Cardiovascular risk and mortality in patients with hyperuricemia treated with febuxostat or allopurinol: a retrospective nation-wide cohort study in Austria 2014-2017.

Patients with hyperuricemia and gout are at an increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Inhibition of the xanthine oxidase with allopurinol or febuxostat have become the mainstay for urate lowering therapy. However, it has been suggested that febuxostat increases the risk for CV mortality as compared to allopurinol. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the CV risk among patients with febuxostat or allopurinol therapy. Patients who initiated urate lowering therapy with febuxostat or allopurinol between 2014 and 2017 were selected from the drug reimbursement database of the Austrian health insurances funds. The primary CV endpoint was a composite of angina pectoris, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal subarachnoid or cerebral hemorrhage, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or death from any cause. In total, 28.068 patients (62.1% male) with a mean age of 71 years were included. 7.767 initiated febuxostat treatment and 20.301 received allopurinol. The incidence rate per 100 patient-years of the composite primary endpoint was 448 (febuxostat) and 356 (allopurinol) with a corresponding adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 (95% CI 0.53-0.63) for allopurinol vs. febuxostat initiators. Similar HR were found for secondary endpoints including all-cause mortality [0.61 (95% CI 0.55-0.68)] and separate analyses of cardiac events [0.48 (95% CI 0.38-0.61)] and ischemic stroke [0.47 (95% CI 0.36-0.61)]. Data from this Austrian population-based study suggests that febuxostat initiators are at an increased risk for nonfatal CV events or death from any cause as compared to those with allopurinol. This is consistent with CV concerns of other trials, which limited the broad therapeutic use of febuxostat.

Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated With Radiochemotherapy Including Image-Guided Brachytherapy: A Retro-EMBRACE Study.

PURPOSE: To present a nomogram for prediction of overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing definitive radiochemotherapy including image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven hundred twenty patients with LACC treated with radiochemotherapy including IGABT in 12 institutions (median follow-up 56 months) were analyzed; 248 deaths occurred. Thirteen candidate predictors for OS were a priori chosen on the basis of the literature and expert knowledge. Missing data (7.2%) were imputed using multiple imputation and predictive mean matching. Univariate analysis with a multivariable Cox regression model for OS stratified by center was performed. Stepwise selection of predictive factors with the Akaike Information Criterion was used to obtain a predictive model and construct a nomogram for OS predictions 60 months from diagnosis; this was internally validated by concordance probability as a measure of discrimination and a calibration plot. RESULTS: Thirteen potential predictive factors were evaluated; 10 factors reached statistical significance in univariate analysis (age, Hemoglobin, FIGO Stage2009, tumor width, corpus involvement, lymph node involvement, concurrent chemotherapy, dose to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume, volume of CTV at the first brachytherapy [CTVHRVolumeBT], overall treatment time [OTT]). Four factors were confirmed significant within the multivariable Cox regression model (FIGO Stage2009, lymph node involvement, concurrent chemotherapy, CTVHRVolumeBT). The predictive model and corresponding nomogram were based on 7 Akaike Information Criterion-selected factors (age, corpus involvement, FIGO Stage2009, lymph node involvement, concurrent chemotherapy, CTVHRVolumeBT, OTT) and showed promising calibration and discrimination (cross-validated concordance probability c = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first nomogram to predict OS in patients with LACC treated with IGABT. In addition to previously reported factors (age, FIGO2009 stage, corpus involvement, chemotherapy delivery, OTT, lymph node involvement), status of primary tumor at the time of brachytherapy seems to be an essential outcome predictor. These results can facilitate individualized tailoring of treatment and patient counseling during the treatment.