Audiological Outcomes of Weekly vs. Triweekly Cisplatin in Head and Neck Cancer with Cochlear-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Cisplatin, one of the most ototoxic anti-neoplastic agents, causes permanent hearing loss in up to 90% of patients. We assessed ototoxicity rates and prospectively collected audiologic outcomes of patients receiving low-dose or high-dose cisplatin with concurrent cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) receiving definitive or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were analyzed. Cisplatin was administered either in low doses weekly (40 mg/m2) for up to seven doses or in high doses triweekly (100 mg/m2) for up to three doses. Cochlear-sparing IMRT was delivered in all cases. Audiologic data were prospectively collected before, during, and after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was a hearing change grade of ≥3 after CRT completion. Of the 96 HNSCC patients evaluated, 69 received weekly cisplatin and 58 received definitive CRT. Of patients receiving weekly cisplatin, 13% developed ≥G3 ototoxicity vs. 56% of patients who received triweekly cisplatin (p < 0.001). In multivariable modeling, the cisplatin dose schedule remained significant (OR: 8.4, 95%CI: 2.8-27.8, p < 0.001) for risk of severe irreversible ototoxicity. Triweekly cisplatin CRT significantly increased the ≥G3 severe irreversible ototoxicity risk compared to low-dose weekly cisplatin, irrespective of the cumulative cisplatin dose, even with the use of cochlear-sparing IMRT. No significant difference in oncologic outcomes was observed between the two schedules.

Safety and Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with 15 or more Brain Metastases.

Background: Current standard of care treatment for patients with ≥15 brain metastases (BM) is whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), despite poor neurocognitive outcomes. We analyzed our institutional experience of treating these patients with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with the aim of evaluating safety, cognitive outcomes, and survival metrics. Methods: Patients who received SRS for ≥15 BMs in 1 to 5 fractions from 2014 to 2022 were included. Cognitive outcomes were objectively evaluated using serial Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and log-rank test for intergroup comparisons. Results: Overall, 118 patients underwent 124 courses of LINAC-based SRS. The median number of lesions treated per course was 20 (range, 15-94). Most patients received fractionated SRS to a dose of 24 Gy in 3 fractions (81.5%). At the time of SRS, 19.4% patients had received prior WBRT, and 24.2% had received prior SRS. The rate of any grade radiation necrosis (RN) and grade ≥3 RN were 15.3% and 3.2%, respectively. When evaluating longitudinal PROMIS score trends, 25 of 31 patients had a stable/improved PROMIS score. Patients who did not receive prior brain RT had a longer median survival (7.4 months vs 4.6 months, P = .034). The 12m local control was 97.6%, and the cumulative incidence of distant intracranial failure, with death as a competing event, was 46% (95% CI, 36%, 55%). One year freedom from neurologic death, leptomeningeal disease, and salvage WBRT were 89%, 94.6%, and 84%, respectively. Conclusion: We present here one of the largest studies evaluating SRS for patients with ≥15 BMs. SRS was safe, had favorable cognitive outcomes, and had comparable survival outcomes to contemporary studies evaluating WBRT in this population. Treatment-naïve patients had a median survival of >6 months, long enough to benefit from cognitive sparing with SRS. Our study supports randomized studies comparing SRS and hippocampal avoidance WBRT approaches for these patients.

Beyond the bias! Sex distribution in paediatric growth hormone deficiency reexamined.

OBJECTIVES: Various biases pertaining to stature account for a male sex predominance in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) cases diagnosed by endocrinology clinics. This manuscript will assess the sex distribution when biases are minimised. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with GHD between 3 and 16 years of age. The sex distribution of cases was ascertained according to: (1) peak GH (pGH) by groups; based on growth hormone provocative testing, (2) pituitary gland imaging results, and (3) isolated GHD (IGHD) versus multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD). The relative frequency of each sex was compared according to these subgroups with significance evaluated at α = .05 level. RESULTS: Of the 5880 clinic referrals for short stature, there were 3709 boys (63%) and 2171 girls (37%). Of these, 20% of boys (n = 745) and 15.3% of girls (n = 332) underwent provocative testing for GHD. Of those tested, 39.2% of boys (n = 292) and 32.2% of girls (n = 107) were diagnosed with GHD, all p < .001. There was a male predominance in GHD cases based on pGH or GHD severity. Though not significant, girls were more likely than boys to have MPHD (p = .056), even across pGH groups (p = .06). Both boys and girls had a similar distribution of imaging abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Stratifying by sex, we found similar percentages of pituitary imaging abnormalities (including tumours) and the number of pituitary hormone deficiencies in boys and girls as the cause of GHD. For these classifications, we did not find the historically reported male sex predominance.

Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions. RESULTS: Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT. CONCLUSIONS: Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.

Long term outcome after surgical treatment for hypothalamic hamartoma.

PURPOSE: To determine long-term outcome for seizure control and clinical predictors for seizure freedom in patients undergoing surgical treatment for epilepsy associated with hypothalamic hamartoma (HH). METHODS: 155 patients underwent surgical treatment for HHs and treatment-resistant epilepsy at one center (Barrow Neurological Institute at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA) between February 2003 and June 2010. Data collection included medical record review and direct follow-up interviews to determine seizure outcome. Statistical analysis included descriptive summaries of patient characteristics and time-to-event analysis for seizure freedom. RESULTS: Long-term survival with follow-up of at least five years since first surgical treatment was available for 108 patients (69.7% of the treatment cohort). The surgical approach for first HH intervention consisted of transventricular endoscopic resection (n = 57; 52.8%), transcallosal interforniceal resection (n = 35; 32.4%), pterional resection (n = 7; 6.5%), and gamma knife radiosurgery (n = 9; 8.3%). Multiple surgical procedures were required for 39 patients (36.1%). There were 10 known deaths from all causes in the treatment cohort (6.5%). Of these, one (0.6%) was related to immediate complications of HH surgery, three (1.9%) were attributed to Sudden Unexpected Death in Epileptic Persons (SUDEP), and one (0.6%) to complications of status epilepticus. For surviving patients with long-term follow-up, 55 (50.9%) were seizure-free for all seizure types. Univariable analysis showed that seizure-freedom was related to 1) absence of a pre-operative history for central precocious puberty (p = 0.01), and 2) higher percentage of HH lesion disconnection after surgery (p = 0.047). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows that long-term seizure outcome following HH surgery is comparable to short-term results. SUMMARY: These uncontrolled observational results show that long-term seizure control following HH surgical treatment is comparable to other forms of epilepsy surgery. Late relapse (at least one year after surgery) and SUDEP do occur, but in a relatively small number of treated patients. These results inform clinical practice and serve as a comparable benchmark for newer technologies for HH surgery, such as magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy, where long-term outcome results are not yet available.

Emerging Resistance Trends in Viridans Group Streptococci Bloodstream Infections Among Immunocompromised Children Receiving Levofloxacin Prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin prophylaxis (LVXp) is often used for patients with underlying leukemia and severe neutropenia to reduce the risk of fever and bacteremia. This study evaluated trends in viridans group streptococci (VGS) antibiotic susceptibilities over time and clinical outcomes of children with VGS bloodstream infections (BSIs) during institutional adoption of LVXp. METHODS: VGS blood culture isolates between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2021 with susceptibility testing reported were included. Available isolates were re-identified to the species level and additional susceptibility testing was performed. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 264 VGS BSI isolates were identified in immunocompromised (IC, n = 125) and non-immunocompromised subjects, (non-IC, n = 139). IC subjects had lower rates of VGS isolates susceptible (S) to LVX and higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) to LVX (p = 0.004) and ciprofloxacin (p = 0.0005) compared with non-IC subjects. No other evaluated antibiotic had increased MICs in either group. Fifteen of 19 (74%) LVX not susceptible (NS) isolates occurred in IC subjects, 13 represented breakthrough infections. IC subjects had higher rates of VGS-related shock (p = 0.012), need for pressor support (p = 0.039), and longer duration of hospitalization than non-IC subjects (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were comparable between subjects with LVX S and NS VGS BSI isolates. CONCLUSIONS: VGS with reduced susceptibility to LVX emerged during institutional adoption of LVXp in high-risk children with immunocompromising conditions, but did not result in significant differences in clinical outcomes. Ongoing surveillance and susceptibility testing are critical in weighing the utility of LVXp against emerging antimicrobial resistance in this high-risk population.

Comparing pre-operative versus post-operative single and multi-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with resectable brain metastases.

Background: The standard treatment for patients with large brain metastases and limited intracranial disease is surgical resection and post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, post-operative SRS still has elevated rates of local failure (LF) and is complicated by radiation necrosis (RN), and meningeal disease (MD). Pre-operative SRS may reduce the risk of RN and MD, while fractionated therapy may improve local control through delivering a higher biological effective dose. We hypothesize that pre-operative fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) will have less toxicity compared to patients who receive post-operative SRS or FSRT. Methods: A multi-institutional analysis was conducted and included patients who had surgical resection and stereotactic radiation therapy to treat at least one brain metastasis. Pertinent demographic, clinical, radiation, surgical, and follow up data were collected for each patient. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint defined as patients with one of the following adverse events: 1) LF, 2) MD, and/or 3) Grade 2 or higher (symptomatic) RN. Results: 279 patients were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up time was 9 months. 87 % of patients received fractionated treatment. 29 % of patients received pre-operative treatment. The composite endpoint incidences for post-operative SRS (n = 10), post-operative FSRT (n = 189), pre-operative SRS (n = 27), and pre-operative FSRT (n = 53) were 0 %, 17 %, 15 %, and 7.5 %, respectively. Conclusions: In our study, the composite endpoint of 7.5% for pre-operative FSRT compares favorably to our post-operative FSRT rate of 17%. Pre-operative FSRT was observed to have low rates of LF, MD, and RN. Prospective validation is needed.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Women Older than 65 with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the second most common cause of brain metastases (BM). Despite increasing incidence of BM in older women, there are limited data on the optimal management of BM in this age group. In this study, we assessed the survival outcomes and treatment patterns of older breast cancer patients ≥65 years old with BM compared to younger patients at our institution. METHODS: An IRB-approved single-institutional retrospective review of biopsy-proven breast cancer patients with BM treated with 1- to 5-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS) from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time interval between the end of SRS to the date of the first CNS progression. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) from the end of SRS and radiation treatment patterns. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression method were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 112 metastatic breast cancer patients with BMs were included of which 24 were ≥65 years old and 88 were <65 years old. Median age at RT was 72 years (range 65-84) compared to 52 years (31-64) in younger patients. There were significantly higher number of older women with ER/PR positive disease (75% vs. 49%, p = 0.036), while younger patients were more frequently triple negative (32% vs. 12%, p = 0.074) and HER2 positive (42% vs. 29%, p = 0.3). Treatment-related adverse events were similar in both groups. Overall, 14.3% patients had any grade radiation necrosis (RN) (older vs. young: 8.3% vs. 16%, p = 0.5) while 5.4% had grade 3 or higher RN (0% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.7). Median OS after RT was poorer in older patients compared to younger patients (9.5 months vs. 14.5 months, p = 0.037), while intracranial PFS from RT was similar between the two groups (9.7 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.580). On univariate analysis, significant predictors of OS were age ≥65 years old (hazard risk, HR = 1.70, p = 0.048), KPS ≤ 80 (HR = 2.24, p < 0.001), HER2 positive disease (HR = 0.46, p < 0.001), isolated CNS metastatic disease (HR = 0.29, p < 0.001), number of brain metastases treated with RT (HR = 1.06, p = 0.028), and fractionated SRS (HR = 0.53, p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, KPS ≤ 80, HER2 negativity and higher number of brain metastases predicted for poorer survival, while age was not a significant factor for OS after adjusting for other variables. Patients who received systemic therapy after SRS had a significantly improved OS on univariate and multivariable analysis (HR = 0.32, p < 0.001). Number of brain metastases treated was the only factor predictive of worse PFS (HR = 1.06, p = 0.041), which implies a 6% additive risk of progression for every additional metastasis treated. CONCLUSIONS: Although older women had poorer OS than younger women, OS was similar after adjusting for KPS, extracranial progression, and systemic therapy; and there was no difference in rates of intracranial PFS, neurological deaths, and LMD in the different age groups. This study suggests that age alone may not play an independent role in treatment-selection and that outcomes for breast cancer patients with BMs and personalized decision-making including other clinical factors should be considered. Future studies are warranted to assess neurocognitive outcomes and other radiation treatment toxicities in older patients.

Association of Long-term Outcomes With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Resected Brain Metastasis: A Secondary Analysis of The N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Long-term outcomes of radiotherapy are important in understanding the risks and benefits of therapies for patients with brain metastases. Objective: To determine how the use of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with quality of life (QOL), cognitive function, and intracranial tumor control in long-term survivors with 1 to 4 brain metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial included 48 institutions in the US and Canada. Adult patients with 1 resected brain metastases but limited to those with 1 to 4 brain metastasis were eligible. Unresected metastases were treated with SRS. Long-term survivors were defined as evaluable patients who lived longer than 1 year from randomization. Patients were recruited between July 2011 and December 2015, and data were first analyzed in February 2017. For the present study, intracranial tumor control, cognitive deterioration, QOL, and cognitive outcomes were measured in evaluable patients who were alive at 12 months from randomization and reanalyzed in June 2017. Interventions: Stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Intracranial tumor control, toxic effects, cognitive deterioration, and QOL. Results: Fifty-four patients (27 SRS arm, 27 WBRT arm; female to male ratio, 65% vs 35%) were included for analysis with a median follow-up of 23.8 months. Cognitive deterioration was less frequent with SRS (37%-60%) compared with WBRT (75%-91%) at all time points. More patients declined by 2 or more standard deviations (SDs) in 1 or more cognitive tests for WBRT compared with SRS at 3, 6, and 9 months (70% vs 22%, 46% vs 19%, and 50% vs 20%, respectively). A 2 SD decline in at least 2 cognitive tests was associated with worse 12-month QOL in emotional well-being, functional well-being, general, additional concerns, and total scores. Overall QOL and functional independence favored SRS alone for categorical change at all time points. Total intracranial control for SRS alone vs WBRT at 12 months was 40.7% vs 81.5% (difference, -40.7; 95% CI, -68.1% to -13.4%), respectively. Data were first analyzed in February 2017. Conclusions and Relevance: The use of SRS alone compared with WBRT resulted in less cognitive deterioration among long-term survivors. The association of late cognitive deterioration with WBRT was clinically meaningful. A significant decline in cognition (2 SD) was associated with overall QOL. However, intracranial tumor control was improved with WBRT. This study provides detailed insight into cognitive function over time in this patient population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01372774; ALLIANCE/CCTG: N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group).

Update of a prognostic survival model in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors using an expansion cohort.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) offers new therapeutic venues. We have previously developed a predictive survival model in this patient population based on clinical parameters, and the purpose of this study was to expand the study cohort and internally validate the model. METHODS: A single institutional retrospective analysis of R/M HNSCC patients treated with ICI. Clinical parameters collected included p-16 status, hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (Alb), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet counts. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the impact of patient characteristics and clinical variables on survival. A nomogram was created using the rms package to generate individualized survival prediction. RESULTS: 201 patients were included, 47 females (23%), 154 males (77%). Median age was 61 years (IQR: 55-68). P-16 negative (66%). Median OS was 12 months (95% CI: 9.4, 14.9). Updated OS model included age, sex, absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, albumin, hemoglobin, LDH, and p-16 status. We stratified patients into three risk groups based on this model at the 0.33 and 0.66 quantiles. Median OS in the optimal risk group reached 23.7 months (CI: 18.5, NR), 13.8 months (CI: 11.1, 20.3) in the average risk group, and 2.3 months (CI: 1.7, 4.4) in the high-risk group. Following internal validation, the discriminatory power of the model reached a c-index of 0.72 and calibration slope of 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: Our updated nomogram could assist in the precise selection of patients for which ICI could be beneficial and cost-effective.

Treatment Outcomes of Head and Neck Cancer Patients in the Elderly Receiving Different Chemoradiation Combinations: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effect of definitive or adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) among elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 150 elderly LA HNSCC patients (age ≥70) at a single institution. Demographics, disease control outcomes, and toxicities with different chemotherapy regimens were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 74 years (range 70-88). Of the cohort, 98 (65.3%) patients received definitive and 52 (34.7%) received adjuvant CRT; 44 (29.3%) patients received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, 43 (28.7%) weekly cetuximab, 33 (22%) weekly carboplatin, and 30 (20%) weekly cisplatin. The OS at 2 years was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63-79%), and PFS at 2 years was 61% (95% CI: 53-70%). There was no significant difference in OS or PFS between definitive and adjuvant CRT (p = 0.867 and p = 0.475, respectively). Type of chemotherapy regimen (single-agent carboplatin vs. others) (95% CI: 1.1-3.9; p = 0.009) was a key prognostic factor in predicting OS in multivariable analysis. Concurrent use of cetuximab was associated with increased risk of PEG tube dependence at 6 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Management of LA HNSCC in the elderly is a challenging scenario. Our study shows that CRT is a feasible treatment modality for elderly patients with LA HNSCC. We recommend CRT with weekly cisplatin or weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. A chemotherapy regimen should be carefully selected in this difficult to treat population.

Validation of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a candidate therapeutic target in the spontaneous canine model of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a heterogeneous group of blood cancers arising in lymphoid tissues that commonly effects both humans and dogs. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5), an enzyme that catalyzes the symmetric di-methylation of arginine residues, is frequently overexpressed and dysregulated in both human solid and hematologic malignancies. In human lymphoma, PRMT5 is a known driver of malignant transformation and oncogenesis, however, the expression and role of PRMT5 in canine lymphoma has not been explored. To explore canine lymphoma as a useful comparison to human lymphoma while validating PRMT5 as a rational therapeutic target in both, we characterized expression patterns of PRMT5 in canine lymphoma tissue microarrays, primary lymphoid biopsies, and canine lymphoma-derived cell lines. The inhibition of PRMT5 led to growth suppression and induction of apoptosis, while selectively decreasing global marks of symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and histone H4 arginine 3 symmetric dimethylation. We performed ATAC-sequencing and gene expression microarrays with pathway enrichment analysis to characterize genome-wide changes in chromatin accessibility and whole-transcriptome changes in canine lymphoma cells lines upon PRMT5 inhibition. This work validates PRMT5 as a promising therapeutic target for canine lymphoma and supports the continued use of the spontaneously occurring canine lymphoma model for the preclinical development of PRMT5 inhibitors for the treatment of human NHL.

Exploring genetic counselors' perceptions of usefulness and intentions to use refined risk models in clinical care based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).

Pathogenic germline mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are associated with an elevated lifetime risk for breast (50%-85% risk) and ovarian cancer (20%-40% risk). Genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 genetic variants associated with modified breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Risk models generated based on these variants have shown that these genetic modifiers strongly influence absolute risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. There is a lack of understanding, however, about the clinical applicability and utility of these risk models. To investigate this gap, we collected survey data from 274 cancer genetic counselors (GCs) through the National Society of Genetic Counselors Cancer Special Interest Group. Questions assessed perceptions of usefulness and intentions of genetic counselors to use these refined risk models in clinical care based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). We found that GCs' reactions to the estimates were largely positive, though they thought the possibility of changing management based on results was unlikely. Additionally, we found that more experienced GCs were more likely to consider refined risk estimates in clinic. Support also was provided for core predictions within the TAM, whereby the perceived usefulness (indirect effect est. = 0.08, 95% CI: [0.04, 0.13]) and perceived ease of use (indirect effect est. = 0.078, 95% CI: [0.04, 0.13]) of refined risk estimates were indirectly associated with intentions to use via attitudes.

The expression of Mirc1/Mir17-92 cluster in sputum samples correlates with pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multi-organ disorder characterized by chronic sino-pulmonary infections and inflammation. Many patients with CF suffer from repeated pulmonary exacerbations that are predictors of worsened long-term morbidity and mortality. There are no reliable markers that associate with the onset or progression of an exacerbation or pulmonary deterioration. Previously, we found that the Mirc1/Mir17-92a cluster which is comprised of 6 microRNAs (Mirs) is highly expressed in CF mice and negatively regulates autophagy which in turn improves CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function. Therefore, here we sought to examine the expression of individual Mirs within the Mirc1/Mir17-92 cluster in human cells and biological fluids and determine their role as biomarkers of pulmonary exacerbations and response to treatment. METHODS: Mirc1/Mir17-92 cluster expression was measured in human CF and non-CF plasma, blood-derived neutrophils, and sputum samples. Values were correlated with pulmonary function, exacerbations and use of CFTR modulators. RESULTS: Mirc1/Mir17-92 cluster expression was not significantly elevated in CF neutrophils nor plasma when compared to the non-CF cohort. Cluster expression in CF sputum was significantly higher than its expression in plasma. Elevated CF sputum Mirc1/Mir17-92 cluster expression positively correlated with pulmonary exacerbations and negatively correlated with lung function. Patients with CF undergoing treatment with the CFTR modulator Ivacaftor/Lumacaftor did not demonstrate significant change in the expression Mirc1/Mir17-92 cluster after six months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Mirc1/Mir17-92 cluster expression is a promising biomarker of respiratory status in patients with CF including pulmonary exacerbation.