Predictive performance of the common red flags in emergency department headache patients: a HEAD and HEAD-Colombia study.

OBJECTIVES: Only a small proportion of patients presenting to an ED with headache have a serious cause. The SNNOOP10 criteria, which incorporates red and orange flags for serious causes, has been proposed but not well studied. This project aims to compare the proportion of patients with 10 commonly accepted red flag criteria (singly and in combination) between patients with and without a diagnosis of serious secondary headache in a large, multinational cohort of ED patients presenting with headache. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data obtained in the HEAD and HEAD-Colombia studies. The outcome of interest was serious secondary headache. The predictive performance of 10 red flag criteria from the SNNOOP10 criteria list was estimated individually and in combination. RESULTS: 5293 patients were included, of whom 6.1% (95% CI 5.5% to 6.8%) had a defined serious cause identified. New neurological deficit, history of neoplasm, older age (>50 years) and recent head trauma (2-7 days prior) were independent predictors of a serious secondary headache diagnosis. After adjusting for other predictors, sudden onset, onset during exertion, pregnancy and immune suppression were not associated with a serious headache diagnosis. The combined sensitivity of the red flag criteria overall was 96.5% (95% CI 93.2% to 98.3%) but specificity was low, 5.1% (95% CI 4.3% to 6.0%). Positive predictive value was 9.3% (95% CI 8.2% to 10.5%) with negative predictive value of 93.5% (95% CI 87.6% to 96.8%). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of the red flag criteria in this study were lower than previously reported. Regarding clinical practice, this suggests that red flag criteria may be useful to identify patients at higher risk of a serious secondary headache cause, but their low specificity could result in increased rates of CT scanning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR376695.

Clinical presentation and assessment of older patients presenting with headache to emergency departments: A multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics, assessment and management of older emergency department (ED) patients with non-traumatic headache. METHODS: Planned sub-study of a prospective, multicentre, international, observational study, which included adult patients presenting to ED with non-traumatic headache. Patients aged ≥75 years were compared to those aged <75 years. Outcomes of interest were epidemiology, investigations, serious headache diagnosis and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients (7%) in the parent study were aged ≥75 years. Older patients were less likely to report severe headache pain or subjective fever (both P < 0.001). On examination, older patients were more likely to be confused, have lower Glasgow Coma Scores and to have new neurological deficits (all P < 0.001). Serious secondary headache disorder (composite of headache due to subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), intracranial haemorrhage, meningitis, encephalitis, cerebral abscess, neoplasm, hydrocephalus, vascular dissection, stroke, hypertensive crisis, temporal arteritis, idiopathic intracranial hypertension or ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications) was diagnosed in 18% of older patients compared to 6% of younger patients (P < 0.001). Computed tomography brain imaging was performed in 66% of patients ≥75 years compared to 35% of younger patients (P < 0.001). Older patients were less likely to be discharged (43% vs 63%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with headache had different clinical features to the younger cohort and were more likely to have a serious secondary cause of headache than younger adults. There should be a low threshold for investigation in older patients attending ED with non-traumatic headache.

Epidemiology, investigation, management, and outcome of headache in emergency departments (HEAD study)-A multinational observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of nontraumatic headache in adults presenting to emergency departments (EDs). BACKGROUND: Headache is a common reason for presentation to EDs. Little is known about the epidemiology, investigation, and treatment of nontraumatic headache in patients attending EDs internationally. METHODS: An international, multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted over one calendar month in 2019. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with nontraumatic headache as the main presenting complaint. Exclusion criteria were recent head trauma, missing records, interhospital transfers, re-presentation with same headache as a recent visit, and headache as an associated symptom. Data collected included demographics, clinical assessment, investigation, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: We enrolled 4536 patients (67 hospitals, 10 countries). "Thunderclap" onset was noted in 14.2% of cases (644/4536). Headache was rated as severe in 27.2% (1235/4536). New neurological examination findings were uncommon (3.2%; 147/4536). Head computed tomography (CT) was performed in 36.6% of patients (1661/4536), of which 9.9% showed clinically important pathology (165/1661). There was substantial variation in CT scan utilization between countries (15.9%-75.0%). More than 30 different diagnoses were made. Presumed nonmigraine benign headache accounted for 45.4% of cases (2058/4536) with another 24.3% classified as migraine (1101/4536). A small subgroup of patients have a serious secondary cause for their headache (7.1%; 323/4536) with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), stroke, neoplasm, non-SAH intracranial hemorrhage/hematoma, and meningitis accounting for about 1% each. Most patients were treated with simple analgesics (paracetamol, aspirin, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents). Most patients were discharged home (83.8%; 3792/4526). In-hospital mortality was 0.3% (11/4526). CONCLUSION: Diagnosis and management of headache in the ED is challenging. A small group of patients have a serious secondary cause for their symptoms. There is wide variation in the use of neuroimaging and treatments. Further work is needed to understand the variation in practice and to better inform international guidelines regarding emergent neuroimaging and treatment.

Epidemiology of Headache in Children in a Community Emergency Department: A Scoping Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of headache in children attending a community mixed adult-pediatric emergency department (ED) in Australia with a view to providing scoping data for future headache-related projects for the pediatric ED research networks. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study by medical record review. Participants were children aged 2 to 16 years who presented to the ED between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016, with a major symptom of headache. Exclusion criteria were a history of recent head trauma, a ventriculoperitoneal shunt in situ, or known intracranial conditions associated with headache. Data collected included demographics, clinical features, investigations, diagnosis, disposition, and outcome. The primary outcomes of interest were the proportion of children with a serious ED diagnosis, the distribution of ED diagnoses, investigation ordering patterns, treatments provided, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: A total of 225 children were studied, with a median age of 9 years (interquartile range, 6-13 years). The most common associated symptoms were fever (47%) and vomiting (42%). The most common examination feature was fever (21%). Abnormal neurological findings were very uncommon. Few children underwent advanced neuroimaging (7 patients; 3%), and no intracranial abnormalities were detected. Seven children had a serious diagnosis (7/225 [3%]; 95% confidence interval, 2%-6%). Six of these 7 were viral meningitis, and there was 1 case of bacterial meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: In a community teaching hospital cohort of children with headache, intercurrent viral illness is the most common cause. Serious causes were very uncommon. The rate of bacterial meningitis, tumor, or abscess was <1%. This has implications for the planning of research projects.

Epidemiology, treatment and outcome of patients with lower respiratory tract infection presenting to emergency departments with dyspnoea (AANZDEM and EuroDEM studies).

OBJECTIVE: Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a frequent cause of dyspnoea in EDs, and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We described and compared the management of this disease in Europe and Oceania/South-East Asia (SEA) cohorts. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study with three time points in Europe and Oceania/SEA. We included in this manuscript patients presenting to EDs with dyspnoea and a diagnosis of LRTI in ED. We collected comorbidities, chronic medication, clinical signs at arrival, laboratory parameters, ED management and patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1389 patients were included, 773 in Europe and 616 in SEA. The European cohort had more comorbidities including chronic heart failure, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking. Levels of inflammatory markers were higher in Europe. There were more patients with inflammatory markers in Europe and more hypercapnia in Oceania/SEA. The use of antibiotics was higher in SEA (72.2% vs 61.8%, P < 0.001) whereas intravenous diuretics, non-invasive and invasive ventilation were higher in Europe. Intensive care unit admission rate was 9.9% in Europe cohort and 3.4% in Oceania/SEA cohort. ED mortality was 1% and overall in-hospital mortality was 8.7% with no differences between regions. CONCLUSIONS: More patients with LRTI in Europe presented with cardio-respiratory comorbidities, they received more adjunct therapies and had a higher intensive care unit admission rate than patients from Oceania/SEA, although mortality was similar between the two cohorts.

How closely do blood gas electrolytes and haemoglobin agree with serum values in adult emergency department patients: An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to establish the bias (mean difference) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between electrolyte values (sodium and potassium) and haemoglobin between whole blood analysed by the ED resuscitation room blood gas analyser and specimens analysed using standard techniques in the central hospital laboratory and to determine the proportion of analyses falling outside defined clinically acceptable LoA and pathology expert defined standards. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Paired blood gas analyser and laboratory samples taken no more than 10 min apart were included. The primary outcome of interest was bias and 95% LoA by Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analyses for values outside the normal range were also conducted. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-two sample pairs were included in the analysis. For sodium concentration the bias was 0.6 mmol/L (95% LoA -3.3 to 4.6 mmol/L). For potassium concentration the bias was 0.21 mmol/L (95% LoA -0.36 to 0.79 mmol/L). For haemoglobin concentration the bias was -1.6 g/dL (95% LoA -10.2 to 6.9 g/dL). For sodium and haemoglobin concentrations, >95% of results fell within the defined clinically acceptable limits. For potassium concentration, >90% of results fell within the defined clinically acceptable limits. In general, serum sodium and potassium concentrations were slightly higher than blood gas levels and for haemoglobin serum levels were slightly lower. CONCLUSION: Agreement between blood gas analysis and laboratory analysis for sodium, potassium and haemoglobin concentrations shows acceptable agreement for use in time critical clinical decision-making in ED.

Yield of serious axial injury from pan scans after blunt trauma in haemodynamically stable low-risk trauma patients.

OBJECTIVES: Whole body computed tomography (WBCT) scanning for trauma has gained popularity but its role in low-risk patients is controversial. We aimed to determine the rate of serious axial/truncal injury and emergency intervention in conscious, stable patients undergoing WBCT for blunt trauma in two non-trauma centre EDs in the Victorian trauma system. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study by medical record and radiology report review. Patients were included if they were conscious, haemodynamically stable adults presenting by ambulance and having WBCT scan. Exclusion criteria were age <16 years, no history of trauma, Glasgow Coma Scale <14, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and intoxication with alcohol or drugs. Data collected included demographics, clinical findings, results of CT scans and emergency interventions (emergency truncal surgery, transfer to a trauma centre and/or transfusion within 24 h). The outcomes of interest were the rate of defined serious axial/truncal injury and emergency interventions. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were studied. Median age was 45 years; 67% were men. Median injury severity score (ISS) was 1.5 (interquartile range 0-5); only one patient had an ISS ≥15. Ninety (87%, 78-92%) patients had no defined serious injury. Five (5%) patients had a defined emergency intervention - four trauma centre transfers and one transfusion. Two of these were not trauma-related. CONCLUSION: The rate of serious axial/truncal injury was low. The high rate of normal scans makes it likely that the risk:benefit ratio between injury identification and radiation related cancer risk is unacceptably high. This data supports a selective CT strategy in low-risk trauma patients.

Do instability markers predict satisfactory reduction and requirement for later surgery in emergency department patients with wrist fracture?

OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that the presence of instability markers in patients with displaced distal radial fractures is associated with poorer outcome. Our aims were to determine whether the presence of previously defined instability markers could predict the likelihood of successful ED reduction and requirement for a secondary procedure after ED reduction. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study performed by medical record review. Adult ED patients coded as having an isolated wrist fracture and having fracture reduction in ED were eligible for inclusion. Data collected included demographics, history of osteoporosis, mechanism of injury, radiological features on X-rays and performance of a secondary procedure. Outcomes of interest were the rate of successful fracture reduction in ED (against defined radiological criteria), the rate of secondary procedures and the association between the number of defined instability risk factors and successful reduction and performance of a secondary surgical procedure. Analysis was by χ2 test, receiver operating characteristic curve, logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Three hundred and nineteen patients were studied; median age 62 years, 77% female. Sixty-five per cent of patients had satisfactory fracture reduction in ED (95% CI 59%-70%). Eighty-six patients underwent a secondary procedure to reduce/stabilise their fracture (28%, 95% CI 23%-33%). Younger age, lack of satisfactory ED reduction and increased number of instability factors were independently predictive of the performance of a secondary procedure. CONCLUSION: Instability risk factors are common in patients with wrist fractures requiring reduction in ED. The number of instability factors is not a strong predictor of the performance of secondary procedures.

Protective lung strategies: A cross sectional survey of nurses knowledge and use in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is commonly used in emergency departments (EDs). Protective lung strategies (PLS), comprising of low tidal volume (6mL/kg), control of oxygen and plateau pressures, and administration of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been shown to reduces the risks associated with MV but there is little evidence exists about nurses' knowledge or application of PLS. Our aim was to explore nurses knowledge and application of PLS in Australian EDs. METHODS: Descriptive, exploratory design utilising an online questionnaire. A convenience sample was recruited via the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia mailing list and secondary snowball sampling was used to optimise response rate. RESULTS: There were 157 participants. PLS are being used in most EDs (n=104, 75%) and clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are often available (n=86, 62%). Most ED ventilators are capable of implementing PLS, but measurement of plateau pressures was infrequent (n=46%). Participants demonstrate appropriate knowledge, but reported varying levels of confidence and perceived autonomy when implementing PLS in the ED. CONCLUSION: PLS are being used in Australian EDs, aligning with best available evidence. Nursing staff have good levels of PLS knowledge. Development of an evidence-based CPG may improve confidence when implementing PLS and may pave the way for ED nurses to expand their scope of practice.

Failed validation of risk prediction model for intervention in renal colic patients after emergency department evaluation.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that three criteria (size of calculus ≥6 mm, visual analogue scale pain score at discharge ≥2 cm and location above mid-ureter; the Papa criteria) were sensitive for predicting patients who require intervention (surgery or lithotripsy) within 28 days of index emergency department (ED) visit for ureteric colic. It was suggested that absence of these criteria identified a group for whom early follow-up may not be needed. No validation has been reported. We aimed to validate these criteria. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with clinical presentation of ureteric colic and radiologically proven renal tract stones. Data collected included demographics, clinical features, features of the stone, imaging results and 28-day outcome. Outcome of interest was performance of the Papa criteria for prediction of urological intervention by clinical performance analysis. We also undertook a post hoc analysis to identify predictors of urological intervention for the group overall and for the subgroup discharged from ED. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four patients were studied (median age 49, 79% male) with 75 (33%) requiring urological intervention within 28 days. The presence of any of the Papa criteria had sensitivity for urological intervention of 83.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71.2-91.9%) with specificity of 47.7% (95% CI 38.9-56.6%), positive predictive value of 40.9% (95% CI 31.9-50.4%) and negative predictive value of 87.3% (95% CI 76.8-93.7%). Nine patients with no Papa criteria had intervention: 12.7% (95% CI 6.8-22.4%). CONCLUSION: The Papa criteria are not sufficiently accurate to determine which patients require intervention or a subgroup who do not need specialist urological follow-up.

Arteriovenous blood gas agreement in intensive care patients with varying levels of circulatory compromise: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Venous blood gas (VBG) analysis is suggested as an alternative to arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. In haemodynamically stable patients, there is clinically acceptable arteriovenous (AV) agreement for pH and bicarbonate (HCO3-) concentration, but in haemodynamically unstable patients, evidence is conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the level of AV agreement for the values of pH, PCO2, base excess, HCO3- and lactate between ABGs and VBGs in critically ill patients with varying degrees of hypotension. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study of a convenience sample of patients in an intensive care unit of a metropolitan teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: Paired ABG and central VBG samples were drawn within 5 minutes of each other from existing arterial lines and central venous lines, and analysed for AV agreement of pH, PCO2, base excess, HCO3- and lactate. The outcome of interest was AV agreement with varying levels of blood pressure (BP). Analysis was by descriptive statistics, box whisker plot and Bland-Altman bias plot analysis. RESULTS: We studied 50 patients with 117 paired ABG and VBG samples. The AV differences (venous-arterial) were: pH, -0.04; HCO3-, -0.37 mmmol/L; base excess, 0.08 mEq/ L; and lactate, 0.16 mmol/L. There was not a clinically relevant deterioration in agreement for these parameters with falling BP. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients with varying degrees of hypotension in the ICU, there is clinically acceptable AV agreement for the values of pH, HCO3-, base excess and lactate, an agreement that does not deteriorate significantly with falling blood pressure.

Agreement between mathematically arterialised venous versus arterial blood gas values in patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Blood gas analysis is important for assessment of ventilatory function. Traditionally, arterial analysis has been used. A method for mathematically arterialising venous blood gas values has been developed. Our aim was to validate this method in patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in an emergency department (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This post hoc substudy of a prospective cohort study included adult patients undergoing NIV for acute respiratory compromise. When arterial blood gas analysis was required for clinical purposes, a venous sample was also drawn. Mathematically arterialised values were calculated independent of arterial values. Primary outcome of interest was agreement between mathematically arterialised venous and arterial values for pH and pCO2. Bland-Altman agreement plot analysis was used. RESULTS: Eighty sample-pairs (58 patients) were studied. Mean difference for arterial pH (actual-calculated) was 0.01 pH units (95% limits of agreement: -0.04, 0.06). Mean difference for pCO2 (actual-calculated) was -0.06 kPa (95% limits of agreement: -1.34, 1.22). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing NIV in an ED, agreement between mathematically arterialised venous values and arterial values was close for pH but only moderate for pCO2. Depending on clinician tolerance for agreement, this method may be a clinically useful alternative to arterial blood gas analysis in the ED.