Clinical utility of the carcinoembryonic antigen level in patients with stage III colon cancer after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The association between perioperative and post-adjuvant carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and recurrence and prognosis remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether perioperative CEA levels are an integral component of the assessment of recurrence and prognosis of patients with stage III colon cancer (CC). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2005 to 2013. We enrolled patients with stage III CC who underwent complete resection of a primary tumor and received adjuvant chemotherapy. We analyzed the association between perioperative and post-adjuvant CEA levels and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 564 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. The RFS and OS of patients with high postoperative CEA levels were significantly worse than those of patients with normal postoperative CEA levels. In the multivariate analysis, high postoperative CEA levels were associated with shorter RFS and OS. The number of risk factors, postoperative CEA levels, and T/N-stage all had a cumulative effect on RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: High postoperative CEA levels and the number of risk factors are associated with recurrence and worse prognosis for patients with stage III CC.

Treatment strategies and outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: A multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is required to achieve prolonged survival. We aimed to clarify the differences in treatment strategies for locally advanced ESCC and the outcomes of elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) vs. younger patients (aged < 75 years). METHODS: We compared the treatment strategy selection and the outcomes of 40 elderly and 160 younger patients with cStage II/III ESCC diagnosed between January, 2014 and December, 2016. RESULTS: Nineteen (47.5%) of the elderly patients and 144 (90.0%) of the younger patients underwent esophagectomy and 9 (22.5%) of the elderly patients and 131 (81.9%) of the younger patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ivor-Lewis or transhiatal esophagectomy was performed more frequently in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.0096). The survival rate after esophagectomy was higher in the younger group than in the elderly group. The overall survival rate of the elderly patients who underwent esophagectomy was significantly higher than that in those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy is a practical choice for elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC, although reduced treatment intensity may impact long-term survival.

[A Case of Complete Resection Using the Liver-First Approach after Systemic Chemotherapy in a Patient with Synchronous Colorectal Liver and Lung Metastases].

Conversion surgery for patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases is increasingly being performed because of effective systemic chemotherapy. Additionally, many studies have reported the benefit of the liver-first approach for advanced liver metastasis. We report a case of an initially unresectable advanced colon cancer with multiple liver and lung metastases that was successfully treated with the liver-first approach following chemotherapy. The patient was a 36-year- old woman who was diagnosed with advanced rectal cancer, cT4aN2aM1b, cStage Ⅳb. After a temporary transverse colostomy, she was administered systemic chemotherapy for 9 months. The primary tumor and liver metastases showed partial response while the lung metastases showed complete response. Since it was considered that liver metastases were the main prognostic factors, we performed a right hemihepatectomy plus S3 partial hepatectomy, followed by laparoscopic high anterior resection. A partial pneumonectomy was also performed because of the regrowth of the lung metastases, and we succeeded in complete resection. The liver-first approach was a beneficial treatment option for this patient with unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

Successful transition from open to minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience in Japan.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates surgical outcomes of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) in our institution, with the transition from open ILE to hybrid or totally minimally invasive ILE (MI-ILE). METHODS: Selected patients who underwent ILE for esophageal cancer between 2013 and 2020 were included. We retrospectively investigated the patients' background characteristics and the short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: In this period, among a total of 858 esophagectomies, selected seventy-one patients (8.3%) underwent ILE, consisted of 17 cases with completely open procedures, 27 with hybrid MI-ILE, and 27 with total MI-ILE. The major indications for ILE were adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction (33.8%) and patients with prior treatment of head and neck cancer (31.0%). Among these approaches, there were no significant differences in the characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, preoperative therapy, and clinical TNM stage, except for histology. Compared to the completely open and hybrid groups, incidences of both total and severe complications in the total MI-ILE group were significantly lower (total 70.6 vs. 66.6 vs. 37.0%, p=0.036; severe 35.3 vs. 44.4 vs. 11.1%, p=0.023), and also, those of pneumonia (41.2 vs. 29.6 vs. 7.4%, p=0.026) and postoperative stricture (11.8 vs. 18.5 vs. 0%, p=0.001) were significantly fewer in the total MI-ILE group. CONCLUSIONS: We have been able to achieve the transition from completely open to total MI-ILE with better short-term outcomes. Total MI-ILE with linear-stapled anastomosis can be a good alternative to open procedures for the selected patients with reducing the incidence of postoperative pneumonia and anastomotic stricture.

Significance of D-dimer-based screening for detecting pre-operative venous thromboembolism in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have evaluated the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for esophageal cancer and the efficacy of a D-dimer (DD)-based VTE screening (DBS). In the present study, we aimed to clarify the changes in DD levels and the effectiveness of DBS. METHODS: We included 234 patients who underwent esophagectomy between August 2017 and July 2019 and evaluated the changes in DD levels before and after NAC. We had introduced the DBS strategy in August 2018, in which we recommended ultrasound (US) of the leg or computed tomography (CT) with the deep vein thrombosis (DVT) protocol. We then evaluated the incidence of VTE detected by DBS compared with that in the clinical practice as a control. RESULTS: The DD levels were significantly increased after NAC. After the introduction of DBS, the proportion of patients who underwent US and CT after NAC was significantly increased. VTE was more frequently detected in the DBS group than in the control group (16.7% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.02) among patients who underwent NAC. Pulmonary embolism (PE) during NAC was also more frequent in the DBS than in the control group (7.6% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.06). The DD levels after NAC were significantly higher in patients with VTE than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: NAC for patients with esophageal cancer increases the risk of developing VTE. DBS is useful in identifying asymptomatic DVT and may contribute to improving patient safety.

Comparison of the outcomes between total eversion and conventional triangulating stapling technique in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage and stenosis remain major problems after esophageal reconstruction. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes between the total eversion (TE) triangulating stapling technique (TST) and conventional (C) TST. METHODS: The study included 404 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy by TST between January 2013 and December 2018. The postoperative outcomes were compared between TE-TST and C-TST using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Before matching, the cT stage and the cTNM stage were different between the groups. After matching, each group consisted of 128 patients. The patients' background characteristics were similar between the groups. Although the incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar between the groups (p = 0.216), anastomotic stricture occurred in 19 (14.8%) and 7 (5.5%) patients in the C-TST and the TE-TST groups, respectively (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was significantly lower in the TE-TST group than in the C-TST group. TE-TST decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture and can improve the quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with positive circumferential resection margin.

BACKGROUND: The significance of postoperative radiotherapy for residual disease after esophageal cancer surgery remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with positive circumferential resection margin (CRM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1190 patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC at our hospital from 2005 to 2018, of whom 61 (5.1%) patients were diagnosed with positive CRM of ESCC. Overall survival (OS), progression-specific survival (PSS), local progression-specific survival (LPSS), and clinicopathological factors were compared between patients with and without postoperative radiotherapy. The efficacy of additional radiotherapy on patient outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 61 patients analyzed, 29 (47.5%) underwent radiotherapy (RT group) and 32 (52.5%) did not (NRT group). In the RT group, 22 patients (75.9%) received radiotherapy and 7 patients (24.1%) received chemoradiotherapy. The RT group included younger patients, a greater number of upper-esophageal tumors, and a greater rate of R2 resections than the NRT group. The LPSS and PSS of the RT group were significantly better than those of the NRT group (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, postoperative radiotherapy was an independent factor for LPSS [P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.46] and PSS (P < 0.001; HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiotherapy contributed to the control of residual tumor and was significantly associated with better LPSS and PSS among patients with positive CRM after esophagectomy for ESCC.

[Esophagectomy and Perioperative Management in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer].

According to the aging of society, elderly patients with esophageal cancer have been increasing in Japan. A multimodality treatment strategy is required to achieve long-term survival in patients with advanced-stage esophageal cancer. However, in elderly patients with impaired organ functions, the highly invasive treatment strategy is often difficult to be indicated. Esophagectomy remains the mainstay of treatment even in the elderly. Indication for esophagectomy in the elderly should be determined comprehensively, based on the physical status, life expectancy, tumor staging, and patients' desires. To predict the risk of postoperative complications, some scoring systems, such as estimation of physiology ability and surgical stress( E-PASS) and controlling nutritional status(CONUT), and the risk calculator provided by the National Clinical Database in Japan should be appropriately used. For patients with impaired organ functions, surgical procedures to reduce the surgical invasiveness, such as 2-stage operation, transhiatal esophagectomy, and mediastinoscopic esophagectomy, should be considered as an alternative to conventional transthoracic esophagectomy and reconstruction. Depending on the situations, preservation of the bronchial artery, thoracic duct, and azygos arch should be considered. A care bundle by a multidisciplinary perioperative management team may decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy.

The Design of and Rationale for the Effect of Perioperative Inhaled Tiotropium for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Esophageal Cancer Surgery (EPITOPE): an Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia is one of the most frequently occurring complications after esophagectomy and is associated with increased operative mortality. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is known to be a risk factor for pulmonary complications and operative mortality. However, in COPD patients preparing for esophagectomy, preventive measures against postoperative pneumonia have not yet been discovered. In this study, we evaluate the effect of perioperative inhaled tiotropium, a long-acting, antimuscarinic bronchodilator used in the management of COPD, on patients with COPD who undergo esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This study investigates the effect of perioperative inhaled tiotropium on patients with COPD who undergo esophagectomy. It is an open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in a single center (EPITOPE study). A total of 32 enrolled patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either conventional management or inhalation of tiotropium in addition to the conventional management. Patients included in the intervention group receive tiotropium Respimat 5 µg (two inhalations of 2.5 µg) for at least 2 weeks before the esophagectomy. Following the esophagectomy, tiotropium is re-delivered, starting as early as possible and continuing until the postoperative evaluation (between 30 and 44 days after the operation). The primary outcome is the incidence of pneumonia within 30 days after esophagectomy. Secondary outcomes are the incidence of cardiovascular complications within 30 days after esophagectomy, the incidence of any postoperative complications within 30 days after esophagectomy, pulmonary function (preintervention, preoperative, and postoperative), walking distance in the incremental shuttle walking test (preintervention, preoperative, and postoperative), the incidence of adverse events, and mortality within 30 days after esophagectomy. DISCUSSION: The EPITOPE study is the first pilot study on the effects of perioperative inhaled tiotropium on patients with COPD undergoing esophagectomy. After completing this study, we will plan a multicenter RCT with the appropriate outcomes in the future.

Correction to: Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.

The article Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer, written by Masayuki Watanabe, Reiko Otake, Ryotaro Kozuki, Tasuku Toihata, Keita Takahashi, Akihiko Okamura, Yu Imamura, was originally published Online First without Open Access.

Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal cancers. This review focuses on eight topics within the multidisciplinary approach for esophageal cancer. As esophagectomy is highly invasive and likely to impair quality of life, the development of less invasive strategies is expected. Endoscopic resection (ER) of early esophageal cancer is a less invasive treatment for early esophageal cancer. A recent phase II trial revealed that combined ER and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is efficacious as an esophagus-preserving treatment for cT1bN0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Esophagectomy and definitive CRT are equally effective for patients with clinical stage I SCC in terms of long-term outcome. For locally advanced resectable cancers, multidisciplinary treatment strategies have been established through several clinical trials of neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may improve the outcomes of patients and CRT is a curative-intent alternative to esophagectomy. CRT with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy combined with salvage surgery is a promising option to preserve the esophagus. Induction chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy may improve the outcomes of patients with locally advanced unresectable tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective for esophageal cancer, and their introduction to clinical practice is awaited.

Salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a potentially curative treatment modality, even for patients with unresectable T4 tumors. For patients who fail dCRT, salvage esophagectomy is known to be a high-risk procedure. However, the efficacy and safety of salvage surgery for these patients remain unclear. METHODS: A total of 35 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 ESCC were assessed, and both outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery were investigated. RESULTS: Among the study population, R0 resection was achieved in 19 patients (54.3%). Postoperatively, 8 patients (22.9%) experienced Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher complications, and 3 patients (8.6%) registered surgery-related mortality. Overall survival rates were 45.7%, 28.6%, and 5.7% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, residual or relapsed tumor limited to T2 or less was an independent prognostic factor for better survival (P = 0.010). On the other hand, postoperative pneumonia and incomplete resection were negative prognostic factors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). Nodal involvement and extent of lymph node dissection did not impact patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable T4 ESCC is considered a high-risk surgery with poor prognosis, long-term survival may be achieved in patients with ≤ T2 residual tumors. In addition, R0 resection and postoperative pneumonia prevention are crucial to improve patient survival.

Steam induced by the activation of energy devices under a wet condition may cause thermal injury.

BACKGROUND: During esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, meticulous attention is needed to prevent thermal injury to the vital organs, such as the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and tracheobronchus. In order to clarify the novel mechanism behind thermal injury induced by energy devices, we investigated the temperature of steam with the use of two different devices under wet and dry conditions. METHODS: An ultrasonic device (Sonicision™) and a vessel sealing device (Ligasure™) were studied. We evaluated the temperature at the tip of the devices and the steam when the devices were activated under different grasping ranges, under four different combinations of device and muscle, and under four different wet/dry conditions (dry-dry, dry-wet, wet-dry, and wet-wet). RESULTS: Although the maximum temperature of the devices was significantly higher with Sonicision™ than with Ligasure™, the maximum temperature of the steam was significantly higher with Ligasure™ than with Sonicision™ in almost all situations. At 1 mm away from Sonicision™, the critical temperature more than 60 °C was observed only when used with one-third grasping range under the wet-dry or the wet-wet conditions. In case of Ligasure™, high-temperature steam was observed when used with one-third grasping under the wet-dry or the wet-wet condition and two-third grasping under the dry-wet, the wet-dry, or the wet-wet condition. Under the wet condition, the emission of steam from the non-grasping part of Ligasure™ caused a spike in temperature that exceeded the critical temperature. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the use of energy devices under a wet condition generates steam from the non-grasping part of the devices. The temperatures of steam from Ligasure™ were significantly higher than that from Sonicision™. To prevent thermal injury to the vital organs, a very attentive and meticulous surgical technique is imperative considering the characteristics of each device.

Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer in a Patient with Left Pulmonary Artery Sling.

BACKGROUND: In esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients, the dissection of the lymph nodes around the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is essential for curative esophagectomy.1,2 Left pulmonary artery sling (LPAS) is a rare congenital anomaly, in which anomalous left pulmonary artery arises from the right pulmonary artery and reach the left pulmonary hilum.3-5 Because LPAS crosses between esophagus and trachea and the hemodynamics of LPAS could collapse when retracting the trachea anteriorly for left RLN node dissection, esophagectomy for patients with LPAS is technically challenging. In this video, we applied the cervicothoracoscopic approach in a patient with LPAS, in which we performed bilateral RLN node dissection from cervical operation field before thoracoscopic surgery.6,7 METHODS: A 44-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage II ESCC. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we planned to perform a three-stage esophagectomy. Preoperative-enhanced computed tomography revealed LPAS. During the cervical procedure, we identified the RLN, dissected the lymph nodes around the nerve, and mobilized the cervical esophagus. After the cervical procedures, we performed thoracoscopic surgery through the right thoracic cavity with the patient in a prone position. RESULTS: We achieved curative esophagectomy without any intraoperative adverse events. Total operation time was 419 min, with an estimated blood loss of 40 ml. There were no postsurgical complications, including RLN palsy. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LPAS in esophageal cancer surgery makes it difficult to dissect the left RLN nodes. We could safely perform curative esophagectomy for an ESCC patient with LPAS using the cervicothoracoscopic approach.

Inflammatory response and recurrence after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

PURPOSE: Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a very invasive surgery that induces an intense systemic inflammatory response. Postoperative infectious complications worsen survival after esophagectomy through inflammatory responses, and this study aimed to investigate the impact of the response on disease recurrence. METHODS: We assessed 230 patients who underwent curative minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The area under the curve of serum C-reactive protein levels from preoperative day through postoperative day 7 was defined as the cumulative magnitude of postoperative inflammatory response. RESULTS: Relapse-free survival was compared among quartiles of the area, and fourth quartile showed the worst relapse-free survival. Patients in the fourth quartile were the high group, and others were low group. Compared with low group (n = 173), high group (n = 57) showed significantly worse relapse-free survival and overall survival (P = 0.014 and 0.028, respectively). Multivariate analyses found that high group (P = 0.048) was an independent risk factor for recurrence but not overall survival. Higher body mass index (P < 0.001) and postoperative infections (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors to become high group. However, the influence of high group on recurrence was not affected by postoperative infections in interaction analysis (P = 0.889). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative intense systemic inflammatory response independently increased the risk of recurrence after curative minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Factors associating with intensified inflammatory response are higher body mass index and postoperative infections. Therefore, surgeons should make every effort to prevent postoperative infections to improve the long-term outcomes of patients.

Prognostic Significance of Skeletal Muscle Loss During Early Postoperative Period in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle loss during the early postoperative period frequently occurs during post-esophagectomy. Preoperative sarcopenia is a known prognostic factor. However, the prognostic significance of postoperative skeletal muscle loss remains unclear. This study was designed to clarify the impact of skeletal muscle loss during the early postoperative period on the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: We included 316 patients (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent esophagectomy. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumber vertebra's bottom level was measured using computed tomography (CT) before surgery and 4 months after surgery. The SMI reduction rate, patient's prognosis, and recurrence rates were evaluated. RESULTS: The SMI reduction rates in tertiles were < 1.25% in the first tertile (t1, n = 105), between 1.25 and 9.13% in the second tertile (t2, n = 106), and > 9.13% in the third tertile (t3, n = 105). Both relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in t3 were significantly worse than those in t1 and t2 (p < 0.001). Therefore, we defined t3 as the massive reduction (MR) group and t1 and t2 as the limited reduction (LR) group. By univariate analysis, both RFS and OS were significantly poorer in the MR group than in LR. By multivariate analysis, the massive skeletal muscle loss during the early postoperative period was an independent factor for both RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative skeletal muscle loss predicts both recurrence and poor survival.

Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy.

BACKGROUND: Synchronous or metachronous esophageal, and head and neck cancers are often observed, and we occasionally encounter esophageal cancer cases with a past history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) for head and neck cancers. Total esophagectomy after TPL may impair blood supply to the trachea and may cause tracheal necrosis. Meanwhile, Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy can prevent the above-mentioned risks, but there is a concern about an anastomosis with the remnant upper esophagus that lost blood supply after two surgical procedures. The surgical outcomes of Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy after TPL remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL at our institution between 2005 and 2017. We retrospectively investigated the patients' background characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients (8 men and 4 women) were included in this study. The median period between TPL and esophagectomy was 32 months (range 2-185 months). All patients underwent esophagectomy via right open thoracotomy and reconstruction using a gastric tube with intrathoracic anastomosis. Although the esophagogastric anastomosis was made on the remnant upper esophagus, which had already lost blood supply from the inferior thyroid artery, there was no case of anastomotic leakage or esophageal necrosis, and hospital mortality was not observed. CONCLUSION: Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for patients with a history of TPL is a safe procedure, which can prevent severe complications including anastomotic leakage or tracheal necrosis.

Significance of Intramural Metastasis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Indicator of Aggressive Cancer Behavior.

BACKGROUND: Intramural metastasis (IM) is occasionally noted in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few recent studies have investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of IM and its survival impact. The present study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of IM in patients with ESCC. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 918 consecutive patients who underwent curative intent esophagectomy for ESCC. IM was defined as a pathologically confirmed metastatic lesion, which was clearly separate from the primary tumor and located within the esophageal or gastric wall. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival impact of IM were evaluated. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to further elucidate the prognostic impact of IM. RESULTS: Among 918 patients, 46 (5.0%) had IM. Advanced tumors were significantly more frequent in patients with IM than in those without IM. The curative resection rate was lower in patients with IM (P = 0.001). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were worse in patients with IM (both P < 0.001). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, IM presence was an independent poor prognostic indicator for OS and DSS (both P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, advanced tumors according to pathological N stage and lymphatic invasion were more frequent in patients with IM (P = 0.015 and 0.004, respectively). Additionally, OS and DSS were different between patients with and those without IM (both P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IM from ESCC is a local indicator of lymphatic invasion and advanced cancer, as well as an independent factor for poor prognosis.

Supraclavicular and celiac metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus.

PURPOSE: Squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus (SCC-ME) often metastasizes to the neck, mediastinum, and abdomen. This study aims to assess the prognostic impact of supraclavicular (SC) and celiac (CE) lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with SCC-ME. METHODS: We examined 210 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy with three-field LN dissection for SCC-ME. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with and without SC and/or CE metastases were compared to assess the prognostic significance of SC and/or CE metastases. RESULTS: We observed metastases to SC and CE in 25 (11.9%) and 20 (9.5%) patients, respectively. Seven patients (3.3%) had both SC and CE metastases. Although the survival of patients with SC and/or CE metastases was worse compared with those without, that of patients with SC metastases but without CE metastases was comparable with that of patients with CE metastases but without SC metastases; the 5 year overall survival rates were 35.6% and 46.2%, respectively. However, survival of patients with both SC and CE metastases was the worst among all groups, and all patients with both SC and CE metastases experienced disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of patients with both SC and CE metastases was extremely poor. In contrast, patients with metastasis to either one of these sites could be candidates for surgery as the main modality in a multidisciplinary strategy.