Changes in intracellular water volume after leg lymphedema onset and lymphaticovenular anastomosis as its surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the changes in the intracellular water (ICW) volume in lymphedema-affected legs after lymphedema onset and its surgical intervention (ie, lymphaticovenular anastomosis [LVA]), we investigated the changes in body water composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 41 women with unilateral secondary leg lymphedema. The volume changes in the ICW and extracellular water (ECW) of the affected leg were measured using an InBody S10 (InBody Co, Ltd) multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer, at both lymphedema onset and 1 year after LVA. RESULTS: The volume increase with leg lymphedema onset was comparable between the ECW and ICW (0.59 L vs 0.56 L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 0.06; P = .27), and the increase rate was higher for ECW (35.3% vs 22.1%; 95% CI, 9.3%-17.2%; P < .001). The volume reduction at 1 year after LVA was comparable between ECW and ICW (0.23 L vs 0.27 L; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.02; P = .20), and the reduction rate was higher for ECW (8.7% vs 7.0%, 95% CI, 0.04%-3.2%; P = .044). The volume difference between ICW and ECW remained constant throughout the six measurements before and after LVA (F[3.01, 120.20] = 1.85; P < .14). CONCLUSIONS: Leg LVA reduced ICW in the lymphedematous leg. The onset of leg lymphedema increased ECW and ICW in the affected limb, and LVA decreased both ECW and ICW. The volume change in the affected leg was comparable between ECW and ICW at both lymphedema onset and after LVA. However, the rate of change was higher for ECW. The volume difference between ICW and ECW remained constant. Using bioelectrical impedance analysis, alterations in ICW volume were detected in the legs affected by lymphedema, both after the onset of lymphedema and after LVA intervention.

Screening for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Development Using Extracellular Water Ratio.

Background: This case-control retrospective study examined whether the extracellular water ratio (%ECW) of the upper extremity, as measured through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), could be an indicator of the development and severity of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods and Results: BIA was used to evaluate the changes in %ECW due to BCRL development, with the %ECW measured in female patients with unilateral BCRL and healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic ability of %ECW to distinguish BCRL patients from controls. Twenty female patients, who were eligible for inclusion, and 20 healthy control volunteers were included. The %ECW of the affected arm correlated with the water volume difference between the affected and unaffected arms (R2 = 0.7183). ROC analysis showed that %ECW had a high diagnostic ability as a screening tool for BCRL development (area under the ROC curve = 0.982). A cutoff %ECW value of 38.5% could predict the presence of BCRL with a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 97.9%. Conclusions: This study confirmed that %ECW could assess the presence and severity of BCRL in a single measurement noninvasively in a shorter amount of time. The %ECW value strongly correlated with excess arm body water volume, an indicator of the severity of unilateral arm lymphedema. The cutoff %ECW value could predict the presence of BCRL with high accuracy.

Impact of Magnetic Resonance Lymphography on Lymphaticolvenular Anastomosis for Lower-Limb Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Although several investigations have described the safety, utility, and precision of magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) as a preoperative examination for lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA), it is unclear how much MRL assistance impacts LVA results. The present study aimed to clarify the outcome of MRL-assisted LVA for leg lymphedema using body water measurements obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: The water reductive effect of MRL-assisted LVA in female secondary leg lymphedema patients was compared with that of non-MRL-assisted controls in this retrospective study. In the MRL-assisted group, all LVA candidates underwent MRL prior to surgery, and the lymphatic vessels to be anastomosed were primarily determined by MRL findings. The body water composition of the treated legs was assessed before LVA and at 6 months postoperatively using a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients in the MRL-assisted study group and an equal number in the non-MRL-assisted control group were analyzed. Although mean leg water volume before LVA, mean excess water volume of the affected leg before LVA, and number of anastomoses created were comparable between the groups, the water volume reduction (1.02 L versus 0.49 L; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-1.03, p < 0.05) and edema reduction rate (46.7% versus 27.2%; 95% CI: 3.7-35.5%, p < 0.05) in the MRL-assisted group were significantly greater than in controls. CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRL-assisted lymph vessel visualization and selection appeared to significantly enhance the water reductive effect of LVA for International Society of Lymphology classification stage 2 leg lymphedema. MRL also helped to reliably identify lymphatic vessels for anastomosis. Without increasing the number of anastomoses, LVA could be performed more effectively by better detecting stagnant lymphatic vessels using MRL.

Therapeutic strategies for elbow ankylosis due to heterotopic ossification in patients with severe burns.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) occurs frequently in the elbow in burn patients, and extends beyond the anatomical structure. HO of the elbow can cause joint contracture and adversely affect activities of daily living.Currently, there is no effective prophylaxis for HO as the precise underlying mechanism remains unknown. Therefore, there is no choice but to treat HO after it has developed. To date, however, no effective standard treatment has been reported, and therefore treatment methods vary between different facilities. Surgical resection is widely accepted as the only therapeutic option once HO limits functional mobility of the elbow. PURPOSES: Based on past reports, we examined our cases and recommend effective therapeutic strategies. We posed the following three questions: (1) Is the surgical intervention effective or detrimental for elbow ankylosis due to HO? (2) What is the best timing for the intervention? (3) What is the most effective postoperative rehabilitation plan? METHODS: We treated three patients with complete ankylosis of the elbow due to HO after severe burn injury using different protocols. RESULTS: Surgery was performed in two cases and rehabilitation therapy was commenced immediately from the first postoperative day. Both patients showed improvement in the active range of motion in their elbow joints. The other patient did not undergo surgery, and his elbows became fixed in the completely extension position. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection is beneficial for elbow ankylosis due to HO after burn injury. Although the exact surgical timing is still controversial, we recommend that surgery should be performed as soon as possible after improving the skin condition around the elbow and confirming the maturation of HO on radiographs. Early rehabilitation and pain control are also important after surgery.