The implementation status of prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a questionnaire survey to the board-certified facilities in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation during neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to improve clinical outcomes. However, information on its global dissemination status is limited. This Japanese nationwide survey investigated the implementation status of and barriers to prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer in hospitals. METHODS: This multicenter nationwide survey was conducted by post. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified within the last 10 years as authorized institutes for board-certified esophageal surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society. We administered an original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation during NAC. RESULTS: The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). Forty-six facilities (39%) provided prehabilitation during NAC. The most frequently selected reasons for not providing or providing insufficient prehabilitation were lack of human resources, issues with the reimbursement of medical fees, difficulty in providing continuous prehabilitation during repeated inpatient and outpatient care, the lack of established standard prehabilitation programs, challenges in providing multidisciplinary prehabilitation, and difficulty in managing physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: We observed that the implementation rate of prehabilitation during NAC was low. Critical reasons were not only the lack of medical resources but also the lack of evidence-based standard prehabilitation programs during NAC and the lack of evidence for how to continuously deliver prehabilitation during NAC to patients with physical symptoms.

Priority of the basic and instrumental activities of daily living in older patients with cancer prescribed rehabilitation: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: There is no information on whether vulnerable older patients with cancer consider basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) important outcomes. Our survey aimed to investigate the priority of BADL and IADL in outcomes among vulnerable older patients with cancer. METHODS: This was a single-center survey in a Japanese cancer center. Eligible patients were ≥ 65 years of age and were prescribed in-hospital rehabilitation while under cancer treatment. Using original self-administered ranking questionnaires, patients were asked to rank outcomes and subdomain of BADL and IADL. High-priority domains were defined as the highest, second-highest, and third-highest priority domains in individuals. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 74.0 years (standard deviation, 5.1 years) and the number of males was 107 (63%). The order of ranking of high-priority outcomes was BADL and IADL (n = 155), cognitive function (n = 91), mental function (n = 82), nutrition (n = 61), social function (n = 51), comorbidity (n = 39), and life span (n = 28). The top three high-priority independence subdomains of BADL and IADL were toilet use (n = 140), feeding (n = 134), and mobility (n = 69) among the BADL and shopping (n = 93), food preparation (n = 88), and ability to handle finances (n = 85) among the IADL. CONCLUSIONS: BADL and IADL can be considered the most important health outcomes in clinical trials and in practice among older patients with cancer and physical vulnerabilities.

Impact of early postoperative factors on changes in skeletal muscle mass after esophagectomy in older patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Loss of skeletal muscle mass, measured by the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), after esophagectomy negatively impacts prognosis. However, the information to develop novel supportive care options for preventing loss of skeletal muscle mass is limited. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the impact of early postoperative factors on change in SMI 4 months after curative esophagectomy in older patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: This study included 113 subjects who underwent esophagectomy between 2015 and 2020. Preoperative and postoperative SMI (cm2/m2) were calculated from computed tomography images. The percentage change in SMI 4 months after surgery (SMI%) was calculated as follows: ([postoperative SMI - preoperative SMI] ÷ preoperative SMI) × 100. Potential factors affecting percentage change of SMI after surgery were analyzed by multiple regression. RESULTS: The mean SMI% was - 5.6%. The percentage change (per 1%) in quadriceps muscle strength in the first month after surgery (standardized ß = 0.190, p = 0.048) impacted the SMI%, which was independent of age, sex, preoperative SMI, comorbidity, pathological stage, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Quadriceps muscle weakness in the first month after esophagectomy impacted the SMI% in a dose-dependent relationship.

Prognostic Impact of the Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Older Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In older adults, skeletal muscle mass is an important factor for health and prognosis. The loss of SMM during neoadjuvant therapy affects the prognosis of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, information is limited regarding this possibility in older patients. This study aimed to establish the prognostic impact of SMM loss during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on older patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients age 65 years or older had undergone R0 curative esophagectomy after NAC. The skeletal muscle mass index before and after NAC was calculated from computed tomography images. The percentage change in the SMI during NAC (SMI%) was calculated from the SMI before and after NAC. RESULTS: The study analyzed 150 patients with a mean age of 71.1 ± 3.7 years. The mean value of the SMI was 42.7 ± 7.2 cm2/m2 before NAC, and the SMI% was - 6.4% ± 5.9%. The cutoff of SMI% for overall survival was defined by the log-rank test as - 12%. The Cox proportional hazard model showed that major loss of the SMI (≥ 12%) significantly influenced OS (hazard ratio, 2.490; 95% confidence interval, 1.121-5.529; p = 0.025) independently of age, sex, pathologic T and N factors, or treatment regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Major SMI loss has an impact on OS after R0 curative esophagectomy for older patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients Aged 70 Years or Older with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with esophageal cancer aged ≥ 70 years with a poor prognosis is increasing. In general patients with esophageal cancer, postoperative loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is a prognostic factor. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic impact of postoperative loss of SMM in patients aged ≥ 70 years with esophageal cancer. METHODS: This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent R0 esophagectomy between 2016 and 2020 were included. The percentage postoperative loss of skeletal muscle mass index (SMI%) was calculated using computed tomography images before and at 4 ± 2 months after surgery. RESULTS: The number of subjects in the ≥ 70-year and < 70-year age groups was 166 and 218, respectively. The median SMI% was 5% in all patients; thus, 5% was defined as the cutoff point to define major loss of SMI. Major loss of SMI impacted 3-year overall survival (OS) in the ≥ 70-year age group, independent of age, sex, clinical stage, pathological T and N factors, Charlson comorbidity index, and length of hospital stay (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 4.400; 95% confidence interval: 1.202-16.105; P = 0.025). The adjusted HR of major loss of SMI in the ≥ 70-year age group was higher than in the < 70-year age group (adjusted HR: 4.400 vs. 2.388, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative loss of SMI in patients with esophageal cancer aged ≥ 70 years more strongly impacted 3-year OS than in patients aged < 70 years.

Subcutaneous Lymphatic Vessels in the Lower Extremities: Comparison between Photoacoustic Lymphangiography and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Lymphangiography.

Background Detailed visualization of the lymphatic vessels would greatly assist in the diagnosis and monitoring of lymphatic diseases and aid in preoperative planning of lymphedema surgery and postoperative evaluation. Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of photoacoustic imaging (PAI) for obtaining three-dimensional images of both lymphatic vessels and surrounding venules. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, the authors recruited healthy participants from March 2018 to January 2019 and imaged lymphatic vessels in the lower limbs. Indocyanine green (5.0 mg/mL) was injected into the subcutaneous tissue of the first and fourth web spaces of the toes and below the lateral malleolus. After confirmation of the lymphatic flow with near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging as the reference standard, PAI was performed over a field of view of 270 × 180 mm. Subsequently, the number of enhancing lymphatic vessels was counted in both proximal and distal areas of the calf and compared between PAI and NIRF. Results Images of the lower limbs were obtained with PAI and NIRF in 15 participants (three men, 12 women; average age, 42 years ± 12 [standard deviation]). All participants exhibited a linear pattern on NIRF images, which is generally considered a reflection of good lymphatic function. A greater number of lymphatic vessels were observed with PAI than with NIRF in both the distal (mean: 3.6 vessels ± 1.2 vs 2.0 vessels ± 1.1, respectively; P < .05) and proximal (mean: 6.5 vessels ± 2.6 vs 2.6 vessels ± 1.6; P < .05) regions of the calf. Conclusion Compared with near-infrared fluorescence imaging, photoacoustic imaging provided a detailed, three-dimensional representation of the lymphatic vessels and facilitated an increased understanding of their relationship with the surrounding venules. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lillis and Krishnamurthy in this issue.