Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e059172, 2022 06 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35768092

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three tests-radial pulse palpation, an electronic blood pressure monitor and a handheld single-lead ECG device-for opportunistic screening for unknown atrial fibrillation (AF). DESIGN: We performed a diagnostic accuracy study in the intention-to-screen arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial aimed at opportunistic screening for AF in general practice. We performed radial pulse palpation, followed by electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A) and handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) in random order. If one or more index tests were positive, we performed a 12-lead ECG at shortest notice. Similarly, to limit verification bias, a random sample of patients with three negative index tests received this reference test. Additionally, we analysed the dataset using multiple imputation. We present pooled diagnostic parameters. SETTING: 47 general practices participated between September 2015 and August 2018. PARTICIPANTS: In the electronic medical record system of the participating general practices (n=47), we randomly marked 200 patients of ≥65 years without AF. When they visited the practice for any reason, we invited them to participate. Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, inability to give informed consent or visit the practice or having a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. OUTCOMES: Diagnostic accuracy of individual tests and test combinations to detect unknown AF. RESULTS: We included 4339 patients; 0.8% showed new AF. Sensitivity and specificity were 62.8% (range 43.1%-69.7%) and 91.8% (91.7%-91.8%) for radial pulse palpation, 70.0% (49.0%-80.6%) and 96.5% (96.3%-96.7%) for electronic blood pressure measurement and 90.1% (60.8%-100%) and 97.9% (97.8%-97.9%) for handheld ECG, respectively. Positive predictive values were 5.8% (5.3%-6.1%), 13.8% (12.2%-14.8%) and 25.2% (24.2%-25.8%), respectively. All negative predictive values were ≥99.7%. CONCLUSION: In detecting AF, electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A), but especially handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) showed better diagnostic accuracy than radial pulse palpation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register No. NL4776 (old NTR4914).


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Pressão Sanguínea , Eletrocardiografia , Eletrônica , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Palpação , Atenção Primária à Saúde
2.
J Clin Med ; 10(4)2021 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33562702

RESUMO

Background: We conducted a comprehensive medication review at the patients' home, using data from electronic patient records, and with input from relevant specialists, general practitioners and pharmacists formulated and implemented recommendations to optimize medication use in patients aged 60+ years with polypharmacy. We evaluated the effect of this medication review on quality of life (QoL) and medication use. Methods: Cluster randomized controlled trial (stepped wedge), randomly assigning general practices to one of three consecutive steps. Patients received usual care until the intervention was implemented. Primary outcome was QoL (SF-36 and EQ-5D); secondary outcomes were medication changes, medication adherence and (instrumental) activities of daily living (ADL, iADL) which were measured at baseline, and around 6- and 12-months post intervention. Results: Twenty-four general practices included 360 women and 410 men with an average age of 75 years (SD 7.5). A positive effect on SF-36 mental health (estimated mean was stable in the intervention, but decreased in the control condition with -6.1, p = 0.009,) was found with a reduced number of medications at follow-up compared to the control condition. No significant effects were found on other QoL subscales, ADL, iADL or medication adherence. Conclusion: The medication review prevented decrease of mental health (SF36), with no significant effects on other outcome measures, apart from a reduction in the number of prescribed medications.

4.
BMJ ; 370: m3208, 2020 09 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938633

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether opportunistic screening in primary care increases the detection of atrial fibrillation compared with usual care. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 47 intention-to-screen and 49 usual care primary care practices in the Netherlands, not blinded for allocation; the study was carried out from September 2015 to August 2018. PARTICIPANTS: In each practice, a fixed sample of 200 eligible patients, aged 65 or older, with no known history of atrial fibrillation in the electronic medical record system, were randomly selected. In the intention-to-screen group, 9218 patients eligible for screening were included, 55.0% women, mean age 75.2 years. In the usual care group, 9526 patients were eligible for screening, 54.3% women, mean age 75.0 years. INTERVENTIONS: Opportunistic screening (that is, screening in patients visiting their general practice) consisted of three index tests: pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement with an atrial fibrillation algorithm, and electrocardiography (ECG) with a handheld single lead electrocardiographic device. The reference standard was 12 lead ECG, performed in patients with at least one positive index test and in a sample of patients (10%) with three negative tests. If 12 lead ECG showed no atrial fibrillation, patients were invited for more screening by continuous monitoring with a Holter electrocardiograph for two weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in the detection rate of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation over one year in intention-to-screen versus usual care practices. RESULTS: Follow-up was complete for 8874 patients in the intention-to-screen practices and for 9102 patients in the usual care practices. 144 (1.62%) new diagnoses of atrial fibrillation in the intention-to-screen group versus 139 (1.53%) in the usual care group were found (adjusted odds ratio 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.35)). Of 9218 eligible patients in the intention-to-screen group, 4106 (44.5%) participated in the screening protocol. In these patients, 12 lead ECG detected newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in 26 patients (0.63%). In the 266 patients who continued with Holter monitoring, four more diagnoses of atrial fibrillation were found. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation in primary care patients, aged 65 and over, did not increase the detection rate of atrial fibrillation, which implies that opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation is not useful in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register No NL4776 (old NTR4914).


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Seleção de Pacientes , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Análise por Conglomerados , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Fatores de Risco
6.
BMJ Open ; 8(2): e017740, 2018 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478012

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Investigate the effectiveness of a complex intervention aimed at improving the appropriateness of medication in older patients with multimorbidity in general practice. DESIGN: Pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial with general practice as unit of randomisation. SETTING: 72 general practices in Hesse, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 505 randomly sampled, cognitively intact patients (≥60 years, ≥3 chronic conditions under pharmacological treatment, ≥5 long-term drug prescriptions with systemic effects); 465 patients and 71 practices completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention group (IG): The healthcare assistant conducted a checklist-based interview with patients on medication-related problems and reconciled their medications. Assisted by a computerised decision support system, the general practitioner optimised medication, discussed it with patients and adjusted it accordingly. The control group (CG) continued with usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a modified Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI, excluding item 10 on cost-effectiveness), assessed in blinded medication reviews and calculated as the difference between baseline and after 6 months; secondary outcomes after 6 and 9 months' follow-up: quality of life, functioning, medication adherence, and so on. RESULTS: At baseline, a high proportion of patients had appropriate to mildly inappropriate prescriptions (MAI 0-5 points: n=350 patients). Randomisation revealed balanced groups (IG: 36 practices/252 patients; CG: 36/253). Intervention had no significant effect on primary outcome: mean MAI sum scores decreased by 0.3 points in IG and 0.8 points in CG, resulting in a non-significant adjusted mean difference of 0.7 (95% CI -0.2 to 1.6) points in favour of CG. Secondary outcomes showed non-significant changes (quality of life slightly improved in IG but continued to decline in CG) or remained stable (functioning, medication adherence). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had no significant effects. Many patients already received appropriate prescriptions and enjoyed good quality of life and functional status. We can therefore conclude that in our study, there was not enough scope for improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99526053. NCT01171339; Results.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Reconciliação de Medicamentos , Polimedicação , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multimorbidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
7.
Age Ageing ; 45(3): 402-8, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27013501

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: polypharmacy contributes to patients' non-adherence with physicians' prescriptions. Patients' knowledge about the indications for their medicines is one of the factors influencing adherence. OBJECTIVE: to identify factors associated with appropriate knowledge about the indications for drugs prescribed to older patients with polypharmacy. METHODS: in a primary care setting, using home interviews and postal questionnaires, patients aged 60 and over who were taking five or more prescribed drugs simultaneously were asked about their medication. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association (odds ratio, OR) between medication knowledge and explanatory variables like medication use, sex, age, living situation and educational level. RESULTS: seven hundred and fifty-four participants (mean age 73.2 years) reported an average daily intake of nine (SD 3.0) prescribed drugs. Only 15% of the patients were able to recall the indication for each of their prescribed drugs. Variables that were negatively associated with correct reporting of all indications were taking many prescribed drugs (e.g. ≥10 versus ≤5: OR 0.05), age 80 years or over (versus 60-69 years: OR 0.47) and male sex (OR 0.53). Patients living with a partner were more knowledgeable than patients living alone (OR 2.11). We did not find an association with educational level. CONCLUSION: among older patients using five or more prescribed drugs, there was little understanding of the indications for their drugs, especially among patients taking the highest number of drugs, patients aged 80 or over, and men. Patients living independently with a partner were more knowledgeable than others.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vida Independente , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Polimedicação , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalos de Confiança , Estudos Transversais , Escolaridade , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Países Baixos , Razão de Chances , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos
8.
Eur J Health Econ ; 15(8): 869-83, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24096902

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many children stand to benefit from being asthma-free for life with primary (i.e., prenatally started) prevention addressing one environmental exposure in a unifaceted (UF) approach or at least two in a multifaceted (MF) approach. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of primary prevention programmes for Dutch children in a decision-analytic framework. METHODS: A decision-analytic tree model analysing healthcare costs and asthma cases prevented was developed to compare usual care (UC) with two UF and three MF programmes on the primary prevention of asthma amongst children. Programmes were evaluated through incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and net monetary benefits. Decision and parameter uncertainty were subjected to value-of-information analyses. RESULTS: The current UC and one of three MF programmes dominated the other alternatives. The MF programme was more costly but also more effective than UC at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 8,209.20/additional asthma case prevented. The value of perfect information to reduce uncertainty was 291.6M at its lowest. Most of the uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness threshold was attributable to the probability and cost estimates for low-risk children. CONCLUSION: This study supports the feasibility of a structured programme that simultaneously addresses exposure to house dust mites, pet dander, environmental tobacco, and breast-feeding as a cost-effective alternative to UC in the primary prevention of asthma amongst children.


Assuntos
Asma/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária/economia , Asma/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cadeias de Markov , Prevenção Primária/métodos
9.
J Psychosom Res ; 75(3): 249-54, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23972414

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: According to the Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) protocol for patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), therapists are advised to categorize patients in relatively active and passive patients. However, evidence to support the differences in physical functioning between these subgroups is limited. Using the baseline data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial (FatiGo), the differences in actual and perceived physical functioning between active and passive patients with CFS were evaluated. METHODS: Sixty patients, who received CBT during the FatiGo trial were included. Based on the expert opinion and using the definitions of subgroups defined in the CBT protocols, the therapist categorized the patient. Data from an activity monitor was used to calculate actual physical functioning, physical activity, daily uptime, activity fluctuations and duration of rest during daily life. Perceived physical functioning was assessed by measuring physical activity, physical functioning and functional impairment with the Checklist Individual Strength, Short Form-36 and Sickness-Impact Profile 8. RESULTS: Relatively active patients have a significantly higher daily uptime and show significantly less fluctuations in activities between days. Passive patients experience a significantly lower level of physical functioning and feel more functionally impaired in their mobility. However, no significant differences were found in the other actual or perceived physical functioning indices. CONCLUSIONS: A clear difference in actual and perceived physical functioning between relatively active and passive patients with CFS as judged by their therapists could not be found. Future research is needed to form a consensus on how to categorize subgroups of patients with CFS.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/psicologia , Estilo de Vida , Atividade Motora , Adulto , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Avaliação da Deficiência , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Breastfeed Med ; 8(1): 23-30, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23186384

RESUMO

Infants of parents with a history of asthma could benefit from exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months of life to reduce the chance of developing childhood asthma. Continuing to breastfeed for 6 months seemed difficult to perform for many Dutch women. Therefore, an educational breastfeeding program was developed and implemented. The program (a theory-based booklet and pre- and postnatal home visits by trained assistants) significantly improved exclusive breastfeeding rates at 6 months postpartum (48% for intervention vs. 27% for control). Repeated-measurements analyses showed significant increases in knowledge and more positive attitudinal beliefs regarding breastfeeding for 6 months, in particular immediately after exposure to the program, compared with the controls. As expected, over time perceived self-efficacy and women's positive emotions toward breastfeeding increased, and support for breastfeeding diminished in both groups. The intervention group was reported to perceive more pressure to bottle feed and to know more breastfeeding models than the control group. Implications for practice are discussed.


Assuntos
Asma/psicologia , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Mães , Cuidado Pós-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Mães/educação , Mães/psicologia , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Folhetos , Cooperação do Paciente , Gravidez , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoeficácia
11.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 22(8): 794-802, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21749461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the effectiveness of the multifaceted allergen-reducing interventions for the prevention of asthma in susceptible children was showed to be proven, the feasibility was not clear. METHODS: The research question of the PREVention of asthma in susceptible children (PREVASC) trial was focused on the assessment of the effectiveness and feasibility of a multifaceted intervention on the prevention of allergic asthma in general practice. The effectiveness and feasibility of an intervention aimed at the simultaneous reduction in the environmental exposures to inhalant- and food allergens in susceptible children was investigated. A total of 476 children susceptible for developing asthma were initially included during pregnancy and were randomly divided over an intervention group of n = 222 children whose parents were offered a multifaceted environmental exposure-reducing intervention. Controls (n = 221) received usual care. The main outcome was 'diagnosis of allergic asthma at age 6'. RESULTS: A significant reduction in inhalant allergen exposure levels of house dust mite [(Der p1), p = 0.043], cat [(Fel d1), p = 0.037], and dog [(Can f1), p = 0.012] was reached. Significantly more intervention group children started using cow's milk and solids after the age of 6 months (p ≤ 0.001). No statistical difference, however, was reached between groups on the duration of breast-feeding (p = 0.635) and the reduction in smoke exposure (p = 0829). At age 6, the intervention had no influence on the development of main outcome allergic asthma (OR = 1.010 (CI 0.580-1.758). CONCLUSION: Other primary preventive asthma-reducing interventions were shown to be effective in reducing the occurrence of asthma for at least the first 7-8 yr of life. The multifaceted PREVASC allergic asthma primary preventive intervention was effective in reducing the exposure to inhalant and food allergens, but was not feasible for the parents. A lack of sufficient room for improvement focus on stimulating adherence seemed to be involved. It is suggested that a multifaceted environmental exposure-reducing intervention may have to be adapted to the personal circumstances of patients at baseline.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Animais , Asma/genética , Asma/fisiopatologia , Aleitamento Materno , Gatos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cães , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Gravidez , Pyroglyphidae/imunologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco
12.
Psychol Health ; 26(4): 449-64, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20437294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Burnout and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are two fatigue syndromes which have developed largely independently from each other, yet whose similarities in symptoms can be a source of confusion. We aim to explore the phenomenology of burnout and CFS in a historical context as this may provide some insight into the links and relationship between these conditions. METHOD: A narrative review based on literature in the fields of history, social science and medicine. RESULTS: The origins of CFS lie within medicine, whereas burnout developed in a psychological setting. As well as symptoms, burnout and CFS also share similar themes such as an overload process triggering illness onset, the need for restoration of depleted energy, external causal attributions and the characteristics of people suffering from these illnesses. However, these themes are expressed in either psychological or medical terms according to the historical background. CONCLUSION: Despite their similarities, there have been few direct comparisons of the two concepts. Culture, illness perceptions and accountability are important issues in both conditions and could contribute to their differences. Comparing burnout and CFS within one sample frame, thus looking beyond the psychology/medicine divide, could be a useful first step towards understanding their relationship.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/história , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/história , Esgotamento Profissional/diagnóstico , Esgotamento Profissional/fisiopatologia , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/fisiopatologia , História do Século XX , Humanos , Neurastenia
13.
Stroke ; 40(4): 1410-6, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19182090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke risk increases with age in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It is uncertain whether the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies in atrial fibrillation changes as patients age. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of age on the relative efficacy of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy (including acetylsalicylic acid and triflusal) on ischemic stroke, serious bleeding, and vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This is an analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation Investigators database, which contains patient level-data from randomized trials of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. We used Cox regression models with age as a continuous variable that controlled for sex, year of randomization, and history of cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Outcomes included ischemic stroke, serious bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage or systemic bleeding requiring hospitalization, transfusion, or surgery), and cardiovascular events (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, or vascular death). RESULTS: The analysis included 8932 patients and 17 685 years of observation from 12 trials. Patient age increased risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio per decade increase 1.45; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.66), serious bleeding (1.61; 1.47 to 1.77), and cardiovascular events (1.43; 1.33 to 1.53). Compared with placebo, OAC and AP significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke (OAC, 0.36; 0.29 to 0.45; AP, 0.81; 0.72 to 0.90) and cardiovascular outcomes (OAC, 0.59; 0.52 to 0.66; AP, 0.81; 0.75 to 0.88), whereas OAC increased risk of serious bleeding (1.56; 1.03 to 2.37). The relative benefit of OAC versus placebo or AP did not vary by patient age for any outcome. Compared with placebo, the relative benefit of AP for preventing ischemic stroke decreased significantly as patients aged (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As patients with atrial fibrillation age, the relative efficacy of AP to prevent ischemic stroke appears to decrease, whereas it does not change for OAC. Because stroke risk increases with age, the absolute benefit of OAC increases as patients get older.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Trombose/epidemiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico
15.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 120(2): 388-95, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17498791

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Family and environmental factors affect the development of respiratory morbidity. How these factors interact is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to clarify the interactive effect of family history of asthma and environmental factors on the occurrence of respiratory morbidity. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-one infants with a positive family history of asthma (PFH) and 308 with a negative family history of asthma (NFH) were prenatally selected and followed until the age of 2 years. Exposure to environmental factors and the occurrence of respiratory morbidity were recorded. By using multiple logistic regression analysis, increased risk was expressed in odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for relevant covariables. RESULTS: Infants with a PFH had more respiratory morbidity than infants with an NFH. Adjusted ORs ranged from 1.7 (95% CI, 1.0-2.8) for expiratory wheezing to 4.9 (95% CI, 1.7-13.6) for croup. Parental smoking increased the OR of a PFH for wheezing ever (OR, 5.8 [95% CI, 2.5-13.8]) and attacks of wheezing (OR, 6.8 [95% CI, 2.7-16.9]), as did Der p 1 (OR, 10.2 [95% CI, 2.8-36.3] and OR, 7.1 [95% CI, 7.1-21.0], respectively). Exposure to both parental smoking and Der p 1 further increased this OR (OR, 30.8 [95%, CI, 6.9-137.2] and OR, 26.2 [95% CI, 5.9-115.6], respectively). Breast-feeding decreased the ORs of PFH for tonsillitis and acute otitis media: the increased ORs for these diagnoses in formula-fed infants with PFHs versus those with NFHs (OR, 9.2 [95% CI, 2.1-39.7] and OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.1-7.2], respectively) was attenuated in breast-fed infants (OR, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.8-3.8] and OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.4-1.3]). CONCLUSION: Parental smoking and Der p 1 increase the effect of a PFH on respiratory morbidity. Breast-feeding reduces this effect. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Extra attention should be given to stimulate mothers to breast-feed their children in case they cannot stop smoking or taking sanitation measures.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Dermatophagoides , Asma , Exposição Ambiental , Prontuários Médicos , Pais , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Antígenos de Dermatophagoides/imunologia , Proteínas de Artrópodes , Aleitamento Materno , Estudos de Coortes , Cisteína Endopeptidases , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/imunologia , Doenças Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco
17.
Br J Gen Pract ; 56(533): 938-44, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17132382

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials have shown the efficacy of several treatment modalities for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in selected populations. The effectiveness in daily practice has hardly been investigated, especially in primary care and is dependent on choices between all possible treatment options and best investigated in a comprehensive study, including all treatment modalities (watchful waiting, alpha-blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, and surgery). AIM: Assessment of the effectiveness of a comprehensive treatment protocol for LUTS in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Fourteen general practices in the Netherlands. INTERVENTION: treatment protocol based on a formalised expert opinion. Control condition: usual care. STUDY POPULATION: 208 subjects with moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS > or =8, median = 13). OUTCOME MEASURES: symptom severity (IPSS [International Prostate Symptom Score]), bother score (Dan-PSS [Danish Prostate Symptom Score]), and maximum urinary flow (Q(max)); incidence of acute urinary retention and urinary tract infections. RESULTS: In the intervention group markedly more subjects used an alpha-blocker at end of follow-up than in the usual care group (24% versus 6%). No significant differences were found between intervention and control group in IPSS, Q(max) or Dan-PSS. CONCLUSION: alpha-blockers and watchful waiting are the most frequent treatment modalities for LUTS in primary care. Our study showed no evidence that a protocol using well-defined indications for all possible treatment modalities based on a formalised expert opinion procedure has added value. Based on our results, we cannot recommend a broadening of the indication for alpha-blockers, which, however, seems to be the current trend.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Retenção Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudos de Coortes , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Finasterida/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Tansulosina , Resultado do Tratamento , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia
18.
Fam Pract ; 23(6): 666-73, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16971394

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: GPs have four main treatment options for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): watchful waiting, alpha-blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors or (referral for) surgery. Guidelines do not provide clear cut-off values for (combinations of) symptoms and physical examination results to decide which treatment is best. OBJECTIVE: (i) To develop a decision aid ('checklist') for GPs for the treatment of patients with LUTS. (ii) To assess its value for use in a primary care population. Materials and methods. Population-based cross-sectional study. Included were subjects with uncomplicated LUTS for whom treatment in primary care may be appropriate. [International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > or = 8, no prior prostate surgery, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value < 10 ng/ml]. For each subject the appropriateness of surgery and alpha-blocker treatment was determined using a previously validated formalized international expert panel judgement. Regression models using data available in primary care were constructed to predict the panel judgement. Subsequently these models were transformed into simple checklists. Finally, the efficiency of these checklists was calculated. RESULTS: The best checklists consisted of age, symptoms severity, type of symptoms, a quality of life score and PSA value. Assuming one would like to provide at least 95% of the subjects for whom a certain treatment is appropriate with this treatment (i.e. 'sensitivity' of the checklist > or = 95%), one can reach a positive predictive value of 50-60%. CONCLUSION: Simple checklists based on the judgement of experts regarding the most appropriate therapy can help GPs to advise their patients of a rational treatment strategy.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/métodos , Médicos de Família , Doenças Urológicas/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Colestenona 5 alfa-Redutase/antagonistas & inibidores , Colestenona 5 alfa-Redutase/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Creatinina/sangue , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Padrões de Prática Médica , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Qualidade de Vida , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Urológicas/sangue , Doenças Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos
19.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 36(5): 594-601, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16650043

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is generally thought that infants with a first-degree familial predisposition of asthma are at higher risk of developing asthma than infants without predisposition. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is an association between being at high risk for developing asthma and increased level of total IgE in newborns and whether total IgE is influenced by gender, family size, birth season, maternal smoking, birth weight, gestational age, and maternal diet. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-one high risk and 308 low-risk infants were prenatally selected in a 5-year-period. Three to 5 days after birth, the total IgE was measured in capillary heel blood. RESULTS: Data on total IgE and first-degree familial predisposition were available for 170 high-risk and 300 low-risk infants. There was a statistically significant relationship between being at high-risk (maternal asthma) and increased levels of total IgE in newborns (total IgE cut-off levels: 0.6-0.9 IU/mL (odds ratio (OR)=2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-3.7 to 3.0, 95% CI: 1.5-5.9)), between being born in autumn and increased levels of total IgE in newborns [total IgE cut-off levels: 0.5-0.6 IU/mL (OR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.1 to 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.4)] and between maternal vitamin supplements intake and decreased levels of total IgE in newborns (total IgE cut-off level: 0.9 IU/mL (OR=0.5, 95% CI:0.3-1.0)). There was no interaction between the effects of maternal asthma and birth season on total IgE, as well as between the effects of maternal asthma and maternal vitamin supplements intake. Gender, family size, maternal smoking, birth weight, and gestational age did not influence the associations. CONCLUSION; Being at high-risk of asthma (maternal asthma) and birth season are positively associated with the presence of increased levels of total IgE at birth, whereas maternal vitamin supplements intake is negatively associated with the presence of total IgE at birth.


Assuntos
Asma/etiologia , Saúde da Família , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Adulto , Asma/genética , Peso ao Nascer , Suplementos Nutricionais , Características da Família , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Mães , Fatores de Risco , Estações do Ano , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Vitaminas/administração & dosagem
20.
Fam Pract ; 23(2): 180-7, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16326800

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are over-prescribed for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The influence of clinicians' history and examination findings on antibiotic prescribing for LRTI has not been directly assessed, and the extent to which these clinical findings predict appropriate antibiotic prescribing is unknown. A clearer understanding is crucial to achieving evidence-based prescribing. OBJECTIVES: To directly assess the influence of general practitioners' history and examination findings on antibiotic prescribing for LRTI, and to explore the extent to which these clinical findings predict appropriate antibiotic prescribing. METHODS: In this observational cohort study 25 GPs in The Netherlands were recruited during routine consultations and 247 adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of LRTI. The GPs recorded clinical information. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical variables predicting a prescription for an antibiotic were calculated. The relationship between antibiotic prescription and radiographic evidence of pneumonia was explored in order to gauge appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS: Auscultation abnormalities (OR 11.5; 95% CI 5.4-24.7), and diarrhoea (OR>11) were strongly associated with antibiotic prescribing. An antibiotic was prescribed for 195 (79%) patients. Assuming that an antibiotic definitely needs to be prescribed only for patients with pneumonia, antibiotics may have been inappropriately prescribed for 166/193 (86%) of the patients. Antibiotics were not prescribed for 5 of the 32 (16%) patients with a radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal findings on auscultation in patients with LRTI strongly predict antibiotic prescribing and this is probably inappropriate for most patients. These results should prompt GPs to consider the extent to which finding 'crackles/rhonchi on auscultation' influences their decisions to prescribe antibiotics for their patients with LRTI, and to consider the predictive value of individual clinical signs in reaching evidence-based prescribing decisions.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Países Baixos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infecções Respiratórias/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA