Impact of malnutrition on cancer recurrence, colorectal cancer-specific death, and non-colorectal cancer-related death in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery.

AIM: This study aimed to examine how malnutrition, as reflected by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence and cause of death. METHODS: Consecutive stage I-III CRC patients (n = 601) were divided into two groups using GNRI 98 as the cutoff. The relationship of GNRI with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated, followed by competing risk analysis to determine prognostic factors of non-CRC-related death, and hazard function analysis to examine changes in the risk of recurrence and death. RESULTS: Median body mass index was lower in the low GNRI group than in the high GNRI group (19.8 vs. 23.5; p < 0.001). After adjusting for known prognostic factors, a low GNRI was independently associated with reduced OS/RFS, and was a significant predictor of non-CRC-related death. The risk of recurrence was higher and peaked earlier in the low GNRI group than in the high GNRI group, although after 3 years, both groups had a similar risk. Meanwhile, the low GNRI group had a higher risk of non-CRC-related death over the course of 5 years. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider preoperative nutritional status along with the cancer stage when developing strategies to improve outcomes for CRC patients.

Level of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation in Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery: Analysis of Apical Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence.

INTRODUCTION: Whether high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is optimal for treating sigmoid colon and rectal cancers is controversial. The present study aimed to compare outcomes of high and low ligation of the IMA and determine the adequate extent of IMA lymph node dissection. METHODS: Subjects were 455 consecutive stage I-III colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery between 2011 and 2019. We assessed the association between the level of IMA ligation and overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) by propensity score matching analysis. Clinicopathological features of IMA lymph node metastasis and recurrence patterns were analyzed. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the low ligation group had a significantly worse prognosis than that of the high ligation group for RFS (p = 0.039). Positive IMA lymph nodes were associated with pathological T3 or T4 stage and N2 stage. IMA lymph node recurrences in the high ligation group occurred at the superior left side of the IMA root. In contrast, all recurrences in the low ligation group occurred at the left colic artery bifurcation. CONCLUSION: High ligation of IMA is oncologically safe. However, even with high ligation, care must be taken to ensure adequate lymph node dissection.

Impact of severe postoperative inflammatory response on recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The relationship between recurrence and systemic inflammation in the early postoperative period of colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear, and no study has examined changes in recurrence risk resulting from postoperative inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of severe postoperative inflammatory response after curative resection of CRC. METHODS: Subjects were 422 consecutive CRC patients who underwent curative surgery between 2012 and 2016, with a follow-up period of 5 years after surgery. The prognostic impacts of high and low postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were examined, and temporal changes in recurrence risk were examined using hazard function analysis. RESULTS: Patients were divided into high (n = 68) and low (n = 354) CRP groups using CRP 12.5 mg/dL as the cut-off based on receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed that high CRP was a significant predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio: 2.21; p < 0.001). According to the hazard function of recurrence risk, the hazard rate of the low CRP group peaked at 8.4 months postoperatively (peak hazard rate: 0.0073/month) and decreased thereafter, while that of the high CRP group peaked at 5.6 months (0.0142/month) and was persistently higher than that of the low CRP group for the study duration. CONCLUSIONS: A severe inflammatory response in the early postoperative period of CRC increased the recurrence risk, and the recurrence hazard of patients with high CRP levels was earlier and persistently higher than that of patients with low CRP levels. CRC patients with high CRP levels may require more frequent follow-up.

Association of nutritional risk and systemic inflammation with survival in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition and inflammation adversely affect the prognosis of patients with cancer. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and systemic inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), lymphocyte-to-C reactive protein ratio (LCR), and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), predict survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. The present study aimed to examine the association of these two factors with CRC survival. METHODS: Subjects were 433 consecutive CRC patients who underwent curative surgery between 2013 and 2018. Patients were stratified by nutritional status, and relationships between overall survival (OS) and systemic inflammation were evaluated. The prognostic impact of combinations of the GNRI and inflammatory markers was assessed. Multivariable analyses were also performed. RESULTS: All assessed biomarkers predicted OS in univariable analysis (GNRI:P < 0.001, NLR:P = 0.048, LMR:P = 0.001, LCR:P = 0.010, CAR: P = 0.039). Stratified analysis showed that each inflammatory marker had a prognostic impact on OS in the low GNRI group (NLR:P = 0.028, LMR:P = 0.003, LCR:P = 0.05, CAR:P = 0.009). In contrast, inflammatory markers had no prognostic impact on OS in the high GNRI group. The combination of malnutrition and systemic inflammation had a high prognostic value (all P < 0.016). The multivariable analysis revealed that a low GNRI (hazard ratio: 2.58-2.89) was independently associated with reduced survival, whereas none of the inflammatory markers independently predicted poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The GNRI is a useful prognostic biomarker for CRC patients, whereas systemic inflammatory markers can only serve as prognostic factors when patient nutritional status is taken into account. The combination of malnutrition and systemic inflammation may enhance the accuracy of prognostic prediction.

Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy and Open Gastrectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) for scirrhous gastric cancer (GC) as a unique subtype also known as type 4 gastric cancer or linitis plastica. Background: Although data on the efficacy and safety of LG as an alternative to OG are emerging, the applicability of LG to scirrhous GC remains unclear. Methods: Patients with clinical type 4 GC undergoing gastrectomy at 13 hospitals from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. As the primary endpoint, we compared overall survival (OS) between the LG and OG groups. To adjust for confounding factors, we used multivariate Cox regression analysis for the main analyses and propensity-score matching for sensitivity analysis. Short-term outcomes and recurrence-free survival were also compared. Results: A total of 288 patients (LG, 62; OG, 226) were included in the main analysis. Postoperative complications occurred in 25.8% and 30.1%, respectively (P = 0.44). No significant difference in recurrence-free survival was observed (P = 0.72). The 5-year OS rates were 32.4% and 31.6% in the LG and OG groups, respectively (P = 0.60). The hazard ratio (LG/OG) for OS was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.43) in the multivariate regression analysis. In the sensitivity analyses after propensity-score matching, the hazard ratio for OS was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.58-1.45). Conclusions: Considering the hazard ratios and 95% CIs for OS, LG for scirrhous GC was not associated with worse survival than that for OG.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the right accessory hepatic duct diagnosed preoperatively: A case report.

Accessory hepatic duct or gallbladder duplication is considered to be a risk factor for bile duct injuries and open conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A 32-year-old woman with epigastric pain was referred to our department. Gallstone disease in the gallbladder was diagnosed by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. The involvement of an accessory hepatic duct was suspected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography showed that the cystic duct merged with the accessory right hepatic duct. Single-incision LC (SILC) was successfully performed without bile duct injury. The operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 145 min and 1 mL, respectively. The patient was discharged 3 days' postoperatively, without complications. The involvement of the accessory right hepatic duct is a rare anomaly and is considered to be a risk factor for bile duct injuries. However, obtaining pre-operative images enabled us to perform SILC successfully.

A Randomized Phase II Study of S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Hochu-ekki-to, a Japanese Herbal Medicine, for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: The KUGC07 (SHOT) Trial.

Objectives: A multicenter randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the effects of Hochu-ekki-to (TJ-41) for reducing adverse reactions and increasing compliance with S-1 adjuvant therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: The eligibility criteria were pathological stage II/III after R0 resection. Patients received adjuvant therapy with S-1 alone (group S) or S-1 with TJ-41 (group ST) for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of S-1. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, relative dose intensity, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: We randomly assigned 56 patients to group ST and 57 patients to group S. The completion rates of S-1 were 54.5 and 50.9%, the median relative dose intensities were 89.2 and 71.9%, and adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 45.5 and 54.5% in groups ST and S, respectively. There was no significant difference in 3-year OS or RFS between the two groups. Conclusions: TJ-41 does not increase relative dose and completion rate of S-1 significantly. J-41 may reduce toxic effects, but our findings do not support routine use of TJ-41 after gastrectomy.

Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor with a large cyst.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising at sites other than the alimentary tract are rare, and they are called extra-GISTs (EGISTs). We report a case of a large EGIST forming a cyst, probably arising in the mesentery of the transverse colon. A 64-year-old Japanese man presented to a hospital with an abdominal tumor forming a large cyst. Intraoperatively, the tumor was neither present in nor in contact with the alimentary tract. It was present in the mesentery of the transverse colon and was attached to the greater omentum and peritoneum, immediately anterior to the body of the pancreas. The tumor was resected with the spleen and a part of the pancreas. Histological examination of the tumor revealed that it belonged to the high-risk category of cystic EGISTs.

A Phase 2 Study of Induction Chemotherapy Using Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis (KUGC06).

BACKGROUND: The authors previously showed the significant efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastasis. They conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction chemotherapy using a docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) triplet regimen to treat gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. METHODS: The key eligibility criteria were gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology but no other distant metastases and capability of oral administration. The patients received three 28-day cycles of DCS (60 mg/m2 of cisplatin, 40 mg/m2 of docetaxel on day 1, and 80 mg/m2 of S-1 from day 1 to day 14), then underwent D2 gastrectomy if R0 was possible. The primary end point was the R0 resection rate. The sample size was determined to have 80% power for detecting a 20% improvement in the R0 resection rate over a 45% baseline for a one-tailed alpha of 0.1. RESULTS: Among 30 enrolled patients, 24 completed three cycles of DCS. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (60%). A complete response of peritoneal metastasis was observed in 16 patients, and 14 patients achieved R0 resection (47%; 95% confidence interval 28-66%). When the extent of peritoneal metastasis was classified as P0CY1, P1, P2, and P3 according to the Japanese classification, the R0 resection rates were respectively 63%, 60%, 46% and 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy with DCS is safe and can achieve R0 resection for some patients with limited peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology. The efficacy, however, appears similar to that of S-1 plus cisplatin.

A Novel Three-Step Approach for Secure Splenectomy During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy during total gastrectomy increases operative morbidity (Nakata et al. in Surgical endoscopy 7:1817-1822, 2015). Establishing a safe approach to laparoscopic splenectomy is one of the most urgent issues in the treatment of proximal advanced gastric cancer, which invades to the greater curvature (Kawamura et al. in Gastric Cancer 3:662-668, 2015). We developed a novel three-step procedure for splenectomy during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: Splenectomy consisted of three steps. Step 1 (dorsal approach): The pancreatic tail and spleen were mobilized. This step delineates the dissection plane and the anatomy around the pancreatic tail. Step 2 (suprapancreatic approach): The suprapancreatic peritoneum was incised to fenestrate to the mobilized space. The no. 11d station was dissected. The inferior branch of the splenic artery was exposed. Step 3 (splenic hilum approach): The spleen was lifted up to straighten the splenic hilum. The aim was to prolong the splenic vasculature and enable the surgeon to transect splenic vasculatures easily despite their anatomical diversity. Division of the splenic branches promotes mobility of the pancreatic tail, enabling precise dissection and preservation of its blood supply. RESULTS: Of 45 patients with gastric cancer who underwent LTG, seven underwent concurrent splenectomy. In all cases, splenectomy was successfully accomplished. The median operation time, duration of splenectomy, blood loss, number of total retrieved lymph nodes, lymph node counts from stations 10 and 11d, and drain amylase levels on the third postoperative day were 382 min, 94 min, 30 ml, 51, 5, 5, and 158 IU/L, respectively. Postoperative morbidity more severe than Clavien-Dindo grade 2 occurred in one case, with no pancreas-related morbidity. No mortality or conversion occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This laparoscopic procedure allows adequate nodal dissection and safe splenectomy.

Laparoscopic transhiatal lymphadenectomy in the lower mediastinum for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagogastrectomy is difficult because the lower mediastinum is so deeply located that the operative field is narrow and restricted by surrounding organs. Therefore, we performed lymphadenectomy with opening of the bilateral mediastinal pleura to maintain safety and obtain better exposure of lymph nodes and important organs. We will present our technique for laparoscopic lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy and reconstruction for cancer of the esophagogastric junction. Five abdominal ports were used. Retraction of the left lobe of the liver exposed the esophageal hiatus. A long, narrow gastric tube (3 cm wide) was formed, and regional abdominal lymph nodes (No. 1, 2, 3a, 7, 8a, 9, 19, and 20) were resected. The diaphragmatic hiatus was widely split and the opened bilateral mediastinal pleura enabled better exposure for lymph node dissection and reconstruction. The level where the inferior vena cava passed through the diaphragm into the chest was used as a landmark to identify supradiaphragmatic (No. 111) and lower thoracic paraesophageal nodes (No. 110), which were completely retrieved with this procedure. The posterior mediastinal nodes (No. 112pulR, 112pulL, and 112aoA) were also retrieved with bilateral opening of the mediastinal pleura and dissection of the inferior pulmonary ligaments. An esophagogastric tube anastomosis with pseudo-fornix was made with a no-knife linear stapler to prevent postoperative reflux esophagitis. This approach enabled safe and accurate laparoscopic lower mediastinal nodal dissection. With the advantage of a narrow gastric tube, the good working space made tension-free anastomosis possible.

Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic palliative resection for patients with incurable, asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: A multicenter study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective multicenter study compared short- and long-term results between Japanese patients with asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer who underwent palliative laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus those who underwent conventional open surgery (OS). METHODS: Among 968 patients treated for stage IV colorectal cancer from January 2006 to December 2007 in 41 surgical units that were participating in the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery group, we studied 398 patients who received palliative resection of their asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor. RESULTS: We analyzed data from patients undergoing LS (LS group, n=106) and OS (OS group, n=292). Fourteen (13.2%) LS group patients were converted to OS. Although the differences between groups for postoperative complications were not significant, the mean time to solid food intake and postoperative length of hospital stay for the LS group were significantly shorter than those for the OS group (2 vs. 3 days, p<0.0001; 13 vs. 16 days, p<0.0001, respectively). The LS group patients experienced a longer median survival time than that of the OS group (24.5 vs. 23.9 months, p=0.0357). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic palliative resection (LS) offers advantages for short-term outcomes and no disadvantages for long-term outcomes. The use of laparoscopic procedures to treat asymptomatic, incurable stage IV colorectal cancer appears to be acceptable.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin for stage III gastric cancer: KUGC03.

OBJECTIVES: A multi-center phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with S-1 plus cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: The eligibility criteria were clinical T3/T4 or N2, not Stage IV. Patients received two 35-day cycles of S-1 plus cisplatin, and then underwent D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were ratio of R0 resection, response rate, adverse events, and overall survival. A sample size of 49 was determined to have 80% power for detecting 15% improvement in the 3-year PFS over 55% at a one-sided alpha of 0.1. RESULTS: Among 53 patients enrolled, 44 patients completed two cycles of NAC (83%), and 48 patients underwent R0 resection (91%). Postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (26%). A pathological response was confirmed in 24 patients (45%), including four complete responses. The 3-year PFS was 50.7%, while the 3-year OS was 74.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the observed 3-year PFS rate was worse than expected, NAC with S1 plus cisplatin was safe and led to a high rate of R0 resection. A randomized controlled trial is needed to make conclusions about the effectiveness of NAC in Japanese patients undergoing D2 resection.

Setting the stomach transection line based on anatomical landmarks in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has become widespread as a treatment for early gastric cancer in eastern Asia, but a standard method for setting the stomach transection line has not been established. Here we report a novel method of setting this line based on anatomical landmarks. At the start of the operation, two anatomical landmarks along the greater curvature of the stomach were marked with ink: the proximal landmark at the avascular area between the last branch of the short gastric artery and the first branch of the left gastroepiploic artery, and the distal landmark at the point of communication between the right and left gastroepiploic arteries. Just before specimen retrieval, the stomach was transected from the center of these two landmarks toward the lesser curvature. Then, about two-third of the stomach was reproducibly resected, and gastroduodenostomy was successfully performed in 26 consecutive cases. This novel method could be used as a standard technique for setting the transection line in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the prone position has advantages over the left decubitus position. METHOD: A total of 110 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who had undergone MIE were included in the analysis. The clinical outcomes were compared between 51 patients treated in the prone position (prone group) and 59 patients treated in the left decubitus position (LD group). The main outcome was postoperative respiratory complications and postoperative oxygenation [arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio)]. The secondary outcomes included the length of the operation, blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative morbidities and mortality. RESULTS: The P/F ratio after the operation was significantly higher in the prone group (0 h: P = 0.01, 12 h: P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of respiratory complications (P = 0.89). The blood loss in the prone group was significantly lower (P < 0.001), and the number of dissected intrathoracic lymph nodes was significantly higher (P = 0.03) than in the LD group. No significant differences were observed in the frequencies of overall postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: MIE in the prone position preserves better oxygenation of patients during the early recovery period, and is associated with less blood loss and a larger number of dissected lymph nodes.

Laparoscopic resection for torsion of an omental lipoma presenting as an acute abdomen in a 5-year-old girl.

Primary tumors of the greater omentum are rare. We report a case of a 5-year-old girl presenting with an acute abdomen who had omental torsion caused by a giant lipoma of the greater omentum, which was diagnosed by a computed tomography scan. Laparoscopy revealed a yellow tumor of the greater omentum with a smooth surface. Tumor excision and partial omentectomy was performed to treat the torsion, and the tumor was retrieved through a 4-cm-wide abdominal incision. Macroscopically, the specimen was 80 × 60 × 25 mm in size and 74.8 g in weight, and histopathological findings were consistent with the diagnosis of lipoma. The present case highlights the possible use of laparoscopic surgery for removing large abdominal lipomas, thus avoiding the drawbacks of laparotomy in terms of postoperative pain and prolonged hospital stay.

Short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy: experience with the first consecutive 112 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Although laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has become a viable treatment option for gastric cancer, laparoscopic total gastrectomy remains in limited use. PURPOSE: The present study was designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG). METHODS: The records of 112 consecutive patients who underwent TLTG for gastric cancer between September 2006 and November 2012 were reviewed, and surgical outcomes were retrospectively investigated. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 21 patients (18.8 %). The degree of lymphadenectomy was D1+ in 83 patients (74.1 %) and D2 in 29 (25.9 %). The operation time was 359 min, median intraoperative blood loss was 85 ml, and median total number of harvested lymph nodes was 64. Grade II or higher postoperative complications developed in 25 patients (22.3 %). On univariate analysis, pathologic stages IB to IV (versus stage IA) overlapped esophagojejunostomy (versus functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy) and operation time >360 min (versus ≤360 min) were related to postoperative morbidity. In the multivariate analysis, operative time and pathologic stage were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: TLTG is feasible and can be performed with acceptable postoperative morbidity. A longer operating time and more advanced pathologic stage were significantly associated with higher postoperative morbidity.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery: results of a matched-pair analysis.

PURPOSE: The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for patients who have undergone previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) remain unclear. A matched-pair analysis was conducted to compare the short-term outcomes of LG between patients with gastric cancer who had undergone PUAS and those who had not. METHODS: A matched-pair analysis was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of LG between 22 patients who had undergone PUAS and 66 who had not (control group). To compare the outcome to that of open gastrectomy (OG) following PUAS, a total of 143 consecutive OG patients treated during the same study period were also reviewed. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy was the most common type of PUAS, followed by gastrectomy. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the length of the operation, blood loss, and the number of retrieved lymph nodes or the rate of conversion to open surgery. The postoperative morbidity in the PUAS group (3/22, 13.6 %) was comparable to that of the control group (7/66, 10.6 %, P = 0.6981). There was no mortality within 30 days in either group. When compared to OG following PUAS (n = 23), LG was performed with significantly less blood loss with an equivalent postoperative outcome. CONCLUSIONS: LG following PUAS is considered to be a safe and feasible surgical modality. PUAS should therefore not be regarded as a contraindication for LG.

Multicenter study of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: This Japanese multicenter retrospective study evaluated short- and long-term outcomes of palliative laparoscopic procedures for symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer compared with conventional open procedures. METHODS: Of 968 eligible patients with stage IV colorectal cancer enrolled during January 2006-December 2007 from 41 participating surgical units (Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Group), we studied 409 patients who underwent palliative resection of symptomatic primary colorectal tumor. RESULTS: Data from patients with laparoscopic resection (n = 98) and open colorectal resection (n = 311) were analyzed. Eleven (11.2 %) laparoscopic operations were converted to an open procedure. Fewer complications were reported for laparoscopic resections than for open procedures (13.3 vs. 26.7 %; p = 0.0042). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic vs. open resection group (median, 14 vs. 17 days; p = 0.0242). Postoperative chemotherapy treatment was administered to 245 (78.9 %) patients in the open and 78 (79.6 %) patients in the laparoscopic resection group. Time from surgery to start of postoperative chemotherapy was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic vs. open resection group (median, 32 vs. 27 days; p = 0.0487). Median survival time between the two groups was not significantly different (22.0 vs. 22.2 months; p = 0.948). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic palliative resection results in reduced postoperative complications and earlier recovery with acceptable long-term outcomes comparable with open surgery. When performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients, it may be a safe and feasible option. Because of the potential of significant bias arising from the included studies, further randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to confirm this bias.

Open versus laparoscopic resection of primary tumor for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: a large multicenter consecutive patients cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypothesis that laparoscopic primary tumor resection is safe and effective when compared with the open approach for colorectal cancer patients with incurable metastases. BACKGROUND: There are only a few reports with small numbers of patients on laparoscopic tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients who underwent palliative primary tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer between January 2006 and December 2007 were collected retrospectively from 41 institutions. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who underwent laparoscopic or open resection. RESULTS: A total of 904 patients (laparoscopic group: 226, open group: 678) with a median age of 64 years (range: 22-95) were included in the analysis. Conversion was required in 28 patients (12.4%) and the most common reasons for conversion (23/28: 82%) were bulky or invasive tumors. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality in either group. The complication rate (NCI-CTCAE grade 2-4) after laparoscopic surgery (17%) was significantly lower than that after open surgery (24%) (P = 0.02), and the difference was greater (4% vs 12%; P < 0.001) when we limited the analysis to severe (≥grade 3) complications. The median length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the open group (14 vs 17 days; P = 0.002). In univariate analysis, overall survival for the laparoscopic group was significantly better than that for open surgery (median survival time: 25.9 vs 22.3 months, P = 0.04), although no difference was apparent in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic primary tumor resection has advantages in the short term and no disadvantages in the long term. It is a reasonable treatment option for certain stage IV colorectal cancer patients with incurable disease.