'Head Invasion' Is Not a Metastasis-Free Condition in Pedunculated T1 Colorectal Carcinomas Based on the Precise Histopathological Assessment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Previous reports stated that pedunculated T1 colorectal carcinomas with 'head invasion' showed almost no nodal metastasis, requiring endoscopic treatment alone. However, clinically, some lesions develop nodal metastasis. We aimed to validate the necessity of distinguishing between 'pedunculated' and 'non-pedunculated' lesions, and also between 'head' and 'stalk' invasions. METHODS: Initial or additional surgery with lymph node dissection was performed in 76 pedunculated and 594 non-pedunculated cases. Among pedunculated lesions, the baseline was defined as the junction line between normal and neoplastic epithelium (Haggitt's level 2). The degree of invasion was classified as 'head invasion' (above the baseline) or 'stalk invasion' (beyond the baseline). Clinicopathological factors were analyzed with respect to nodal metastasis. RESULTS: Nine of 76 (11.8%) pedunculated cases and 52/594 (8.8%) non-pedunculated cases developed nodal metastasis (p = 0.40). No significant differences were found in the rate of nodal metastasis between 'head invasion' (4/30, 13.3%) and 'stalk invasion' (5/46, 10.9%). All the 4 cases with 'head invasion' had at least one pathological factor. CONCLUSIONS: 'Head invasion' was not a metastasis-free condition. Even for pedunculated T1 cancers with 'head invasion', additional surgery with lymph node dissection should be considered if these have pathological risk factors.

Management of T1 colorectal cancers after endoscopic treatment based on the risk stratification of lymph node metastasis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recent advances in endoscopic technology have allowed many T1 colorectal carcinomas to be resected endoscopically with negative margins. However, the criteria for curative endoscopic resection remain unclear. We aimed to identify risk factors for nodal metastasis in T1 carcinoma patients and hence establish the indication for additional surgery with lymph node dissection. METHODS: Initial or additional surgery with nodal dissection was performed in 653 T1 carcinoma cases. Clinicopathological factors were retrospectively analyzed with respect to nodal metastasis. The status of the muscularis mucosae (MM grade) was defined as grade 1 (maintenance) or grade 2 (fragmentation or disappearance). The lesions were then stratified based on the risk of nodal metastasis. RESULTS: Muscularis mucosae grade was associated with nodal metastasis (P = 0.026), and no patients with MM grade 1 lesions had nodal metastasis. Significant risk factors for nodal metastasis in patients with MM grade 2 lesions were attribution of women (P = 0.006), lymphovascular infiltration (P < 0.001), tumor budding (P = 0.045), and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous carcinoma (P = 0.007). Nodal metastasis occurred in 1.06% of lesions without any of these pathological factors, but in 10.3% and 20.1% of lesions with at least one factor in male and female patients, respectively. There was good inter-observer agreement for MM grade evaluation, with a kappa value of 0.67. CONCLUSIONS: Stratification using MM grade, pathological factors, and patient sex provided more appropriate indication for additional surgery with lymph node dissection after endoscopic treatment for T1 colorectal carcinomas.