Effect of atorvastatin 1% mouthwash in the prevention of radiotherapy induced mucositis: A pilot study.

Background: Oral mucositis is a troublesome symptom for people who receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy and it is a dose-dependent factor. Atorvastatin is a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and various studies have proven its anti-inflammatory effects. The goal of this study was to evaluate atorvastatin 1% mouthwash effects in prevention of radiotherapy-induced mucositis. Methods: Atorvastatin 1% suspension was prepared for mouthwash in this randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Thirty patients randomly received atorvastatin or placebo mouthwash. They had to gargle 5cc of mouthwash, 3 times per day during radiotherapy. The severity and pain of mucositis was evaluated every week, during their treatment. Results: The severity of mucositis between the two study groups was significant every four weeks (p<0.05) and the percentage of patients with more severe mucositis was less in the atorvastatin group. It is found that the pain intensity was lower after 3 and 4 weeks in atorvastatin group. Conclusion: These findings indicated that atorvastatin mouthwash showed a significant activity in relieving of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and pain.

Evaluation of Cholestyramine 15% Ointment in Relieving Pruritus and Burning After Ileostomy: A Rrandomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Purpose/Aims: Skin irritation is a common ileostomy problem that causes burning and pruritus among patients due to the leakage of intestinal discharge around the stoma. This clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of topical cholestyramine (15%) on the reduction of the levels of burning and pruritus after an ileostomy. Material and methods: The patients were randomly divided into two groups of treatment and control (n = 15). The intervention group was subjected to one fingertip of cholestyramine, whereas the other group received the placebo ointment (approximately 0.5 g) on the skin immediately after the surgery and twice a day for 2 months. The primary outcome measure was the severity of burning and pruritus measured by a visual analog scale at different times after an ileostomy. Results: Out of 34 patients, four cases were excluded due to the inappropriate completion of the questionnaire (n = 2) and unwillingness to attend the follow-up visits (n = 2). Therefore, 30 patients were included in the study. The levels of burning among patients in the cholestyramine were lower in weeks 3, 4, and 8 compared to the placebo group. Moreover, lower levels of pruritus were observed among patients in the treatment group in weeks 4 and 8 after an ileostomy. No side effects were reported among the patients. Conclusions: Topical cholestyramine was found to be effective in the management of burning and pruritus resulting from an ileostomy among the population under study.

Topical Minoxidil Versus Topical Diltiazem for Chemical Sphincterotomy of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Anal fissure is a common anorectal problem causing severe pain and discomfort to the patients. Chemical sphincterotomy has emerged as a noninvasive alternative to the surgical methods of fissure treatment. The objective of this study was evaluation of the efficacy and the adverse effects of topically applied minoxidil in chemical sphincterotomy of chronic anal fissure in comparison with topical diltiazem. METHODS: A total of 88 patients with chronic anal fissure aged between 15 and 65 years were included in this double-blind, randomized clinical trial and were randomly assigned to either 0.5% minoxidil cream or 2% diltiazem cream twice daily for 2 weeks. The pain intensity, bleeding, wound healing, itching, headache, dizziness, significant drop in blood pressure, allergy and fissure relapse were assessed on a monthly basis for 2 months. RESULTS: Both diltiazem and minoxidil reduced the pain, bleeding and improved fissure healing with no significant difference. There were no between-groups differences in the frequencies of adverse effects, except for itching which was slightly higher with minoxidil during the first month. Allergy occurred in two patients in the minoxidil group, which was not severe and did not lead to discontinuation of the trial. CONCLUSION: Topically administered minoxidil is of equal efficacy as diltiazem in the treatment of chronic anal fissure with low frequency of adverse effects. Thus, it can be considered as an agent for chemical sphincterotomy of anal fissure, but the itching at the beginning of the treatment can affect the adherence of the patient to treatment. Trial registration number IRCT2015041414483N6 (the full trial protocol could be accessed online at www.irct.ir ).

Sunitinib Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia.

Sunitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor which prevents tumor growth and metastatic progression. It was approved for treatment of advanced renal cell cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. It has several adverse reactions on multi organ systems including hematologic system. Although the neutropenia and thrombocytopenia commonly happens as Grade 3 or 4 abnormalities following bone marrow suppression, in the rare cases, the immune mediated abnormality may drive the sunitinib-induced hematologic disorder. In this report, we present a case of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia induced by sunitinib. One month after first treatment cycle with sunitinib, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were occurred. The patient had a normal bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, the thrombocytopenia was resistant to platelet transfusion which successfully was treated with prednisolone.