Fiberscope-Based Measurement of Coaptation Height for Intraoperative Assessment of Mitral Valve Repair.

BACKGROUND: Restoring adequate coaptation height is a key principle of mitral valve (MV) repair. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of fiberscope (FS) technology to assess MV coaptation height for intraoperative use. METHODS: Ex-vivo testing was performed on five adult porcine hearts. The left atrium (LA) was resected, and the left ventricle (LV) was pressurized retrograde to 27 ± 1mm Hg. An endoscope was inserted into the LV apex, centered under the MV orifice. An FS system (Milliscope II camera, LED light source, and 0.7 mm diameter × 15 cm long) 90° semirigid scope with 1.2 mm focal length) was mounted above the MV annulus in a custom alignment and measuring fixture. Three blinded measurements were taken at two locations on each MV, A2 and P2 segment, from the top of coaptation to the leaflet edge identified by the FS. Accurate positioning was verified using the LV endoscope. A control (metal rod of similar thickness) was used for comparison, with coaptation height recorded when the control was seen via the endoscope. RESULTS: Coaptation heights were similar for the control and FS methods across all hearts at A2 (11.6 ± 2.6 mm control vs 11.8 ± 2.2 mm FS) and P2 (13.3 ± 2.6 mm control vs 13.4 ± 2.9 mm FS) segments, with similar measurement variability (control SD 0.1-1.0 mm; FS SD 0.1-0.9 mm). One outlier was excluded from analysis (n = 19/20). The maximum absolute difference and percent error between measurement methods were less than 1.1 mm (median [IQR], 0.6 [0.3-0.9] mm) and less than 14% (4.1 [2.2-7.6]%). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of a miniaturized FS enabled precise and accurate quantification of MV coaptation. This technique is promising for evaluating post-repair valve competence and coaptation height.

Aortic growth after arch reconstruction with patch augmentation: a 2-decade experience.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal aortic sizing during aortic arch reconstruction remains unknown. Negative effects of arch under- or oversizing are well-published. We aimed to characterize longitudinal aortic growth after patch-augmented arch reconstruction to identify the initial reconstructed arch size that results in normal mid-term arch dimensions. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective review of infants undergoing Damus-Kaye-Stansel (DKS) or non-DKS patch-augmented aortic arch reconstruction between 2000 and 2021. Ascending aorta, proximal and distal transverse arch, aortic isthmus (AIsth) and descending aorta dimensions were measured in postoperative echocardiograms (<3 months from index operation) and cross-sectional imaging (>12 months). Longitudinal changes to aortic dimensions and z-scores were analysed. Secondary outcomes included reintervention, valve and ventricular function, mortality and transplantation. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (16 DKS, 38 non-DKS) were included. At 6.3 [2.2, 12.0]-year follow-up, all aortic segments grew significantly in both groups, while z-scores remained unchanged except for non-DKS proximal and distal transverse arch z-scores, which significantly increased (P < 0.05 each). When stratified by initial postoperative z-score (z < -1, -1 ≤ z ≤ 1, z > 1), non-DKS patients with initial AIsth z-score <-1 had a final z-score significantly smaller than both the targeted z-score zero (P = 0.014) and final z-score in a group with initial postoperative z-score ±1 (P = 0.009). Valve and ventricular function remained stable. Eighteen patients required reintervention, 1 died and 1 underwent transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Over mid-term follow-up, aortic growth after arch reconstruction with patch augmentation was proportional when repaired to normal z-score dimensions, aside from proximal transverse arch, which disproportionately dilated. AIsth undersizing prevailed mid-term and trended towards a higher reintervention rate. Initial reconstruction between z-score 0 and +1 resulted in maintenance of that z-score size at mid-term follow-up. Overall, it is crucial to achieve targeted aortic sizing at index operation to maintain appropriate aortic dimensions over time and reduce reintervention risk with specific focus on the AIsth.

Mechanical failure analysis of patch materials used in aortic arch reconstruction: implications for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Thick-patch pulmonary homograft, autologous pericardium and CardioCel Neo are common patch materials for aortic arch reconstruction. Insufficient data exist on sutured patch strength and limits of use. We evaluated failure strength of these materials to develop a failure prediction model for clinical guidance. METHODS: Patch failure strength was evaluated via sutured uniaxial and burst pressure testing. In sutured uniaxial testing, patches were sutured to aortic or Dacron tabs and pulled to failure. In burst pressure testing, patches were sewn into porcine aortas or Dacron grafts and pressurized to failure. Failure membrane tension was calculated. A prediction model of membrane tension versus vessel diameter was generated to guide clinical patch selection. RESULTS: Combining sutured uniaxial and burst pressure test data, pulmonary homograft failure strength {0.61 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.44, 0.78] N/mm, n = 21} was less than half that of autologous pericardium [2.22 (IQR: 1.65, 2.78) N/mm, n = 15] and CardioCel Neo [1.31 (IQR: 1.20, 1.42) N/mm, n = 20]. Pulmonary homograft burst pressure [245 (IQR: 202, 343) mmHg, n = 7] was significantly lower than autologous pericardium [863 (IQR: 802, 919) mmHg, n = 6] and CardioCel Neo [766 (IQR: 721, 833) mmHg, n = 6]. Our model predicts failure limits for each patch material and outlines safety margins for combinations of aortic diameter and pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Sutured failure strength of thick-patch pulmonary homograft was significantly lower than autologous pericardium and CardioCel Neo. Patient selection (predicted postoperative arch diameter and haemodynamics) and blood pressure management must be considered when choosing patch material for arch reconstruction. In older children and adolescents, autologous or bovine pericardium may be more suitable materials for aortic patch augmentation to minimize the risk of postoperative patch failure.