STIR vs. T1-weighted fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of bone marrow edema of the knee: computer-assisted quantitative comparison and influence of injected contrast media volume and acquisition parameters.

PURPOSE: To compare short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted (T1w) gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced fat-suppressed MRI of bone marrow edema (BME) of the knee, and investigate the influence of injected contrast media volume and variation of major acquisition parameters on apparent BME volume and signal contrast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: STIR and T1w Gd-enhanced fat-suppressed images were obtained from 30 patients with BME of the knee. Two groups of patients were examined with different MR scanners, acquisition parameters, and contrast media volumes. For both sequences, BME volume and signal contrast were assessed by computer-assisted quantification, and were compared through their arithmetic means and correlation coefficients (r(2)). The injected contrast media volume was also correlated with BME volume and signal contrast differences between sequences. RESULTS: A strong correlation between the STIR and Gd-enhanced T1w images was found for BME volume (r(2) = 0.96-0.99) and BME signal contrast (r(2) = 0.86-0.94). Despite the differences in MR acquisition parameters and injected contrast media volume, both sequences depicted an almost identical BME volume in both groups. Contrast media volume showed a moderate correlation (r(2) = 0.40) with BME volume differences. CONCLUSION: STIR is the optimum method for determining the size and signal contrast of BME. The injected contrast media volume appears to have only a limited influence on apparent BME volume.

Texture analysis for tissue discrimination on T1-weighted MR images of the knee joint in a multicenter study: Transferability of texture features and comparison of feature selection methods and classifiers.

PURPOSE: To investigate the reproducibility and transferability of texture features between MR centers, and to compare two feature selection methods and two classifiers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coronal T1-weighted MR images of the knees of 63 patients, divided into three groups, were included in the study. MR images were obtained at three different MR centers. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in the bone marrow and fat tissue. Then texture analysis (TA) of the ROIs was performed, and the most discriminant features were identified using Fisher coefficients and POE+ACC (probability of classification error and average correlation coefficients). Based on these features, artificial neural network (ANN) and k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN) classifiers were used for tissue discrimination. RESULTS: Although the texture features differed among the MR centers, features from one center could be successfully used for tissue discrimination in texture data on MR images from other centers. The best results were achieved using the ANN classifier in combination with features selected by POE+ACC. CONCLUSION: The differences in texture features extracted from MR images from different centers seem to have only a small impact on the results of tissue discrimination.

MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee: ligaments, menisci, and articular cartilage.

The surgical management of knee injuries has increased in recent years. Postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the knee following surgical intervention serves an important role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent or residual symptoms following surgical intervention. MR imaging additionally assists in the noninvasive documentation of temporal changes at the surgical site potentially reflective of procedural success, or failure. Background understanding of the common surgical procedures performed, their normal postoperative MR imaging appearance, and imaging features of potential procedural complications are essential in the accurate evaluation of patients following prior knee surgery. The focus of the following article is to review the clinical and MR imaging features of the postoperative knee following prior surgical treatment of ligamentous, meniscal, and articular cartilage injuries of the joint.

Computer-assisted quantitative analysis of bone marrow edema of the knee: initial experience with a new method.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe a largely observer-independent computer-assisted method for accurate quantitative analysis of bone marrow edema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with bone marrow edema of the knee were included in the study. Coronal STIR images of the affected knees were obtained using a 1.0-T MR scanner. Size and signal intensity of the bone marrow edema were assessed on the basis of gray-scale value analysis and calculation of a threshold value for differentiating normal and edematous bone marrow. All measurements were carried out three times for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The intraobserver coefficient of variation was 0.89% for the volume and 0.94% for the signal intensity of the bone marrow edema, showing the small impact of manual interference on results produced with this method. CONCLUSION: A computer-assisted method for quantification of bone marrow edema has been described. Intraobserver variation was very low, indicating excellent reproducibility of results. Although the method is too time-consuming for clinical use, it is recommended for research purposes.

Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography.

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the accuracy of conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, direct MR arthrography, and indirect MR arthrography in assessment of possible recurrent or residual meniscal tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-four patients who had previously undergone meniscal preservation surgery were prospectively examined with conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography. Ninety-four patients (104 postoperative menisci) underwent subsequent second-look arthroscopic surgery. Each case was evaluated for (a) surfacing intrameniscal intermediate- or T1-weighted signal intensity, (b) surfacing intrameniscal T2-weighted signal intensity, (c) morphologic changes beyond those expected postoperatively, (d) joint effusion on conventional MR or indirect MR arthrographic studies, and (e) overall presence or absence of recurrent meniscal tear. RESULTS: Seventy-one arthroscopically proved recurrent meniscal tears were found. In the diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 86%, 67%, 83%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, for conventional MR imaging; 83%, 78%, 90%, 64%, and 81%, respectively, for indirect MR arthrography; and 90%, 78%, 90%, 78%, and 85%, respectively, for direct MR arthrography. No significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of one method relative to another was observed (P >.54). Surfacing intrameniscal T2-weighted signal intensity was the most specific sign, with the highest positive predictive value of a recurrent tear. CONCLUSION: Although a small incremental increase in accuracy is associated with the use of direct MR arthrography over conventional MR imaging and indirect MR arthrography, no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy among the three techniques was demonstrated for detection of recurrent or residual meniscal tear.