Mortality related to actigraphic long and short sleep.

BACKGROUND: The folk belief that we should sleep 8 h seems to be incorrect. Numerous studies have shown that self-reported sleep longer than 7.5 h or shorter than 6.5 h predicts increased mortality risk. This study examined if prospectively-determined objective sleep duration, as estimated by wrist actigraphy, was associated with mortality risks. METHODS: From 1995-1999, women averaging 67.6 years of age provided one-week actigraphic recordings. Survival could be estimated from follow-up continuing until 2009 for 444 of the women, with an average of 10.5 years before censoring. Multivariate age-stratified Cox regression models were controlled for history of hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, cancer, and major depression. RESULTS: Adjusted survival functions estimated 61% survival (54-69%, 95% C.I.) for those with sleep less than 300 min and 78% survival (73-85%, 95% C.I.) for those with actigraphic sleep longer than 390 min, as compared with survival of 90% (85-94%, 95% C.I.) for those with sleep of 300-390 min. Time-in-bed, sleep efficiency and the timing of melatonin metabolite excretion were also significant mortality risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study confirms a U-shaped relationship between survival and actigraphically measured sleep durations, with the optimal objective sleep duration being shorter than the self-report optimums. People who sleep five or six hours may be reassured. Further studies are needed to identify any modifiable factors for this mortality and possible approaches to prevention.

Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia.

BACKGROUND: Patients often complain about insufficient sleep or chronic insomnia in the belief that they need 8 hours of sleep. Treatment strategies may be guided by what sleep durations predict optimal survival and whether insomnia might signal mortality risks. METHODS: In 1982, the Cancer Prevention Study II of the American Cancer Society asked participants about their sleep duration and frequency of insomnia. Cox proportional hazards survival models were computed to determine whether sleep duration or frequency of insomnia was associated with excess mortality up to 1988, controlling simultaneously for demographics, habits, health factors, and use of various medications. RESULTS: Participants were more than 1.1 million men and women from 30 to 102 years of age. The best survival was found among those who slept 7 hours per night. Participants who reported sleeping 8 hours or more experienced significantly increased mortality hazard, as did those who slept 6 hours or less. The increased risk exceeded 15% for those reporting more than 8.5 hours sleep or less than 3.5 or 4.5 hours. In contrast, reports of "insomnia" were not associated with excess mortality hazard. As previously described, prescription sleeping pill use was associated with significantly increased mortality after control for reported sleep durations and insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can be reassured that short sleep and insomnia seem associated with little risk distinct from comorbidities. Slight risks associated with 8 or more hours of sleep and sleeping pill use need further study. Causality is unproven.

Exercise and Survival in the Very Old.

Risk factors that are strongly associated with cardiovascular events in middle age are less predictive in the elderly. These reduced associations are most evident after about age 75 years. Exercise has been associated with survival in middle-aged men; data are sparse on its relation to survival in the very old. This association was tested in a community-dwelling cohort of 440 men and 457 women aged 75 years or older who were followed prospectively for an average of 5 years. In age-adjusted proportional hazards models, current regular exercise at least 3 times per week was strongly associated with survival in men (relative risk for death 0.54, P is less than.01) and women (relative risk 0.45, P is less than.01). Results were unchanged after adjustment for physical and emotional health status, or when persons with heart disease at baseline were excluded. Results were also unchanged after adjustment for change in exercise level compared with 10 years ago, and for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, lipid concentration, glucose levels, and smoking).