RESUMO
Chylolymphatic cyst, variant of mesenteric cyst, is a rare entity. Clinical presentation and radiological features are not characteristic, so diagnosis can be made finally on histopathology. We report an extremely rare case of giant chylolymphatic cyst measuring >15 cm. A 2-year-old female presented with abdominal pain and vomiting. On examination, a ill-defined and firm mass was palpable just below umbilicus. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan revealed a large ill-defined lesion, which measured 16 × 13.2 × 6.7 cm in size and was seen in relation to the abdominal mesentery. Provisional diagnosis of mesenteric cyst was made. Laparotomy revealed multiple lymphatic cysts of variable size arising from the mesentery of proximal ileum. Histopathology examination confirmed the presence of a giant chylolymphatic cyst. Chylolymphatic cysts are rare entity and should be kept in mind while diagnosing a pediatric case of abdominal cysts.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preputioplasty as a part of hypospadias repair restores the normal appearance of phallus, which is especially important in distal and mid penile hypospadias. However possibility of its inherent complications such as iatrogenic phimosis or preputial breakdown are the cause of controversy and reluctance regarding this procedure.This study evaluates the results of preputial reconstruction with TIP urethroplasty in distal and mid penile hypospadias repair and analyses if preputioplasty may be offered to these patients. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 48 cases of distal and mid penile hypospadias underwent TIP urethroplasty and preputioplasty and results were assessed at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Major complications included preputial dehiscence, tight prepuce (iatrogenic phimosis) and minor complications included ventral tethering, persistent dorsal whorls and redundant prepuce. Data was analysed with Microsoft Excel spreadsheet where descriptive statistics were obtained. RESULTS: Preputioplasty was performed in 48 children with a mean age of 5.1 years. Preputioplasty dehiscence was seen in three (6%) patients, which gave an appearance of irregular prepuce on 6 m follow up. Two patients (4%) were confirmed to have preputial tightness at 3 months but this resolved conservatively in one patient and only one patient (2%) required circumcision for a tight prepuce. Minor complications included ventral tethering, persistence of dorsal whorls and redundant prepuce. Ventral tethering was present in 3 patients (6.25%). Redundant prepuce was observed in 2 patients (4.16%). Additionally, unsightly dorsal whorls were found to be persistent in 2 children (4.16%). None of these patients opted for circumcision. The rest of the children had a cosmetically and functionally normal prepuce. Two patients (4%) developed urethrocutaneous fistula at 3 months' follow-up. CONCLUSION: Preputial reconstruction is feasible with a good cosmetic outcome and minimal complications in patients of distal and mid penile hypospadias undergoing TIP urethroplasty. Mild preputial tightness evolves over time and resolves with conservative measures. In patients with very prominent dorsal whorls and underlying bulky tissues the preputioplasty does not appear to be of satisfactory cosmesis. To help the patient and parents take a well informed decision, it would be useful to explain all possible major and minor foreskin complications, and their rectification.