Polyaxial locking plate fixation in periprosthetic, peri-implant and distal shaft fractures of the femur : a comparison of open and less invasive surgical approaches.

Polyaxial locking plate fixation is a widely performed treatment for femoral shaft, periprosthetic, and peri-implant fractures in elderly patients. This study's purpose was to compare patient outcomes following the open technique (OT) and less invasive techniques (LIT). Data were gathered from 44 patients with 46 fractures treated with polyaxial locking plate between 2010-2015. Twenty fractures underwent the OT and 26 had a LIT. Long-term assessments for 83% of the fractures were done at a median of 23 months postoperatively. Bone healing rates were 82% in the OT and 100% in the LIT group (p=0.0688). The difference in the median duration of the surgery (OT 120 minutes, LIT 73 minutes) (p< 0.001) was the main statistically significant finding. Both surgical techniques resulted in similarly favourable outcomes. The LIT would be the preferred operating technique, especially when treating patients more susceptible to intra- and/or postoperative morbidity.

A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes following direct anterior hip arthroplasty with or without a surgical extension table.

PURPOSE: Using a surgical extension table during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely considered state-of-the-art. However, intra-operative leg positioning requires additional time and leg length determination can be challenging. Our study's aim was to compare patient outcomes, particularly leg length precision, following surgery with or without an extension table. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from medical records of 324 patients who underwent THA using the direct anterior approach by one surgeon at a Swiss cantonal hospital (2015-2017). Patients were grouped by table type-standard (TS) or extension table (TE). Variables analyzed were demographics, operative/anaesthetic conditions, and medical outcomes. The leg length was measured pre- and post-operatively with mediCAD Classic®. RESULTS: An extension table was used in 161 (49.7%) patients. The median operative duration (minutes) was shorter in TS (55 (interquartile range (IQR) 48-67) than TE (60 (IQR 54-69)) (p = 0.002) and blood loss (ml) was lower (TS = 400 (IQR 300-500), TE = 500 (IQR 300-600), p = 0.0175). The median post-operative leg length discrepancy (mm) was less in TS (TS = 1 (IQR 0-3), TE = 2 (IQR 0-4), p = 0.0122). All four dislocations occurred in TE, and 7.4% of patients had complications (TS = 7%, TE = 7.5%, p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: We found that operating on a standard table during THA resulted in slightly more favourable outcomes. Given the added expenses, human resources, and time associated with an extension table, opting for a standard table remains a sensible choice.

Reconstrucción anatómica del Acromion en casos de fracturas traumáticas y posterior a artroplastia reversa del Hombro. Reporte de Casos / Anatomic reconstruction of the acromion in cases of traumatic fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Report of a series of cases

Introducción Tanto las fracturas traumáticas del acromion, así como las fracturas acromiales por insuficiencia posterior a artroplastia reversa del hombro, son entidades poco frecuentes. Con la ampliación des los criterios operativos para la artroplastia reversa del hombro, es de suponer un aumento en el caso des las fracturas acromiales por insuficiencia posteriores a dicho procedimiento quirúrgico. Al ser estas entidades poco frecuentes hacen falta en la literatura recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para el manejo de estas, las cuales representan un reto para el especialista tratante. Materiales y Métodos Reporte de seis casos entre 2013 y 2016 en el hospital cantonal de Frauenfeld (Suiza) de dos grupos de pacientes con fracturas del Acromion. En el grupo A se clasificaron tres pacientes que presentaron fractura por insuficiencia del acromion posterior a artroplastia reversa del Hombro. En el grupo B clasificaron tres pacientes con fracturas traumáticas del acromion en las cuales el manejo conservador no fue exitoso. Los dos grupos de pacientes fueron sometidos al mismo método quirúrgico con reducción abierta y reconstrucción anatómica del Acromion por medio de fijación con placa y tornillos interfragmentarios. Resultados Posterior a la intervención quirúrgica, la función del hombro se recuperó en todos los pacientes del Grupo A. La flexión anterior aumentó en promedio de 53° a 127°, y la abducción mejoró de 52° a 125°. Las mediciones posteriores al año de la intervención mostraron puntajes constantes entre 55-71, así como un valor subjetivo de hombro (SSV) de 50-90. En el Grupo B, el rango de movimiento preoperatorio se mantuvo constante. La flexión hacia delante mejoró de 133° a 157° y la abducción aumentó de 147° a 153°. Un año después de la cirugía, los puntajes de Constant en el grupo B variaron de 70 a 86 y el SSV se encontró entre 80 a 100. Los tres pacientes del Grupo B consiguieron retomar sus actividades diarias sin dolor y pudieron regresar al trabajo. La extracción de la placa fue necesaria en la mitad de los pacientes de la cohorte (Grupo A n=1, Grupo B n=2). Discusión La fractura del acromion es una condición seria que puede causar daño significativo al funcionamiento del hombro. Tanto en pacientes con ARH así como en pacientes sin ARH previa, nuestra técnica operativa abierta de reconstrucción anatómica del acromion mostró buenos resultados. Recomendamos el manejo quirúrgico por medio de reconstrucción con placa y clavos de fijación. Nivel de evidencia: IV

Aim To propose a surgical technique to treat the traumatic acromion fractures, as well as acromion fractures before reverse total Shoulder Replacement (TSR). Methods Six patients were treated with the same fixation technique between December 2013 and December 2016. Three patients had acromial insufficiency fractures (type II) following TSR (Group A). The other three patients, who had traumatic acromion fractures, underwent unsuccessful conservative treatment (Group B). Surgical treatment involved reconstruction of the acromion using an open technique with plate and interfragmentary screw fixation. Results Following reconstruction, shoulder function was regained in all patients in Group A. Forward flexion increased, on average, from 53° to 127°, and abduction improved from 52° to 125°. Measurements at one-year follow-up were Constant scores from 55-71, and subjective shoulder value (SSV) from 50-90. In Group B, preoperative range of motion was not substantially diminished. Forward flexion improved from 133° to 157°, and abduction increased from 147° to 153°. One year following surgery, the Constant scores in Group B ranged from 70-86, and SSV was 80-100. All three patients performed daily activities without pain, and were able to return to work. Plate removal was necessary in half the patients in the cohort (Group A n=1; Group B n=2). Conclusion An acromion fracture is a serious condition that can cause significant damage to shoulder functioning. In patients with or without previous TSR, this fixation technique was used successfully to reconstruct the anatomic lateral and basal acromion. Evidence Level: IV

The traumatic acromion fracture: review of the literature, clinical examples and proposal of a treatment algorithm.

PURPOSE: Traumatic acromion fractures are rare and typically occur in patients with multiple fractures, which often delays diagnosis. Limited guidance exists on the treatment of these fractures. We present a review of the literature from the last 20 years and describe our experience in treating five patients-two conservatively and three with open reduction and internal fixations (ORIF). METHODS: We used the U.S. National Library of Science database, MEDLINE®, to search for all pertinent publications from January 1999 to December 2017. Included were retrospective or prospective studies, including case series and case reports, describing treatment for traumatic acromion fractures and clinical and/or radiological outcomes. For our case reports, we present five patients with traumatic acromion fractures who were treated at our institution between 2013 and 2017. RESULTS: Through our review of 14 publications, we found that current recommendations are often based on a limited number of cases. No gold standard to treat these fractures exists. Most authors recommend anatomic reconstruction, especially for dislocated fractures, persistent symptomatic non-unions or additional injuries to the superior shoulder suspensory complex. There is no clear trend in terms of the operative technique. With regard to our five clinical examples that were all initially treated conservatively, two were successful and three eventually required reconstruction with ORIF. Based on the findings of this review, we proposed a treatment algorithm for traumatic acromion fractures. CONCLUSIONS: A classification system providing clear guidance on treatment options is needed. Although the non-union rate with conservative treatment is relatively high, it is not always painful or limiting to shoulder function, especially in elderly or less active patients. Fixation seems to be a more suitable treatment option for active patients who are more likely to require revision of symptomatic non-unions.

Decision-making for complex scapula and ipsilateral clavicle fractures: a review.

INTRODUCTION: Complex scapula with ipsilateral clavicle fracures remains a challange and treatment recommendations are still missing.  This review provides an overview of the evolution of the definition, classification and treatment strategies for complex scapula and ipsilateral clavicle fractures. As with other rare conditions, consensus has not been reached on the most suitable management strategies to treat these patients. The aim of this review is twofold: to compile and summarize the currently available literature on this topic, and to recommend treatment approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in the review are the following topics: biomechanics of scapula and ipsilateral clavicle fractures, preoperative radiological evaluation, surgical treatment of the clavicle only, surgical treatment of both the clavicle and scapula, and nonsurgical treatment options. RESULTS: A decision-making algorithm is proposed for different treatment strategies based on pre-operative parameters, and an example of a case treated our institution is presented to illustrate use of the algorithm. DISCUSSION: The role of instability in complex scapula with ipsilateral clavicle fractures remains unclear. The question of stability is preoperatively less relevant than the question of whether the dislocated fragments lead to compromised shoulder function.

Anatomical reconstruction to treat acromion fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are often associated with substantial shoulder impairment. Patient outcomes following either conservative or operative treatment have not been favourable, and consensus is lacking on the best treatment approach. We describe a technique for anatomic reconstruction of fractured lateral and basal acromion in patients at higher risk for diminished function or those for which conservative treatment has already failed. METHODS: Of the 95 patients who underwent RSA at our institution between December 2013 and December 2016, three had post-operative acromion fractures (type II). Two of these patients had secondary dislocation and one underwent conservative treatment that failed. In all three cases, the acromion was reconstructed using an open technique with plate and interfragmentary screw fixation. RESULTS: After the acromial fracture and prior to reconstructive surgery, the shoulder function decreased substantially in all three cases. Following reconstruction, forward flexion improved from 53.0° to 127°, and abduction improved from 52.0 to 125°. The range of the Constant scores at the one year follow-up was 55-71, and the subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 50-90. One patient reached the same active range of motion (ROM) as her pre-fracture status, and the two other patients improved but did not regain the previous ROM level. CONCLUSION: Acromion fractures after RSA are serious complications that have the potential to cause severe shoulder function impairment. Our fixation technique for anatomic lateral and basal acromion reconstruction was used safely to treat three patients with poor shoulder function due to secondary dislocation or non-unions.

Short- and long-term outcomes following hallux-valgus correction: a modified Kramer osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Short- and long-term assessments were performed of a modification to the Kramer osteotomy that developed to stabilize the metatarsal head using an angular implant, the LINK(®) internal hallux fixator (Waldemar LINK GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany). METHODS: For this retrospective study, radiological assessments were used to measure outcomes in 72 feet with hallux valgus treated from 2006 to 2011. The hallux-valgus angle, the intermetatarsal angle between the first and second intermetarsal shaft axes, and the distal metatarsal articular angle were measured at short- and long-term intervals. Long-term clinical assessments included results of the Foot Function Index and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Forefoot Score. RESULTS: Of the 72 feet treated, 12 were done as bilateral operations. Fifty-five patients at a mean age of 52 years (±12; range 22-78) were included in short-term assessments. Significant improvements in angular measurements were made (p < 0.001) between baseline and 3 month assessments. Three postoperative complications occurred and 40 % (29/72) of the implants were eventually removed. Fifty-five of the 72 feet were available for long-term assessments at a median of 5 years postoperatively (IQR 5-7; range 3-9). No significant loss of correction was detected (p = 0.373). Clinical assessments indicated successful outcomes in 86 % (47/55) of the feet, with slightly better results in older patients (p = 0.033; OR 1.1, CI 95 % 1.01-1.15). CONCLUSION: This technique can achieve normal angular configuration, even with severe deformities, without significant long-term loss of correction. Patients should be informed of potential discomfort necessitating hardware removal, although the likelihood of complications is low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III study.