODS: From 2001 and 2014, 146 consecutive patients (69.3±9.4 years, 84 females) who underwent bioprosthetic heart valve replacement concomitant with AF ablation were assessed. We evaluated long-term rhythm and valve-related outcomes. RESULTS: During 49.1 months of follow-up (interquartile range, 22.5-96.8 months), 7 in-hospital and 49 (6.7% per person-year) post-discharge deaths occurred. The thromboembolic event-free survival rate at 5 years was 79.2%±3.5%. The freedom from AF recurrence rate at 5 years was 59.8%±4.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that old age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.11; p=0.002), previous cardiac operation (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.22-7.43; p=0.02), and a large left atrial (LA) dimension (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; p=0.045) were significantly associated with AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: The overall long-term clinical outcomes in these predominantly elderly patients undergoing AF ablation concomitantly with bioprosthetic valve replacement were satisfactory; however, AF recurrence was frequent. Older age, a history of prior cardiac surgery, and large LA size were associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence.

Concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in rheumatic mitral valve disease has been regarded inferior to that in nonrheumatic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate net clinical benefits by the addition of concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Among 1229 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation from 1997 to 2016 (54.4 ± 11.7 years; 68.2% were female), 812 (66.1%) received concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation (ablation group), and 417 (33.9%) underwent valve surgery alone (no ablation group). Death and thromboembolic events were compared between these groups. Mortality was regarded as a competing risk to evaluate thromboembolic outcomes. To reduce selection bias, inverse probability of treatment weighting methods were performed. RESULTS: Freedom from atrial fibrillation occurrence at 5 years was 76.5% ± 1.8% and 5.3% ± 1.1% in the ablation and no ablation groups, respectively (P < .001). The ablation group had significantly lower risks for death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.93) and thromboembolic events (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.76) than the no ablation group. Time-varying Cox analysis revealed that the occurrence of stroke after surgery was significantly associated with death (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.36-6.69). In subgroup analyses, the reduction in the composite risk of death and thromboembolic events was observed in all mechanical (n = 829; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.73), bioprosthetic replacement (n = 239; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41-1.08), and repair (n = 161; HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.52) subgroups (P for interaction = .47). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical atrial fibrillation ablation during rheumatic mitral valve surgery was associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality and thromboembolic events. Therefore, atrial fibrillation ablation for rheumatic mitral valve disease may be a reasonable option.

The fate of unrepaired chronic type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: The current guidelines do not consider chronic type A aortic dissection as one of the triggers for prophylactic aortic repair, and an aortic diameter of 55 mm is considered the threshold for surgery. METHODS: From the institutional database, we retrieved 82 patients who were diagnosed as having chronic type A aortic dissection but did not undergo immediate surgical repair from 1997 to 2016. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse aortic events defined as aortic rupture and sudden death. Conversion to elective surgery during follow-up was regarded as competing risk for adverse events. RESULTS: The median value of the maximal aortic diameter at baseline was 55.2 mm. During a median follow-up of 77.1 months, 19 adverse events occurred while 9 patients received elective aortic repair. On multivariable competing risk analyses, baseline aortic diameter and age emerged as significant and independent factors associated with aortic events. The estimated rates of aortic event within 5 years were 12.0%, 19.4%, and 29.7% for aortic diameters of 50, 60, and 70 mm, respectively, with escalating risk rates as age increased for the given aortic diameters. CONCLUSIONS: In unrepaired chronic type A aortic dissection, aortic events were not infrequent even for patients with an aortic diameter of less than 55 mm. This finding indicates that there may be a need to lower the surgical threshold for chronic type A aortic dissection.

Aortic Root Reimplantation in a Patient Who Underwent an Arterial Switch Operation.

Neo-aortic insufficiency associated with root enlargement following an arterial switch operation is a serious late complication. To achieve successful surgical correction of this condition, multiple factors should be considered, including the individual patient's anatomy, the challenging nature of the redo procedure, and the patient's young age. However, limited publications have described the use of valve-sparing techniques for the treatment of neo-aortic insufficiency associated with root enlargement following an arterial switch operation. Herein, we report our recent experience of a valve-sparing aortic root procedure with ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement despite the presence of a discrepancy in leaflet size and nearby severe adhesions.

A Minimally Invasive Approach for the Treatment of Mid-Aortic Syndrome in Takayasu Arteritis.

A 61-year-old woman who presented with claudication and dyspnea on exertion was found to have severe calcified narrowing of the descending aorta and severe insufficiency of the aortic valve. These findings were compatible with Takayasu arteritis. To treat these hemodynamic abnormalities, extra-aortic bypass surgery combined with replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta-to-hemiarch replacement was performed through a separated upper hemi-sternotomy and limited median laparotomy. We present our successful surgical experience with this case.

Extracorporeal life support for adults with refractory septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: Although the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in shock patients is increasing worldwide, studies concerning this treatment for adult septic shock are limited. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of venoarterial ECMO in adult patients with septic shock refractory to conventional treatment. METHODS: A total of 71 consecutive patients who presented with septic shock and underwent venoarterial ECMO were reviewed. Clinical parameters were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Weaning and survival outcomes of these patients were compared with the control group of 253 patients who received venoarterial ECMO for cardiogenic shock. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.0 ± 12.3 years. Of the 71 septic shock patients, 11 (15.5%) were successfully weaned from ECMO after a median of 7.9 [interquartile range (IQR), 6.3-10.2] days, 5 of whom (7.0%) survived to discharge. Pre- and 6 hours post-procedural lactate levels were significantly higher in the nonsurvivors (11.6 [IQR, 7.5-15.0] vs 5.8 [IQR, 4.3-5.9], P = .036; 15.0 [IQR, 11.1-15.0] vs 5.2 [IQR, 4.7-5.4], P = .002). Rates of successful weaning from venoarterial ECMO (15.5% vs 45.5%), and of survival up to hospital discharge (7.0% vs 28.9%) were significantly lower in septic shock than in cardiogenic shock patients (n = 253; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of ECMO in refractory septic shock patients were poor with a very low probability of survival. This finding raises questions concerning the utility of applying ECMO for medically refractory septic shock. Elevated arterial lactate levels pre- and post-ECMO were associated with risk of in-hospital death. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate the results of this study.

Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Involving the Ascending Aorta.

A 58-year-old man visited the emergency department with vague anterior chest discomfort. From the computed tomographic findings, our initial suspicion was intramural hematoma in the ascending aorta. After a comprehensive discussion with relevant departments, emergent operation was planned. Intrapericardial space, however, was severely adhered, suggesting chronic inflammation. Biopsies were performed, and additional surgical procedures were discontinued. The patient was finally diagnosed as having granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Careful approach with high-degreed suspicion for granulomatosis with polyangiitis, although rare, is required when preoperative findings are similar to the present case.