Demographic and clinical data in acquired hemophilia A: results from the European Acquired Haemophilia Registry (EACH2).

BACKGROUND: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII and characterized by spontaneous hemorrhage in patients with no previous family or personal history of bleeding. Although data on several AHA cohorts have been collected, limited information is available on the optimal management of AHA. OBJECTIVES: The European Acquired Hemophilia Registry (EACH2) was established to generate a prospective, large-scale, pan-European database on demographics, diagnosis, underlying disorders, bleeding characteristics, treatment and outcome of AHA patients. RESULTS: Five hundred and one (266 male, 235 female) patients from 117 centers and 13 European countries were included in the registry between 2003 and 2008. In 467 cases, hemostasis investigations and AHA diagnosis were triggered by a bleeding event. At diagnosis, patients were a median of 73.9 years. AHA was idiopathic in 51.9%; malignancy or autoimmune diseases were associated with 11.8% and 11.6% of cases. Fifty-seven per cent of the non-pregnancy-related cases were male. Four hundred and seventy-four bleeding episodes were reported at presentation, and hemostatic therapy initiated in 70.5% of patients. Delayed diagnosis significantly impacted treatment initiation in 33.5%. Four hundred and seventy-seven patients underwent immunosuppression, and 72.6% achieved complete remission. CONCLUSIONS: Representing the largest collection of consecutive AHA cases to date, EACH2 facilitates the analysis of a variety of open questions in AHA.

Postoperative paraneoplastic factor VIII auto-antibodies in patients with solid tumours.

Paraneoplastic FVIII antibodies may occur concurrent with the diagnosis or at various times after diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Between 2002 and 2009, we observed two patients with acquired haemophilia A due to an FVIII auto-antibody, which appeared 4 and 5 months after uncomplicated cancer surgery. We aimed to evaluate if such an association of cancer surgery and FVIII antibody formation has been observed previously. We retrieved all published case reports of cancer-associated FVIII auto-antibodies from PubMed for the period 1950-2010. The search in the literature revealed 13 patients in whom a FVIII inhibitor developed after uncomplicated surgery for cancer and a bleeding-free time interval of up to 6 months; 11/15 patients had abdominal cancers (five colon cancer, four pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer and choledochus carcinoma one each). The median time period between surgery and antibody detection was 3 months (1 week-6 months). In most cases, the antibody titre was low (median: 14 BU mL⁻¹, range: 1.7-64 BU mL⁻¹). Immunosuppressive treatment was successful in most of the cases - nine of the treated patients reached a sustained CR of the antibody after a median time of 3 months. Postoperative paraneoplastic FVIII inhibitors may be regarded as a special, not yet recognized subgroup of acquired FVIII antibodies. They share some characteristics with postpartum FVIII inhibitors with regard to the latency period between the triggering event and the appearance of the antibody, and between the usually low antibody titres and their good response to immunosuppressive treatment.

Prostaglandin E(1) does not influence plasmatic coagulation, hepatic synthesis, or postoperative blood loss in patients after coronary-artery bypass grafting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether postoperatively administered prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) might prevent bleeding in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: 49 patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The PGE1 group received intravenous PGE(1) up to 15 ng/kg/min for 72 hours after surgery, whereas the placebo group received isotonic saline for the same time period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nine patients (4 in the PGE1 group vs. 5 in the placebo group) had to be excluded because of hemodynamic instability, and 1 in the placebo group because of gastric bleeding. In the remaining 39 patients (20 vs. 19), no significant differences with regard to hemoglobin levels or platelet count could be observed. There was no significant difference between the groups concerning the amount of packed red blood cells, platelet concentrates, or fresh frozen plasma transfused. No significant differences could be observed regarding laboratory markers of coagulation activation or hepatic synthesis either. CONCLUSIONS: PGE1 did not prevent coagulation disturbances and blood loss when administered postoperatively in patients undergoing CABG. The absence of these expected effects might be explained by the concomitant administration of acetylsalicylic acid, whose antiaggregatory acivity seems to exceed the effects of PGE1.

Post-transplant acute myeloid leukemia (PT-AML).

Acute myeloid leukemia following organ transplantation (PT-AML) is a rare event with only a few published cases in the literature. We present three patients who developed AML (FAB M1, M5, M4) after renal, double lung or liver transplantation. Molecular analysis detected a t(9;11) in one patient and documented the recipient origin of AML in a second patient. All patients were treated with chemotherapy. Immunosuppression was reduced to cyclosporin A (CsA) and prednisone in two patients and to prednisone alone in one patient. Two patients achieved a complete remission (CR), with a remission duration of 4.6 months in one patient, the other patient died from septicemia after 15.2 months in CR. One patient was refractory to chemotherapy and died from septicemia. This report together with the documented cases in the literature suggests that PT-AML (1) develops after a median interval of 5 years after transplantation with variable latency (range, <1-17 years); (2) is heterogeneous with respect to FAB classification; (3) shows chromosomal and molecular changes typical of therapy-related AML (t-AML: -7, +8, 11q23, inv16, t(15;17)); (4) standard chemotherapy is feasible after reduction of immunosuppression and produces a CR rate of 56% with a median remission duration of 4.6 months and an overall survival of 2.6 months; (5) the major complications are early death (25%), gram-negative septicemia, progressive disease or relapse. This review provides diagnostic and therapeutic experiences and guidelines for the management of this increasing group of post-transplant patients.

Leukemia-free survival and mortality in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia given marrow transplants from sibling and unrelated donors.

Between April 1982 and February 1997 39 patients (24 male, 15 female) with refractory acute leukemia and a median age of 31 years (19-51 years) received allogeneic marrow grafts from an HLA-identical sibling (n = 27), HLA-identical unrelated donor (MUD; n = 10) or 1-antigen mismatched unrelated donor (n = 2). Twenty-eight patients had acute myelogenous leukemia and 11 acute lymphoblastic leukemia. For conditioning most patients received total body irradiation combined with cyclophosphamide (n = 23) or etoposide (n = 7). For graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis patients received cyclosporin A (CsA) and methotrexate (MTX) (n = 20), MTX alone (n = 3), CsA and methylprednisone (n = 6), or CsA alone (n = 10), respectively. As of June 1997 probability of leukemia-free survival projected to 3 years after BMT was 14% for patients given sibling marrow grafts and 28% after MUD transplantation. Transplant-related mortality projected to 3 years was 32% after sibling and 37% after MUD marrow grafting. Although not significantly different, probability of relapse projected to 3 years after BMT was lower after MUD at 56% compared to 78% with sibling BMT. Thus, high-dose chemo/radiotherapy followed by allogeneic marrow infusion has a curative potential for patients with refractory leukemia and offers the chance of long-term disease-free survival for some patients.

Prostaglandin E1 inhibits platelet decrease after massive blood transfusions during major surgery: influence on coagulation cascade?

BACKGROUND: A plunge in platelet count if often observed after massive blood transfusions during major surgery. This study was designed to assess whether the prophylactic administration of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) might prevent this drop in platelet count. METHODS: Forty-five patients receiving massive transfusions of packed red blood cells (> 10 units) during major orthopedic surgery were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and divided into two groups: group 1 (therapy group) received intravenous PGE1 up to 30 ng/kg/min for 72 hours after surgery, and group 2 (placebo group) received a placebo during the same time period. RESULTS: The patients in group 1 suffered no reduction in platelet count and thus required no platelet concentrate transfusions. In contrast, a significant postoperative drop in platelet count (p < 0.05) was observed in the placebo group between days 3 and 5 after surgery when compared to the therapy group, necessitating transfusions of platelet concentrates in this group. Similarly, red blood cell count and hemoglobin were far more stable in the therapy group, which required fewer transfusions of red blood cells than did the placebo group (p < 0.05). There seemed to be a tendency toward a consumptive coagulation disorder in the placebo group as indicated by a decrease of fibrinogen levels, prothrombin time, and antithrombin III activity, and an increase of partial thromboplastin time. The incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome was slightly lower in the therapy group. Last but not least, the length of intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter in the therapy group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our study, the administration of PGE1 prevented a reduction in platelet count. Furthermore, measurements of clotting activity furnished the possibility that PGE1 might inhibit transfusion-induced coagulation disturbances. We recommend that PGE1 should be considered in patients requiring massive transfusion during major surgery.