Tooth morphology fusion technique is more accurate than conventional technique in transferring morphology of provisional to definitive screw-retained, implant-supported crown: A preliminary intervention study.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of the tooth morphology fusion (TMF) digital technique and customized impression transfer coping (conventional) technique when transferring the morphology of a provisional crown to a definitive screw-retained implant-supported crown. METHODS: Six cases of partial edentulism (one anterior and five posterior) treated with oral implant placement in our clinic for the loss of three or fewer teeth in the maxilla or mandible between April 2017 and September 2018 were included. After implant placement and re-entry surgery, provisional restorations were made and adjusted to obtain the ideal morphology. Two definitive restorations were constructed by transferring the complete morphology of the provisional restorations, including the subgingival contour, using the TMF digital and conventional techniques. Three sets of surface morphological data were obtained using a desktop scanner. The three-dimensional total discrepancy volume (TDV) between the provisional restoration (reference) and the two definitive restorations was digitally measured by overlapping the surface data of the stone cast using the Boolean operation. Each TDV ratio (%) was calculated by dividing the TDV by the volume of provisional restoration. The median TDV ratios for TMF and conventional techniques were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The median TDV ratio between provisional and definitive restorations constructed using the TMF digital technique (8.05%) was significantly lower than that obtained using the conventional technique (13.56%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary intervention study, the TMF digital technique was more accurate than the conventional technique for the transfer of morphology from provisional to definitive prosthesis.

Accuracy of a novel modified single computed tomography scanning method for assisting dental implant placement: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare dental implant placement accuracy of three surgical guide fabrication methods: single (SCT) and double computed tomography (DCT), and a newly developed modified SCT (MSCT) scan method. METHODS: A total of 183 cases (183 surgical guides, and 485 implants) of static-guide-assisted implant placement surgery using the SCT, DCT, or MSCT methods in a dental clinic were included in the study. Three-dimensional (3D) deviations (mm) at the entry and tip of the implant body between preoperative simulation and actual placement were measured as surrogate endpoints of implant placement accuracy. The following survey details were collected from medical records and CT data: sex, age at implant placement surgery, surgical guide fabrication method, number of remaining teeth, implant length, implant location, alveolar bone quality, and bone surface inclination at implant placement site in preoperative simulation, etc. Risk factors for reducing implant placement accuracy were investigated using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: The SCT and DCT methods (odds ratios [ORs] vs. MSCT method: 1.438, 1.178, respectively), posterior location (OR: 1.114), bone surface buccolingual inclination (OR: 0.997), and age at implant placement surgery (OR: 0.995) were significant risk factors for larger 3D deviation at the entry; the SCT (OR: 1.361) and DCT methods (OR: 1.418), posterior location (OR: 1.190), implant length (OR: 1.051), and age at implant placement surgery (OR: 0.995) were significant risk factors for larger 3D deviation at the tip of the implant body. CONCLUSIONS: Implant placement accuracy was better using the MSCT method compared to the SCT and DCT methods.

An Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of Adenosine-assisted Clipping Surgery for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: Study Protocol.

The effectiveness of adenosine-induced flow arrest in surgical clipping for the cerebral aneurysms with difficulties in temporary clip placement to the proximal main trunk has been reported. This is the first clinical trial to evaluate the safety and feasibility of adenosine-assisted clipping surgery for unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCAs) in Japan. The inclusion criteria are as follows: patients over 20 years old, patients who agree to be enrolled in this study after providing informed consent, patients who undergo clipping surgery for UCA in our institute, and patients in whom the surgeons (T.H. or I.D.) judge that decompression of the aneurysm is effective. The primary endpoint is a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 30 days after surgery. We plan to enroll 10 patients in this study. The original protocol of adenosine administration was established in this trial. Herein, we present the study protocol.

Distinct Osteogenic Potentials of BMP-2 and FGF-2 in Extramedullary and Medullary Microenvironments.

Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) have been regarded as the major cytokines promoting bone formation, however, several studies have reported unexpected results with failure of bone formation or bone resorption of these growth factors. In this study, BMP-2 and FGF-2 adsorbed into atellocollagen sponges were transplanted into bone defects in the bone marrow-scarce calvaria (extramedullary environment) and bone marrow-abundant femur (medullary environment) for analysis of their in vivo effects not only on osteoblasts, osteoclasts but also on bone marrow cells. The results showed that BMP-2 induced high bone formation in the bone marrow-scarce calvaria, but induced bone resorption in the bone marrow-abundant femurs. On the other hand, FGF-2 showed opposite effects compared to those of BMP-2. Analysis of cellular dynamics revealed numerous osteoblasts and osteoclasts present in the newly-formed bone induced by BMP-2 in calvaria, but none were seen in either control or FGF-2-transplanted groups. On the other hand, in the femur, numerous osteoclasts were observed in the vicinity of the BMP-2 pellet, while a great number of osteoblasts were seen near the FGF-2 pellets or in the control group. Of note, FCM analysis showed that both BMP-2 and FGF-2 administrated in the femur did not significantly affect the hematopoietic cell population, indicating a relatively safe application of the two growth factors. Together, these results indicate that BMP-2 could be suitable for application in extramedullary bone regeneration, whereas FGF-2 could be suitable for application in medullary bone regeneration.

Type XVIII Collagen Modulates Keratohyalin Granule Formation and Keratinization in Oral Mucosa.

Epithelial keratinization involves complex cellular modifications that provide protection against pathogens and chemical and mechanical injuries. In the oral cavity, keratinized mucosa is also crucial to maintain healthy periodontal or peri-implant tissues. In this study, we investigated the roles of type XVIII collagen, a collagen-glycosaminoglycan featuring an extracellular matrix component present in the basement membrane, in oral mucosal keratinization. Histological analysis of keratinized and non-keratinized oral mucosa showed that type XVIII collagen was highly expressed in keratinized mucosa. Additionally, a 3D culture system using human squamous carcinoma cells (TR146) was used to evaluate and correlate the changes in the expression of type XVIII collagen gene, COL18A1, and epithelial keratinization-related markers, e.g., keratin 1 (KRT1) and 10 (KRT10). The results showed that the increase in COL18A1 expression followed the increase in KRT1 and KRT10 mRNA levels. Additionally, loss-of-function analyses using silencing RNA targeting COL18A1 mRNA and a Col18-knockout (KO) mouse revealed that the absence of type XVIII collagen induces a dramatic decrease in KRT10 expression as well as in the number and size of keratohyalin granules. Together, the results of this study demonstrate the importance of type XVIII collagen in oral mucosal keratinization.

A longitudinal retrospective study of the analysis of the risk factors of implant failure by the application of generalized estimating equations.

PURPOSE: Many studies have identified risk factors for dental implant failure, although few have investigated the correlation among implant fixtures within single patients. A better analytical method may include repeated measures analysis including generalized estimating equations (GEE). This retrospective cohort study aimed to (1) identify the risk factors for failure of dental implantation and (2) evaluate an analytical method using GEE analysis. METHODS: We analyzed data on early and late implant failures in 296 patients providing 721 rough surface dental implants (2.44 implants per patient). Potential predictors of implant failure included age, gender, smoking, location of implant, use of bone augmentation, number of remaining teeth, opposing tooth condition, fixture length, fixture diameter and type of suprastructure (fixed or removable partial denture). The likelihood of early and late implant failure was estimated by GEE. RESULTS: The early failure rate was 1.5% (11/721 implants, 7/296 patients) and the 10-year cumulative survival rate was 94.0% (7/710 implants, 5/293 patients). The GEE analysis revealed that a significant risk factor for early implant failure was smoking (p<0.01), whereas significant risk factors for late failure were maxillary implant (p=0.02), posterior implant (p<0.01), number of remaining teeth (≥20) (p<0.01), opposing unit being a removable partial denture or nothing (p=0.04) and having a removable type suprastructure (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: GEE analysis showed that smoking was a risk factor for early implant failure, and several risk factors were identified for late implant failure.