A method for generating intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields for small animal irradiators utilizing 3D-printed compensator molds.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using fused deposition modeling (FDM) three-dimensional (3D) printer to generate radiation compensators for high-resolution (~1 mm) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for small animal radiation treatment. We propose a novel method incorporating 3D-printed compensator molds filled with NaI powder. METHODS: The inverse planning module of the computational environment for radiotherapy research (CERR) software was adapted to simulate the XRAD-225Cx irradiator, both geometry and kV beam quality (the latter using a phase space file provided for XRAD-225Cx). A nine-field IMRT treatment was created for a scaled-down version of the imaging and radiation oncology core (IROC) Head and Neck IMRT credentialing test, recreated on a 2.2-cm-diameter cylindrical phantom. Optimized fluence maps comprising nine fields and a total of 2564 beamlets were calculated at resolution of 1.25 × 1.25 mm2 . A hollow compensator mold was created (using in-house software and algorithm) for each field using 3D printing with polylactic acid (PLA) filaments. The molds were then packed with sodium iodide powder (NaI, measured density ρNaI  = 2.062 g/cm3 ). The mounted compensator mold thickness was limited to 13.8 mm due to clearance issues with couch collision. At treatment delivery, each compensator was manually mounted to a customized block tray attached to the reference 40 × 40 mm2 collimator. Compensator reproducibility among three repeated 3D-printed molds was measured with Radiochromic EBT2 film. The two-dimensional (2D) dose distributions of the nine fields were compared to calculated 2D doses from CERR using gamma comparisons with distance-to-agreement criteria of 0.5-0.25 mm and dose difference criteria of 3-5%. RESULTS: Good reproducibility of 3D-printed compensator manufacture was observed with mean error of ±0.024 Gy and relative dose error of ±4.2% within the modulated part of the beam. Within the limit of 13.8 mm compensator height, a maximum radiation blocking efficiency of 91.5% was achieved. Per field, about 45.5 g of NaI powder was used. Gamma analysis on each of the nine delivered IMRT fields using radiochromic films resulted in eight of nine treatment fields with >90% pass rate with 5%/0.5 mm tolerances. However, low gamma passing rate of 49-66% (3%/0.25 mm to 5%/0.5 mm) was noted in one field, attributed to fabrication errors resulting in over-filling the mold. The nine-field treatment plan was delivered in under 30 min with no mechanical or collisional issues. CONCLUSIONS: We show the feasibility of high spatial resolution IMRT treatment on a small animal irradiator utilizing 3D-printed compensator shells packed with NaI powder. Using the PLA mold with NaI powder was attractive due to the ease of 3D printing a PLA mold at high geometric resolution and the well-balanced attenuation properties of NaI powders that prevented the mold from becoming too bulky. IMRT fields with 1.25-mm resolution are capable with significant fluence modulation with relative dose accuracy of ±4.2%.

Delivered Dose Distribution Visualized Directly With Onboard kV-CBCT: Proof of Principle.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate proof of principle of visualizing delivered 3-dimensional (3D) dose distribution using kilovoltage (kv) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) mounted onboard a linear accelerator. We apply this technique as a unique end-to-end verification of multifocal radiosurgery where the coincidence of radiation and imaging systems is quantified comprehensively at all targets. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dosimeters (9.5-cm diameter N-isopropylacrylamide) were prepared according to standard procedures at one facility and shipped to a second (remote) facility for irradiation. A 4-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) multifocal radiosurgery plan was prepared to deliver 20 Gy with 6-MV photons to 6 targets (1-cm diameter). A dosimeter was aligned via CBCT and irradiated, followed by 3 CBCT scans acquired immediately, with total time between pre-CBCT and final CBCT <30 minutes. Image processing included background subtraction and low-pass filters. A dose-volume structure was created per target with the same volume as the planned prescription dose volume, and their spatial agreement was quantified using volume centroid and the Jaccard index. For comparison, 5 diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans were also acquired after >24 hours with the same spatial analysis applied; comparison with planned doses after absolute dose calibration also was conducted. RESULTS: Regions of high dose were clearly visualized in the average CBCT with a contrast-to-noise ratio of 1.7 ± 0.7, which increased to 5.8 ± 0.5 after image processing, and 11.9 ± 3.7 for average diagnostic CT. Centroids of prescription isodose volumes agreed with the root mean square difference of 1.1 mm (range, 0.8-1.7 mm) for CBCT and 0.7 mm (0.4-0.8 mm) for diagnostic CT. The dose was proportional to density above 10 to 12 Gy with a 3D gamma pass rate of 94.0% and 99.5% using 5% for 1-mm and 3% for 2-mm criteria, respectively (threshold = 15 Gy, using global dose criteria). CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates for the first time the potential to visualize in 3D delivered dose using onboard kV-CBCT (0.5 × 0.5 × 1 mm3 voxel size) immediately after irradiation with a sufficient contrast-to-noise ratio to measure radiation and imaging system coincidence to within 2 mm.