Toward Evidence-Based Severity Assessment in Mouse Models with Repeated Seizures: (II.) Impact of Surgery and Intrahippocampal Kainate.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic epilepsy models require neurosurgical procedures including depth electrode implants. The intrahippocampal kainate model is a frequently used chronic paradigm, which is based on chemoconvulsant administration and status epilepticus induction during the surgical procedure. This experimental approach raises the question of the extent to which this approach affects postsurgical recovery. In addition to the short- and long-term impact of the surgical intervention, a potential impact of highly frequent electrographic seizure events needs to be considered in the context of severity assessment. METHODS: Various behavioral, biochemical, and telemetric parameters were analyzed in four experimental groups of mice: 1st naive, 2nd with transmitter implants, 3rd with transmitter and electrode implants, and 4th with transmitter implants, electrode implants, and kainate-induced status epilepticus. RESULTS: During the early postsurgical phase, transmitter implants caused a transient impact on Mouse Grimace scores and intragroup increase of fecal corticosterone metabolites. Additional craniotomy was associated with an influence on total heart rate variability and fecal corticosterone metabolites. Heart rate and Irwin score increases as well as a prolonged increase in Mouse Grimace scores pointed to an added burden related to the induction of a nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Data from the chronic phase argued against a relevant influence of frequent electrographic seizures on behavioral patterns, fecal corticosterone metabolites, heart rate, and its variability. However, Irwin scores indicated long-term changes in some animals with increased reactivity, body tone, and Straub tail. Interestingly, selected behavioral and telemetric data from the early post-status epilepticus phase correlated with the frequency of electrographic seizure events in the chronic phase. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our findings argue against the pronounced impact of highly frequent electrographic seizures on the well-being of mice. However, an increased level of nervousness in a subgroup of animals should be considered for handling procedures and refinement measures. In the early postsurgical phase, several parameters indicate an influence of the interventions with evidence that the nonconvulsive status epilepticus can negatively affect the recovery. Thus, the development and validation of refinement efforts should focus on this experimental phase. Finally, the datasets suggest that simple readout parameters may predict the long-term consequences of the epileptogenic insult. Respective biomarker candidates require further validation in the follow-up studies in models with subgroups of animals with or without epilepsy development.

Grimace scale, burrowing, and nest building for the assessment of post-surgical pain in mice and rats-A systematic review.

Several studies suggested an informative value of behavioral and grimace scale parameters for the detection of pain. However, the robustness and reliability of the parameters as well as the current extent of implementation are still largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to systematically analyze the current evidence-base of grimace scale, burrowing, and nest building for the assessment of post-surgical pain in mice and rats. The following platforms were searched for relevant articles: PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Web of Science. Only full peer-reviewed studies that describe the grimace scale, burrowing, and/or nest building as pain parameters in the post-surgical phase in mice and/or rats were included. Information about the study design, animal characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcome measures was extracted from identified publications. In total, 74 papers were included in this review. The majority of studies have been conducted in young adult C57BL/6J mice and Sprague Dawley and Wistar rats. While there is an apparent lack of information about young animals, some studies that analyzed the grimace scale in aged rats were identified. The majority of studies focused on laparotomy-associated pain. Only limited information is available about other types of surgical interventions. While an impact of surgery and an influence of analgesia were rather consistently reported in studies focusing on grimace scales, the number of studies that assessed respective effects was rather low for nest building and burrowing. Moreover, controversial findings were evident for the impact of analgesics on post-surgical nest building activity. Regarding analgesia, a monotherapeutic approach was identified in the vast majority of studies with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs and opioids being most commonly used. In conclusion, most evidence exists for grimace scales, which were more frequently used to assess post-surgical pain in rodents than the other behavioral parameters. However, our findings also point to relevant knowledge gaps concerning the post-surgical application in different strains, age levels, and following different surgical procedures. Future efforts are also necessary to directly compare the sensitivity and robustness of different readout parameters applied for the assessment of nest building and burrowing activities.

Defining body-weight reduction as a humane endpoint: a critical appraisal.

In many animal experiments scientists and local authorities define a body-weight reduction of 20% or more as severe suffering and thereby as a potential parameter for humane endpoint decisions. In this study, we evaluated distinct animal experiments in multiple research facilities, and assessed whether 20% body-weight reduction is a valid humane endpoint criterion in rodents. In most experiments (restraint stress, distinct models for epilepsy, pancreatic resection, liver resection, caloric restrictive feeding and a mouse model for Dravet syndrome) the animals lost less than 20% of their original body weight. In a glioma model, a fast deterioration in body weight of less than 20% was observed as a reliable predictor for clinical deterioration. In contrast, after induction of chronic diabetes or acute colitis some animals lost more than 20% of their body weight without exhibiting major signs of distress. In these two animal models an exclusive application of the 20% weight loss criterion for euthanasia might therefore result in an unnecessary loss of animals. However, we also confirmed that this criterion can be a valid parameter for defining the humane endpoint in other animal models, especially when it is combined with additional criteria for evaluating distress. In conclusion, our findings strongly suggest that experiment and model specific considerations are necessary for the rational integration of the parameter 'weight loss' in severity assessment schemes and humane endpoint criteria. A flexible implementation tailored to the experiment or intervention by scientists and authorities is therefore highly recommended.