Severe hyperlactatemia in unselected surgical patients: retrospective analysis of prognostic outcome factors.

BACKGROUND: Etiology of hyperlactatemia in ICU patients is heterogeneous-septic, cardiogenic or hemorrhagic shock seem to be predominant reasons. Multiple studies show hyperlactatemia as an independent predictor for ICU mortality. Only limited data exists about the etiology of hyperlactatemia and lactate clearance and their influence on mortality. The goal of this single-center retrospective study, was to evaluate the effect of severe hyperlactatemia and reduced lactate clearance rate on the outcome of unselected ICU surgical patients. METHODS: Overall, 239 surgical patients with severe hyperlactatemia (> 10 mmol/L) who were treated in the surgical ICU at the University Medical Center Freiburg between June 2011 and August 2017, were included in this study. The cause of the hyperlactatemia as well as the postoperative course and the patient morbidity and mortality were retrospectively analyzed. Lactate clearance was calculated by comparing lactate level 12 h after first measurement of > 10 mmol/L. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate in our cohort was 82.4%. Severe hyperlactatemia was associated with death in the ICU (p < 0.001). The main etiologic factor was sepsis (51.9%), followed by mesenteric ischemia (15.1%), hemorrhagic shock (13.8%) and liver failure (9.6%). Higher lactate levels at ICU admission were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.001). Lactate clearance after 12 h was found to predict ICU mortality (ANOVA p < 0.001) with an overall clearance of under 50% within 12 h. The median percentage of clearance was 60.3% within 12 h for the survivor and 29.1% for the non-survivor group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lactate levels appropriately reflect disease severity and are associated with short-term mortality in critically ill patients. The main etiologic factor for surgical patients is sepsis. When elevated lactate levels persist more than 12 h, survival chances are low and the benefit of continued maximum therapy should be evaluated.

Surgery as an Emotional Strain: An Observational Study in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery.

Recent research suggests an impact of psychological distress on postoperative outcomes in orthopedic and neurosurgery. It is widely unknown whether patients' mood might affect the postoperative outcome and complication rate in colorectal surgery. Over a period of 22 months, a monocentric, observational study among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery without the creation of an ostomy was conducted. Patients were asked to fill in a standardized multi-dimensional mood questionnaire (MDMQ) preoperatively as well as on the third, sixth, and ninth postoperative days to assess mood, wakefulness, and arousal. The results of 80 patients (51% male, mean age 59 years) were analyzed. Almost half of the patients (58%) developed postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (Grade I 14%, Grade II 30%, Grade III 9%, Grade IV 3%). Patients' mood increased continually from the preoperative day to the ninth postoperative day. Patients' wakefulness decreased initially (pre- to third postoperative day) and increased again in the further course. Patients' arousal decreased pre- to postoperatively. Neither preoperative mood, nor arousal or wakefulness of patients showed a clear association with the development of postoperative complications. In conclusion, preoperative psychological distress measured by MDMQ did not affect the postoperative complication rate of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Ogilvie's syndrome-is there a cutoff diameter to proceed with upfront surgery?

PURPOSE: Although Ogilvie's syndrome was first described about 70 years ago, its etiology and pathogenesis are still not fully understood. But more importantly, it is also not clear when to approach which therapeutic strategy. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with Ogilvie's syndrome at our institution in a 17-year time period (2002-2019) were included and retrospectively evaluated regarding different therapeutical strategies: conservative, endoscopic, or surgical. RESULTS: The study included 71 patients with 21 patients undergoing conservative therapy, 25 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy, and 25 patients undergoing surgery. However, 38% of patients (n = 8) who were primarily addressed for conservative management failed and had to undergo endoscopy or even surgery. Similarly, 8 patients (32%) with primarily endoscopic treatment had to proceed for surgery. In logistic regression analysis, only a colon diameter ≥ 11 cm (p = 0.01) could predict a lack of therapeutic success by endoscopic treatment. Ninety-day mortality and overall survival were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: As conservative and endoscopic management fail in about one-third of patients, a cutoff diameter ≥ 11 cm may be an adequate parameter to evaluate surgical therapy.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an uncommon, but life-threatening clinical entity due to late diagnosis resulting in irreversible ischemic bowel necrosis. The most common causes of AMI are the embolic occlusion and the acute thrombosis of the mesenteric circulation. Typical treatment is composed of an early revascularization of the mesenteric circulation followed by abdominal surgery for resection of nonviable intestine and restoration of the intestinal continuity, but the mortality rates remain high. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted, aiming to evaluate clinical characteristics, performed surgical procedures and outcomes of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia who underwent emergency abdominal surgery at a high volume surgical center in Germany. RESULTS: Overall, 53 patients were identified with the intraoperatively proven diagnosis of AMI. Overall hospital mortality was with 62% comparable to the literature. Nineteen patients presented with an intraoperatively verified complete and non-reversible intestinal infarction without any angiographic or surgical option for a revascularization of the mesenteric circulation or an option for intestinal resection. From the rest of the patients, 14 underwent intestinal resection of the ischemic area without restoration of intestinal continuity; the other 20 underwent resection with a primary anastomosis to restore intestinal continuity. The mortality rate of these patients with curative-intended surgery remained high (41% of patients died). Pre- and postoperative hyperlactatemia were associated with lower survival of these patients. CONCLUSION: AMI remains a life-threatening abdominal emergency. Therapeutic approaches are highly depended on acting surgeon's decision, being affected by subjectively rated bowel viability and physical condition of the affected patient. Only selected patients with good bowel viability appear to be suitable for receiving primary anastomosis. The results clearly indicate the need for further research to develop therapeutic approaches for a better management of AMI and to improve outcome of affected patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: retrospective real-life data.

BACKGROUND: The recommendation for postoperative chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is based on prospective randomized trials. However, patients included in clinical trials do not often reflect the overall patient population treated in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreas resection for PDAC between 2001 and 2013 was performed. Follow-up data from oncologists, general practitioners, or hospital patient files were available for 92% of patients. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were included in our analysis. Chemotherapy was recommended for 223 patients, but 86 patients did not follow the recommendation. The application of the recommended chemotherapy, consisting of 6 cycles of gemcitabine, was only applied to 45 patients. Forty patients received the recommended number of cycles with dose reduction or prolonged intervals between cycles, and adjuvant chemotherapy was terminated prior to the intended completion of all 6 cycles in 54 patients. Survival of patients after adjuvant chemotherapy was increased compared to that of patients without chemotherapy (with recurrence 25.6 vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.001, and without recurrence 27.4 vs. 14.3 months, p <  0.001). Terminating chemotherapy prior to completion (p = 0.009) as well as a lower number of chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.026) was associated with a decreased survival. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall and disease-free survival after curative pancreatic resection, but only a small fraction of patients completes the recommended 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our data indicates that performance status of patients after pancreas resections for PDAC requires not only highly biologically active but also well-tolerated adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

The impact of immunosuppression on postoperative graft function after graft-unrelated surgery: a retrospective controlled cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are faced with a growing number of patients after renal transplantation undergoing graft-unrelated surgery. So far, little is known about the postoperative restitution of graft function and the risk factors for a poor outcome. METHODS: One hundred one kidney transplant recipients undergoing graft-unrelated surgery between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. A risk analysis was performed and differences in creatinine, GFR and immunosuppressive treatment were evaluated. Additional, a comparison with a case-matched non-transplanted control group were performed. RESULTS: Preoperative creatinine averaged 1.88 mg / dl [0.62-5.22 mg / dl] and increased to 2.49 mg / dl [0.69-8.30 mg / dl] postoperatively. Acute kidney failure occurred in 18 patients and 14 patients had a permanent renal failure. Significant risk factors for the development of postoperative renal dysfunction were female gender, a preoperative creatinine above 2.0 mg / dl as well as a GFR below 40 ml / min and emergency surgery. Patients with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil treatment showed a significant lower risk of renal dysfunction than patients with other immunosuppressants postoperatively. Contrary to that, the risk of patients with cyclosporine treatment was significantly increased. Transplanted patients showed a significantly increased rate of postoperative renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of immunosuppressant might have an impact on graft function and survival of kidney transplant recipients after graft-unrelated surgery. Further investigations are needed.

Surgical outcomes of renal transplant recipients after abdominal surgery not connected with transplantation. A retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing number of patients after kidney transplantation, elective and emergency surgery of transplanted patients is becoming a relevant challenge in clinical routine. The current data on complication rate of patients after kidney transplantation, which must undergo another elective or emergency abdominal surgery, is inhomogeneous. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of renal transplant patients undergoing abdominal and abdominal wall surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed an observational study of patients after kidney transplantation undergoing graft-unrelated abdominal surgery between 2005 and 2015. We randomly created a non-transplanted control for a case-matched controlled analysis. Primary endpoint was the comparison of complication rate. Secondary, a risk analysis of all patients was performed and differences in mortality, length of hospital stay and reoperation rates were calculated. RESULTS: Overall 101 kidney transplanted patients were eligible for inclusion. 20 (19.8%) died after graft-unrelated surgery and 60 (59.4%) suffered from postoperative complications. Case-matched analysis could be performed for 84 out of these 101 patients. We found no significant difference in morbidity rate (58.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.090). Transplanted patients had, however, a significantly higher mortality (19% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.001), a longer hospital stay (28.2 vs. 16.9 days, p = 0.020) and a higher rate of re-operations (38.1% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.017). . CONCLUSIONS: Patients after renal transplantation undergoing graft-unrelated abdominal surgery have a significantly increased mortality risk, are more frequently re-operated and have to stay significantly longer in hospital than non-transplanted patients.

Naturopathic Treatment and Complementary Medicine in Surgical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Many patients in Germany use naturopathic treatments and complementary medicine. Surveys have shown that many also use them as a concomitant treatment to surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases were systematically searched for systematic reviews, controlled trials, and experimental studies concerning the use of naturopathic treatments and complementary medicine in the management of typical post-operative problems (PROSPERO CRD42018095330). RESULTS: Of the 387 publications identified by the search, 76 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In patients with abnormal gastrointestinal activity, acupuncture can improve motility, ease the passing of flatus, and lead to earlier defecation. Acupuncture and acupressure can reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as pain. More-over,aromatherapy and music therapy seem to reduce pain, stress and anxiety and to improve sleep. Further studies are needed to determine whether phytotherapeutic treatments are effective for the improvement of gastrointestinal function or the reduction of stress. It also remains unclear whether surgical patients can benefit from the methods of mind body medicine. CONCLUSION: Certain naturopathic treatments and complementary medical methods may be useful in postoperative care and deserve more intensive study. In the publications consulted for this review, no serious side effects were reported.

Duodenal Exclusion but Not Sleeve Gastrectomy Preserves Insulin Secretion, Making It the More Effective Metabolic Procedure.

INTRODUCTION: There is an ongoing debate on which procedure provides the best treatment for type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, the pathomechanisms of diabetes improvement of partly anatomically differing operations is not fully understood. METHODS: A loop duodenojejunostomy (DJOS) with exclusion of one third of intestinal length, a sleeve gastrectomy (SG), or a combination of DJOS + SG was performed in 8-week-old male ZDF rats. One, three, and six months after surgery, an oral glucose tolerance test and measurements of GLP-1, GIP, insulin, and bile acids were conducted. RESULTS: After an initial (4 weeks) equal glucose control, DJOS and DJOS + SG showed significantly lower glucose levels than SG 3 and 6 months after surgery. There was sharp decline of insulin levels in SG animals over time, whereas insulin levels in DJOS and DJOS + SG were preserved. GIP levels were significantly larger in both groups containing a sleeve at all three time points, whereas GLP-1 was equal in all groups at all time. Bile acid levels were significantly higher in the DJOS compared to the SG group at all time points. Interestingly, the additional SG in the DJOS + SG group led to lower bile acid levels 1 and 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The effect of SG on glucose control was transient, whereas a duodenal exclusion was the more effective procedure in this model due to a sustained pancreatic function with a preserved insulin secretion.

Postoperative changes of the microbiome: are surgical complications related to the gut flora? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to identify the relationship between the gut microbiome and the development of postoperative complications like anastomotic leakage or a wound infection. Recent reviews focusing on underlying molecular biology suggested that postoperative complications might be influenced by the patients' gut flora. Therefore, a review focusing on the available clinical data is needed. METHODS: In January 2017 a systematic search was carried out in Medline and WebOfScience to identify all clinical studies, which investigated postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgery in relation to the microbiome of the gut. RESULTS: Of 337 results 10 studies were included into this analysis after checking for eligibility. In total, the studies comprised 677 patients. All studies reported a postoperative change of the gut flora. In five studies the amount of bacteria decreased to different degrees after surgery, but only one study found a significant reduction. Surgical procedures tended to result in an increase of potentially pathogenic bacteria and a decrease of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. The rate of infectious complications was lower in patients treated with probiotics/symbiotics compared to control groups without a clear relation to the systemic inflammatory response. The treatment with synbiotics/probiotics in addition resulted in faster recovery of bowel movement and a lower rate of postoperative diarrhea and abdominal cramping. CONCLUSIONS: There might be a relationship between the gut flora and the development of postoperative complications. Due to methodological shortcomings of the included studies and uncontrolled bias/confounding factors there remains a high level of uncertainty.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Surgical Patients with Intensive Care Unit Lengths of Stay of 90 Days and Greater.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of prolonged length of stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) on the mortality and morbidity of surgical patients. METHODS: We performed a monocentric and retrospective observational study in the surgical critical care unit of the department of surgery at the Medical Center of the University of Freiburg, Germany. Clinical data was collected from patients assigned to the ICU with a length of stay (LOS) of 90 days and greater. RESULTS: From the total of the 19 patients with ICU LOS over 90 days, ten patients died in the ICU whereas nine patients were discharged to the normal ward. The ICU mortality rate was 52%. The overall survival one year after ICU discharge was 32%. Regarding factors affecting mortality of the patients, significantly higher mortality was associated with age of the patients at the time point of the ICU admission and with postoperative need of renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high but in our opinion acceptable mortality rate in surgical patients with ICU LOS of 90 days and greater. We identified age and the need of renal replacement therapy as risk factors for mortality.

Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002-2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long-term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P < 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk-adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P < 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742-3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long-term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.

Long-term results after adult ex situ split liver transplantation since its introduction in 1987.

BACKGROUND: Split liver transplantation is still discussed controversially. Utilization of split liver grafts has been declining since a change of allocation rules for the second graft abolished incentives for German centres to perform ex situ splits. We therefore analysed our long-term experiences with the first ex situ split liver transplant series worldwide. METHODS: A total of 131 consecutive adult ex situ split liver transplants (01.12.1987-31.12.2010) were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality rates and 1- and 3-year patient survival rates were 13, 76.3, and 66.4 %, respectively. One- and three-year graft survival rates were 63.4 and 54.2 %, respectively. The observed 10-year survival rate was 40.6 %. Continuous improvement of survival from era 1 to 3 was observed (each era: 8 years), indicating a learning curve over 24 years of experience. Patient and graft survival were not influenced by different combinations of transplanted segments or types of biliary reconstruction (p > 0.05; Cox regression). Patients transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis had better survival (p = 0.021; log-rank), whereas all other indications including acute liver failure (13.6 %), acute and chronic graft failure (9.1 %) had no significant influence on survival (p > 0.05; log-rank). Biliary complications (27.4 %) had no significant influence on patient or graft survival (p > 0.05; log-rank). Hepatic artery thrombosis (13.2 %) had a significant influence on graft survival but not on patient survival (p = 0.002, >0.05, respectively; log-rank). CONCLUSIONS: Split liver transplantation can be used safely and appears to be an underutilized resource that may benefit from liberal allocation of the second graft.

Living donor liver transplantation: effect of the type of liver graft donation on donor mortality and morbidity.

To investigate the influence of the type of liver graft donation on donor mortality and morbidity. The clinical course of 87 living liver donors operated on at our center between 2002 and 2009 was retrospectively analysed and data pertaining to all complications were retrieved. No donor mortality was observed and no donor suffered any life-threatening complication. Four donors (4.6%) developed biliary leakage, nine (10.3%) had to be readmitted to hospital and six (6.9%) required some or other type of reoperation related to the previous liver donation. Reoperations included incisional or diaphragmatic hernia repair (n = 4), biliary leakage repair (n = 1) and segmental colon resection combined with diaphragmatic hernia repair (n = 1). There was a statistically significant difference in hospital stay (P < 0.001), autologous blood transfusions (P < 0.001) and operating time (P < 0.005) when right lobe donations (Segments V-VIII) were compared with left lobe (Segments II-IV) and left lateral lobe (Segments II-III) donations, whereas no difference was found between these groups regarding hospital readmission, operative revisions and the incidence or severity of complications. Right lobe donation was associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased blood transfusions and prolonged operating time when compared with left and left lateral lobe donation, whereas donor mortality and morbidity did not differ between these groups.