GP100 expression is variable in intensity in melanoma.

Drugs or cellular products that bind to gp100 are being investigated for treatment of cutaneous melanoma. The relative specificity of gp100 expression in melanocytes makes it an attractive target to harness for therapeutic intent. For example, Tebentafusp, a bispecific gp100 peptide-HLA-directed CD3 T cell engager, has generated significant enthusiasm in recent years due to its success in improving outcomes for uveal melanoma and is being studied in cutaneous melanoma. However, the extent and intensity of gp100 expression in advanced cutaneous melanoma has not been well studied. Here, we interrogated a large cohort of primary and metastatic melanomas for gp100 expression by immunohistochemistry. Expression in metastatic samples was globally higher and almost uniformly positive, however the degree of intensity was variable. Using a quantitative immunofluorescence method, we confirmed the variability in expression. As gp100-binding drugs are assessed in clinical trials, the association between activity of the drugs and the level of gp100 expression should be studied in order to potentially improve patient selection.

TIGIT expression in renal cell carcinoma infiltrating T cells is variable and inversely correlated with PD-1 and LAG3.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but many patients do not respond to therapy and the majority develop resistant disease over time. Thus, there is increasing need for alternative immunomodulating agents. The co-inhibitory molecule T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) may play a role in resistance to approved immune checkpoint inhibitors and is being investigated as a potential therapeutic target. The purpose of this study was to quantify TIGIT positivity in tumor-infiltrating T cells in RCC. METHODS: We employed tissue microarrays containing specimens from primary RCC tumors, adjacent normal renal tissue, and RCC metastases to quantify TIGIT within tumor-infiltrating CD3+ T cells using quantitative immunofluorescent analysis. We also compared these results to TIGIT+ CD3+ levels in four other tumor types (melanoma, non-small cell lung, cervical, and head and neck cancers). RESULTS: We did not observe significant differences in TIGIT positivity between primary RCC tumors and patient-matched metastatic samples. We found that the degree of TIGIT positivity in RCC is comparable to that in lung cancer but lower than that in melanoma, cervical, and head and neck cancers. Correlation analysis comparing TIGIT positivity to previously published, patient-matched spatial proteomic data by our group revealed a negative association between TIGIT and the checkpoint proteins PD-1 and LAG3. CONCLUSION: Our findings support careful evaluation of TIGIT expression on T cells in primary or metastatic RCC specimens for patients who may be treated with TIGIT-targeting antibodies, as increased TIGIT positivity might be associated with a greater likelihood of response to therapy.

Patterns of brain metastases response to immunotherapy with pembrolizumab.

PURPOSE: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from lung cancers and melanoma, significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in local therapies, there is a need for effective systemic treatments. Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has shown promise for some patients with untreated brain metastases from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to analyze the response of brain metastasis to pembrolizumab and associate characteristics like size and location with treatment outcome. METHODS: This retrospective study used imaging data from a phase II trial of pembrolizumab in melanoma or NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases. MRI evaluations were conducted at 2 month intervals, with each brain metastasis treated as a distinct tumor for response assessment, based on modified RECIST criteria (maximum 5 lesions, 5 mm target lesions). RESULTS: Of 130 individual target metastases (> 5 mm), in 65 patients with NSCLC (90 metastases) and Melanoma (40 metastases), 32 (24.6%) demonstrated complete resolution, 24 (18.5%) had partial resolution, 32 (24.6%) were SD and 42 (32.3%) demonstrated PD. Those smaller than 10 mm were more likely to show complete resolution (p = 0.0218), while those ≥ 10 mm were more likely to have PR. There was no significant association between size, number or location (supratentorial vs. infratentorial) and lesion progression. The median time to metastatic lesion progression in the brain was 5.7-7 weeks. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab is effective in brain metastases from NSCLC and melanoma, showing response (CR + PR) in 43% and progression (PD) in 32% of metastases. With the median time to CNS progression of 5.7-7 weeks, careful radiographic monitoring is essential to guide timely local treatment decisions.

Causes of death and patterns of metastatic disease at the end of life for patients with advanced melanoma in the immunotherapy era.

Despite remarkable advances in immunotherapy, melanoma remains a significant cause of cancer mortality. Many factors concerning melanoma mortality are poorly understood, posing an obstacle to optimal care. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 183 patients with metastatic melanoma who died following immunotherapy treatment to investigate sites of metastases at death, settings of death, and mechanisms of death. The median time from metastatic diagnosis to death was 16.1 months (range 0.3-135.1 months). Most patients experienced hospitalization within 3 months before death (80.3%), with 31.7% dying while hospitalized, 31.2% while in inpatient hospice, and 29.4% while in home hospice. The most common sites of metastases at death were distant lymph nodes (62.8%), lung (57.9%), liver (50.8%), brain (38.8%), and bone (37.7%). The most common causes of death were progressive failure to thrive (57.5%), respiratory failure (22.4%), and infection (21.8%); the vast majority (87.9%) of patients died from melanoma-specific causes. Overall, 10.9% of patients in our cohort had survival >5 years after metastatic diagnosis, and 76.2% of long-term survivors died due to melanoma. This study describes factors associated with melanoma mortality, highlighting an ongoing need for therapeutic advancements.

Spatially Informed Gene Signatures for Response to Immunotherapy in Melanoma.

PURPOSE: We aim to improve the prediction of response or resistance to immunotherapies in patients with melanoma. This goal is based on the hypothesis that current gene signatures predicting immunotherapy outcomes show only modest accuracy due to the lack of spatial information about cellular functions and molecular processes within tumors and their microenvironment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We collected gene expression data spatially from three cellular compartments defined by CD68+ macrophages, CD45+ leukocytes, and S100B+ tumor cells in 55 immunotherapy-treated melanoma specimens using Digital Spatial Profiling-Whole Transcriptome Atlas. We developed a computational pipeline to discover compartment-specific gene signatures and determine if adding spatial information can improve patient stratification. RESULTS: We achieved robust performance of compartment-specific signatures in predicting the outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the discovery cohort. Of the three signatures, the S100B signature showed the best performance in the validation cohort (N = 45). We also compared our compartment-specific signatures with published bulk signatures and found the S100B tumor spatial signature outperformed previous signatures. Within the eight-gene S100B signature, five genes (PSMB8, TAX1BP3, NOTCH3, LCP2, and NQO1) with positive coefficients predict the response, and three genes (KMT2C, OVCA2, and MGRN1) with negative coefficients predict the resistance to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the spatially defined compartment signatures utilize tumor and tumor microenvironment-specific information, leading to more accurate prediction of treatment outcome, and thus merit prospective clinical assessment.

Vascular mimicry as a facilitator of melanoma brain metastasis.

Melanoma has the highest propensity among solid tumors to metastasize to the brain. Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are a leading cause of death in melanoma and affect 40-60% of patients with late-stage disease. Therefore, uncovering the molecular mechanisms behind MBM is necessary to enhance therapeutic interventions. Vascular mimicry (VM) is a form of neovascularization linked to invasion, increased risk of metastasis, and poor prognosis in many tumor types, but its significance in MBM remains poorly understood. We found that VM density is elevated in MBM compared to paired extracranial specimens and is associated with tumor volume and CNS edema. In addition, our studies indicate a relevant role of YAP and TAZ, two transcriptional co-factors scarcely studied in melanoma, in tumor cell-vasculogenesis and in brain metastasis. We recently demonstrated activation of the Hippo tumor suppressor pathway and increased degradation of its downstream targets YAP and TAZ in a metastasis impaired cell line model. In the current study we establish the utility of anti-YAP/TAZ therapy in mouse models of metastatic melanoma whereby treatment effectively inhibits VM and prolongs survival of mice with MBM. The data presented herein suggest that VM may be an important and targetable mechanism in melanoma and that VM inhibition might be useful for treating MBM, an area of high unmet clinical need, thus having important implications for future treatment regimens for these patients.

Melanocortin-1 Receptor Expression as a Marker of Progression in Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) plays a critical role in human pigmentation and DNA repair mechanisms. MC1R-targeting agents are being investigated in clinical trials in patients with melanoma, yet large studies investigating the rate and degree of MC1R expression in primary and metastatic human melanoma tissue are lacking. METHODS: Using tissue microarrays containing three large cohorts of 225 cases of benign nevi, 189 with primary melanoma, and 271 with metastatic melanoma, we applied quantitative immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry to comprehensively study MC1R protein expression. RESULTS: We show a stepwise elevation of MC1R expression in different stages of melanoma progression (nevi, primary, metastasis). Higher MC1R expression was seen in deeper (>1 mm) primary lesions and ulcerated lesions and was associated with shorter survival in primary and metastatic tumors. On multivariable analysis, Breslow thickness, male sex, and chronic sun exposure were independent predictors of worse overall survival in the primary melanoma cohort. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that MC1R might be a valuable drug target in aggressive melanoma. Additional studies are warranted to determine its functional significance in melanoma progression and its utility as a predictive biomarker in patients receiving MC1R-directed therapies.

Digital spatial proteomic profiling reveals immune checkpoints as biomarkers in lymphoid aggregates and tumor microenvironment of desmoplastic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare melanoma subtype characterized by dense fibrous stroma, a propensity for local recurrence, and a high response rate to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. Occult sentinel lymph node positivity is significantly lower in both pure and mixed DM than in conventional melanoma, underscoring the need for better prognostic biomarkers to inform therapeutic strategies. METHODS: We assembled a tissue microarray comprising various cores of tumor, stroma, and lymphoid aggregates from 45 patients with histologically confirmed DM diagnosed between 1989 and 2018. Using a panel of 62 validated immune-oncology markers, we performed digital spatial profiling using the NanoString GeoMx platform and quantified expression in three tissue compartments defined by fluorescence colocalization (tumor (S100+/PMEL+/SYTO+), leukocytes (CD45+/SYTO+), and non-immune stroma (S100-/PMEL-/CD45-/SYTO+)). RESULTS: We observed higher expression of immune checkpoints (lymphocyte-activation gene 3 [LAG-3] and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 [CTLA-4]) and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) markers (smooth muscle actin (SMA)) in the tumor compartments of pure DMs than mixed DMs. When comparing lymphoid aggregates (LA) to non-LA tumor cores, LAs were more enriched with CD20+B cells, but non-LA intratumoral leukocytes were more enriched with macrophage/monocytic markers (CD163, CD68, CD14) and had higher LAG-3 and CTLA-4 expression levels. Higher intratumoral PD-1 and LA-based LAG-3 expression appear to be associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our proteomic analysis reveals an intra-tumoral population of SMA+CAFs enriched in pure DM. Additionally, increased expressions of immune checkpoints (LAG-3 and PD-1) in LA and within tumor were associated with poorer prognosis. These findings might have therapeutic implications and help guide treatment selection in addition to informing potential prognostic significance.

Circulating Tumor Reactive KIR+CD8+ T cells Suppress Anti-Tumor Immunity in Patients with Melanoma.

Effective anti-tumor immunity is largely driven by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells that can specifically recognize tumor antigens. However, the factors which ultimately dictate successful tumor rejection remain poorly understood. Here we identify a subpopulation of CD8+ T cells which are tumor antigen-specific in patients with melanoma but resemble KIR+CD8+ T cells with a regulatory function (Tregs). These tumor antigen-specific KIR+CD8+ T cells are detectable in both the tumor and the blood, and higher levels of this population are associated with worse overall survival. Our findings therefore suggest that KIR+CD8+ Tregs are tumor antigen-specific but uniquely suppress anti-tumor immunity in patients with melanoma.

Immunotherapy utilization in stage IIIA melanoma: less may be more.

Background: Immunotherapy agents are approved for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma; however, evidence for survival benefit in early stage III disease is lacking. Current guidelines for adjuvant immunotherapy utilization in stage IIIA rely on clinician judgment, creating an opportunity for significant variation in prescribing patterns. This study aimed to characterize current immunotherapy practice variations and to compare patient outcomes for different prescribing practices in stage IIIA melanoma. Study design: Patients with melanoma diagnosed from 2015-2019 that met American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition criteria for stage IIIA and underwent resection were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multiple imputation by chained equations replaced missing values. Factors associated with receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy were identified. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression compared overall survival across groups. Results: Of 4,432 patients included in the study, 34% received adjuvant immunotherapy. Patients had lower risk-adjusted odds of receiving immunotherapy if they were treated at an academic center (OR=0.48, 95%CI=0.33-0.72, p<0.001 vs. community facility) or at a high-volume center (OR=0.69, 0.56-0.84, p<0.001 vs. low-volume). Immunotherapy receipt was not associated with risk-adjusted survival (p=0.095). Moreover, patients treated at high-volume centers experienced longer overall risk-adjusted survival than those treated at low-volume centers (HR=0.52, 0.29-0.93, p=0.030). Risk-adjusted survival trended toward being longer at academic centers than at community centers, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Academic and high-volume centers utilize significantly less adjuvant immunotherapy in stage IIIA melanoma than community and low-volume centers without compromise in overall survival. These findings suggest that this population may benefit from more judicious immunotherapy utilization.

CD70 is Consistently Expressed in Primary and Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: CD70 is commonly overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma and is minimally expressed in normal human tissue, making it a potential therapeutic target for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The expression frequency of CD70 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is not well established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed CD70 immunohistochemistry in 391 primary renal tumors and 72 metastatic renal cell carcinomas on a tissue microarray including 26 sets of paired primary and metastatic tumors. RESULTS: CD70 was frequently overexpressed in clear cell carcinoma, with a significantly lower expression rate in papillary renal cell carcinoma (P < .0001). No expression of CD70 was detected in other types of renal tumors and normal renal parenchyma. In clear cell renal cell carcinoma, CD70 expression was significantly correlated with hypoxia pathway proteins, corroborating with a recent study suggesting that CD70 is a downstream target gene of hypoxia-inducible factor. While higher expression levels were observed in males and non-Caucasians, CD70 expression was not associated with tumor grade, sarcomatoid differentiation, stage, or cancer-specific survival. Further, analysis of 26 paired primary and metastatic tumors from same individuals revealed a concordance rate of 85%. CONCLUSION: Our findings validated CD70 as a promising therapeutic target for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The utility of primary tumor tissue as surrogate samples for metastatic clear cell carcinoma awaits future CD70-targeted clinical trials.

Immunotherapy Initiation at the End of Life in Patients With Metastatic Cancer in the US.

Importance: While immunotherapy is being used in an expanding range of clinical scenarios, the incidence of immunotherapy initiation at the end of life (EOL) is unknown. Objective: To describe patient characteristics, practice patterns, and risk factors concerning EOL-initiated (EOL-I) immunotherapy over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using a US national clinical database of patients with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or kidney cell carcinoma (KCC) diagnosed after US Food and Drug Administration approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of each disease through December 2019. Mean follow-up was 13.7 months. Data analysis was performed from December 2022 to May 2023. Exposures: Age, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance, location, facility type, hospital volume, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index, and location of metastases. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were EOL-I immunotherapy, defined as immunotherapy initiated within 1 month of death, and characteristics of the cohort receiving EOL-I immunotherapy and factors associated with its use. Results: Overall, data for 242 371 patients were analyzed. The study included 20 415 patients with stage IV melanoma, 197 331 patients with stage IV NSCLC, and 24 625 patients with stage IV KCC. Mean (SD) age was 67.9 (11.4) years, 42.5% were older than 70 years, 56.0% were male, and 29.3% received immunotherapy. The percentage of patients who received EOL-I immunotherapy increased over time for all cancers. More than 1 in 14 immunotherapy treatments in 2019 were initiated within 1 month of death. Risk-adjusted patients with 3 or more organs involved in metastatic disease were 3.8-fold more likely (95% CI, 3.1-4.7; P < .001) to die within 1 month of immunotherapy initiation than those with lymph node involvement only. Treatment at an academic or high-volume center rather than a nonacademic or very low-volume center was associated with a 31% (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.74; P < .001) and 30% (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.65-0.76; P < .001) decrease in odds of death within a month of initiating immunotherapy, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study show that the initiation of immunotherapy at the EOL is increasing over time. Patients with higher metastatic burden and who were treated at nonacademic or low-volume facilities had higher odds of receiving EOL-I immunotherapy. Tracking EOL-I immunotherapy can offer insights into national prescribing patterns and serve as a harbinger for shifts in the clinical approach to patients with advanced cancer.

Clinical Predictors of Survival in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibitors After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Prospective and between trial comparisons indicate that first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors improves survival outcomes compared to first-line therapy with combined BRAF and MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma containing BRAFV600E/K mutations. Long-term outcomes for BRAF/MEK inhibition after progression on immunotherapy have not been reported. Moreover, clinical variables associated with outcome from treatment with combined BRAF/MEK inhibition were previously identified in the first-line setting but have not been investigated when targeted therapies are administered after progression on immune therapy. We performed a retrospective single institution analysis of 40 metastatic melanoma patients receiving combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors after progression on an anti-PD-1 or ipilimumab plus nivolumab to assess response rate by RECIST 1.1, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS). Pretreatment clinical variables were analyzed for association with OS. Ipilimumab/nivolumab was the first-line immunotherapy regimen in 39 patients (97.5%), and BRAFV600E/K mutations were present in 33 (83%) and 7 (17%) patients, respectively. The median OS from start of BRAF/MEK inhibitors was 20.3 months (1.73-106.4+, 95% CI of median 13.3-30.7). Clinical characteristics associated with worse survival prior to starting BRAF/MEK inhibitors included age > 60 years (median OS 14 vs. 28 months; HR 2.5; 95% CI 0.91-6.87, P = .023), ECOG-PS > 2 (median OS 7 vs. 33 months; HR 2.89; 95% CI 0.78-10.76, P = .018), and presence of bone metastases (median OS 9 vs. 52 months; HR 3.17; 95% CI 1.33-7.54, P = .002). These associations with shorter survival maintained their significance on multivariate analysis. If confirmed in larger cohorts, the identified prognostic variables can be used for stratification of patients in future randomized trials.

Educational Review: Clinical Application of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Melanoma.

In the last decade, immunotherapy has become the cornerstone in the management of patients with melanoma, the foremost cause of skin-cancer-related death in the USA. The emergence of immune checkpoint blockade as a crucial element in current immunotherapy and combination strategies has significantly transformed the treatments of resectable and advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. This paper reviews the landmark clinical trials that formed the basis of management of melanoma in the perioperative and metastatic setting. Furthermore, we discuss the rationale for the applications of PD-1 blockade and its combination with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-LAG-3. The review also explores new experimental combinations of PD-1 blockade with other immunomodulatory agents, including targeted therapies, anti-TIGIT antibodies, TLR-9 agonists, antiangiogenic agents, and mRNA vaccines.

Leptomeningeal disease in melanoma: An update on the developments in pathophysiology and clinical care.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a major challenge in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma patients. Outcomes for patient remain poor, and patients with LMD continue to be excluded from almost all clinical trials. However, recent trials have demonstrated the feasibility of conducting prospective clinical trials in these patients. Further, new insights into the pathophysiology of LMD are identifying rational new therapeutic strategies. Here we present recent advances in the understanding of, and treatment options for, LMD from metastatic melanoma. We also annotate key areas of future focus to accelerate progress for this challenging but emerging field.

A Phase II Trial of the CD40 Agonistic Antibody Sotigalimab (APX005M) in Combination with Nivolumab in Subjects with Metastatic Melanoma with Confirmed Disease Progression on Anti-PD-1 Therapy.

PURPOSE: Disease progression during or after anti-PD-1-based treatment is common in advanced melanoma. Sotigalimab is a CD40 agonist antibody with a unique epitope specificity and Fc receptor binding profile optimized for activation of CD40-expressing antigen-presenting cells. Preclinical data indicated that CD40 agonists combined with anti-PD1 could overcome resistance to anti-PD-1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase II trial to evaluate the combination of sotigalimab 0.3 mg/kg and nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks in patients with advanced melanoma following confirmed disease progression on a PD-1 inhibitor. The primary objective was to determine the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled and evaluable for safety. Thirty-three were evaluable for activity. Five confirmed partial responses (PR) were observed for an ORR of 15%. Two PRs are ongoing at 45.9+ and 26+ months, whereas the other three responders relapsed at 41.1, 18.7, and 18.4 months. The median duration of response was at least 26 months. Two additional patients had stable disease for >6 months. Thirty-four patients (89%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), and 13% experienced a grade 3 AE related to sotigalimab. The most common AEs were pyrexia, chills, nausea, fatigue, pruritus, elevated liver function, rash, vomiting, headache, arthralgia, asthenia, myalgia, and diarrhea. There were no treatment-related SAEs, deaths, or discontinuation of sotigalimab due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Sotigalimab plus nivolumab had a favorable safety profile consistent with the toxicity profiles of each agent. The combination resulted in durable and prolonged responses in a subset of patients with anti-PD-1-resistant melanoma, warranting further evaluation in this setting. See related commentary by Wu and Luke, p. 9.

A bedside to bench study of anti-PD-1, anti-CD40, and anti-CSF1R indicates that more is not necessarily better.

BACKGROUND: Stimulating inflammatory tumor associated macrophages can overcome resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade. We previously conducted a phase I trial of cabiralizumab (anti-CSF1R), sotigalimab (CD40-agonist) and nivolumab. Our current purpose was to study the activity and cellular effects of this three-drug regimen in anti-PD-1-resistant melanoma. METHODS: We employed a Simon's two-stage design and analyzed circulating immune cells from patients treated with this regimen for treatment-related changes. We assessed various dose levels of anti-CSF1R in murine melanoma models and studied the cellular and molecular effects. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled in the first stage. We observed one (7.7%) confirmed and one (7.7%) unconfirmed partial response, 5 patients had stable disease (38.5%) and 6 disease progression (42.6%). We elected not to proceed to the second stage. CyTOF analysis revealed a reduction in non-classical monocytes. Patients with prolonged stable disease or partial response who remained on study for longer had increased markers of antigen presentation after treatment compared to patients whose disease progressed rapidly. In a murine model, higher anti-CSF1R doses resulted in increased tumor growth and worse survival. Using single-cell RNA-sequencing, we identified a suppressive monocyte/macrophage population in murine tumors exposed to higher doses. CONCLUSIONS: Higher anti-CSF1R doses are inferior to lower doses in a preclinical model, inducing a suppressive macrophage population, and potentially explaining the disappointing results observed in patients. While it is impossible to directly infer human doses from murine studies, careful intra-species evaluation can provide important insight. Cabiralizumab dose optimization is necessary for this patient population with limited treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03502330.

Digital spatial profiling of melanoma shows CD95 expression in immune cells is associated with resistance to immunotherapy.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has dramatically improved outcome for metastatic melanoma patients, many patients do not benefit. Since adverse events may be severe, biomarkers for resistance would be valuable, especially in the adjuvant setting. We performed high-plex digital spatial profiling (DSP) using the NanoString GeoMx® on 53 pre-treatment specimens from ICI-treated metastatic melanoma cases. We interrogated 77 targets simultaneously in four molecular compartments defined by S100B for tumor, CD68 for macrophages, CD45 for leukocytes, and nonimmune stromal cells defined as regions negative for all three compartment markers but positive for SYTO 13. For DSP validation, we confirmed the results obtained for some immune markers, such as CD8, CD4, CD20, CD68, CD45, and PD-L1, by quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF). In the univariable analysis, 38 variables were associated with outcome, 14 of which remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Among them, CD95 was further validated using multiplex immunofluorescence in the Discovery immunotherapy (ITX) Cohort and an independent validation cohort with similar characteristics, showing an association between high levels of CD95 and shorter progression-free survival. We found that CD95 in stroma was associated with resistance to ICI. With further validation, this biomarker could have value to select patients that will not benefit from immunotherapy.

Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) expression as a marker of progression in melanoma.

Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) plays a critical role in human pigmentation and DNA repair mechanisms. MC1R-targeting agents are being investigated in clinical trials in melanoma patients, yet large studies investigating the rate and degree of MC1R expression in primary and metastatic human melanoma tissue are lacking. Using tissue microarrays containing three large cohorts of 225 cases of benign nevi, 189 with primary melanoma, and 271 with metastatic melanoma, we applied quantitative immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry to comprehensively study MC1R protein expression. We show a stepwise elevation of MC1R expression in different stages of melanoma progression (nevi, primary, metastasis). Higher MC1R expression was seen in deeper (>1 mm) primary lesions, ulcerated lesions, and mucosal melanomas compared to cutaneous melanomas and was associated with shorter survival in primary and metastatic tumors. On multi-variable analysis, Breslow thickness, ulceration, male sex, and chronic sun exposure were independent predictors of worse overall survival in the primary melanoma cohort. In the metastatic melanoma cohort, MC1R expression and mucosal melanomas were independent predictors of inferior overall survival. Our data suggest that MC1R might be a valuable drug target in aggressive melanoma. Additional studies are warranted to determine its functional significance in melanoma progression and its utility as a predictive biomarker in patients receiving MC1R-directed therapies.