Evaluation of custom-made relay® stent-grafts for aortic arch landing zones 0 and I: experience from two high-volume aortic centers.

OBJECTIVES: To report experience with a Relay® stent graft custom-made platform in treating different aortic arch pathology in two high-volume aortic centers. METHODS: a retrospective analysis of all patients treated between July 2016 and July 2023 with custom-made Relay® stent graft (CMD). Underlying aortic arch pathology was aneurysm, penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) and dissection. Three CMD designs were used: proximal scallop, fenestrations, and inner branches. Endpoints were technical success, perioperative stroke, death, and reintervention rate. RESULTS: 35 patients (89% males) with a mean age of 70 ± 11 years were treated.Indication for treatment was PAU in 14 patients (40%), aneurysm in eleven patients (31%), and ten patients (29%) had aortic dissection. Technical success rate was 100%. Twenty-eight patients (80%) had proximal sealing in zone 0 and seven (20%) in zone 1. Nine patients (25.6%) had proximal scallops, nine (25.6%) one big fenestration and 17 (48.8%) a branched device; one with single branch; 15 with double branches and one with triple branches. Thirty patients (86%) had previous or simultaneous LSA revascularization. No patient died during 30-days. Two patients (5.7%) had stroke postoperatively; both recovered without disabling deficits. Mean follow-up was 35 ± 26 months. Six patients (17.1%) died during follow-up. One patient required reinforcement of the bridging stent in the LCCA and one additional vascular pluging of the LSA. Three patients received distal extension. CONCLUSIONS: The Relay® stent graft custom-made platform showed a good performance in our study with high technical success rate, low perioperative stroke and mortality, and low reintervention rates during the follow-up.

Indication and Outcome of Late Open Conversion after Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the standard of care for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms over the last 2 decades. Endograft technology and treatment of complications like endoleaks, graft migration, or graft occlusion developed over time. However, sometimes open surgical conversion maybe required. Our aim was to analyze the indications, the technical aspects and outcomes in patients who underwent open conversion after EVAR with different types and generations of endografts. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study reviewed all patients who underwent EVAR from 2004 to 2020. Open surgical conversions >1 month post EVAR were identified. Conversions for graft infection were excluded. Indications for conversion and operative technique were analyzed. Primary endpoint of the study was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were re-interventions and follow-up mortality. RESULTS: During 2004 and 2020, 443 consecutive EVARs were performed, and 28 patients required open surgical conversion, with an additional 3 referred from other hospitals (N = 31). The median age was 75 (range 58-93); 94% were male. Conversion was performed after a median time of 55 months (range 16-209). Twenty patients underwent elective and 11 emergency conversion. Indications for open conversion were graft migration, respectively, disease progression with endoleak type Ia and/or Ib in 52% (16/31) and sac expansion due to endoleak type II in 26% (8/31). Of the 31 patients, 17 (55%) had at least one previous endovascular re-intervention. All patients met the device-specific instructions for use for each implanted endograft. In-hospital intervention rate was 16% (5/31). Thirty-day mortality rate was 3% (1/31) with one patient died due to multiorgan failure after rupture with complete endograft replacement. Five patients (16%) died during follow-up. Mid-term follow-up was 47.5 months (range 24-203) with estimated cumulative survival rates of 97%, 89%, and 84%, at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Late open conversion remains a valuable treatment option and can be performed safely in elective and emergency setting with a low early mortality. Lifelong surveillance and prompt intervention when necessary are essential in ensuring optimal outcomes after EVAR and preventing the need for emergent conversions.

The Safety and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Staged Segmental Artery Coil Embolization (MIS2ACE) Prior Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Single-Center Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally Invasive Staged Segmental Artery Coil Embolization (MIS2ACE) is a novel technique of spinal cord preconditioning used to reduce the risk of paraplegia in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. In this study, we report our experience with MIS2ACE, including both degenerative and post-dissection TAAA, while we attempt to systematically summarize relevant data available in the literature. DESIGN: single-center observational study with systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Initial retrospective analysis of 7 patients undergoing MIS2ACE over 12 sessions with a subsequent systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the available published data (PROSPERO protocol number: CRD42023477411). Baseline patient and aneurysm characteristics, along with procedural technique and outcomes, were analyzed. One-arm pooling of proportions was used to summarize available published data. RESULTS: We treated seven patients (5 males, 71%) with a median age of 69 years (IQR 55,69). According to the Crawford classification, five patients (1%) had extent II TAAA, and two (29%) had extent III TAAA. Five patients (71%) had post-dissection -TAAA; four of them were after Stanford type A dissection, and one had a chronic type B dissection. Three patients (43%) had connective tissue disease. Of the seven patients, six (86%) underwent previous aortic surgery, while the median aneurysm diameter was 58 mm (IQR 55,58). MIS2ACE was successful in 11 sessions (92%). The median number of embolized arteries was 4 (IQR 1,4). There were no periprocedural complications in any embolization. The median embolization-operation time interval was 37.0 days (IQR 31,78). Two patients had open and five endovascular treatment. There were no events of spinal cord ischemia either after MIS2ACE or after the aortic repair. Out of the 432 initially retrieved articles, we included two studies in the meta-analysis, including patients with MIS2ACE for spinal cord preconditioning in addition to our cohort. The prevalence of pooled postoperative spinal cord ischemia among MIS2ACE patients is 1.9% (95% CI -0.028 to 0.066, p = 0.279; 3 studies; 81 patients, 127 coiling sessions). CONCLUSIONS: While the current published data is limited, our study further confirms that MIS2ACE is a technically feasible and safe option for spinal cord preconditioning.

Physician-modified versus chimney endografting for pararenal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the existing published evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of the endovascular aortic repair with chimney technique (ch-EVAR) and physician-modified stent-grafts (PMSGs) for the treatment of pararenal aortic aneurysm repair. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of all relevant studies reported until October 2023 according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines was performed. The pooled 30-day mortality, peri- and postoperative complication rates were estimated using fixed or random effect methods. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 679 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 16 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 1094 patients (ch-EVAR N.=861 and PMSG N.=233) (90% male) were identified. The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 3.4% for ch-EVAR and 2.6% for PMSG. The major adverse events (MAE) in the early period was 14.7% for ch-EVAR and 18.5% PMSG, respectively. Higher occlusion rate was observed of the chimney stents grafts (8.2%) than the bridging stents (1.4%) during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Ch-EVAR and physician-modified technology are safe with low 30-day mortality in elective settings for pararenal aortic aneurysms repair. No significant differences were seen between the two surgical methods regarding the early major adverse events rate. However, higher occlusion rate for the chimneys can be expected over time.

European Multicentric Experience With Fenestrated-branched ENDOvascular Stent Grafting After Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: The EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To report the mid-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) following a failed previous endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) or previous open aneurysm repair (pOAR). METHODS: Data from consecutive patients who underwent F-BEVAR for pEVAR or pOAR from 2006 to 2021 from 17 European vascular centers were analyzed. Endpoints included technical success, major adverse events, 30-day mortality, and 5-year estimates of survival, target vessel primary patency, freedom from reinterventions, type I/III endoleaks, and sac growth >5 mm. BACKGROUND: Treatment of a failed previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a complex undertaking. F-BEVAR is becoming an increasingly attractive option, although comparative data are limited regarding associated risk factors, indications for treatment, and various outcomes. RESULTS: There were 526 patients included, 268 pOAR and 258 pEVAR. The median time from previous repair to F-BEVAR was 7 (interquartile range, 4-12) years, 5 (3-8) for pEVAR, and 10 (6-14) for pOAR, P <0.001. Predominant indication for treatment was type Ia endoleak for pEVAR and progression of the disease for pOAR. Technical success was 92.8%, pOAR (92.2%), and pEVAR (93.4%), P =0.58. The 30-day mortality was 6.5% overall, 6.7% for pOAR, and 6.2% for pEVAR, P =0.81. There were 1853 treated target vessels with 5-year estimates of primary patency of 94.4%, pEVAR (95.2%), and pOAR (94.4%), P =0.03. Five-year estimates for freedom from type I/III endoleaks were similar between groups; freedom from reintervention was lower for pEVAR (38.3%) than for pOAR (56.0%), P =0.004. The most common indication for reinterventions was for type I/III endoleaks (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Repair of a failed pEVAR or pOARis safe and feasible with comparable technical success and survival rates. While successful treatment can be achieved, significant rates of reintervention should be anticipated, particularly for issues related to instability of target vessels/bridging stents.

Motor evoked potential-guided segmental artery revascularization during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery after coil embolization as a part of the minimally invasive staged segmental artery coil embolization concept.

Sacrifice of the segmental arteries during thoracoabdominal aortic repair carries the risk of spinal cord injury. Staged embolization of segmental arteries has been discussed as an option for preconditioning the spinal cord vascular network. In the present case, periprocedural monitoring of motor-evoked potentials detected spinal cord ischemia after aortic cross-clamping, although embolization of eight segmental arteries had been performed in advance. Implantation of an intercostal artery bypass restored spinal cord perfusion and normalized the motor-evoked potentials. Thus, the preconditioning strategy to stimulate creation of a spinal cord collateral network as an adjunctive method to prevent paraplegia is not perfect.

Risk for Additional Infarction in Emergency Carotid Artery Endarterectomy in Thrombectomy Acute Stroke Patients.

Purpose: Thromboembolic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery with tandem occlusion of the internal carotid artery is a life-threatening condition with unfavorable neurological outcome. We perform emergency carotid endarterectomy in the same anesthesia session as thrombectomy in our angiography suite whenever needed despite the absence of electrophysiological neuromonitoring. Methods: We evaluated 47 thrombectomy patients with emergency CEA in our clinic between June 2013 and November 2020. To determine whether there were additional infarctions due to the surgical procedure, we assessed the initial diagnostic CT imaging for previously infarcted areas, cerebral perfusion, and vascular anatomy, including collateralization in the Circle of Willis (CoW). We then analyzed follow-up imaging with respect to new infarctions that could not be explained by the initial stroke. Results: 5 of 47 (11%) patients had a complete CoW. There was contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion in 18/47 (38%) patients. Surgical procedure was eversion CEA in 34 (72%) and with a patch graft CEA in 13 (28%) cases. Shunts were used during surgery in 17/47 (36%) patients. Two patients suffered from an additional infarction in a new territory, however this was not caused by the surgical procedure but due to embolism during endovascular thrombectomy. In 1 of these 2 patients a hemodynamic border zone infarction was also observed, which could have developed during thrombectomy as well as during surgery, although this could not be attributed with absolute certainty to the surgery. The final infarction size was significantly larger in patients with contralateral ICA stenosis or occlusion (P = .038). Neither CoW anatomy nor the absence of a shunt during surgery could be identified as risk factors for additional infarction. Conclusion: Emergency surgery in the angiography suite without neuromonitoring was not associated with an increased additional stroke rate in our patient cohort.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of stroke rates in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm and type B dissection.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the stroke rates after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms and/or dissections. METHODS: A systematic search of all the literature reported until September 2021 was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. The pooled perioperative stroke rates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed or random effect methods. RESULTS: A total of 878 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 43 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 5764 patients (63.5% male) were identified among the eligible studies. The pooled any stroke rate was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.60%-5.28%). However, after procedures without left subclavian artery (LSA) ostial coverage (eg, TEVAR deployed within or distal to zone ≥3), the stroke rate was 3.15% (95% CI, 2.21%-4.22%). For the patients with LSA coverage, the pooled stroke rate was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.69%-4.14%) for patients receiving left subclavian artery revascularization. However, the patients without LSA revascularization had a pooled estimated stroke incidence of 11.8% (95% CI, 5.85%-19.12%). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke has been a common finding after TEVAR, especially with LSA coverage without revascularization, validating current clinical practice guidelines recommending routine revascularization, when feasible. Additional studies with larger patient numbers that provide separate data regarding the aortic pathology treated, the anatomic location of the stroke and their association with functional recovery and survival are needed.

Outcome of Elective and Emergency Open Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in 255 Cases: a Retrospective Single Centre Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study reports on open TAAA repair comparing short and long term patient outcome according to the type of repair defined by the Crawford classification and elective vs. emergency repair. Endpoints were death, acute kidney injury (AKI), sepsis, spinal cord ischaemia (SCI), and re-intervention rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective study reporting the outcomes of 255 patients (between 2006 and 2019), designed according to the STROBE criteria. RESULTS: The TAAA distribution was type I 25%, type II 26%, type III 23%, type IV 18%, and type V 7%. Fifty-one (20%) patients had an emergency procedure. Of all the patients, 51% had a history of aortic surgery, 58% suffered from post-dissection TAAA, and 26% had connective tissue disease. The in hospital mortality rate among electively treated patients was 16% (n = 33) vs. 35% (n = 18) in the emergency subgroup; the total mortality rate was 20% (n = 51). The adjusted odds ratio for in hospital death following emergency repair compared with elective repair was 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 - 5.48). Temporary renal replacement therapy because of AKI was required in 29% (n = 74) of all patients, sepsis from different cause was observed in 37% (n = 94), and SCI in 7% (n = 18, 10 patients suffering from paraplegia and eight from paraparesis). The mean follow up time was 3.0 years (median 1.5, range 0 - 12.8 years). Aortic related re-intervention was required in 2.8%. The total mortality rate during follow up was 22.5% (n = 46); 5.3% (n = 11) of all patients died because of aortic related events. CONCLUSION: Open TAAA repair is associated with an important morbidity and mortality rate, yet the incidence of spinal cord ischaemia may be favourably low if a neuromonitoring protocol is applied. The aortic related re-intervention and aortic related mortality rate during follow up are low.

Perioperative and long-term outcome after ascending aortic and arch repair with elephant trunk and open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair following previous aortic arch repair including elephant trunk (ET) or frozen elephant trunk (FET) for acute and chronic pathologies. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter study including 32 patients treated between 2006 and 2019 in two aortic centers using identical surgical protocols. Assessment focused on perioperative and long-term outcome, namely in-hospital morbidity and mortality, as well as procedure-related reintervention rate and aortic-related mortality rate. Kaplan-Meier curves with 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze the overall survival after surgery within the cohort. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 13.6 years; 20 males [62.5%]) were treated because of acute (34.38% [n = 11]) or chronic (65.62% [n = 21]) aortic pathologies, including residual dissection following acute, symptomatic type A dissection (n = 7) and symptomatic mega aortic syndrome (n = 4), as well as post-dissection TAAA (n = 18) and asymptomatic mega aortic syndrome (n = 3). Twenty-eight patients (87.5%) received type II repair, and 4 patients (12.5%) received type III repair after previous ascending aorta and arch repair including ET/FET. Concomitant infrarenal and iliac vessel repair was performed in 38.7% (n = 12) and 29.4% (n = 10), respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 18.75% (n = 6). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in two cases, both after one-stage emergency procedure with one case of permanent paraplegia. Temporary acute kidney injury occurred in 41.94% (n = 13). The estimated 1-year survival rate was 78.1% (95% confidence interval, 63.9%-95.6%), with a median follow-up time of 1.29 years (interquartile range, 0.26-3.88 years). No procedure-related reinterventions and one case of aortic-related mortality, namely sepsis because of graft infection, was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Open TAAA repair following aortic arch repair including ET or FET because of acute or chronic aortic pathologies is associated with a relevant perioperative morbidity and mortality rate. During follow-up, a low aortic-related mortality rate and procedure-related reintervention rate were observed.

First-in-Human Clinical Application of the Medyria TrackCath System in Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms (ACCESS Trial): A Prospective Multicenter Single-Arm Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: The Medyria TrackCath Catheter (MedTCC) is an innovative, thermal convection-based blood flow velocity (BFV) tracking catheter that may be used during complex aortic endovascular procedures for identification and catheterization of target orifices. The ACCESS Trial analyzes the safety and performance of the MedTCC for targeted vessel catheterization to generally evaluate the feasibility of thermal convection-based BFV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a first-in-human, proof-of-concept, prospective single-arm multicenter clinical trial between March 2018 and February 2019 in patients who underwent endovascular aortic procedures at 4 high-volume centers. During these procedures, the MedTCC was advanced over a guidewire through the femoral access. The D-shape was enfolded in the reno-visceral part of the aorta and target orifices were identified and catheterized with a guidewire via the side port of the MedTCC through BFV tracking. BFV measurements were performed at baseline (Baseline-BFV), alignment to the orifice (Orifice-BFV), and following catheterization (Confirmation-BFV) to prove correct identification and catheterization of target orifices. The procedural success rate, the catheterization success rate, procedure-related parameters, and (serious) adverse events ((S)AE) during the follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were included in the safety group (SG) and 26 in the performance group (PG). The procedural success rate was 89% (PG), the MedTCC catheterization success rate was 98% (PG). The MedTCC reliably measured BFV changes indicated by significant differences in BFV between Baseline-BFV and Orifice-BFV (p<0.05). Median (interquartile range; IQR) fluoroscopy time per orifice was 5.0 (1.5-8.5) minutes [total surgery 49 (26-74) minutes], median (IQR) contrast agent used per orifice was 1.0 (0-5.0) mL [total surgery 80 (40-100) mL], and median (IQR) MedTCC-based procedural time was 3.0 (2.0-6.0) minutes. There was no device-related SAE. CONCLUSIONS: The ACCESS Trial suggests that BFV measurement allows for reliable target orifice identification and catheterization. The use of MedTCC is safe and generates short fluoroscopy time and low contrast agent use, which in turn might facilitate complex endovascular procedures.

Case report: Keeping a cool head - A delayed open repair of a ruptured TAAA.

INTRODUCTION: The limited resources available for complex surgical procedures during the nightshift can influence the postoperative outcome and are associated with increased complication rates and 30-day mortality. On the other hand, cases of the nightshift are often urgent and demand prompt reaction. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Hereby we report a patient with a ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, who was admitted during nightshift and was operated 12 h later to gain optimal conditions for such a complex surgical treatment and bypass the nightshift-effect. DISCUSSION: A review of the literature shows a significant short-term mortality increase on elective procedures performed during the weekend or during the nightshift, however it remains undecisive on the impact of the weekend-effect on emergent procedures. CONCLUSION: The fortunate recovering of the patient during his hospital stay as well as in the following months emphasizes the importance of critical risk assessment during emergency management, which may justify a delayed surgical treatment.

In-hospital mortality and organ failure after open and endovascular thoraco-abdominal aortic surgery can be predicted by increased levels of circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular and open thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is associated with specific complications. Circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (cDPP3) is a novel biomarker that shows a strong association with organ failure which has not been assessed in surgical settings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the prognostic capabilities of cDPP3 for predicting patient survival and organ failure following open and endovascular TAAA repair. METHODS: Thirty-three patients undergoing TAAA repair were assessed in this prospective observational single-centre study. cDPP3 levels were serially measured perioperatively until 72 h after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). In-hospital mortality and any organ failure were the clinical end points. RESULTS: Postoperative organ failure was detected in 17 patients (51.5%), and 6 patients died after surgery (18.2%). At 12 h after admission to the ICU, cDPP3 levels were significantly increased in patients who died or developed organ failure (P < 0.001). cDPP3 levels after surgery demonstrated a remarkable predictive accuracy for in-hospital mortality [12 h area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.907 (P < 0.001), 24 h AUC: 0.815 (P = 0.016), 48 h AUC: 0.914 (P = 0.003)] and the development of organ failure [12 h AUC: 0.882 (P < 0.001), 24 h AUC: 0.850 (P < 0.001), 48 h AUC: 0.846 (P < 0.001)]. Additionally, a significant correlation between cDPP3, the sequential organ failure assessment score and procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.011, P = 0.007, respectively) based on all available measurements and time points was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings highlight the role of cDPP3 as an early, highly specific postoperative biomarker for prediction of in-hospital mortality and organ failure after TAAA repair.

Increase of urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 as potential predictor of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy and patients' outcome following complex endovascular and open thoracic abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery - a prospective observational study.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) as complication after open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) is one major predictor of mortality and postoperative complications. We evaluated tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) as combined early biomarker for AKI detection and predictor of patients' outcome. Patients and methods: Between 2014 and 2015, 52 patients have been enrolled in this observational study, of whom 29 (55.8%) underwent elective open repair and 23 (44.2%) endovascular repair. TIMP2 × IGFBP7 were measured until 48 hours after admission on intensive-care unit (ICU) and were analyzed regarding their predictive ability for AKI (defined according to the KDIGO criteria) requiring temporary renal replacement therapy (RRT) and 90-day mortality using ROC curves. Results: Mean patient age was 64.5 years (Min: 43, Max: 85), endovascular treated patients were older (p <0.0001). 40.4% (n = 21) developed AKI, and 21.2% (n = 11) required renal replacement therapy. In-hospital and total mortality rates were 7.7% (n = 4) and 9.6% (n = 5), respectively. At no time a significant difference in TIMP2 × IGFB7 levels between patients undergoing open or endovascular surgery was observed. The predictive quality of the TIMP2 × IGFBP7 value on ICU admission was sound regarding AKI requiring temporary renal replacement therapy (sensitivity: 55.56% [38.1-72.1%], specificity: 90.91% [58.7-99.8%] with an area under the curve [AUC]: 0.694 [0.543-0.820]). Mean follow-up was 13.2 months (Min: 2, Max: 20), regarding the 90-day mortality, the predictive property of the TIMP2 × IGFBP7 value was not sufficient (sensitivity: 80% [28.4-99.5%], specificity: 52.38% [36.4-68%], and AUC: 0.607 [0.454-0.746]). Conclusions: TIMP2 × IGFBP7 level measured 6-12 hrs postoperatively may be useful as an early detectable biomarker for AKI requiring temporary renal replacement therapy. It seems not suited to predict patients' outcome following complex thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, regardless if performed by open or endovascular repair.

The Role of Ribonuclease 1 and Ribonuclease Inhibitor 1 in Acute Kidney Injury after Open and Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common post-operative complications and is closely associated with increased mortality after open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Ribonuclease (RNase) 1 belongs to the group of antimicrobial peptides elevated in septic patients and indicates the prediction of two or more organ failures. The role of RNase 1 and its antagonist RNase inhibitor 1 (RNH1) after TAAA repair is unknown. In this study, we analyzed RNase 1 and RNH1 serum levels in patients undergoing open (n = 14) or endovascular (n = 19) TAAA repair to determine their association with post-operative AKI and in-hospital mortality. Increased RNH1 serum levels after open TAAA repair as compared with endovascular TAAA repair immediately after surgery and 12, 48, and 72 h after surgery (all p < 0.05) were observed. Additionally, elevated RNase 1 and RNH1 serum levels 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery were shown to be significantly associated with AKI (all p < 0.05). RNH1 serum levels before and RNase 1 serum levels 12 h after TAAA repair were significantly correlated with in-hospital mortality (both p < 0.05). On the basis of these findings, RNase 1 and RNH1 may be therapeutically relevant and may represent biomarkers for post-operative AKI and in-hospital mortality.

Assessment of Neurone-Specific Enolase, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and S100 B as Spinal Cord Ischemia Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Open and Endovascular Complex Aortic Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite all efforts, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a relevant and feared complication after open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Besides the established correlation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and SCI, the usage of biomarkers for early detection of SCI intraoperatively and postoperatively after TAAA surgery is scarcely described in literature. METHODS: The methods include retrospective assessment of 33 patients (48.48% male) undergoing open and endovascular TAAA repair between January 2017 and January 2018. Levels of the biomarkers neurone-specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and S100 B were correlated with a decrease of the amplitude of the MEPs of more than 50%, indicating SCI. Linear mixed models were applied to test for differences in the biomarker levels between open and endovascular surgery and between different times of measurement. Post hoc analyses were performed using Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between GFAP, NSE, and S100 B levels at different times and a significant decrease in MEP or in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Altogether, 19 patients were treated by endovascular repair; 14 patients were treated by open repair; 5 patients were treated because of a type I TAAA; 7 received treatment because of a type II TAAA; 7, 10, and 4 patients received type III, IV, or V TAAA repair, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 18.18% (n = 6); 5 of these patients were treated because of symptomatic TAAA. MEP decrease could be observed in 18 cases (54.5%), with 16 (48.4%) recovering during the intervention. SCI could be observed in 9.09% (n = 3), 2 endovascular repairs leading to paraplegia and one open repair leading to paraparesis. All biomarkers showed increasing levels over time, with no statistically significant difference between open and endovascular repair. The difference in NSE and S100 B levels between the different times of measurements was statistically significant (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0017, respectively). In a univariable logistic regression analysis, no correlation with the end points "significant decrease in MEP" or "in-hospital mortality" was observed for any of the assessed biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: SCI-related biomarkers, namely NSE and S100 B, show a relevant increase directly after open and endovascular TAAA surgery, while no clear association between these biomarker levels and an intraoperatively measurable indicator for SCI could be observed.

Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination for endoleak detection after complex and infrarenal endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (iCEUS) examination for endoleak (EL) detection after complex endovascular aortic repairs (EVAR) in comparison with the standard angiographic completion control. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (16 male; median age, 73 years [range, 54-81 years]) who underwent single-stage EVARs at our center between October 2016 and October 2018 were included prospectively. The procedures comprised fenestrated and/or branched EVAR (n = 14; 66%), infrarenal EVAR (n = 5; 24%), infrarenal EVAR with bilateral iliac side branch implantation (n = 1; 5%), and infrarenal EVAR with occluder implantation into the internal iliac artery (n = 1; 5%). The used endografts included 14 custom made devices (Cook, Australia Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia, n = 6; Vascutek Terumo, Glasgow, Scotland, n = 8) and seven standard infrarenal endografts (Medtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, Calif, n = 5; Vascutek Terumo, Glasgow, Scotland, n = 1; Cook, n = 1). All patients underwent an angiographic completion control for EL detection followed by iCEUS examination. The iCEUS examination was performed by the same examiner who was blinded to the angiography result. In addition to the comparison of the angiographic results to iCEUS examination, iCEUS examination was also compared with the computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge (median time to CTA, 5 days [range, 1-7 days]). RESULTS: Angiography detected eight type II EL, defining the EL origin in four cases. In addition to detecting all of those eight EL, iCEUS examination revealed eight more type II EL not seen on angiography (P = .002) and allowed a definition of the EL origin in all cases. CTA before discharge showed a persistence of only 5 of the 16 type II EL detected by iCEUS examination (31%, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: An iCEUS examination can be used as another adjunct to decrease exposure to contrast agent and radiation during EVAR, including complex procedures. A replacement of the completion angiography by iCEUS examination is conceivable for infrarenal EVAR, but also for endovascular type IV or type V repairs. Future studies with larger patient numbers will help to further validate iCEUS examination during complex EVAR.

Management strategies for true and dissecting visceral artery aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) are rare and the literature regarding management strategies is limited. The study aim was to evaluate our 13-year experience with VAA treatment including conservative, open surgical and endovascular therapy. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 37 patients (31 male, median age 70 years [46-79 years]) with true and dissecting VAA treated between January 2006 and December 2018. Indications for invasive therapy were ruptured (N.=1) and symptomatic (N.=8) VAA or asymptomatic VAA>20 mm (N.=15). The decision on the treatment type was made after interdisciplinary (vascular surgeons/radiologists) discussion. RESULTS: The aneurysms affected the celiac trunk (N.=18, 49%), the splenic artery (N.=11, 30%), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA, N.=6, 16%), the hepatic artery (N.=5, 14%) and proximal SMA side branches (N.=2, 5%). Six patients had multiple VAA, one had an intrahepatic artery aneurysm and one had peripheral mesocolic artery aneurysms plus a VAA. 46% of the patients (N.=17) had coexisting aneurysms in other vascular territories. Thirteen patients were managed conservatively (median VAA diameter 15 [14-25] mm), 18 underwent open surgery with venous or prosthetic bypass or interposition graft implantation and 6 were treated by endovascular means (coiling [N.=3] or endograft [N.=3]). Median follow-up (FU) was 21 months (4-123 months). In-hospital mortality was 0%. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (5-28 days) after surgical and 3 days (2-71 days) after endovascular treatment. Complications included an early type I endoleak, 3 secondary open abdominal surgeries for bleeding/peritonitis after endovascular treatment of a ruptured intrahepatic aneurysm, an asymptomatic aorto-truncal bypass occlusion and aneurysm recurrence after a venous SMA interposition graft. None of the conservatively treated VAA required invasive treatment during FU. CONCLUSIONS: Small (<20 mm) asymptomatic VAA can be managed conservatively. Whenever invasive treatment is indicated, both open and endovascular treatments can be performed with low complication rates. In order to choose the optimal therapeutic approach, anatomical features and patient comorbidities should be considered and, ideally, discussed interdisciplinarily.

Feasibility and Twelve-month Patency of a Six-fold Fenestrated Stent Graft for Type IV Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) is a standard procedure for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysm. More than 4 fenestrations are still randomly used, even in case of complex aneurysm anatomy involving accessory renal arteries. METHODS: We are presenting the case of a 62-year-old male patient suffering from 63-mm juxtarenal aortic aneurysm. Because of his medical history and an ongoing immunosuppressive medication an endovascular approach was conducted. Using a 6-fold fenestrated endograft, 4 renal arteries as well as the superior mesenteric artery and the celiac trunk have been cannulated and stented successfully. RESULTS: No perioperative complications such as impairment of renal function could be observed. After 12 months, still a nonhampered renal function could be assessed. Furthermore, the endoprosthesis showed a good fit without detection of endoleaks, patent fenestrations, and a decreasing aneurysm diameter after 12 months of follow-up. Coverage of accessory renal arteries has been described as an established and necessary technique during endovascular repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysm; yet coverage of these vessels may be related to renal infarction and an impaired renal function during follow-up. Based on current technical developments the implantation of a 6-fold FEVAR may be conducted with promising results. CONCLUSIONS: Six-fold fenestrated stent-graft prosthesis for the treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysm involving accessory renal arteries may be a feasible treatment option related to an appropriate 12-month patency.

New Large Animal Model for Aortic Aneurysms in the Viscerorenal Segment.

BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysms in the viscerorenal-segment are nowadays treatable by endovascular means. Previously, new endograft techniques were only tested in healthy animals. We aimed to establish a new large animal model for testing complex endovascular stent techniques preclinically. METHODS: In sheep, four juxtarenal and two type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were surgically created via a retroperitoneal approach. Two pieces out of a 10 × 15-cm bovine pericardial patch were sewn with the healthy aorta longitudinally. The viscerorenal segment was clamped, and the aorta was incised longitudinally. Then, the patches were longitudinally sewn together. In the meantime, antegrade flow through the native part of the aorta was already established by tangential clamping. Computed tomography angiography was performed after 4, 8, and 52 wk. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%. The median surgical procedure time was 3 h, the median blood loss was 210 mL, and the viscerorenal-segment clamping time was 2-4 min. The animals started drinking 1 h after arousal from anesthesia. One animal died after 1 wk because of delayed bleeding and another died after 1 y because of aneurysm rupture by a secondary bacterial infection. Four animals survived. The proximal landing zone diameter and the clock position of the vessel were stable over 52 wk. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical creation of an aortic aneurysm in the viscerorenal-segment in sheep was successful, without an ischemia/reperfusion injury. This animal model offers a new platform for evaluating innovative endovascular therapy options in vivo.