The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Society for Vascular Medicine.

The Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society recently published Part I of the 2022 clinical practice guidelines on varicose veins. Recommendations were based on the latest scientific evidence researched following an independent systematic review and meta-analysis of five critical issues affecting the management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins, using the patients, interventions, comparators, and outcome system to answer critical questions. Part I discussed the role of duplex ultrasound scanning in the evaluation of varicose veins and treatment of superficial truncal reflux. Part II focuses on evidence supporting the prevention and management of varicose vein patients with compression, on treatment with drugs and nutritional supplements, on evaluation and treatment of varicose tributaries, on superficial venous aneurysms, and on the management of complications of varicose veins and their treatment. All guidelines were based on systematic reviews, and they were graded according to the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using the GRADE method. All ungraded Consensus Statements were supported by an extensive literature review and the unanimous agreement of an expert, multidisciplinary panel. Ungraded Good Practice Statements are recommendations that are supported only by indirect evidence. The topic, however, is usually noncontroversial and agreed upon by most stakeholders. The Implementation Remarks contain technical information that supports the implementation of specific recommendations. This comprehensive document includes a list of all recommendations (Parts I-II), ungraded consensus statements, implementation remarks, and best practice statements to aid practitioners with appropriate, up-to-date management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins.

Recapturing the Team Approach to Vascular Care.

BACKGROUND: The care of the vascular patient remains decentralized rather than coordinated. METHODS: We reviewed the current state of practice and published competency and care documents created by vascular professional societies. RESULTS: Vascular professional societies routinely and repeatedly endorse both a team approach and the competency of specialists from disparate training backgrounds. The care of the vascular patient does not always reflect these public endorsements. CONCLUSIONS: Centering the vascular patient as the mode of organization of care should improve care processes, expertise brought to bear, and outcomes.

Prevalence and outcomes of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients with venous thromboembolic disease: Insight from national inpatient sample.

OBJECTIVE: The mainstay of therapy for patients with venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is anticoagulation. In the inpatient setting, majority of these patients are treated with heparin or low molecular weight heparin. The prevalence and outcomes of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in hospitalized patients with venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is unknown. METHODS: This nationwide study identified patients with VTE from the National Inpatient Sample database between January 2009 and December 2013. Among these patients, we compared in-hospital outcomes of patients with and without HIT using a propensity score-matching algorithm. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of blood transfusions, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleed, length of hospital stay, and total hospital charges. RESULTS: Among 791,932 hospitalized patients with VTE, 4948 patients (0.6%) were noted to have HIT (mean age, 62.9 ±16.2 years; 50.1% female). Propensity-matched comparison showed higher rates of in-hospital mortality (11.01% vs 8.97%; P < .001) and blood transfusions (27.20% vs 20.23%; P < .001) in patients with HIT compared with those without HIT. No significant differences were noted in intracranial hemorrhage rates (0.71% vs 0.51%; P > .05), gastrointestinal bleed (2.00% vs 2.22%; P > .05), length of hospital stay (median, 6.0 days; interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-11.0 vs median, 6.0 days; IQR, 3.0-10.0 days; P > .05), and total hospital charges (median, $36,325; IQR, $17,798-$80,907 vs median, $34,808; IQR, $17,654-$75,624; P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide observational study showed that 0.6% of hospitalized patients with VTE in the United States have HIT. The presence of HIT was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and blood transfusion rates compared with those without HIT.

VIEW-VLU observational study of the effect of Varithena on wound healing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic venous hypertension, triggered by venous reflux and/or obstruction, leads to skin changes and venous leg ulcers (VLUs). Compression therapy is the standard of care, but many wounds remain unhealed. The objectives of this study were to observe the effects of endovenous chemical ablation with commercially available 1% polidocanol injectable microfoam on VLU healing and recurrence rates. METHODS: The VIEW VLU study was a multicenter, open-label, phase IV registry of patients with active VLUs resulting from venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein and/or anterior accessory saphenous vein systems who underwent ablation with 1% polidocanol microfoam. Primary outcomes included wound healing rate (change in wound perimeter), wound closure at 12 weeks after treatment, and time to wound closure. Secondary outcomes included VLU recurrence, numeric pain score at the ulcer location, EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire quality-of-life index, and the Venous Clinical Severity Score. Patients were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 76 patients (80 ulcers) from 14 sites across the United States and Canada (mean age 63.6 ± 13.7 years, 39.5% female, mean body mass index 36.3). Of the enrollees, 96.3% presented with great saphenous vein incompetence. The mean baseline wound perimeter was 117.2 ± 107.4 mm and 26.3% of wounds (21/80) were circumferential. The mean ulcer age was 34.8 ± 51.8 weeks at first presentation and the mean compression therapy duration was 26.4 ± 35.9 weeks. The median wound perimeter decreased by 16.3% from baseline in the first 2 weeks after the procedure and by 27.0% at 12 weeks. By 12 weeks, 53.8% of wounds (43/80) were healed. The median time to ulcer closure by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 89 days (95% confidence interval, 62.0-117.0). In a Kaplan-Meier analysis of initially healed wounds, 88.9% (95% confidence interval, 76.9-94.8) remained closed at 12 weeks after closure. The mean numeric pain scores (ulcer site) improved by 41.0% and 64.1% at 12 weeks and 12 months after the procedure, respectively. The health-related quality-of-life index (scale of 0-1) improved from 0.65 ± 0.27 at baseline to 0.72 ± 0.28 at 12 weeks and 0.73 ± 0.30 at 12 months. By 12 weeks after treatment, the mean target leg Venous Clinical Severity Score had significantly decreased by 5.8 points, and by 12 months it had decreased by 10.0 points. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 1% polidocanol microfoam was associated with promising wound healing rates and low recurrence rates for VLUs, despite a challenging patient population with recalcitrant ulcers, a large percentage of which were circumferential, in patients with high body mass indexes.

Incidence and predictors of acute limb ischemia in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and predictors of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS: Patients with index hospitalizations for AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock from 2016 to 2019 in the US National Readmission Database were identified. We evaluated the incidence of ALI and its associated mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine independent predictors of ALI in this population. RESULTS: A total of 84,615 patients had AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock and 1302 (1.54%) developed ALI. The rates of ALI increased from 1.29% in 2016 to 1.66% in 2019 (P ≤ .002). The use of microaxial mechanical circulatory support increased from 2.25% in 2016 to 13.36% in 2019 (P = .0001). The major predictors of ALI included peripheral arterial disease (odds ratio [OR], 7.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.12-8.81), venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 3.19-6.07), and microaxial mechanical circulatory support (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.74-3.55). ALI in patients with cardiogenic shock was associated higher mortality (39.20% vs 33.53%; P ≤ .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide observational study shows that ALI is an important complication of AMI with cardiogenic shock. This complication is associated with higher mortality. In addition to peripheral artery disease, the use of mechanical circulatory devices was associated with significantly higher rates of ALI.

The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex Scanning and Treatment of Superficial Truncal Reflux: Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine and the International Union of Phlebology.

The Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society collaborated to update the 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum clinical practice guidelines and provide new evidence-based recommendations on critical issues affecting the care of patients with varicose veins. Each recommendation is based on a recent, independent systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic tests and treatments options for patients with lower extremity varicose veins. Part I of the guidelines includes evidence-based recommendations for the evaluation of patients with CEAP (Clinical Class, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathology) class 2 varicose vein using duplex ultrasound scanning and other diagnostic tests, open surgical treatment (ligation and stripping) vs endovenous ablation techniques, thermal vs nonthermal ablation of the superficial truncal veins, and management of incompetent perforating veins in CEAP class 2 disease. We have also made recommendations on the concomitant vs staged treatment of varicose tributaries using phlebectomy or liquid or foam sclerotherapy (with physician-compounded foam or commercially prepared polidocanol endovenous microfoam) for patients undergoing ablation of incompetent superficial truncal veins.

Outcomes from a tertiary care center using a catheter thrombectomy system for managing acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to report a large, single-center experience using the ClotTriever thrombectomy system (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) for the management of acute iliofemoral (IF) deep vein thrombosis (DVT). One limitation of all endovascular devices for the treatment of acute IF-DVT has been the inability to completely remove all acute thrombus and the need for adjunctive thrombolysis with its attendant risk of bleeding complications. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients with acute IF-DVT treated with the ClotTriever thrombectomy system (Inari Medical) is reported. Procedural efficacy was evaluated by an independent core imaging laboratory (Syntactx, New York, NY). Both procedural and in-hospital safety were assessed during the index hospitalization. The treated vein patency was assessed using duplex ultrasound at 30 days after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were included in the present retrospective review, 40 of whom (40%) had contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. In terms of efficacy, 93 patients (97%) had ≥75% thrombus removal. During the index hospitalization, two patients (2%) had experienced a symptomatic pulmonary embolus. However, no mortality, major bleeding, or device-related complications had occurred in the study population. Of the 96 patients, 64 had undergone duplex ultrasound at 30 days after the procedure. Of the 64 patients, 62 had normal flow (97%), 53 (83%) had normal compressibility, and 11 (17%) had partial compressibility. CONCLUSIONS: The ClotTriever thrombectomy catheter was both safe and effective in our cohort of patients with acute IF-DVT outside a randomized clinical trial.

Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage in patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Although acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a rare complication of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), it remains a major concern associated with the use of CDT. The incidence and clinical predictors of developing ICH in the setting of CDT are not known. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients with proximal lower extremity or caval deep vein thrombosis (DVT) from January 2005 to December 2013 in the United States. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the clinical predictors of ICH between patients with DVT who had received anticoagulation therapy alone and those who had been treated with CDT plus anticoagulation therapy. RESULTS: Of 138,049 patients with proximal lower extremity or caval DVT, 7119 (5.2%) had received anticoagulation therapy and CDT. Of the patients treated with anticoagulation alone, ICH had occurred in 0.2% compared with 0.7% for those treated with CDT (P < .01). The independent predictors of ICH in the CDT cohort were a history of stroke (odds ratio [OR], 19.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8-42.8; P < .01), chronic kidney disease (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.7; P = .03), age >74 years (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3; P = .02), male sex (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.01-3.3; P = .048). Of those patients treated with anticoagulation alone, the risk factors for the development of ICH were a history of stroke, hospital teaching status, and age >74 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present nationwide observational study showed that of patients with DVT treated with CDT, the independent predictors for developing ICH were a history of stroke, chronic kidney disease, male sex, and age >74 years.

Outcomes of endovascular venous stenting in patients on direct oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy at a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND: Endovenous revascularization is the standard in the management of acute thrombotic, chronic post-thrombotic iliocaval or iliofemoral obstruction, and nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions. The purpose of this study is to describe our single-center experience of postprocedure anticoagulation and antiplatelet regimens used after endovenous revascularization for a variety of venous occlusive conditions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent endovenous stenting for iliocaval or iliofemoral obstruction from January 1, 2014, to April 30, 2018. Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants, warfarin, or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with or without antiplatelet therapy were identified. Demographic, procedural, patency, and follow-up data were collected. Stent patency was evaluated using duplex Doppler ultrasound examination or contrast venography. RESULTS: Seventy-one of 100 patients were treated with direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC). Sixteen (23%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 55 (77%) available for analysis. The mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 1-43 months) with 32 patients (58%) followed for 12 months or longer. Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary-assisted patency rates were 87%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, at 12 months. In the non-DOAC group (patients treated with warfarin or LMWH), these rates were 87%, 93%, and 95%, respectively, at 12 months. Antiplatelet therapy, including clopidogrel, aspirin, or both, was used in 53 of 55 patients in the DOAC cohort and 18 of 19 patients in the non-DOAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Our-single center retrospective analysis demonstrates acceptable primary patency rates when using DOAC therapy compared with those treated with warfarin or LMWH.

Low-Cost Office-Based Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning and Focused Carotid Ultrasound in an Asian-Indian Cohort.

This study developed an office-based cardiovascular risk calculator using a machine learning (ML) algorithm that utilized a focused carotid ultrasound. The design of this study was divided into three steps. The first step involved collecting 18 office-based biomarkers consisting of six clinical risk factors (age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and smoking) and 12 carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes. The second step consisted of the design of an ML-based cardiovascular risk calculator-called "AtheroEdge Composite Risk Score 2.0" (AECRS2.0ML) for risk stratification, considering chronic kidney disease (CKD) as the surrogate endpoint of cardiovascular disease. The last step consisted of comparing AECRS2.0ML against the currently utilized office-based CVD calculators, namely the Framingham risk score (FRS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) risk scores. A cohort of 379 Asian-Indian patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (stage 1 to 5) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. From this retrospective cohort, 758 ultrasound scan images were acquired from the far walls of the left and right common carotid arteries [mean age = 55 ± 10.8 years, 67.28% males, 91.82% diabetic, 86.54% hypertensive, and 83.11% with CKD]. The mean office-based cardiovascular risk estimates using FRS and WHO calculators were 26% and 19%, respectively. AECRS2.0ML demonstrated a better risk stratification ability having a higher area-under-the-curve against FRS and WHO by ~30% (0.871 vs. 0.669) and ~ 20% (0.871 vs. 0.727), respectively. The office-based machine-learning cardiovascular risk-stratification tool (AECRS2.0ML) shows superior performance compared to currently available conventional cardiovascular risk calculators.

3-D optimized classification and characterization artificial intelligence paradigm for cardiovascular/stroke risk stratification using carotid ultrasound-based delineated plaque: Atheromatic™ 2.0.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atherosclerotic plaque tissue rupture is one of the leading causes of strokes. Early carotid plaque monitoring can help reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Manual ultrasound plaque classification and characterization methods are time-consuming and can be imprecise due to significant variations in tissue characteristics. We report a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based plaque tissue classification and characterization system. METHODS: We hypothesize that symptomatic plaque is hypoechoic due to its large lipid core and minimal collagen, as well as its heterogeneous makeup. Meanwhile, asymptomatic plaque is hyperechoic due to its small lipid core, abundant collagen, and the fact that it is often calcified. We designed a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system consisting of three kinds of deep learning (DL) classification paradigms: Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN), Visual Geometric Group-16 (VGG16), and transfer learning, (tCNN). DCNN was 3-D optimized by varying the number of CNN layers and data augmentation frameworks. The DL systems were benchmarked against four types of machine learning (ML) classification systems, and the CADx system was characterized using two novel strategies consisting of DL mean feature strength (MFS) and a bispectrum model using higher-order spectra. RESULTS: After balancing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaque classes, a five-fold augmentation process was applied, yielding 1000 carotid scans in each class. Then, using a K10 protocol (trained to test the ratio of 90%-10%), tCNN and DCNN yielded accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)) pairs of 83.33%, 0.833 (p < 0.0001) and 95.66%, 0.956 (p < 0.0001), respectively. DCNN was superior to ML by 7.01%. As part of the characterization process, the MFS of the symptomatic plaque was found to be higher compared to the asymptomatic plaque by 17.5% (p < 0.0001). A similar pattern was seen in the bispectrum, which was higher for symptomatic plaque by 5.4% (p < 0.0001). It took <2 s to perform the online CADx process on a supercomputer. CONCLUSIONS: The performance order of the three AI systems was DCNN > tCNN > ML. Bispectrum-based on higher-order spectra proved a powerful paradigm for plaque tissue characterization. Overall, the AI-based systems offer a powerful solution for plaque tissue classification and characterization.

Network meta-analysis to compare VenaSeal with other superficial venous therapies for chronic venous insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared different interventions for chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) management, but mixed comparison of these interventions is lacking. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare VenaSeal closure system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn) with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), mechanochemical ablation, sclerotherapy, and surgery for management of CVI to achieve anatomic success (complete closure of treated vein within 6 months after intervention) as the primary outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol-5 Dimension, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), pain scores, and adverse events as secondary outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of journal databases was undertaken, and RCTs between January 1996 and September 2018 comparing different treatment options were included. Risk of bias and quality of publications were assessed using the Cochrane bias tool; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for study selection and reporting. Twenty RCTs comprising 4570 patients were analyzed. Data for anatomic success, VCSS, HRQoL, pain score, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed using mixed treatment comparison in a network meta-analysis. A Bayesian fixed or random effects model was selected for analysis. Rank probability graphs were generated for various treatments and corresponding ranks obtained to estimate their probability of being best. Relative treatment effects were calculated in terms of log odds ratios for anatomic success and adverse events. Mean difference was calculated for VCSS, HRQoL, and pain score. RESULTS: For the primary outcome measure (anatomic success), VenaSeal system had the highest probability of being ranked first (P = .980); RFA was ranked second (P = .365), EVLA third (P = .397), surgery fourth (P = .290), mechanochemical ablation fifth (P = .695), and sclerotherapy sixth (P = .982). For secondary outcome measures, VenaSeal system ranked third for VCSS (P = .332), fifth for EuroQol-5 Dimension (P = .420), and third for Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (P = .300). Although, VenaSeal system was slightly inferior to some of the other interventions for HRQoL, the 95% credible interval of log odds ratio indicated insufficient evidence for any concrete conclusion to be drawn. VenaSeal system ranked first in reduction of postoperative pain score from baseline (P = .690) and was lowest in occurrence of adverse events (P = .650). Odds of occurrence of adverse events was 3.3 times in the sclerotherapy arm, 2.7 times in the EVLA arm, 1.6 times with surgery, and 1.1 times with RFA vs VenaSeal system arm. CONCLUSIONS: VenaSeal system is a promising therapeutic option for anatomic success at 6 months, with fewer occurrences of adverse events (wound and groin infection, pulmonary embolism) in CVI patients compared with other interventions in this study. Additional economic analysis including cost-effectiveness analysis would provide interesting perspectives on real-world insights to patients, payers, and providers.

Prevalence and predictors of elevated central venous pressure and obstructive sleep apnea in patients with lower extremity chronic venous disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a common vascular disorder with manifestations ranging from asymptomatic spider veins to venous ulcers. Elevated right atrial pressure, otherwise called central venous pressure (CVP), can also result in edema and hyperpigmentation similar to chronic venous insufficiency. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for elevation of CVP. Prevalence rates of elevated CVP or OSA are unknown in patients presenting with a diagnosis of CVD. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, descriptive study of patients referred to our tertiary care center with a diagnosis of CVD. Each patient was evaluated by simultaneous venous duplex ultrasound (to assess venous reflux) and limited echocardiography of the right side of the heart (to assess elevated CVP). We assessed the prevalence and predictors of elevated CVP in this cohort using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients with CVD were evaluated, and of these, 22.7% had elevated CVP and 26.9% had OSA. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of OSA or elevated body mass index in the group with elevated CVP compared with patients with normal CVP. The predictors of elevated CVP were age >64.6 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.003-1.05; P = .026), diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.05-4.5; P = .035), and right lower extremity Venous Clinical Severity Score of ≥8.5 (OR, 1.098; 95% CI, 1.011-1.193; P = .026). Other predictors included prior history of pulmonary embolism and renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the general population, the prevalence of elevated CVP and OSA is significant in this cohort of patients. Age, diabetes, and right lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency symptoms seem to be predictors of elevated CVP. Larger, population-based prevalence studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients presenting with venous thromboembolic events after knee arthroscopy in the RIETE Registry.

Knee arthroscopy is the most common orthopedic procedure worldwide. While incidence of post-arthroscopy venous thromboembolic events (VTE) is low, treatment patterns and patient outcomes have not been described. Patients from the "Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica" who had confirmed post-arthroscopy VTE were compared to patients with provoked, post bone-fracture, and to patients with unprovoked VTE. Baseline characteristics, presenting signs and symptoms, treatment and outcomes including recurrent VTE, bleeds or death were compared. A total of 101 patients with post-arthroscopy VTE and 19,218 patients with unprovoked VTE were identified. Post-arthroscopy patients were younger (49.5 vs. 66 years, P < 0.0001) and had less history of VTE [5.9% vs. 20%, OR 0.26 (0.11-0.59)]. Among patients with isolated DVT, there were fewer proximal DVT in the post-arthroscopy group [40% vs. 86%, OR 0.11 (0.06-0.19)]. Treatment duration was shorter in the post-arthroscopy group (174 ± 140 vs. 311 ± 340 days, P < 0.0001) and more often with DOAC [OR 3.67 (1.95-6.89)]. Recurrent VTE occurred in 6.18 (1.96-14.9) and 11.9 (11.0-12.8) per 100 patient years [HR 0.52 (0.16-1.26)] after treatment in the post-arthroscopy and unprovoked groups, respectively. Recurrent VTE occurred in 5.17 (1.31-14.1) per 100 patient years in a separate post bone-fracture group (n = 147), also not statistically different than the post-arthroscopy recurrence rate. After anticoagulation cessation, some patients post-knee arthroscopy develop VTE. While our small sample size precludes drawing firm conclusions, this signal should warrant further research into the optimal treatment duration for these patients, as some patients may be at increased risk for long-term recurrence.

Twenty-four month results from a randomized trial of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE: We previously reported 3-month and 12-month occlusion rates after treatment of clinically symptomatic saphenous vein reflux with either cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) using the VenaSeal Closure System (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial, VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins (VeClose). Herein we report the 24-month follow-up results of the VeClose trial. METHODS: There were 222 patients with symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence who were randomly assigned to receive either CAC (n = 108) or RFA (n = 114). Patients were not allowed to receive adjunctive treatment of tributary varicosities until after the 3-month visit. Duplex ultrasound of the target vein was performed at day 3 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 after treatment, and closure was assessed by ultrasound by the treating physician. Overall 24-month success rates were compared; in addition, time to first reopening of the target vein was evaluated using survival analysis. End points such as Venous Clinical Severity Score, EuroQoL-5 Dimension, and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 222 randomized patients, 171 completed the 24-month follow-up, which included 87 from the CAC group and 84 from the RFA group. The 24-month complete closure rate was 95.3% in the CAC group and 94.0% in the RFA group, demonstrating continued noninferiority of CAC compared with RFA (P = .0034). Symptoms and quality of life improved similarly in both groups. No clinically significant device- or procedure-related late adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both CAC and RFA were effective in closure of the target GSV, resulting in similar and significant improvements in the patient's quality of life through 24 months. These results suggest that CAC of the GSV is safe and durable out to 2 years.

Use of Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam to Improve Hemodynamics and Symptomology in Patients with Challenging Clinical Presentations: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a widely prevalent condition. Saphenous venous reflux is the most common underlying pathology that leads to CVI. Endovenous thermal ablations (ETA) are the current gold standard. However, some patients present with some unique challenges making ETA less ideal. Nonthermal nontumescent therapies could be considered as alternative therapy in these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of treatment effects with United States Food and Drug Administration-approved polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM; Varithena® 1%) on venous symptomology in 10 (n = 10) C3-C6 patients with CVI and concomitant complex disease/pathology that limited the use of ETA. The pathology included risk of bruising or bleeding, severe lipodermatosclerosis, hidradenitis suppurativa, chronic fibrosis of the vein from prior superficial thrombosis, risk for nerve injury, and failed prior ETA. Before treatment, all patients underwent a venous incompetence study by duplex ultrasound (DUS). Preprocedure pain, symptoms, and Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs) were recorded. Clinical assessments and DUS were performed 4 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: DUS demonstrated reflux in the great saphenous vein (GSV), anterior accessory GSV, and/or the small saphenous vein. Pain scores and VCSS were reduced 4 days and 6 weeks after treatment. These lower scores were maintained for up to 1 year after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PEM use in C3-C6 patients resulted in successful improvement in VCSS, CVI symptoms, and wound healing among patients in whom ETA was not considered to be the optimal therapy.

A novel duplex finding of superficial epigastric vein flow reversal to diagnose iliocaval occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: Although duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging is the current gold standard in the diagnosis of femoropopliteal deep venous thrombosis, it is not an optimal diagnostic modality to diagnose iliocaval occlusion. Screening for iliocaval occlusion thus remains a challenge for clinicians because of the lack of a reliable noninvasive technique. This challenge results in most patients undergoing computed tomography venography or magnetic resonance venography or invasive venography and intravascular ultrasound imaging. This study reports a novel, yet simple, reproducible and intuitive, surface DUS finding of physiologic flow reversal within the superficial epigastric vein (SEV) as a sign of proximal iliocaval occlusion (ICO). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 15 patients who were diagnosed with ICO based on the finding of SEV flow reversal on DUS imaging. Patient demographics, presenting CEAP C scores, ICO characteristics, correlation with advanced imaging, and short-term follow-up findings are reported. RESULTS: Physiologic reversal of the SEV resulted in confirmation of ICO in all patients who underwent advanced imaging, including computed tomography venography or traditional venogram along with intravascular ultrasound imaging. All patients who underwent follow-up DUS scans demonstrated normalization of the SEV flow after ICO recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: ICO can result in deep venous thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, and chronic venous insufficiency. Physiologic flow reversal in SEV is diagnostic of ICO. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of this novel DUS finding.

Roll-in phase analysis of clinical study of cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent great saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE: Cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) was shown in the recently published VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins (VeClose) randomized clinical study to be an effective and noninferior option (in terms of both safety and effectiveness) to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. The objectives of this analysis were to report the efficacy and safety outcomes of the VeClose roll-in (training) group treated with CAC by physicians who had received device use training but had no prior treatment experience with the technique and to compare the outcomes with those from the randomized RFA and CAC groups. METHODS: The first two subjects at each participating site (n = 20) were roll-in cases (ie, not randomized but instead treated with CAC) to ensure the physician's familiarity with the procedure. Subsequent eligible subjects were randomized to either CAC or RFA. After treatment, all subjects returned for assessment on day 3 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12. The study's primary end point was complete closure of the target vein at month 3. Secondary analyses included patient-reported intraprocedural pain and investigator-rated ecchymosis at day 3. Additional assessments included procedure time, quality of life surveys, and adverse events. RESULTS: Mean procedure time was longer in the roll-in group (31 minutes) compared with the randomized groups (24 minutes for CAC and 19 minutes for RFA; P < .0001). Procedure time decreased in both the CAC and RFA groups over time, plateauing at about 22 minutes for CAC and 15 minutes for RFA. In the roll-in group, the 3-month complete occlusion rate was 100%. Reported intraprocedural pain ratings were similar between the roll-in and randomized groups. Other clinical assessments, including quality of life improvement and adverse events, were similar between the roll-in and randomized groups. Increasing procedure number did not affect clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the VeClose study roll-in group demonstrate that despite the physician's lack of prior experience, initial treatment with CAC leads to comparable efficacy and safety results to RFA and is associated with a relatively short learning period.

A randomized study of the safety and efficacy of fondaparinux versus placebo in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

UNLABELLED: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may increase the postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we examined the current postoperative need for prophylactic antithrombotic therapy after CABG surgery. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of fondaparinux versus placebo in the prevention of VTE after CABG surgery. Between March 2010 and January 2013, 78 patients free from preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were enrolled, of whom 37 were randomly assigned to placebo and 41 to treatment with fondaparinux. The primary study end point was a composite, up to day 11, of (a) cumulative incidence of all VTE events, defined as symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT, and fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolisms (efficacy end point), and (b) cumulative incidence of major hemorrhages (safety end point). RESULTS: A single asymptomatic DVT of a lower extremity was detected by duplex ultrasound at the time of discharge from the hospital in the placebo-treated group, and a single major postoperative hemorrhage occurred in the fondaparinux-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postprocedural asymptomatic DVT in this sample of patients undergoing CABG surgery was low. The overall incidence of DVT in the control and investigational treatment groups was similar. Our results showed no benefit of prophylactic postoperative fondaparinux in this population. These findings are congruent with other published studies and provide additional support for recent recommendations not to routinely use anticoagulant prophylaxis after cardiac surgery.