Risks and benefits of dermatological machine learning health care applications-an overview and ethical analysis.

BACKGROUND: Visual data are particularly amenable for machine learning techniques. With clinical photography established for skin surveillance and documentation purposes as well as progress checks, dermatology is an ideal field for the development and application of emerging machine learning health care applications (ML-HCAs). To date, several ML-HCAs have detected malignant skin lesions on par with experts or found overlooked visual patterns that correlate with certain dermatological diseases. However, it is well established that ML-HCAs come with ethical and social implications. OBJECTIVES: Currently, there is a lack of research that establishes model design, training, usage and regulation of such technologies sufficient to ensure ethically and socially responsible development and clinical translation, specifically within the field of dermatology. With this paper, we aim to give an overview of currently discussed ethical issues relating to dermatological ML-HCAs. METHODS: On the basis of a thematic, keyword-based literature search, we performed an ethical analysis against established frameworks of biomedical ethics. We combined our results with current, relevant normative machine learning ethics literature to identify the status quo of the ethics of ML-HCAs in dermatology. We describe the benefits and risks of dermatological ML-HCAs that are currently being developed for clinical purposes. RESULTS: The potential benefits range from better patient outcomes to better knowledge accessibility to decreasing health care disparities, that is, standards of care between different population groups. The risks associated with ML-HCAs range from confidentiality issues to individual patient outcomes as well as the exacerbation of prevalent health care disparities. We discuss the practical implications for all stages of dermatological ML-HCA development. CONCLUSION: We found that ML-HCAs present stakeholder-specific risks for patients, health care professionals and society, which need to be considered separately. The discipline lacks sufficient biomedical ethics research that could standardize the approach to ML-HCA model design, training, use and regulation of such technologies.

The invisible basal cell carcinoma: how reflectance confocal microscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy of clinically unclear facial macules and papules.

Difficult to diagnose and early non-melanoma skin cancer lesions are frequently seen in daily clinical practice. Besides precancerous lesions such as actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) score the highest frequency in skin tumors. While infiltrative and nodular BCCs require a surgical treatment with a significant impact on the patients' quality of life, early and superficial BCCs might benefit from numerous conservative treatments, such as topical immune-modulators or photodynamic therapy. Dermoscopy has shown a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of early BCCs, and non-invasive imaging techniques like reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have proven to be helpful. The aim of our study was to investigate the importance of RCM in the diagnosis of BCCs with indistinct clinical and dermoscopic features. We retrospectively examined 27 histologically proven BCCs in which diagnosis was not possible based on naked eye examination; we separately reviewed clinical, dermoscopic, and confocal microscopy features and evaluated the lesions meeting the common diagnostic criteria for BCCs, and our diagnostic confidence. All lesions were clinically unclear, with no characteristic features suggestive for BCC; dermoscopy showed in most cases unspecific teleangiectasias (74 %) and micro-erosions (52 %). Confocal microscopy revealed in most of the cases the presence of specific criteria: peripheral palisading of the nuclei (89 %), clefting (70 %), stromal reaction (70 %), dark silhouettes (70 %), inflammatory particles (70 %), and tumor islands (67 %). In the absence of significant diagnostic clinical signs and with unclear dermoscopic features, specific confocal patterns were present in most of the lesions and enabled a correct diagnosis. In the absence of significant clinical features of BCC and in the case of uncertain dermoscopy, striking confocal features are detectable and easy to recognize in most cases. Confocal microscopy can therefore be instrumentful in the diagnosis of the so-called invisible BCCs.

[Ultrasound for surveillance after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm--simple and safe?]. / Welche Nachkontrolle ist bei endovaskulärer Versorgung von abdominellen Aortenaneurysmen empfehlenswert?

In the past, multislice computed tomography angiography (CTA) with arterial and venous phase was recommended as the gold standard in follow-up after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR). Iodine-containing contrast agents and frequent radiation exposure are limitations for use in elderly patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Colour-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS) and, especially, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) are non-invasive methods that are time and cost effective. Both provide a reliable alternative to CTA in surveillance after EVAR. CEUS seems to be superior in characterisation of the type of endoleaks and can be established in order to reduce iodine-containing contrast agent and radiation exposure in follow-up. In contrast to CTA scans, CEUS can be offered to patients with chronic renal insufficiency and allows a dynamic examination and perfusion analysis (e. g., in fenestrated and branched stentgrafts). Routine combination with X-ray allows control of stentgraft material and location of the branches.

Quality of life following aesthetic plastic surgery: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was the prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. We examined pre- and postoperative changes in quality of life, and performed a comparison of our data with a representative random sample. METHOD: 228 patients agreed to participate in the present study. Measurements were taken preoperatively as well as 3 and 6 months postoperatively. One hundred and thirty two patients completed the three months postoperative evaluation (T1), 82 answered the 6 months follow-up evaluation (T2). The testing instrument included a standardised self-assessment test on satisfaction and quality of life (FLZ(M)), consisting of three modules: satisfaction with general life, health and appearance. Further, a postoperative complication questionnaire was used in order to evaluate the satisfaction with the surgical outcome and to estimate postoperative complications and side effects. RESULTS: Significantly increasing values in two aspects of quality of life were found: health and appearance. Whereas the positive influence on health is persistent, there is a diminishing influence of appearance 6 months postoperatively. Although higher values for some of the individual items of the FLZ(M) modules of the norm data were found in comparison to our study group, a general preoperative lower level of quality of life of the aesthetic surgery patients could not be confirmed. Over 84% were satisfied or very satisfied with the aesthetic result. 85% would undergo the same treatment again and 94% of the patients would further recommend their operation. More than half of the study group did not report a decrease in physical fitness or reduced social contacts in the direct postoperative period. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that aesthetic plastic surgery increases most aspects of quality of life, especially regarding body satisfaction and health. It is very well tolerated by the patients and is therefore a recommended option.