Prevalence of the anterosuperior capsulolabral anatomical variations and their association with pathologies of the glenoid labrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Differentiating the anatomical variations of the anterosuperior portion of the glenoid labrum from pathologies is important to avoid unnecessary iatrogenic complications resulting from inaccurate diagnosis. Additionally, the presence of several variations was reported to be conductive to lesions involving the glenoid labrum. Thus, the aim of this study was to state the prevalence rates of the sublabral recess, sublabral foramen, and the Buford complex, and to verify their association with labral lesions. METHODS: Systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to gain potentially eligible literature. Suitable studies were selected in a two-round screening, and relevant data were subsequently extracted. Calculation of the pooled prevalence estimates, including sub-analyses on cohort size, study type, and geographical variance, was conducted. Pooled analysis of risk ratios (RR) was used to assess the conductive nature of the discussed variants to superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions. RESULTS: The screening resulted in selection of 20 studies investigating the morphological features of the glenoid labrum, consisting of 7601 upper limbs. On the bases of random-effects meta-analysis the sublabral recess, sublabral foramen and Buford complex occur with a pooled prevalence of 57.2% (95% CI 30.0-84.4%), 13.5% (95% CI 8.2-18.9%), and 3.0% (95% CI 1.5-4.5), respectively. Moreover, individuals with Buford complex have RR 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.7) of developing SLAP lesions, especially type II (95.5%; 95% CI 86.1-100%), whereas such risk for sublabral recess and sublabral foramen was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Morphological variants of the glenoid labrum posing diagnostic confusion are frequently observed. Gradually, the Buford complex may be a predisposing factor for sustaining a SLAP lesion.

NON-UNIONS AFTER FIXATION OF HUMERAL FRACTURES USING HACKETHAL'S BUNDLE NAILING TECHNIQUE

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study was to identify factors contributing to the development of non-union after fixation of diaphyseal humeral fractures using Hackethal's intramedullary nailing technique. Methods: In the time period from 2001 to 2010 156 patients with diaphyseal humeral fractures were treated surgically using Hackethal's technique. Six of them (3.8%) developed non-union. This group included three women and two men aged 63-69 years and one woman aged 37 years. The following parameters of the patients were recorded: age, gender, comorbidities, substance abuse, mechanism of injury, fracture type and location according to the AO/ASIF classification, and the operative technique. Results: A non-union developed in six patients treated with Hackethal´s method (3.8%). Five of six non-unions (83%) were observed in patients in their sixties. In the subgroup of sexagenarians, non-union developed in 20.8% of surgically treated patients, as compared to 3.8 % in entire group. In the union group, fractures have been caused by high energy trauma in 52% of patients. In patients who developed non-union, high energy trauma caused 67% of fractures. With correct surgical technique the development of a non-union was observed in 0.7% of patients, with incorrect technique in 35.7% (p<0.001). Conclusion: Treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures with Hackethal's intramedullary elastic bundle nailing resulted in an overall high union rate. Factors contributing to the development of non-union were extension of this method to AO type B3 and C fractures and technical imperfection during implantation. Level of Evidence III, Prospective, Case-Control Study.