Perceived realism of haptic rendering methods for bimanual high force tasks: original and replication study.

Realistic haptic feedback is a key for virtual reality applications in order to transition from solely procedural training to motor-skill training. Currently, haptic feedback is mostly used in low-force medical procedures in dentistry, laparoscopy, arthroscopy and alike. However, joint replacement procedures at hip, knee or shoulder, require the simulation of high-forces in order to enable motor-skill training. In this work a prototype of a haptic device capable of delivering double the force (35 N to 70 N) of state-of-the-art devices is used to examine the four most common haptic rendering methods (penalty-, impulse-, constraint-, rigid body-based haptic rendering) in three bimanual tasks (contact, rotation, uniaxial transition with increasing forces from 30 to 60 N) regarding their capabilities to provide a realistic haptic feedback. In order to provide baseline data, a worst-case scenario of a steel/steel interaction was chosen. The participants needed to compare a real steel/steel interaction with a simulated one. In order to substantiate our results, we replicated the study using the same study protocol and experimental setup at another laboratory. The results of the original study and the replication study deliver almost identical results. We found that certain investigated haptic rendering method are likely able to deliver a realistic sensation for bone-cartilage/steel contact but not for steel/steel contact. Whilst no clear best haptic rendering method emerged, penalty-based haptic rendering performed worst. For simulating high force bimanual tasks, we recommend a mixed implementation approach of using impulse-based haptic rendering for simulating contacts and combine it with constraint or rigid body-based haptic rendering for rotational and translational movements.

Wrist at risk? - Considerations derived from a novel experimental setup to assess torques during hip reaming with potential implications on the orthopedic surgeons' health.

Orthopedic surgeons endure high physical stresses when performing surgery, as large forces and torques are applied commonly. Occupational risks are consequently higher when compared to other surgical disciplines. One example is the reaming of the acetabula during total hip arthroplasty, using customized instruments. This surgery may predispose the surgeon to overuse-related wrist pathology. In this study, torques acting along the reaming tool were measured, and the resulting forces applied to the orthopedic surgeons' wrists were estimated based on the measured torque data from hip reaming. Different reamer sizes and tool velocities were analyzed to determine how both parameters may influence the torques applied at the surgeon's wrist. Using a highly standardized setup, torques were measured while the reamer was pushed into the acetabula to remove cartilage. Maximum torques and stoppage torques at blocking of the reamer were compared between feed rates and reamer sizes. Peak values of the maximum torques along the reamer axis averaged 1.5-1.8 Nm. No significant difference between maximum torques and reamer sizes was found. A significant difference in maximum torques was noted between feed rates with a large effect (p = 0.010; η2 = 0.214) and a large interaction effect (p = 0.017; η2 = 0.186). Based on this experimental setup, it can be hypothesized that the impulsive behavior of the torque when the milling tool reaches the subchondral lamella could potentially contribute to wrist pathology. These preliminary data warrant further study. Consequently, torque limiters should be implemented in reamers to minimize the risk of occupation-related pathology to the wrist.