The dependence of interplay effects on the field scan direction in PBS proton therapy.

The literature is controversial about the scan direction dependency of interplay effects in pencil beam scanning (PBS) treatment of moving targets. A directional effect is supported by many simulation studies, whereas the experimental data are mostly limited to simple geometries, not reflecting realistically clinical treatment plans. We have compared increasingly complex treatment fields, from a homogeneous single energy layer to a more modulated lung plan, under identical experimental settings, seeking evidence for differences in motion mitigation due to the selection of primary scanning direction. In total, 120 experimental samples were taken, combining two primary scan directions and three rescanning regimes with different motion scenarios. 4D dose distributions were measured in water with a moving ionisation chamber array and compared to those of a stationary delivery using 2D gamma analysis. Each plan has been verified twice for the same rescanning regime and motion scenario, changing the meandering direction in between to scan perpendicularly to, or along, the target motion. Additionally, machine log files of the lung plan, together with 4DCT data, were used to calculate the dose distribution that such deliveries would have produced in the patient. The primary meandering direction has a clear influence on measured dose distributions when considering a single energy layer. Introducing spot weight modulation and multiple energy layers however, makes the dynamic of interplay more complex and difficult to predict. Overall, gamma (3%/3 mm) differences between scanning along or orthogonal to the target motion follow a normal distribution [Formula: see text] when considering multiple motion scenarios and rescanning regimes. Nevertheless, data spread [Formula: see text] is significant enough such that, for individual experiments and set-ups, a dependency may be observed even if this is not a general result. Patient reconstructed doses follow the same trend, the two primary scan directions producing statistically insignificant differences in dose distributions in terms of conformity or homogeneity. Except for extremely simplified cases of mono-energetic and homogeneous treatment fields, the interplay effect has been found to be only marginally influenced by the choice of the primary scanning direction.

The impact of pencil beam scanning techniques on the effectiveness and efficiency of rescanning moving targets.

Therapeutic pencil beams are typically scanned using one of the following three techniques: spot scanning, raster scanning or line scanning. While providing similar dose distributions to the target, these three techniques can differ significantly in their delivery time sequence. Thus, we can expect differences in effectiveness and time efficiency when trying to mitigate interplay effects using rescanning. At the Paul Scherrer Institute, we are able to irradiate treatment plans using either of the three delivery techniques. Hence, we can compare them directly with identical underlying machine parameters such as energy switching time or minimum/maximum beam current. For this purpose, we selected three different liver targets, optimized plans for spots, and converted them to equivalent raster and line scanning plans. In addition to the scanning technique, we varied the underlying motion curve, starting phase, prescription dose and rescanning strategy, which resulted in a total of 1584 4D dose calculations and 49 measurements. They indicate that rescanning becomes effective when achieving a high number of rescans for every dose element. Fixed minimum spot weights for spot and raster scanning machines often hamper this. By introducing adaptive scaling of the beam current within iso-energy layers for line scanning, we can flexibly lower the minimum weight whenever required and achieve higher rescanning capability. Averaged over all scenarios studied, volumetric rescanning is significantly more effective than layered provided the same number of rescans are applied. Fast lateral scanning contributes to the efficiency of rescanning. We observed that in any given time window, we can always perform more rescans using raster or line scanning compared to spot scanning irradiations. Thus, we conclude that line scanning represents a promising technique for rescanning by combining both effectiveness and efficiency.

A beam monitoring and validation system for continuous line scanning in proton therapy.

Line scanning represents a faster and potentially more flexible form of pencil beam scanning than conventional step-and-shoot irradiations. It seeks to minimize dead times in beam delivery whilst preserving the possibility of modulating the dose at any point in the target volume. Our second generation proton gantry features irradiations in line scanning mode, but it still lacks a dedicated monitoring and validation system that guarantees patient safety throughout the irradiation. We report on its design and implementation in this paper. In line scanning, we steer the proton beam continuously along straight lines while adapting the speed and/or current frequently to modulate the delivered dose. We intend to prevent delivery errors that could be clinically relevant through a two-stage system: safety level 1 monitors the beam current and position every 10 µs. We demonstrate that direct readings from ionization chambers in the gantry nozzle and Hall probes in the scanner magnets provide required information on current and position, respectively. Interlocks will be raised when measured signals exceed their predefined tolerance bands. Even in case of an erroneous delivery, safety level 1 restricts hot and cold spots of the physically delivered fraction dose to ±[Formula: see text] (±[Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] biologically). In safety level 2-an additional, partly redundant validation step-we compare the integral line profile measured with a strip monitor in the nozzle to a forward-calculated prediction. The comparison is performed between two line applications to detect amplifying inaccuracies in speed and current modulation. This level can be regarded as an online quality assurance of the machine. Both safety levels use devices and functionalities already installed along the beamline. Hence, the presented monitoring and validation system preserves full compatibility of discrete and continuous delivery mode on a single gantry, with the possibility of switching between modes during the application of a single field.

Fluence-based dosimetry of proton and heavier ion beams using single track detectors.

Due to their superior spatial resolution, small and biocompatible fluorescent nuclear track detectors (FNTDs) open up the possibility of characterizing swift heavy charged particle fields on a single track level. Permanently stored spectroscopic information such as energy deposition and particle field composition is of particular importance in heavy ion radiotherapy, since radiation quality is one of the decisive predictors for clinical outcome. Findings presented within this paper aim towards single track reconstruction and fluence-based dosimetry of proton and heavier ion fields. Three-dimensional information on individual ion trajectories through the detector volume is obtained using fully automated image processing software. Angular distributions of multidirectional fields can be measured accurately within ±2° uncertainty. This translates into less than 5% overall fluence deviation from the chosen irradiation reference. The combination of single ion tracking with an improved energy loss calibration curve based on 90 FNTD irradiations with protons as well as helium, carbon and oxygen ions enables spectroscopic analysis of a detector irradiated in Bragg peak proximity of a 270 MeV u(-1) carbon ion field. Fluence-based dosimetry results agree with treatment planning software reference.