RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Modified fluid gelatin 4% is approved for use in children, but there is still a surprising lack of clinical studies including large numbers of pediatric patients. Therefore, we performed a European prospective noninterventional multicenter study to evaluate the use of a modified fluid gelatin 4% in saline (sal-GEL) or an acetate-containing balanced electrolyte solution (bal-GEL) in children undergoing major pediatric surgery. AIMS: The primary aim was to assess the indications and dosing of modified fluid gelatin, and the secondary aim was to assess the safety and efficacy, focusing, in particular, on routinely collected clinical parameters. METHODS: Children aged up to 12 years with ASA risk scores of I-III receiving sal-GEL or bal-GEL were followed perioperatively. Demographic data, surgical procedures performed, anesthesia, hemodynamic and laboratory data, adverse events, and adverse drug reactions were documented using a standardized case report form. RESULTS: 601 children that were investigated at 13 European pediatric centers from May 2015 to March 2020 (sal-GEL 20.1%, bal-GEL 79.9%; mean age 29.1 ± 38.6 (range 0-144) months; body weight 12.1 ± 10.5 (1.4-70) kg) were included in the analysis. The most frequent indications for GEL infusion were hemodynamic instability without bleeding (76.0%), crystalloids alone not being sufficient for hemodynamic stabilization (55.7%), replacement of preoperative deficit (26.0%), and significant bleeding (13.0%). Mean infused GEL volume was 13.0 ± 5.3 (2.4-37.5) ml kg-1 . The total dose was affected by age, with higher doses in younger patients. After gelatin infusion, mean arterial pressure increased (mean change 8.5 ± 7.3 [95% CI: 8 to 9.1] mmHg), and the hemoglobin concentrations decreased significantly (mean change -1.1 ± 1.8 [95% CI: -1.2 to -0.9] g·dL-1 ). Acid-base parameters were more stable with bal-GEL. No serious adverse drug reactions directly related to gelatin (i.e., anaphylactoid reaction, clotting disorders, and renal failure) were observed. CONCLUSION: Moderate doses up to 20 ml kg-1 of modified fluid gelatin were infused most frequently to improve hemodynamic stability in children undergoing major pediatric surgery. The acid-base balance was more stable when gelatin in a balanced electrolyte solution was used instead of saline. No serious adverse drug reactions associated with gelatin were observed.
Assuntos
Hidratação , Substitutos do Plasma , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Soluções Cristaloides/efeitos adversos , Soluções Cristaloides/uso terapêutico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Eletrólitos/administração & dosagem , Eletrólitos/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente) , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Hidratação/métodos , Gelatina , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Substitutos do Plasma/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos OperatóriosRESUMO
This consensus- based S1 Guideline for perioperative infusion therapy in children is focused on safety and efficacy. The objective is to maintain or re-establish the child's normal physiological state (normovolemia, normal tissue perfusion, normal metabolic function, normal acid- base- electrolyte status). Therefore, the perioperative fasting times should be as short as possible to prevent patient discomfort, dehydration, and ketoacidosis. A physiologically composed balanced isotonic electrolyte solution (BS) with 1-2.5% glucose is recommended for the intraoperative background infusion to maintain normal glucose concentrations and to avoid hyponatremia, hyperchloremia, and lipolysis. Additional BS without glucose can be used in patients with circulatory instability until the desired effect is achieved. The additional use of colloids (albumin, gelatin, hydroxyethyl starch) is recommended to recover normovolemia and to avoid fluid overload when crystalloids alone are not sufficient and blood products are not indicated. Monitoring should be extended in cases with major surgery, and autotransfusion maneuvers should be performed to assess fluid responsiveness.
Assuntos
Hidratação/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Alemanha , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Third-generation hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is now approved also for the use in children, but safety studies including large numbers of pediatric patients are still missing. Therefore, we performed an European multicentric prospective observational postauthorization safety study (PASS) to evaluate the use of HES 130/0.42/6:1 in normal saline (ns-HES) or a balanced electrolyte solution (bal-HES) in children undergoing surgery. METHODS: Children aged up to 12 years with ASA risk scores of I-III receiving ns-HES (Venofundin 6%; Braun) or bal-HES (Tetraspan 6%; Braun) were followed perioperatively. Demographic data, surgical procedures performed, anesthesia, hemodynamic and laboratory data, adverse events (AE), and adverse drug reactions (ADR) were documented using a standardized case report form. RESULTS: Of 1130 children studied at 11 European pediatric centers from 2006 to 2009 (ns-HES, 629 children; bal-HES, 475 children; mean age, 3.6 ± 3.8 [range, day of birth-12 years]; and body weight, 15.4 ± 13 [0.9-90 kg]), 1104 were included for analysis. The mean infused HES volume was 10.6 ± 5.8 (0.83-50) ml·kg(-1). In the 399 (36.1%) cases with blood gas analysis before and after HES infusion, hemoglobin and strong ion difference decreased significantly in both groups, whereas bicarbonate and base excess (BE before infusion: ns-HES -1.8 ± 3.1, bal-HES -1.2 ± 3.3 mm; after infusion: ns-HES -2.5 ± 2.8; bal-HES -1.1 ± 3.2 mm, P < 0.05) decreased only with ns-HES but remained stable with bal-HES. Chloride concentrations increased in both groups and were significantly higher with ns-HES (Cl before infusion: ns-HES 105.5 ± 3.6, bal-HES 104.9 ± 2.9 mm; Cl after infusion: ns-HES 107.6 ± 3.4, bal-HES 106.3 ± 2.9 mm, P < 0.05). For the AE/ADR rates, dose-response but no age relationships could be demonstrated. No serious and no severe ADR directly related to HES (i.e. anaphylactoid reaction, clotting disorders, renal failure) were observed. CONCLUSION: Moderate doses of HES 130/0.42/6:1 for perioperative plasma volume replacement seem to be safe even in neonates and small infants. The probability of serious ADR is lower than 0.3%. Changes in acid-base balance may be decreased when HES is used in an acetate-containing balanced electrolyte solution instead of normal saline. Caution should be exercised in patients with renal function disturbances and those with an increased bleeding risk.
Assuntos
Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/uso terapêutico , Substitutos do Plasma/uso terapêutico , Volume Plasmático/efeitos dos fármacos , Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Desequilíbrio Ácido-Base/prevenção & controle , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Eletrólitos/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Hemorragia/complicações , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/efeitos adversos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Infusões Intravenosas , Nefropatias/complicações , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Assistência Perioperatória , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several clinical studies have shown that hydroxyethyl starch (HES) may be as effective and safe as, but less expensive than, albumin when used for perioperative plasma volume replacement (PVR) in children. The new third generation HES 130/0.42 solution was designed to reduce adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and improve safety while maintaining efficacy. Therefore, the objective of this prospective multicenter observational postauthorization safety study (PASS) was to evaluate the perioperative use of HES 130/0.42 in 1000 children with a particular focus on possible ADRs. METHODS: Approximately 300 of 1000 pediatric patients aged up to 12 years with ASA risk scores of I-III receiving perioperative HES 130/0.42 (Venofundin 6%; Braun, Melsungen, Germany) should be enrolled for interims analysis in the first year. The statistical sample size calculation showed that this number of patients would be sufficient to detect a 1% incidence of ADRs. Following approval by local ethics committee, patient demographics, data relating to HES 130/0.42 use, the procedures performed, anesthesia, and ADRs were documented with a particular focus on cardiovascular stability, hemodilution, acid-base balance, renal function, blood coagulation, and hypersensitivity. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixteen children (ASA I-III, age 3 +/- 3.4 [range, day of birth-12 years], body weight 13 +/- 10.5 [range, 1.1-60 kg]) were studied at five centers in Germany, Austria, and Italy from May 2006 until August 2007. Forty-five percent of the patients underwent abdominal surgery, 12.4% urologic procedures, 11.4% thoracic surgery, 7.6% orthopedic procedures, and 7% cardiovascular surgery. The mean volume of infused HES 130/0.42 was 11 +/- 4.8 ml x kg(-1) (range, 5-42). Cardiovascular stability was maintained in all cases. After HES infusion, hemoglobin (11.5 vs 10.25 g x dl(-1)), base excess (-2 vs -2.7 mmol x l(-1)), anion gap (12.9 vs 11.2 mmol x l(-1)), and strong ion difference (34.3 vs 31.4 mmol x L(-1)) decreased, and chloride (105.7 vs 107.8 mmol x l(-1)) increased significantly (P < 0.05). No serious ADRs (i.e., anaphylactoid reaction, renal failure, clotting disorders) were observed. CONCLUSION: Moderate doses of HES 130/0.42 help to maintain cardiovascular stability and lead to only moderate changes in hemoglobin concentration and acid-base balance in children. The probability of serious ADRs is lower than 1%. Therefore, HES 130/0.42 for PVR seems to be safe and effective even in neonates and small infants with normal renal function and coagulation.
Assuntos
Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/efeitos adversos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Equilíbrio Ácido-Base/efeitos dos fármacos , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemoglobinas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/administração & dosagem , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Substitutos do Plasma/administração & dosagem , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
In the postoperative phase after thoracic surgery in children patients can suffer considerable pain. The repertoire of analgesic treatments consist of basic treatment with non-opioid analgesics such as paracetamol or ibuprofen, as well as need-determined treatments with opioids given under intensive care monitoring. In addition, local and regional anaesthetic methods are an important part of the big picture of effective pain control after thoracic surgery in children.