Urinary catheter monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure after major abdominal surgery, a cost-benefit analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate costs and benefits associated with measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). METHODS: We built a cost-benefit analysis from the hospital facility perspective and time horizon limited to hospitalization for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for the intervention of urinary catheter monitoring of IAP. We used real-world data estimating the likelihood of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Costs included catheter costs (estimated $200), costs of additional intensive care unit (ICU) days from IAH and ACS, and costs of CRRT. We took the preventability of IAH/ACS given early detection from a trial of non-surgical interventions in IAH. We evaluated uncertainty through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and the effect of individual model parameters on the primary outcome of cost savings through one-way sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the base case, urinary catheter monitoring of IAP in the perioperative period of major abdominal surgery had 81% fewer cases of IAH of any grade, 64% fewer cases of AKI, and 96% fewer cases of ACS. Patients had 1.5 fewer ICU days attributable to IAH (intervention 1.6 days vs. control of 3.1 days) and a total average cost reduction of $10,468 (intervention $10,809, controls $21,277). In Monte Carlo simulation, 86% of 1,000 replications were cost-saving, for a mean cost savings of $10,349 (95% UCI $8,978, $11,720) attributable to real-time urinary catheter monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure. One-way factor analysis showed the pre-test probability of IAH had the largest effect on cost savings and the intervention was cost-neutral at a prevention rate as low as 2%. CONCLUSIONS: In a cost-benefit model using real-world data, the potential average in-hospital cost savings for urinary catheter monitoring of IAP for early detection and prevention of IAH, ACS, and AKI far exceed the cost of the catheter.

Do we have the guts to go? The abdominal compartment, intra-abdominal hypertension, the human microbiome and exploration class space missions.

Humans are destined to explore space, yet critical illness and injury may be catastrophically limiting for extraterrestrial travel. Humans are superorganisms living in symbiosis with their microbiomes, whose genetic diversity dwarfs that of humans. Symbiosis is critical and imbalances are associated with disease, occurring within hours of serious illness and injury. There are many characteristics of space flight that negatively influence the microbiome, especially deep space itself, with its increased radiation and absence of gravity. Prolonged weightlessness causes many physiologic changes that are detrimental; some resemble aging and will adversely affect the ability to tolerate critical illness or injury and subsequent treatment. Critical illness-induced intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) may induce malperfusion of both the viscera and microbiome, with potentially catastrophic effects. Evidence from animal models confirms profound IAH effects on the gut, namely ischemia and disruption of barrier function, mechanistically linking IAH to resultant organ dysfunction. Therefore, a pathologic dysbiome, space-induced immune dysfunction and a diminished cardiorespiratory reserve with exacerbated susceptibility to IAH, imply that a space-deconditioned astronaut will be vulnerable to IAH-induced gut malperfusion. This sets the stage for severe gut ischemia and massive biomediator generation in an astronaut with reduced cardiorespiratory/immunological capacity. Fortunately, experiments in weightless analogue environments suggest that IAH may be ameliorated by conformational abdominal wall changes and a resetting of thoracoabdominal mechanics. Thus, review of the interactions of physiologic changes with prolonged weightlessness and IAH is required to identify appropriate questions for planning exploration class space surgical care.

L'humanité est à l'aube d'une nouvelle ère d'exploration spatiale, mais le risque de maladies et blessures graves pourrait restreindre de manière catastrophique le potentiel des voyages dans l'espace. L'être humain est un superorganisme vivant en symbiose avec son microbiote, dont la diversité génétique éclipse celle de l'hôte. Cette symbiose est essentielle : tout déséquilibre est associé à une dégradation de l'état de santé dans les heures suivant l'occurrence d'une blessure ou d'une maladie grave. Bon nombre de caractéristiques propres au vol spatial ont des répercussions négatives sur le microbiote; l'espace lointain présente des dangers particuliers en raison de l'exposition accrue au rayonnement et de l'absence de gravité. L'exposition prolongée à l'apesanteur cause une myriade de changements physiologiques nuisant à la santé. Certains ressemblent à des processus de vieillissement et réduiront la capacité à tolérer une blessure ou une maladie grave et son traitement. L'hypertension intra-abdominale (HIA) causée par une maladie grave peut réduire la perfusion des viscères et du microbiote, ce qui peut avoir des conséquences catastrophiques. Des études sur modèle animal ont confirmé les effets profondément délétères de l'HIA sur les intestins par l'apparition d'une ischémie et une altération de la barrière intestinale; cette découverte permettrait d'établir un lien mécanistique entre l'HIA et la défaillance d'organes résultante. Par conséquent, une dysbiose pathologique, associée à un dysfonctionnement immunitaire en apesanteur et à une réduction de la réserve cardiorespiratoire accompagnée d'une exacerbation de la susceptibilité à l'HIA, pourrait signifier qu'un astronaute exposé à l'effet déconditionnant de l'apesanteur serait vulnérable aux problèmes de perfusion de l'intestin découlant de l'HIA. Ce problème pourrait à son tour mener à une ischémie intestinale grave et à une production massive de biomédiateurs chez un astronaute présentant déjà une capacité cardiorespiratoire et immunitaire réduite. Heureusement, des expériences dans des environnements simulant l'apesanteur semblent indiquer que les effets de l'HIA pourraient être contrés par des changements conformationnels de la paroi abdominale et un rétablissement de la mécanique thoracoabdominale. Par conséquent, un examen des interactions des changements physiologiques associés à un état d'apesanteur prolongé et à l'HIA est requis pour déterminer les questions à poser afin de planifier adéquatement les soins chirurgicaux en contexte d'exploration spatiale.

Safe, timely, convenient, and cost-effective: a single-center experience with bedside placement of enteral feeding tubes by midlevel providers using fluoroscopic guidance.

BACKGROUND: Enteral feeding tube placement has been performed by nurses, gastroenterologists using endoscopy, and interventional radiologists. We hypothesized that midlevel providers placed feeding tubes at bedside using fluoroscopy safely, rapidly, and cost-effectively. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed bedside feeding tube placement under fluoroscopy by trained nurse practitioners. We compared charges for this method with charges for placement by other practitioners. RESULTS: Nurse practitioners placed 632 feeding tubes in 462 patients. Three hundred seventy-nine placements took place in mechanically ventilated placements. Ninety-seven percent of tubes were positioned past the pylorus. The mean fluoroscopy time was 0.7 ± 1.2 minutes. The mean procedure time was 7.0 ± 5.1 minutes. All tubes were placed within 24 hours of the request. There were no complications. Institutional charges for tube placement were $149 for nurse practitioners, $226 for gastroenterologists, and $328 for interventional radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of feeding tubes under fluoroscopy by nurse practitioners is safe, timely, and cost-effective.

Implementation of an enoxaparin protocol for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in obese surgical intensive care unit patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious health care issue that affects a large number of people. Few standards exist for delineating the optimal dosing strategy for VTE prevention in obese patients, especially in the setting of major surgery or trauma. OBJECTIVE: To document the efficacy of a surgical intensive care unit (SICU)-specific, weight-based dosing protocol of enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg given subcutaneously every 12 hours for VTE prophylaxis in morbidly obese (defined as body mass index [BMI] ≥35 kg/m(2) or weight ≥150 kg) SICU patients, using peak anti-factor Xa levels to determine therapeutic endpoints. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively in an academic, university-based SICU on 23 morbidly obese patients who received weight-based enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis from December 1, 2008, through June 30, 2010. RESULTS: A weight-based dosage range of enoxaparin 50-120 mg twice daily (median 60) was given to 23 patients. The mean BMI was 46.4 kg/m(2). The initial mean anti-factor Xa level (measured after the third dose) was 0.34 IU/mL (range 0.20-0.59). Patients received an average of 18 doses. Two cases required an increase or decrease in dosage based on anti-factor Xa levels. Morbidity related to this dosing included a single event of minor endotracheal bleeding and a single deep vein thrombosis that was likely present prior to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-based dosing with enoxaparin in morbidly obese SICU patients was effective in achieving anti-factor Xa levels within the appropriate prophylactic range. This regimen reduced the rate of VTE below expected levels and no additional adverse effects were reported.

Delayed abdominal closure in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The objective of this study was to compare initial use of the open abdomen using the vacuum-pack technique followed by delayed abdominal closure with standard primary abdominal closure in the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair. A retrospective review identified 122 rAAA cases, which were divided into two management eras: era 1 (primarily closed) and era 2 (47% open abdomen).One hundred three patients were included in this review: 58 in era 1 and 45 in era 2. Evidence of one of three ischemia-reperfusion (IR) criteria, preoperative hypotension, estimated blood loss > or = 6 L, or intraoperative resuscitation with > or = 12 L, predicted mortality. These criteria were also used as surrogate clinical markers for abdominal compartment syndrome. The in-hospital mortality was higher in those with at least one IR criterion: 43% versus 10% (p = .0003). In those with at least one IR criterion, the initial 24-hour mortality was 21% for era 1 versus 0% for era 2 (p = .03), and the 30-day mortality was 40% for era 1 and 32% for era 2 (p = .77).Three IR criteria were identified and were associated with increased mortality. Patients with these risk factors who were treated with delayed abdominal closure had an improved acute survival rate and a trend for improved long-term survival.

Survey of intensive care physicians on the recognition and management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess current understanding and clinical management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome among critical care physicians. DESIGN: A ten-question, written survey. SETTING: University health sciences center. SUBJECTS: Physician members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). INTERVENTIONS: The survey was sent to 4,538 SCCM members with a response rate of 35.7% (1622). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary training, intensive care unit type, and methods for management of abdominal compartment syndrome were assessed. Surgically trained intensivists managed the highest number of abdominal compartment syndrome cases (47% managed 4-10 cases, 16% managed >10 cases). No cases were seen by 25% of medically trained and pediatric trained intensivists. Respondents agreed that bladder pressures and clinical variables were needed to diagnose abdominal compartment syndrome (70%) vs. bladder pressure (7%) or clinical variables (20%) alone. Two percent of surgical intensivists were unaware of a bladder pressure measurement procedure compared with 24% (p < .0001) of pediatric and 23% (p < .0001) of medical intensivists. Forty-two percent of respondents believed bladder pressures of 20-27 mm Hg may cause physiologic compromise. However, 25-27% of pediatric, medicine, or anesthesia trained intensivists believed that compromise occurs between 12 and 19 mm Hg compared with 18% of surgeons. No respondent believed that physiologic compromise occurred at <8 mm Hg. Thirty-eight percent of pediatric intensivists believed that physiologic compromise was patient dependent vs. 7-17% from other specialties (p < .0001; all comparisons). In managing intra-abdominal hypertension, 33% of pediatric intensivists and 19.6% of medical intensivists would never use decompression laparotomy to treat abdominal compartment syndrome compared with 3.6% of intensivists with surgical training (p < .0001; both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation across medical training exists in the management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. A significant percentage of intensivists may be unaware of current approaches to abdominal compartment syndrome management including monitoring bladder pressures and decompression laparotomy. Future research and education are necessary to establish clear diagnostic criteria and standards for treatment of this relatively common life-threatening disease process.