Long-Term Survivors after Failure of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Role for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation? A German Lymphoma Alliance and German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation Analysis.

The outcome of patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) who relapse or progress after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) administered as salvage therapy beyond the second treatment line is poor. However, a minority of patients become long-term survivors despite CAR-T failure. The German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) has proposed a hierarchical management algorithm for CAR-T failure in LBCL, aimed at allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) as definite therapy in eligible patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate characteristics, relapse patterns, and management strategies in long-term survivors after CAR-T failure, with a particular focus on the feasibility and outcome of alloHCT. This was a retrospective analysis of all evaluable patients with a relapse/progression event (REL) observed in a previously reported GLA sample between November 2018 and May 2021. REL occurred in 214 of 356 patients (60%) who underwent CAR-T for LBCL in the previous GLA study. An evaluable dataset was available for 143 of these 214 patients (67%). Twenty-six of 143 patients (18%) survived 12 months or longer from REL, 109 (76%) died within the first year after REL, and 8 (6%) were alive but had not reached the 12-month landmark. Long-term survivors had more favorable pre-CAR-T features, had a longer interval between CAR-T and REL, and had more often received a tumor biopsy after CAR-T failure, whereas the choice of the first salvage regimen had no impact. AlloHCT was feasible in 40 of 53 patients (75%) intended and resulted in a 12-month post-transplantation overall survival of 36% in those patients who underwent transplantation with sensitive or untreated REL. AlloHCT after CAR-T failure in LBCL is feasible and may be an important contributor to long-term survival, although selection bias must be taken into account. Thus, alloHCT should be considered as a reasonable treatment option for eligible patients in this setting. However, because the overall outlook after CAR-T failure remains poor, novel effective therapeutic approaches are needed, either to allow long-term disease control per se or to improve the preconditions for successful alloHCT.

Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and skeletal involvement.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal involvement (SI) is observed at low prevalence in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Due to the rareness of this particular condition, prospective trials for these patients are scarce. METHODS: We analyzed clinical characteristics and outcome of 75 patients with DLBCL and SI in order to identify factors with prognostic impact towards progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Limited stage disease (Ann Arbor stage IE-IIE) was present in 34 patients (45%), 41 patients (55%) had advanced stage disease (Ann Arbor stage IIIE-IVE). Outcome was generally favorable for patients with DLBCL and SI with 3-year OS of 83%. The international prognostic index (IPI) was able to distinguish between different risk groups within this specific entity. Additionally, hypercalcemia showed to be a factor significantly associated with inferior survival. In regard to first-line treatment modalities, consolidative radiotherapy was positively associated with prolonged PFS and OS while intensification of chemotherapy had no significant impact. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients with DLBCL and SI, high-risk IPI as well as presence of hypercalcemia were associated with inferior outcome. Consolidative radiotherapy had a positive impact on survival.

Lenalidomide enhances myeloma-specific T-cell responses in vivo and in vitro.

Immunomodulation is an important part of lenalidomide's mode of action. We analyzed the impact of lenalidomide on T cells from patients with multiple myeloma during lenalidomide therapy in vivo and in patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease in vitro Patients enrolled in the German Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) MM5 trial received a consolidation therapy with two cycles of lenalidomide after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Half of the study population continued treatment with lenalidomide maintenance therapy for 2 y, while the other patients received lenalidomide maintenance therapy until complete remission. We analyzed 58 patients with (n = 30) or without (n = 28) lenalidomide therapy and 12 patients refractory to lenalidomide with regards to their anti-myeloma-specific T-cell responses displayed by IFNγ, Granzyme B, and Perforin secretion. The immunophenotype of T-cells was investigated by flow cytometry. Significantly, more myeloma-specific T-cell responses were observed in patients during lenalidomide therapy, compared to patients without treatment. Furthermore, we found on T-cells from patients treated with lenalidomide a decreased CD45RA expression, indicating a maturated immunophenotype and a decreased expression of CD57, indicating functional T cells. An improved myeloma-specific T-cell response was observed in 6 out of 12 heavily pretreated patients (refractory to lenalidomide) after in vitro incubation with lenalidomide. Complementary to the results in vivo, lenalidomide decreased CD45RA expression on T cells in vitro.

Analysis of clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and renal involvement in the rituximab era.

Renal involvement in patients with lymphoma is rare but associated with poor prognosis. We analyzed characteristics and outcome of 22 patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and renal involvement treated with a rituximab-containing regimen in curative intent. The majority of patients presented in advanced disease, 86% were Ann Arbor stage ≥ III and had an IPI score ≥ 3. Renal impairment was present in 32%. Outcome was poor with three-year progression-free survival (PFS) 44% and three-year overall survival (OS) 52% and significantly worse compared to DLBCL without renal involvement (p < 0.01). Patients with high-risk IPI had a significantly inferior prognosis compared to intermediate-risk IPI (three-year OS 0% vs. 75%, p = 0.01) as did those with renal impairment. A high rate of central nervous system (CNS) relapse (8/22) was observed. Intravenous high-dose methotrexate and intrathecal therapy showed a trend toward prolonged time to CNS relapse. Implementation of CNS prophylaxis might therefore be considered in these high-risk patients.