RESUMO
PURPOSE: Photodynamic diagnosis using hexaminolevulinate (HAL)-guided BL-TURB may reduce the recurrence risk in non-muscle invasive BCa compared to standard WL-TURB due to more sensitive tumor detection. The impact of the initial use of WL- vs. BL-TURB on follow-up costs was evaluated in this real-world data analysis. METHODS: Anonymous claims data of German statutory health insurances (GKV) from 2011 to 2016 were analyzed in a primary and adjusted study population. Selection criteria included five quarters before enrolment, one index quarter (InQ) of initial TURB and BCa diagnosis, either within two years for the primary analysis or within four years for the adjusted analysis, and a follow-up period (FU) of either eleven or three quarters, respectively. RESULTS: In the primary analysis (n = 2331), cystectomy was identified as an important cost driver masking potential differences between cohorts. Therefore, patients undergoing cystectomy (InQ + FU) were excluded from the adjusted study population of n = 4541 patients (WL: 79%; BL: 21%). Mean total costs of BL-TURB were initially comparable to WL-TURB (WL: EUR 4534 vs. BL: EUR 4543) and tended to be lower compared to WL-TURB in the first two quarters of FU. After one year (3rd FU quarter), costs equalized. Considering total FU, mean costs of BL-TURB were significantly lower compared to WL-TURB (WL: EUR 7073 vs BL: EUR 6431; p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis of healthcare claims data highlights the comparability of costs between BL-TURB and WL-TURB.
Assuntos
Carcinoma , Cistectomia , Cistoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Idoso , Ácido Aminolevulínico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Aminolevulínico/farmacologia , Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma/epidemiologia , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/economia , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/farmacologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Some patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop a severe clinical course with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and fatal outcome. Clinical manifestations and biomarkers in early stages of disease with relevant predictive impact for outcomes remain largely unexplored. We aimed to identify parameters which are significantly different between subgroups. DESIGN: 125 patients with COVID-19 were analysed. Patients with ARDS (N = 59) or non-ARDS (N = 66) were compared, as well as fatal outcome versus survival in the two groups. KEY RESULTS: ARDS and non-ARDS patients did not differ with respect to comorbidities or medication on developing a fatal outcome versus survival. Body mass index was higher in patients with ARDS versus non-ARDS (p = 0.01), but not different within the groups in survivors versus non-survivors. Interleukin-6 levels on admission were higher in patients with ARDS compared to non-ARDS as well as in patients with fatal outcome versus survivors, whereas lymphocyte levels were lower in the different subgroups (all p<0.05). There was a highly significant 3.5-fold difference in fever load in non-survivors compared to survivors (p<0.0001). Extrapulmonary viral spread was detected more often in patients with fatal outcome compared to survivors (P = 0.01). Further the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in serum showed a significantly more severe course and an increased risk of death (both p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have identified early risk markers for a severe clinical course, like ARDS or fatal outcome. This data might help develop a strategy to address new therapeutic options early in patients with COVID-19 and at high risk for fatal outcome.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/terapia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Interleucina-6/análise , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a pivotal role in the treatment of advanced or metastasised prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this health services research was to compare real-world data on the initial use of different GnRH agonists and antagonists (GnRHa) with regard to prescription patterns, hospitalisation rates and costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anonymised claims data fromâ>â70 German health insurance funds between 2010 and 2015 (nâ=â4â205â227) were analysed (1 year pre-observation period, 1 index quarter with initial GnRHa prescription,â≥â2 years of follow-up (FU)). RESULTS: The study population included 2382 PCa patients (mean age 75 years). Leuprolide (Leu) was prescribed most frequently (56.6â%). At initial GnRHa administration, 70â% of patients neither had lymph node nor distant metastases. Around 11.2â% of all patients stopped GnRHa treatment after the first prescription, 17.6â% switched their initial therapy to another substance after a mean of 457 days (median: 399 days); in the hybrid (hyb) group 100 days earlier on average than in the agonist group (pâ=â0.016). The prevalence ranking of the most common comorbidities was consistent over time: hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. The prevalence of hypertension increased significantly in the agonist group (16.4â%) compared with the antagonist (6.9â%, pâ=â0.022) and hyb group (11.6â%, pâ=â0.006). With regard to CVD, there were no significant differences in the relative growth rate between the 3 combined therapy classes. In total, 23.9â% of all patients died within the 3-year FU. The mortality rate was lowest for triptorelin (Trp, 22.1â%) and highest for goserelin (Gos, 29.4â%, n.s.). In the index quarter, 26.4â% of patients had at least one inpatient hospitalisation [min-max: Trp 22.4â%; Gos 30.3â%], with an average length of hospital stay/patient of 3 days [Trp 2.4; Gos 4.5]. The annual hospitalisation rate was between 36.2 and 40.7â%, the average length of hospital stay in the entire FU was between 17.6 (Trp) and 20.8 days (hyb). The average hospital costs in the index quarter were approx. EUR 1200 [Trp 988; Gos 1803] and per FU year approx. EUR 3000. In the Trp cohort, total costs (index quarterâ+â3 years) were more than EUR 1000 below the average costs of EUR 9476 [Trp 8116; Leu 9779; n.s.]. CONCLUSION: This comparative retrospective analysis provides real-world information on initial GnRHa treatment for advanced prostate cancer, revealing differences in treatment patterns, hospitalisation rates and hospital costs in Germany.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios , Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Alemanha , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Prescrições , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Preventable chronic diseases account for the greatest burden in the German health system and statutory health insurance (SHI) funds play a crucial role in implementing and financing prevention strategies. On the contrary, the morbidity-based scheme to distribute financial resources from the Central Reallocation Pool among the different sickness funds may counteract efforts of effective prevention from an economic perspective. We assessed financial impacts of prevention from a sickness funds perspective in a retrospective controlled study. Claims data of 6,247,275 persons were analyzed and outcomes between two propensity-matched groups (n = 852,048) of prevention users and non-users were compared in a 4-year follow-up. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we analyzed healthcare expenditures, the development of morbidity, financial transfers from the Central Reallocation Pool, and contribution margins. The group of prevention users develops less morbidity (incidences and disease aggravations) compared to the control group. Healthcare expenditures increase in both groups within 4 years, whereas the increase is lower for prevention users compared to non-users (568.04 vs. 640.60, p < 0.0001). Taking morbidity-based financial transfers into account, the decrease in contribution margins is stronger for prevention users (- 188.44 vs. - 138.73, p < 0.0001). This study demonstrates an economic disincentive from a sickness funds' perspective. In the semi-competitive SHI market, sickness funds will be discouraged from effective prevention strategies if investments are not worth it financially. Their efforts and knowledge are, however, crucial for joint action to foster prevention over cure in the health system.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica/economia , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Morbidade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Objective: The objective of this study was to obtain real-world information on gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist (GnRHa) therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods: Anonymized, routine healthcare claims data from approx. 75 German statutory health insurance funds from 2010-2015 (n = 4,205,227) were analyzed. Patients had an enrolment of 1 year before GnRHa, 1 index quarter of initial GnRHa prescription and ≥2 years of follow-up. Results: In total, 2,382 patients with PCa were eligible. The most frequent index therapy was leuprolide in 56.6%. The rank order of PCa comorbidity prevalence was consistent over time (% at index and 3-years of follow-up): hypertension (71.5; 85.0), hyperlipidemia (45.2; 60.8), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (35.7; 54.1), and diabetes (28.3; 36.2). Comparing pooled therapy classes (agonists, hybrids, and antagonist), no significant differences in the incidence of CVD or diabetes were observed. For hypertension, there was a significant increase for agonists (16.4%) compared to antagonists (6.9%, p = 0.022) and leuprolide hybrid group (11.6%, p = 0.006). During the follow-up period 23.9% of all PCa patients died. There were no significant differences concerning mortality rate and discontinuation rates between the cohorts. In total, 11.2% of all patients discontinued GnRHa after first prescription; the mean time to first switch to another GnRHa therapy was 100 days earlier for hybrids than for agonists (p = 0.016). Conclusion: This comparative retrospective analysis provides real-world information about healthcare characteristics and treatment patterns, highlighting the impact of different GnRHa on clinical outcomes for patients with advanced PCa in Germany.
RESUMO
AIM: Cataract extraction is one of the most frequent surgeries in Germany. In most cases, the clouded natural lens is replaced by a hydrophobic or hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) implant. The most common long-term complication after cataract surgery is the development of a posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Although no precise real world data are available, published evidence suggests a lower risk for PCO development for hydrophobic acrylic IOLs compared to hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. Therefore, in the present study we assessed real world data on the impact of different IOL material types on the incidence of post-operative PCO treatment. SUBJECT AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 3,025 patients who underwent cataract extraction and implantation of either an acrylic hydrophobic or hydrophilic IOL in 2010. We assessed clinical outcomes and direct costs in a 4-year follow-up period after cataract surgery from a statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective in Germany. RESULTS: PCO that required capsulotomies occurred significantly (p < 0.0001) less frequent in patients who had received a hydrophobic IOL (31.57% of 2,078 patients) compared to the group with hydrophilic IOL implants (56.6% of 947 patients) and costs per patient for postoperative treatment in a 4-year follow-up were 50.03 vs. 87.81 (i.e. 75% higher in the latter group, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Considering the high prevalence of cataract, the economic burden associated with adverse effects of cataract extraction is of great relevance for the German SHI. Hydrophobic lenses seem to be superior regarding both medical and economic results.