Outcomes of a Novel Spine Virtual Fracture Clinic in an Australian Tertiary Hospital.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of referrals diverted by the spine virtual fracture clinic (SVFC) from traditional outpatient clinic management. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The consistent rise in demand for orthopedic outpatient clinic services is creating marked challenges to the provision of quality care. Virtual fracture clinics for upper and lower limb fractures have reduced the burden on outpatient clinics by providing an alternative telehealth management pathway. To date, no study describes the expansion of virtual care to the spine trauma population. METHODS: A study of spine fractures referred to the RMH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery was conducted comparing outcomes before (January to December 2021) and following (July 2022 to November 2023) implementation of an SVFC. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a telephone-based SVFC on outpatient clinic activity, represented by the proportion of referrals discharged without requiring an outpatient clinic appointment. Secondary aims included appointment utilization, lost to follow-up rates, duration of care, missed or misdiagnoses, unplanned operations, and complications. RESULTS: Of the 731 referrals managed by the SVFC, 91.1% were discharged without requiring in-person outpatient clinic attendance. Compared with the outpatient clinic historical cohort (150 referrals), SVFC management was associated with reductions in the average number of consultations per referral (1.8 vs . 2.4, P <0.001), appointments not attended (5% vs . 13%, P <0.001), referrals lost to follow-up (0% vs . 10.7%, P <0.001), and a shorter duration of care (median 48 vs . 58 d, P <0.001). A total of 65 patients (8.1%) were redirected to the outpatient clinic, of which three underwent surgical intervention. No diagnostic errors, complications or adverse events were identified. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that an SVFC is an effective and safe alternative pathway to traditional hospital-based outpatient clinics, ith low-risk for any adverse outcomes.

Long-term follow-up on dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy: a prospective multicenter trial from the EDGE Research Consortium.

In 2018, the Endourology Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) published a prospective trial comparing dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy. One hundred fifty-nine patients were included in the original analysis, which found no difference in stone-free rate at 3 months. We report the intermediate and long-term outcomes of patients included in the original trial. Two analyses were performed. At 1-year, a retrospective chart review was performed, and data collected on stone episodes, Emergency Department (ED) visits, hospital admissions and surgical interventions. To obtain long-term outcomes, the four sites with the largest initial accrual were included in a second phase of data collection with updated analyses. The patients from those sites were contacted, re-consented, and data were collected on stone surgical interventions, stone episodes, stone recurrences on imaging, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital admissions for stone-related care since their original procedure. One-year follow-up data were collected in 111 of the original 159 (69.8%) patients from the nine sites. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of painful episodes, ED visits, hospital admissions, or surgical interventions. 94 patients from four sites were included in the long-term analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in surgical interventions, painful stone episodes, stone recurrence on imaging, ED visits or hospitalizations for stone-related events between the two groups. Long-term outcomes of dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy indicate that there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two surgical modalities.

Stakeholders Perceptions of Barriers to Precision Medicine Adoption in the United States.

Despite evidence that precision medicine (PM) results in improved patient care, the broad adoption and implementation has been challenging across the United States (US). To better understand the perceived barriers associated with PM adoption, a quantitative survey was conducted across five stakeholders including medical oncologists, surgeons, lab directors, payers, and patients. The results of the survey reveal that stakeholders are often not aligned on the perceived challenges with PM awareness, education and reimbursement, with there being stark contrast in viewpoints particularly between clinicians, payers, and patients. The output of this study aims to help raise the awareness that misalignment on the challenges to PM adoption is contributing to broader lack of implementation that ultimately impacts patients. With better understanding of stakeholder viewpoints, we can help alleviate the challenges by focusing on multi-disciplinary education and awareness to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Understanding Causes for Admission in Planned Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Introduction: For treatment of nephrolithiasis, ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (aPCNL) is growing in popularity for select patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a set of aPCNL selection criteria as well as search for predictors of failed aPCNL resulting in inpatient admission. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) patients from 2016 to 2020. A total of 175 met selection criteria for aPCNL and were included. Primary outcome was safety and efficacy, and secondary outcome was to identify predictors of inpatient stay. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed with both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: In total, between 2016 and 2020, 552 patients underwent PCNL, with 175 of them meeting criteria for aPCNL. One hundred thirty-four of the 175 (76.6%) of these patients were discharged the same day as the surgery and 41 patients were admitted. On univariate analysis, patients who required upper pole access or multiple accesses (p = 0.038) American Society of Anesthesiologists >2 (p = 0.005), or postoperative nephrostomy (PCN) tube (p < 0.001) were more likely to be admitted after surgery. On multivariate analysis, only postoperative PCN was significantly associated with admission (p = 0.015). Regarding reasons for unsuccessful aPCNL, 19.5% of admissions were attributed to intraoperative complications, 7% to social causes, 12.2% to postoperative complications, 14.6% to uncontrolled pain, and 34.1% to unexpected intraoperative procedures. Conclusions: aPCNL using selection criteria is safe and effective, with postoperative PCN predicting the possible necessity for conversion to inpatient admission. Furthermore, our study provides a practical algorithm for those opting to provide aPCNL to patients.

Standardizing Perioperative Medications to Be Used in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Is Feasible in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Patients.

Introduction: The objective of this process improvement project was to determine the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) patients with respect to quality of life (QOL) and pain management in the postoperative recovery period. Methods: An electronic-based medical record ERAS orders protocol for PCNL was instituted at an academic medical center in July 2020. The protocol utilized a pain control regimen designed to minimize opioid medication use postoperatively. We prospectively evaluated PCNL patients' QOL through the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) survey and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) at routine perioperative visits. To assess any opioid reduction benefit of the ERAS protocol, we reviewed an age-matched historical cohort n = 66 (before ERAS implementation) to serve as a comparison cohort with respect to opioid usage. Results: After an inception cohort of 95 patients, 55 ERAS patients remained available for assessment with the WISQOL and PROMIS surveys. In comparison with the non-ERAS cohort, the ERAS cohort represented larger stones, more supine positioning, higher blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and more use of access sheath. ERAS patients received a significantly lower amount of opioids compared with non-ERAS patients upon discharge narcotic usage (116.13 morphine milliequivalent [MME] vs 39.57 MME, p = 0.0001). Compared with their preoperative evaluation, the ERAS cohort had significantly improved QOL scores at 1 week, which sustained through 8 weeks postoperatively. Moreover, pain intensity and pain interference scores were improved at 8 weeks postoperatively for ERAS patients compared with their preoperative time point. Conclusions: We demonstrate that standardizing medications in early efforts toward a PCNL ERAS protocol is feasible and allows for reduced opioid use by patients while achieving early and sustained postprocedure QOL.

Internal iliac artery injury and total hip arthroplasty: discovery after 10 years.

Delayed presentation of iliac artery injury by acetabular screw. Screw removal at liner revision of a 10-year-old uncemented acetabular shell resulted in unexpected catastrophic blood loss. Replacing the screw prevented further hemorrhage, and investigation revealed internal iliac artery injury caused by the screw. This was treated successfully by bypass grafting. Careful review of preoperative imaging should aim to identify those at risk and requiring further imaging before undergoing revision surgery.