High-Volume Surgeons and Reducing Racial Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine racial disparities in route of hysterectomy and perioperative outcomes before and after expansion of high-volume minimally invasive surgeons (>10 minimally invasive hysterectomies (MIH)/year) DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Multi-center academic teaching institution PATIENTS: All patients who underwent a scheduled hysterectomy for benign indications during 2018 (pre-intervention) and 2022 (post-intervention) INTERVENTIONS: Recruitment of Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (FMIGS)- trained faculty and increased surgical training for academic specialists in obstetrics and gynecology occurred in 2020. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients in the pre-intervention cohort (n=171) were older (median age 45 years vs. 43 years, p=0.003) while patients in the post-intervention cohort (n=234) had a higher burden of comorbidities (26% ASA class III vs. 19%, p=0.03). Uterine weight was not significantly different between cohorts (p=0.328). Between the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts, high-volume minimally invasive surgeons increased from 27% (n=4) to 44% (n=7) of those performing hysterectomies within the division and percentage of hysterectomies performed via minimally invasive route increased (63% vs. 82%, p<0.001). In the pre-intervention cohort, Black patients had a lower percentage of hysterectomies performed via minimally invasive route compared to White patients (Black = 56% MIH vs. White = 76% MIH, p=0.014). In the post-intervention cohort, differences by race were no longer significant (Black = 78% MIH vs. White = 87% MIH, p= 0.127). There was a significant increase (22%) in MIH for Black patients between cohorts (p<0.001). After adjusting for age, BMI, ASA class, prior surgery, and uterine weight, disparities by race were no longer present in the post-intervention cohort. Perioperative outcomes including length of stay (p<0.001), infection rates (p=0.002) and blood loss (p=0.01) improved post-intervention. CONCLUSION: Increasing FMIGs-trained gynecologic surgeons and providing more opportunities in robotic/laparoscopic training for academic specialists may improve access to MIH for Black patients and reduce disparities.

Evaluation of novel biomarkers for early pregnancy outcome prediction†.

OBJECTIVE: To assess performance and discriminatory capacity of commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of biomarkers for predicting first trimester pregnancy outcome in a multi-center cohort. DESIGN: In a case-control study at three academic centers of women with pain and bleeding in early pregnancy, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of biomarkers were screened for assay performance. Performance was assessed via functional sensitivity, assay reportable range, recovery/linearity, and intra-assay precision (%Coefficient of Variation). Top candidates were analyzed for discriminatory capacity for viability and location among 210 women with tubal ectopic pregnancy, viable intrauterine pregnancy, or miscarriage. Assay discrimination was assessed by visual plots, area under the curve with 95% confidence intervals, and measures of central tendency with two-sample t-tests. RESULTS: Of 25 biomarkers evaluated, 22 demonstrated good or acceptable assay performance. Transgelin-2, oviductal glycoprotein, and integrin-linked kinase were rejected due to poor performance. The best biomarkers for discrimination of pregnancy location were pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 9, pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, kisspeptin (KISS1), pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 3, and beta parvin (PARVB). The best biomarkers for discrimination of pregnancy viability were pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 9, pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 3, EH domain-containing protein 3, KISS1, WAP four-disulfide core domain protein 2 (HE4), quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 2, and pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 1. CONCLUSION: Performance of commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays was acceptable for a panel of novel biomarkers to predict early pregnancy outcome. Of these, six and seven candidates demonstrated good discriminatory capacity of pregnancy location and viability, respectively, when validated in a distinct external population. Four markers demonstrated good discrimination for both location and viability.

Telehealth utilization in gynecologic oncology clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth visits and remote clinical trial operations (such as local collection of laboratory tests or imaging studies) were underutilized in gynecologic oncology clinical trials. Current literature on these operational changes provides anecdotal experience and expert opinion with few studies describing patient-level safety data. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of telehealth and remote clinical trial operations during the COVID-19 Pandemic. METHODS: Gynecologic oncology patients enrolled and actively receiving treatment on a clinical trial at a single, academic institution during the designated pre-Telehealth and Telehealth periods were identified. Patients with at least 1 provider or research coordinator telehealth visit were included. Patient demographics, health system encounters, adverse events, and protocol deviations were collected. Pairwise comparisons were performed between the pre-Telehealth and Telehealth period with each patient serving as their own control. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Virtual provider visits and off-site laboratory testing increased during the Telehealth period. Delays in provider visits, imaging, and laboratory testing did not differ between time periods. Total and minor protocol deviations increased in incidence during the Telehealth period and were due to documentation of telehealth and deferment of non-therapeutic testing. Major protocol deviations, emergency department visits, admissions, and severe adverse events were of low incidence and did not differ between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth and remote clinical trial operations appeared safe and did not compromise clinical trial protocols in a small, single institutional study. Larger scale evaluations of such trial adaptations should be performed to determine continued utility following the Pandemic.

Application of a Multiplex Platform to Identify Novel Biomarkers for Pregnancy Location and Viability.

Determining early pregnancy location and viability can be cumbersome, often requiring serial evaluations. This study aimed to identify novel biomarker candidates for pregnancy location and viability using a pseudodiscovery high-throughput technique. This was a case-control study among patients presenting for early pregnancy assessment, including ectopic pregnancies, early pregnancy losses, and viable intrauterine pregnancies. For pregnancy location, ectopic pregnancy was considered "case" and non-ectopic considered "control." For pregnancy viability, viable intrauterine pregnancy was considered "case" and early pregnancy loss + ectopic pregnancy were considered "control." Using Proximity Extension Assay technology from Olink Proteomics, serum levels of 1012 proteins were compared separately for pregnancy location and viability. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to determine a biomarker's discriminative abilities. Analysis included 13 ectopic pregnancies, 76 early pregnancy losses, and 27 viable intrauterine pregnancies. For pregnancy location, 18 markers had an area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.80, with three being expressed more in ectopic compared to non-ectopic pregnancies: thyrotropin subunit beta, carbonic anhydrase 3, and DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 58. For pregnancy viability, two markers had an AUC ≥0.80: lutropin subunit beta and serpin B8. While some of the markers had previously been implicated in early pregnancy physiology, others were from pathways not previously explored. Using a high-throughput platform, a large number of proteins were screened as potential biomarkers for pregnancy location and viability, and twenty candidate biomarkers were identified. Further exploration of these proteins may facilitate validation as diagnostic tools for establishing early pregnancy diagnoses.

Race, ovarian responsiveness, and live birth after in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation differs by race/ethnicity and whether this predicts live birth rates (LBRs) in non-White patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic infertility center. PATIENT(S): White, Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Self-reported race and ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), defined as (the number of oocytes retrieved ÷ total gonadotropin dose) × 1,000 as a measure of ovarian responsiveness, adjusting for age, body mass index, infertility diagnosis, and cycle number. Secondary outcomes included live birth and clinical pregnancy after first retrievals, adjusting for age, infertility diagnosis, and history of fibroids, as well as miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy, adjusting for age, body mass index, infertility diagnosis, duration of infertility, history of fibroids, and use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. RESULT(S): The primary analysis of OSI included 3,360 (70.2%) retrievals from White patients, 704 (14.7%) retrievals from Asian patients, 553 (11.6%) retrievals from Black patients, and 168 (3.5%) retrievals from Hispanic patients. Black and Hispanic patients had higher OSIs than White patients after accounting for those with multiple retrievals and adjusting for confounders (6.08 in Black and 6.27 in Hispanic, compared with 5.25 in White). There was no difference in OSI between Asian and White patients. The pregnancy outcomes analyses included 2,299 retrievals. Despite greater ovarian responsiveness, Black and Hispanic patients had lower LBRs compared with White patients, although these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.09, for Black; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.61-1.43, for Hispanic). Ovarian sensitivity index was modestly predictive of live birth in White and Asian patients but not in Black (area under the curve, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.64) and Hispanic (area under the curve, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37-0.63) patients. CONCLUSION(S): Black and Hispanic patients have higher ovarian responsiveness to stimulation during IVF but do not experience a consequent increase in LBR. Factors beyond differences in responsiveness to ovarian stimulation need to be explored to address the racial/ethnic disparity established in prior literature.

Elevated antimüllerian hormone levels are not associated with preterm delivery after in vitro fertilization or ovulation induction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and preterm birth risk in a larger cohort of patients who underwent either in vitro fertilization or ovulation induction with intrauterine insemination at a US academic fertility center. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic fertility center. PATIENT(S): Live singleton births from patients who underwent in vitro fertilization or ovulation induction between 2016 and 2020 at a single academic fertility center were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had a missing prepregnancy AMH level, a pregnancy using donor oocytes or a gestational carrier, multiple gestations, a delivery before 20 weeks gestation, or a cerclage in place. INTERVENTION(S): AMH level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was the proportion of preterm delivery. Secondary outcomes included the rate of pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes, and small for gestational age. RESULT(S): In the entire cohort (n = 875), 8.4% of deliveries were preterm. The mean AMH values were similar between those with term and preterm births (3.9 vs. 4.2 ng/mL). Similar proportions of patients with term and preterm deliveries had AMH levels greater than the 75th percentile (25% vs. 21%). The odds of preterm birth were similar by AMH quartile after adjusting for the history of preterm birth. Similarly, in the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) cohort, there was no difference between mean AMH values of term and preterm births (n = 139, 9.6 vs. 10.0 ng/mL). The proportions of patients with PCOS with AMH levels greater than the 75th percentile were similar between those with term and preterm deliveries (25% vs. 22%). The odds of preterm birth were similar by the AMH quartile after adjusting for the history of preterm birth. CONCLUSION(S): Elevated AMH levels were not associated with an increased risk of preterm birth in patients who conceived after in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction, including patients with PCOS. Although studies suggest that AMH levels may help stratify the risk of preterm birth in this population, our findings indicate that further studies are needed before clinical application.

Outcomes of assisted reproductive technology procedures performed on weekdays versus weekends: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes are different based on whether procedures - oocyte retrieval, insemination, embryo biopsy, or embryo transfer - are performed on a weekday versus weekend/holiday. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients ≥ 18 years old who underwent oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization or oocyte banking (n = 3,197 cycles), fresh or natural-cycle frozen embryo transfers (n = 1,739 transfers), or had embryos biopsied for pre-implantation genetic testing (n = 4,568 embryos) in a large academic practice from 2015-2020. The primary outcomes were as follows: oocyte maturity for oocyte retrievals; fertilization rate for insemination; rate of no result on pre-implantation genetic testing for embryo biopsy; and live birth rate for embryo transfers. RESULTS: The average number of procedures performed per embryologist per day was higher on weekends/holidays than weekdays. For oocyte retrievals performed on weekdays vs. weekends/holidays, there was no difference in oocyte maturity rate (88% vs 88%). There was no difference in the fertilization rate (82% vs 80%) in cycles that had intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed on weekdays vs. weekends/holidays. No difference was found in the no result rate for embryos biopsied on weekdays vs. weekends/holidays (2.5% vs 1.8%). Finally, there was no difference by weekday vs. weekend/holiday in the live birth rate per transfer among all transfers (39.6% vs 36.1%), or when stratified by fresh (35.1% vs 34.9%) or frozen embryo transfer (49.7% vs. 39.6%). CONCLUSION: We found no differences in ART outcomes among women who had their oocyte retrievals, inseminations, embryo biopsies, or embryo transfers performed on weekdays versus weekends/holidays.

Application of a Multiplex Platform to Identify Novel Biomarkers for Pregnancy Location and Viability.

Determining early pregnancy location and viability can be cumbersome, often requiring serial evaluations. This study aimed to identify novel biomarker candidates for pregnancy location and viability using a pseudodiscovery high through-put technique. This was a case-control study among patients presenting for early pregnancy assessment, including ectopic pregnancies, early pregnancy losses, and viable intrauterine pregnancies. For pregnancy location, ectopic pregnancy was considered "case" and non-ectopic considered "control." For pregnancy viability, viable intrauterine pregnancy was considered "case" and early pregnancy loss + ectopic pregnancy were considered "control." Using Proximity Extension Assay technology from Olink Proteomics, serum levels of 1012 proteins were compared separately for pregnancy location and viability. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to determine a biomarker's discriminative abilities. Analysis included 13 ectopic pregnancies, 76 early pregnancy losses, and 27 viable intrauterine pregnancies. For pregnancy location, 18 markers had an area under the curve (AUC) ≥ 0.80, with three being expressed more in ectopic compared to non-ectopic pregnancies: thyrotropin subunit beta, carbonic anhydrase 3, and DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 58. For pregnancy viability, two markers had an AUC ≥ 0.80: lutropin subunit beta and serpin B8. While some of the markers were previously identified as implicated in early pregnancy physiology, others were from pathways not previously explored. Using a high through-put platform, a large number of proteins were screened as potential biomarkers for pregnancy location and viability, and twenty candidate biomarkers were identified. Further exploration of these proteins may facilitate validation as diagnostic tools for establishing early pregnancy diagnoses.

"Every minute counts": association between operative time and post-operative complications for patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to assess whether operative time is independently associated with post-operative complications for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISCP). METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, patients undergoing MISCP from 2015 to 2020 were identified by CPT code. The following data were extracted: demographics, concomitant procedures (hysterectomies, midurethral sling, and anterior or posterior repair), and post-operative complications. Complications were categorized into minor, major, and composite, modeled after the Clavien-Dindo classification. For analysis, covariates associated with operative time and composite complications were identified using a general linear model and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Then, adjusted spline regression was performed as a test of nonlinearity between operative time and composite complications. Adjusted relative risks of complications by 60-min increments were estimated using Poisson regression with robust error variance. RESULTS: A total of 13,239 patients who underwent MISCP were analyzed. Overall, mean operative time (SD) was 189.5 (78.3) min. Post-operative complication rates were 2.6% for minor, 4.7% for major, and 7.3% for composite complications. Age, smoking, and sling were the only covariates associated with both operative time and post-operative complications. Adjusted spline regression demonstrated linearity (p<0.0001). With each 60-min increase in operative time, adjusted relative risks (95% CI) were 1.14 for composite (1.09, 1.19), 1.16 for minor (1.10, 1.21), and 1.11 (1.03, 1.20) for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Operative time is independently and linearly associated with post-operative complications for patients undergoing MISCP, even when adjusted for demographic variables and concomitant procedures.

Predictive value of 5-Factor modified frailty index in Oncologic and benign hysterectomies.

Background: The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been validated against the original 11-factor modified frailty index in gynecologic surgery, however its utility has not been evaluated between benign versus gynecologic oncology patient populations. Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the mFI-5 in identifying women at increased risk for major postoperative complications, readmission, or death within 30 days of hysterectomy for benign and oncologic indications. Methods: Patients who underwent hysterectomy between 2015 and 2017 were identified from the NSQIP database and stratified into benign or malignant indications. Demographic and mFI-5 variables were extracted. The mFI-5 was calculated by dividing the sum of all affirmative variables by the total number of input variables in the database. Logistic regression modeling was performed adjusting for confounders. C-statistic with 95% CI was obtained post-regression. Results: 80,293 hysterectomies (59,078 benign and 21,215 oncologic) were identified. The benign group was more likely to have an mFI-5 score of 0 (70 % vs 50 %, p = 0.001) and had shorter operative times (p = 0.001). In the benign group, mFI-5 was a strong predictor of mortality (c = 0.819, CI 0.704-0.933). Within the oncology group, the mFI-5 was a strong predictor of mortality (c = 0.801, CI 0.750-0.851), particularly for uterine and cervical cancers. It was moderately predictive of readmission (c = 0.671, CI 0.656-0.686) and strongly predictive of Clavien-Dindo class III and IV complications (c = 0.732, CI 0.713-0.750). Conclusion: The mFI-5 is a strong predictor of 30-day mortality and serious postoperative complications. These findings have the potential to improve identification of high-risk patients in the preoperative setting.

Cognitive function following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Older women are at higher risk for cognitive dysfunction following surgery. We hypothesized that for women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, memory function would not be significantly different at delayed postoperative assessment compared to baseline. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare performance on tests of various neurocognitive domains before and after surgery for POP. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with women, aged 60 years and older who were undergoing surgery for POP. A battery of highly sensitive neurocognitive tests was administered preoperatively (baseline), on postoperative day 1 (postoperative visit 1, POV1), and at the first postoperative clinic visit 4-6 weeks after surgery (postoperative visit 2, POV2). The test battery included the scene-encoding memory task, the n-back task, the Iowa gambling task, the balloon analogue risk task, and the psychomotor vigilance task. These tests assessed the neurocognitive subdomains of episodic memory, working memory, decision-making, risk-taking, and sustained attention. Two score comparisons were made: between baseline and POV1, and between baseline and POV2. RESULTS: In 29 women, performance on the scene-encoding memory task was worse at POV1 than at baseline (2.22 ± 0.4 vs. 2.45 ± 0.6, p < 0.05) but was better than baseline at POV2 (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.45 ± 0.6, p < 0.05). Similarly, performance on the psychomotor vigilance test was worse at POV1 than at baseline (p < 0.01) but there was no difference at POV2. There was no difference in performance on the Iowa gambling test, n-back test, and balloon analogue risk tasks between baseline and any postoperative visit. CONCLUSION: Cognitive test scores did not worsen significantly between baseline and delayed postoperative assessments in older women undergoing surgery for POP.

Racial disparities in frozen embryo transfer success.

PURPOSE: To compare pregnancy and birth outcomes after frozen embryo transfers (FETs) among White, Black, and Asian women and evaluate the effect of patient, protocol, and cycle characteristics on success. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified women who underwent an autologous FET at an academic fertility center between January 2013 and March 2020. RESULTS: White, Black, and Asian women completed 1,181 (71.7%), 230 (14.0%), and 235 (14.3%) cycles, respectively. Black women were significantly less likely to achieve a positive hCG level (AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.90), clinical pregnancy (AOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.97), and live birth (AOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.89) compared to White women after adjusting for possible confounders. There were no differences in the aforementioned outcomes when looking at cycles completed by Asian versus White women. When comparing outcomes by endometrial preparation protocol, significant differences were seen amongst the three groups for live birth rates following natural cycle FETs (52.36%, 25.81%, and 44.19% for White, Black, and Asian women, respectively, p = 0.02), a difference not appreciated after programmed FETs. CONCLUSION: Black race is associated with significantly worse pregnancy and live birth rates following FET when compared to White race. Additionally, significant differences in live birth rates among White, Black, and Asian women exist following natural cycle FET versus programmed FET. These disparities in success are not only important for patient counseling, but also when determining management strategies to improve fertility rates among minority women.

Embryo re-expansion does not affect clinical pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: A retrospective study examining the effects of embryo re-expansion before transfer on pregnancy outcomes for frozen embryo transfers (FET). METHODS: A total of 486 FET cycles from November 2017 through December 2019 were studied. These cycles included patients using autologous, donor oocytes, and donor embryo with patients ranging from ages 23 to 48 years with infertility diagnoses. Programmed FET priming was performed with exogenous estrogen and progesterone. All blastocysts were cultured in trigas incubators for 20 min to 4 h and 42 min. Pictures of each blastocyst after thaw and before transfer were taken utilizing the Hamilton Thorne Zilos laser software (Beverly, MA). The longest portion of the embryo was measured in µm. Pregnancy was defined by a positive hCG, and ongoing clinical pregnancy was defined by the presence of fetal cardiac activity. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to access differences in change parameters. RESULTS: There is no significant difference in the amount of embryo expansion or contraction to achieve an ongoing pregnancy. The difference remained non-significant when stratified by embryo expansion or contraction. The amount of change over time and percent change from the first measurement were also not associated with achieving an ongoing pregnancy. This remained true after adjustment for patient age and whether or not a biopsy was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Embryos that do not re-expand after warming appear to have a similar chance of achieving a successful pregnancy as those that do re-expand.

Risk factors for atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer in the infertility population: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and identify risk factors for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH) and endometrial cancer (EC) in American women undergoing infertility evaluation. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Academic reproductive endocrinology and infertility practice. PATIENTS: Female patients (18-50 years) seeking infertility evaluation from January 1, 2009 to December 1, 2018. Patients with known genetic predisposition to cancer or prior cancer diagnosis were excluded. Cases were defined as patients diagnosed with AH or EC during infertility workup (n = 22). Controls without AH or EC were randomly selected in a 10:1 ratio (n = 220) from all women undergoing infertility evaluation in the same year. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of AH or EC and odds of AH or EC accounting for age, race, body mass index (BMI), and ovulatory dysfunction. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases of AH or EC were identified among 11,569 women undergoing infertility evaluation (incidence 2 per 1,000 women, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.9 per 1,000). Of these women, 68% had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 compared with 25% of controls. In multivariable analyses, women with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were 5.9 times more likely to be diagnosed with AH or EC (adjusted odds ratio 5.9, 95% CI 2.0-17.2). Women with ovulatory dysfunction were 3.4 times more likely to be diagnosed with AH or EC (adjusted odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.1-10.1). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AH and EC in a population of women undergoing infertility evaluation is 10 times that in the general population of premenopausal women. Obesity is the strongest independent risk factor for AH and EC in women with infertility.

Obesity and no call results: optimal timing of cell-free DNA testing and redraw.

BACKGROUND: Fetal fraction of cell-free DNA decreases with increasing maternal weight. Consequently, cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy has higher screen failures or "no call" rates in women with obesity owing to a low fetal fraction. The optimal timing of testing based on maternal weight is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the optimal timing of initial cell-free DNA testing based on maternal weight and to identify the optimal timing of repeat cell-free DNA testing in cases with an initial screen failure. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing cell-free DNA for fetal aneuploidy screening between 9 and 18 weeks through a single laboratory over 1 year from 2018 to 2019. Fetal fraction change per week was calculated, and generalized linear models were used to calculate relative risk and 95% confidence interval of a no call result at given maternal weights and gestational ages. RESULTS: The vast majority of samples (99.22%) received a test result. The risk of a no call result owing to a low fetal fraction was higher with increasing maternal weight. At 9 to 12 weeks, the rate of a no call result owing to a low fetal fraction in women who weighed <150 lb was 0.14% compared with 17.39% in women weighing >400 lb. Fetal fraction increased with increasing gestational age, although the incremental increase in fetal fraction over time is inversely proportional to maternal weight. At 13 to 18 weeks' gestation, 6.45% of women weighing >400 lb received a no call result owing to a low fetal fraction. In women in the highest weight category, >400 lb, fetal fraction increased 0.5% with each week of gestation. CONCLUSION: Although the risk of a no call result increases with maternal weight, cell-free DNA screening should be offered to all women at 9 to 12 weeks' gestation, allowing the option to have chorionic villus sampling after a positive test result. Pretest counseling for women with obesity should include the increased chance for a test failure. Most women weighing less than 400 lb will receive a test result and more than 80% of women with a weight of >400 lb will receive a test result at 9 to 12 weeks' gestation. Data regarding the expected increase in cell-free DNA fetal fraction per week may help guide the timing of a redraw to optimize test success.

Impact of past surgical history on perioperative outcomes in gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if past surgical history is associated with perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single, tertiary, academic health system of women who underwent hysterectomy from May 2016 - May 2017. Past surgical history (PSH) involving any abdominal or pelvic surgery, baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected. For purposes of analyses, PSH was defined using three algorithms: 1) any prior abdominopelvic surgery, 2) having had abdominopelvic surgeries likely to cause adhesive disease, 3) anatomic location of prior PSH (none; pelvic; abdominal; or abdominal+pelvic). Descriptive, bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: 1256 patients underwent hysterectomy. In adjusted analyses, PSH defined by any prior abdominopelvic surgery was associated with length of stay (LOS) (2.1 days (95%CI 1.9, 2.2) vs. 1.8 (95%CI 1.6, 2.0), (p=0.02)). PSH of procedures likely to cause adhesive disease was associated with greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (243.2 mL (95%CI 208.1, 278.3) vs. 189.0 (95%CI 1734, 204.7), (p=0.01)), longer LOS (2.5 days (95%CI 2.2, 2.8) vs. 1.9 (95%CI 1.7, 2.0), (p<0.01)), and more readmissions (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.3, 4.5) (p<0.01). PSH defined by anatomic location revealed a trend (p=0.07) towards greater EBL in those with prior pelvic or abdominal+pelvic surgery compared to none or abdominal only, whereas LOS, readmissions and operative times did not differ. Increased total number of prior open surgeries was associated with operative time (p<0.0001), EBL (p<0.0001), hospital LOS (p<0.0001) and readmission (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Prior abdominopelvic surgery is associated with worse perioperative outcome measures in women undergoing hysterectomy.

Impact of Surgical Wait Time to Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of surgical wait time on healthcare use and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban, academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign disease between 2012 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were categorized into 2 groups, dichotomized by surgical wait times >30 days or ≤30 days. Healthcare use was measured by the number of discrete patient interactions with the healthcare system through phone calls, secure electronic messaging, and office and emergency room visits. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between surgical wait time and healthcare use and perioperative outcomes while controlling for confounders. A total of 277 patients were included in our analysis: 106 (38.3%) had surgical wait times >30 days (median 47 days, range 24-68 days), and 171 (67.1%) had surgical wait times ≤30 days (median 19 days; range 12-26 days). The groups did not differ by age, insurance status, substance use, or comorbid conditions. Patients in the group with surgical wait times >30 days were more likely to have increased healthcare use (69 of 106, 65% vs 43 of 171, 25%; odds ratio 5.55; 95% confidence interval, 3.27-9.41). There were no differences in intraoperative complications (9 of 106, 8% vs 19 of 171, 11%; p = .482) or postoperative complications (28 of 106, 26% vs 32 of 171, 19%; p = .13) between the groups; however, after controlling for potential confounders, patients with surgical wait times >30 days were 3.22 times more likely to be readmitted than patients with surgical wait times ≤30 days (95% confidence interval, 1.27-8.19). CONCLUSION: A surgical wait time >30 days in patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with increased healthcare use in the interim. Although patients who experience longer surgical wait times do not experience worse surgical outcomes, they may be at higher risk for readmission after surgery. Targeted interventions to optimize perioperative coordination of care for patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease, especially those within vulnerable populations, are needed to improve quality of care, decrease any redundant or inefficient healthcare use, and reduce any unnecessary delays.

Soluble Flt1 levels are associated with cardiac dysfunction in Black women with and without severe preeclampsia.

Background: We evaluate soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) levels and cardiac function during pregnancy and postpartum among Black women with and without preeclampsia. Study design: Prospective longitudinal cohort study from 2015 to 2017 of Black women with preterm severe preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant controls.We obtained echocardiograms and sFlt-1 levels during pregnancy and postpartum. Results: 93 Black women were included (43 cases, 50 controls). Higher sFlt1 levels were correlated with worse longitudinal strain, diastolic dysfunction, decreased ventricular-arterial coupling, and increased chamber and arterial elastance at the time of preeclampsia diagnosis and postpartum. Conclusions: Higher sFlt1 levels are associated with cardiovascular dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum.

Management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol: clinical predictors of treatment success from a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Early pregnancy loss is a common event in the first trimester, occurring in 15%-20% of confirmed pregnancies. A common evidence-based medical regimen for early pregnancy loss uses misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analog, with a dosage of 800 µg, self-administered vaginally. The clinical utility of this regimen is limited by suboptimal effectiveness in patients with a closed cervical os, with 29% of patients experiencing early pregnancy loss requiring a second dose after 3 days and 16% of patients eventually requiring a uterine aspiration procedure. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate clinical predictors associated with treatment success in patients receiving medical management with mifepristone-misoprostol or misoprostol alone for early pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a planned secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing mifepristone-misoprostol with misoprostol alone for management of early pregnancy loss. The published prediction model for treatment success of single-dose misoprostol administered vaginally included the following variables: active bleeding, type of early pregnancy loss (anembryonic pregnancy or embryonic and/or fetal demise), parity, gestational age, and treatment site; previous significant predictors were vaginal bleeding within the past 24 hours and parity of 0 or 1 vs >1. To determine if these characteristics predicted differential proportions of patients with treatment success or failure, we performed bivariate analyses; given the small proportion of treatment failures in the combined treatment arm, both arms were combined for analysis. Thereafter, we performed a logistic regression analysis to assess the effect of these predictors collectively in each of the 2 treatment groups separately as well as in the full cohort as a proxy for the combined treatment arm. Finally, by using receiver operating characteristic curves, we tested the ability of these predictors in association with misoprostol treatment success to discriminate between treatment success and treatment failure. To quantify the ability of the score to discriminate between treatment success and treatment failure in each treatment arm as well as in the entire cohort, we calculated the area under the curve. Using multivariable logistic regression, we then assessed our study population for other predictors of treatment success in both treatment groups, with and without mifepristone pretreatment. RESULTS: Overall, 297 evaluable participants were included in the primary study, with 148 in the mifepristone-misoprostol combined treatment group and 149 in the misoprostol-alone treatment group. Among patients who had vaginal bleeding at the time of treatment, 15 of 17 (88%) in the mifepristone-misoprostol combined treatment group and 12 of 17 (71%) in the misoprostol-alone treatment group experienced expulsion of pregnancy tissue. Among patients with a parity of 0 or 1, 94 of 108 (87%) in the mifepristone-misoprostol treatment group and 66 of 95 (69%) in the misoprostol-alone treatment group experienced expulsion of pregnancy tissue. These clinical characteristics did not predict treatment success in the combined cohort alone (area under the curve=0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.64). No other baseline clinical factors predicted treatment success in the misoprostol-alone treatment arm or mifepristone pretreatment arm. In the full cohort, the significant predictors of treatment success were pretreatment with mifepristone (adjusted odds ratio=2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-4.43) and smoking (adjusted odds ratio=2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.49). CONCLUSION: No baseline clinical factors predicted treatment success in women receiving medical management with misoprostol for early pregnancy loss. Adding mifepristone to the medical management regimen of early pregnancy loss improved treatment success; thus, mifepristone treatment should be considered for management of early pregnancy loss regardless of baseline clinical factors.