Growth speed of large brain metastases between diagnostic and radiosurgical planning MRI and predictors of rapid tumor growth.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess volumetric changes of large brain metastases (≥ 2 cm) between their diagnosis and planning for treatment with fractionated stereotactic radiation surgery (fSRS). Predictors of rapid tumor growth were also analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred nine patients harboring 126 large brain metastases were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor characteristics were evaluated on diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) and MRI performed when planning fSRS (pMRI). Average tumor growth rate and percentage growth rate were calculated. Predictors of rapid growth (percentage growth rate > 5%) were determined using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Both tumor diameter and volume were significantly larger on pMRI than on dMRI (P < 0.001). Median tumor percentage growth rate was 2.6% (range, - 10.8-43.3%). Eighty-eight tumors (70%) were slow-growing (percentage growth rate < 5%) and 38 (30%) grew rapidly (percentage growth rate ≥ 5%). Major peritumoral edema and no steroids were predictors of rapid tumor growth. CONCLUSION: Large brain metastases can grow considerably between the time of diagnosis and the time of fSRS treatment planning. We recommend the time between dMRI and fSRS treatment initiation be as short as possible.

Contour variations of the body and tail of the pancreas: evaluation with MDCT.

PURPOSE: To analyze morphology/contour variations of the pancreatic body and tail in subjects free of pancreatic disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed triple-phase, contrast-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (3P-CE-MDCT) examinations of 449 patients who had no clinical or CT evidence of pancreatic diseases. These patients were evaluated for morphologic/contour variations of the pancreatic body and tail, which were classified into two types. In Type I, a portion of normal pancreatic parenchyma protrudes >1 cm in maximum diameter from the body or tail (Ia-anteriorly; Ib-posteriorly). Type II was defined as a morphologic anomaly of the pancreatic tail (IIa-globular; IIb-lobulated; IIc-tapered; IId-bifid). RESULTS: Thirty-eight (8.5%) out of 449 patients had body or tail variations. Of those, 23 patients showed Type I variant: Ia in 21 and Ib in two. Type II variant was identified in 15 patients: IIa in eight, IIb in two, IIc in two and IId in three. Protrusion of the anterior surface of the normal pancreas, especially in the tail, was the most frequently occurring variant. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the types and subtypes of morphology/contour variations of the pancreatic body and tail could help prevent misinterpretation of normal variants as pancreatic tumors on unenhanced MDCT.

Peripancreatic lymphatic invasion by pancreatic carcinoma: evaluation with multi-detector row CT.

Peripancreatic lymphatic networks are frequently involved in pancreatobiliary carcinoma, affecting the prognosis. However, little attention has been paid to CT imaging of normal and pathological conditions of peripancreatic lymphatic networks. We evaluated multi-detector row CT (MDCT) images of peripancreatic lymphatic networks invaded by pancreatic carcinoma and compared them with those of normal peripancreatic lymphatic networks using imaging reconstruction every 1 mm with a multiplanar reformation technique. Apart from the region around the pancreatic body and tail, normal peripancreatic lymphatic networks were detected as "linear structures" on MDCT. However, peripancreatic lymphatic invasion by pancreatic carcinoma was frequently identified as "reticular," "tubular," or "soft tissue mass" appearances in the peripancreatic fat tissues. Peripancreatic lymphatic invasion by pancreatic carcinoma was more frequently detected around the common hepatic artery, celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, and left para-aortic area. Depending on the tumor location, positive peripancreatic lymphatic invasion was most frequent at the area around the common hepatic artery in the head region and at the area around the celiac artery in the body and tail regions. Knowledge of CT imaging of normal and pathological peripancreatic lymphatic networks is essential for determining the accurate staging of pancreatic carcinoma.