Amplitude Parameters Are Predictive of Hearing Preservation in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implant Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the association between hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI) and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-institutional, prospective randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers. PATIENTS: Adults (n = 87) with sensorineural hearing loss meeting CI criteria (2018-2021) with audiometric thresholds of ≤80 dB HL at 500 Hz. METHODS: Participants were randomized to CI surgery with or without audible ECochG monitoring. Electrode arrays were inserted to the full-depth marker. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing pre-CI, unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to LF-PTA at CI activation. Three ECochG amplitude parameters were analyzed: 1) insertion track patterns, 2) magnitude of ECochG amplitude change, and 3) total number of ECochG amplitude drops. RESULTS: The Type CC insertion track pattern, representing corrected drops in ECochG amplitude, was seen in 76% of cases with ECochG "on," compared with 24% of cases with ECochG "off" ( p = 0.003). The magnitude of ECochG signal drop was significantly correlated with the amount of LF-PTA change pre-CI and post-CI ( p < 0.05). The mean number of amplitude drops during electrode insertion was significantly correlated with change in LF-PTA at activation and 3 months post-CI ( p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: ECochG amplitude parameters during CI surgery have important prognostic utility. Higher incidence of Type CC in ECochG "on" suggests that monitoring may be useful for surgeons in order to recover the ECochG signal and preventing potentially traumatic electrode-cochlear interactions.

Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the degree to which individual coping strategies may influence speech perception after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Adult, postlingually deaf cochlear implant recipients. INTERVENTIONS: The Coping Orientation to Problems Experience inventory, a validated, multidimensional self-reported coping scale, was administered preoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception was measured using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) phoneme and word scores, AzBio sentence accuracy in quiet and noise, and Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life was measured with the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in this study. Mean age at surgery was 70.7 ± 11.4 years. Acceptance was associated with a decreased AzBio in noise score in the 6 months after CI (regression coefficient b = -0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to -0.03; p < 0.01). Denial was associated with a decreased AzBio in quiet score (b = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.09 to -0.01; p < 0.05), whereas humor was associated with an increased AzBio in quiet score (b = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.04; p < 0.05). Humor was also associated with an increased Hearing in Noise Test score (b = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; p < 0.05). Denial was associated with decreased CNC word (b = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.02; p < 0.01) and phoneme (b = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.02; p < 0.01) scores, whereas substance use was associated with increased CNC word (b = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05, p < 0.01) and phoneme (b = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06; p < 0.01) scores. Scores on self-reported quality of life measures were not significantly correlated with coping strategies. CONCLUSION: A variety of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies are used by postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant users. Denial and acceptance may be more predictive of poor speech performance, whereas humor and substance use may be more predictive of improved speech performance.

Can Electrocochleography Help Preserve Hearing After Cochlear Implantation With Full Electrode Insertion?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) monitoring during cochlear implant (CI) surgery on postoperative hearing preservation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers. PATIENTS: Adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss meeting the CI criteria who selected an Advanced Bionics CI. METHODS: Patients were randomized to CI surgery either with audible ECochG monitoring available to the surgeon during electrode insertion or without ECochG monitoring. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing preoperative unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to postoperative LF-PTA at CI activation. Pre- and post-CI computed tomography was used to determine electrode scalar location and electrode translocation. RESULTS: Eighty-five adult CI candidates were enrolled. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) unaided preoperative LF-PTA across the sample was 54 (17) dB HL. For the whole sample, hearing preservation was "good" (i.e., LF-PTA change 0-15 dB) in 34.5%, "fair" (i.e., LF-PTA change >15-29 dB) in 22.5%, and "poor" (i.e., LF-PTA change ≥30 dB) in 43%. For patients randomized to ECochG "on," mean (SD) LF-PTA change was 27 (20) dB compared with 27 (23) dB for patients randomized to ECochG "off" ( p = 0.89). Seven percent of patients, all of whom were randomized to ECochG off, showed electrode translocation from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli. CONCLUSIONS: Although intracochlear ECochG during CI surgery has important prognostic utility, our data did not show significantly better hearing preservation in patients randomized to ECochG "on" compared with ECochG "off."