Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 86(1-2): 149-154, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33761501

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine whether the combined Stop GnRH-agonist (GnRH-ag), letrozole priming, and multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol may improve in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle in poor ovarian responders (PORs). DESIGN: This was a historical cohort, proof of concept study under tertiary setting at University affiliated Medical Center. PATIENTS: Five PORs fulfilling the POSEIDON Group 4 criteria were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of oocytes retrieved, number of top-quality embryos (TQEs), and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) variables were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: The combined Stop GnRH-ag, letrozole priming, and multiple-dose GnRH-ant COH protocol revealed significantly higher number of follicles >13 mm on the day of hCG administration and higher number of oocytes retrieved, with non-significantly more TQEs and a reasonable clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: The combined Stop GnRH-ag, letrozole priming, and multiple-dose GnRH-ant COH protocol is a valuable tool in the armamentarium for treating POSEIDON Group 4 patients. Further large prospective studies are needed to elucidate its role in POR and to identify the specific characteristics of women (before initiating ovarian stimulation) that will aid both fertility specialists' counseling and their patients in adjusting the appropriate COH protocol.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/administração & dosagem , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Letrozol/administração & dosagem , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Adulto , Animais , Formigas , Gonadotropina Coriônica/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Antagonistas de Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Prata , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(4): 782-791, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925631

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the addition of embryo biopsy performed during preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases is associated with a higher risk of obstetric and neonatal complications compared with in vitro fertilization (IVF) without preimplantation genetic testing or spontaneously conceived pregnancies. METHODS: This is a cohort study of all pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M group) from 2006 to 2018 at Sheba Medical Center, Israel. The control groups included patients who had conceived spontaneously (spontaneous conception group) or by IVF without preimplantation genetic testing (IVF group) and delivered at Sheba Medical Center. The obstetrics outcomes were compared among the groups. Multivariable regression modeling was performed, focusing on the relationship between preimplantation genetic testing and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Final analysis included 345 singleton and 76 twin deliveries in the PGT-M group. The spontaneous conception group included 5,290 singleton and 92 twin deliveries. The IVF group included 422 singleton and 101 twin deliveries. Among singleton pregnancies, patients in the PGT-M group had a higher rate of hypertensive disorders (6.9%) compared with those in the spontaneous conception group (2.3%; odds ratio [OR] 3.3; 95% CI 1.9-4.8; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 14.8; 95% CI 7.4-29.8) and the IVF group (4.7%; OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.8-2.7; aOR 5.9; 95% CI 1.9-18.2). Likewise, patients in the PGT-M group had a higher rate of small-for-gestational age neonates (12.4%) compared with those in the spontaneous conception group (3.9%; OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.4-4.9; aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.5-3.4) and the IVF group (4.5%; OR 3; 95% CI 1.7-5.2; aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.7-5.2). Among twin pregnancies, patients in the PGT-M group also had an increased rate of hypertensive disorders compared with those in the spontaneous conception group (4.3%; OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.2-13.3; aOR 10.9; 95% CI 2.3-50) and the IVF group (4%; OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.4-14.7; aOR 3.7; 95% CI 1.1-12.8). CONCLUSION: Pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders were associated with an increased risk of obstetric complications compared with pregnancies conceived spontaneously or by IVF without preimplantation genetic testing.


Assuntos
Biópsia , Fertilização in vitro , Doenças Genéticas Inatas/diagnóstico , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação , Adulto , Biópsia/métodos , Biópsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fertilização , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/diagnóstico , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 105(12)2020 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32968793

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) serves as an alternative to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to trigger final oocyte maturation, while it significantly reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), probably by attenuating vascular/endothelial activation. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this work are to compare the effect of different modes of final follicular maturation (hCG vs GnRH-a) following ovarian stimulation (OS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) on endothelial function. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients age 37 years or younger, undergoing OS for IVF, were allocated into 2 groups according to the type of final follicle maturation: the hCG group (n = 7) or the GnRH-a group (n = 8). INTERVENTION: Endothelial function was assessed by measurement of the peripheral arterial tonometry in reaction to temporary ischemia at 3 study points: day 3 of menstrual cycle (day 0), day of hCG/GnRH-a administration (day trigger) and day of oocyte pick-up (day OPU). The ratio of arterial tonometry readings before and after ischemia is called the reactive hyperemia index (RHI). Decreased RHI (< 1.67) indicates endothelial dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measures of this study included endothelial function at 3 study points during OS with different modes of triggering final follicular maturation. RESULTS: The mean RHI values at day 0 were within the normal range for all patients and comparable between both groups (hCG: 1.7 ±â€…0.3 vs GnRH-a: 1.79 ±â€…0.4, P = .6). All patients presented a decrease in RHI values on day trigger, which did not differ between the 2 groups (1.62 ±â€…0.3 vs 1.4 ±â€…0.2, respectively, P = .2). However, the hCG group demonstrated a further decrease in RHI on day OPU, whereas patients who received GnRH-a had restored normal endothelial function reflected by increased RHI values (1.4 ±â€…0.2 vs 1.75 ±â€…0.2, respectively, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Triggering final follicular maturation with GnRH-a restored normal endothelial function, whereas hCG trigger resulted in a decrease in endothelial function.


Assuntos
Artérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Endotélio Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/farmacologia , Indução da Ovulação , Adulto , Artérias/fisiologia , Gonadotropina Coriônica/farmacologia , Estudos de Coortes , Endotélio Vascular/fisiologia , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/farmacologia , Humanos , Hiperemia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperemia/fisiopatologia , Infertilidade/terapia , Manometria , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Gravidez
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32528403

RESUMO

Objective: To examine whether the Stop GnRH-agonist combined with multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist protocol may improve conventional IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle in poor ovarian response (POR) patients. Design: Cohort historical, proof of concept study. Setting: Tertiary, University affiliated Medical Center. Patient(s): Thirty POR patients, defined according to the Bologna criteria, who underwent a subsequent Stop GnRH-agonist combined with multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol, within 3 months of the previous failed conventional IVF/ICSI cycle, were included. For the purposes of this study, we eliminated a bias in this selection by including only "genuine" poor responder patients, defined as those who yielded up to 3 oocytes following COH with a minimal gonadotropin daily dose of 300 IU. Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of oocytes retrieved, number of top-quality embryos, COH variables. Result(s): The Stop GnRH-agonist combined with multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist COH protocol revealed significantly higher numbers of follicles >13 mm on the day of hCG administration, higher numbers of oocytes retrieved, and top-quality embryos (TQE) with an acceptable clinical pregnancy rate (16.6%). Moreover, as expected, patients undergoing the Stop GnRH-agonist combined with multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist COH protocol required significantly higher doses and a longer duration of gonadotropins stimulation. Conclusion(s): The combined Stop GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant COH protocol is a valuable tool in the armamentarium for treating "genuine" poor ovarian responders. Further, large prospective studies are needed to elucidate its role in POR and to characterize the appropriate patients subgroup (before initiating ovarian stimulation) that may benefit from the combined Stop GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant COH protocol.


Assuntos
Gonadotropina Coriônica/administração & dosagem , Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Antagonistas de Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Resistência a Medicamentos/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/administração & dosagem , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 85(4): 357-361, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32580194

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of the study was to examine whether the Stop GnRH-agonist combined with multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist protocol may overcome progesterone elevation during the late follicular phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort historical, proof of concept study consisting of 11 patients with progesterone elevation (>3.1 nmol/L) during conventional IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), who underwent a subsequent Stop GnRH-agonist combined with multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist ovarian stimulation (OS) protocol, within 3 months of the previous failed conventional IVF/ICSI cycle. RESULTS: The Stop GnRH-agonist combined with multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist COH protocol revealed significantly lower peak progesterone levels, with significantly higher numbers of follicles >13 mm in diameter on the day of hCG administration, oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and top-quality embryos, with an acceptable clinical pregnancy rate (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The combined Stop GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant OS protocol is a valuable tool in the armamentarium for treating patients with progesterone elevation during the late follicular phase. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate our observation and to characterize the appropriate patients' subgroup, which might benefit from the combined Stop GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant COH protocol.


Assuntos
Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Antagonistas de Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Progesterona/sangue , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodos , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Fase Folicular/sangue , Humanos , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA