RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is one of the most relevant influencing factors for the oncological outcome of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Several studies showed that the tumors depth of invasion (DOI) influences the risk for CLNM, however varying across the oral subsites. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of DOI and other risk factors in OSCC of the tongue in relation to the occurrence of occult CLNM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, n = 139 patients with primary OSCC of the tongue, treated by complete surgical resection (R0) with curative intention between 2013 and 2021, were included. For data analysis, epidemiologic data as well as preoperative tumor staging, surgical therapy including neck management, histopathological tumor data and follow-up were considered. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine association between histopathological risk factors and the occurrence of occult CLNM. RESULTS: The rate of occult cervical metastasis was 19.4%. T-staging, cervical nodal disease (pN+) and lymphatic invasion were significantly associated with reduced OS and RFS. While DOI had no relevant influence on the OS and RFS (p = 0.88 and p = 0.91 respectively), there was significant correlation between DOI and the occurrence of occult CLNM (OR: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.05-1.30; p < 0.01). The optimal cutoff in predicting occult CLNM was 6 mm (Sensitivity: 84.2%, Specificity: 73.5%, AUC: 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The DOI is a helpful risk parameter to predict the occurrence of occult nodal disease in OSCC of the tongue. Given the critical decision cutoff between 2 and 4 mm DOI for performing elective neck dissection in the current guidelines, our data suggests that in these cases, surgical de-escalation could be feasible with close follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlights the relevance of DOI as a risk parameter in the prediction of CLNM with the aim to specify the individual patient risk and to deescalate surgical therapy in order to decrease comorbidities while improving the oncological prognosis.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Metástase Linfática , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Língua , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Língua/patologia , Neoplasias da Língua/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Medição de Risco , Idoso , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
Selective neck dissection (SND) is the treatment of choice in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) and clinically node-negative necks (cN0). The treatment of patients with positive-staged necks (cN+) includes SND as well as comprehensive neck dissection (CND). The clear benefit of one or the other remains under debate. We aim to address this lack of clarity by analysing patients with OSCC staged with clinically node-positive necks, treated with either CND or SND using a level-by-level approach. This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OSCC with clinically (cN+) and pathologically (pN+) positive cervical lymph nodes (LNs) with clear neck level categorization during the years 2010-2019. In total, 74 patients were analysed. Cox regression analysis found no significance for the type of ND being an independent risk factor, neither for overall survival (OS) nor for disease-free survival (DFS). Regional recurrence of CND cases (5.77%) was comparable to SND cases (9.09%). For OS, extracapsular spread (ECS) and male sex were identified as independent risk factors with poorer outcome. pT-stage and ECS were found to be independent risk factors for DFS. The results of this study suggest that both CND and SND may be viable treatment options for certain patients with OSCC pN+.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Linfonodos , Metástase Linfática , Neoplasias Bucais , Esvaziamento Cervical , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Neoplasias Bucais/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esvaziamento Cervical/métodos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Objective: In advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), adjuvant therapy (AT) is an important part of the treatment to ensure extended locoregional control after primary surgical resection. The impact of the time interval between surgery and AT on the oncological prognosis remains unclear, particularly in high-risk constellations. The aim of this study is to categorize treatment delays and to determine their impact on the oncological prognosis within the context of the histopathological risk parameters of patients with advanced OSCC. Methods: In this single-institutional retrospective cohort study, all patients treated for OSCC between 2016 and 2021 and who received postoperative chemoradiation (POCRT) were included. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I: ≤ 6 weeks between surgery and POCRT; and Group II: > 6 weeks between surgery and POCRT. Results: Overall, 202 patients were included (Group I: 156 (77.2%) vs. Group II: 46 (22.8%)). There were no statistically significant differences in epidemiological aspects and histopathological risk factors between the two groups. The maximum time to initiation of POCRT was 11 weeks. Delayed POCRT initiation had no statistically significant influence on the 5-year OS (61.6% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.89), locoregional control rate (38.6% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.57), and RFS (32.3% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.21). On multivariate analysis, extracapsular spread (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.21 - 4.04, p = 0.01) and incomplete surgical resection (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.10 - 3.69, p = 0.02) were significantly correlated with OS. For RFS, ECS (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.15 - 2.86, p = 0.01), incomplete resection (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.04 - 2.71, p = 0.04), and vascular infiltration of the tumor (V-stage; HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.08 - 4.27, p = 0.03) were significant risk predictors. Conclusion: Delays in POCRT initiation up to 11 weeks after surgical resection for advanced OSCC were not statistically significantly associated with impaired survival. In cases of prolonged surgical treatment due to management of complications, a small delay in AT beyond the recommended time limit may be justified and AT should still be pursued.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Intraoperative frozen section analysis (IFSA) is a well-established procedure for determining the intraoperative soft tissue resection status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Margin status is a major predictor of the patient´s outcome, histologically free margins of ≥ 5 mm are demanded. This study evaluates the accuracy of IFSA, the impact of margin status and the impact of intraoperative margin revision on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This retrospective study included 213 patients with OSCC. IFSA results were compared with definitive histopathological reports, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. Cut-off values were calculated for resection margins considering known risk factors. RESULTS: IFSA showed positive margins in 8 cases (3.8%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences for OS or DFS if R0-status was achieved by initial resection or immediate re-resection. Final histopathological evaluation revealed false-positive IFSA in 3/8 cases (37.5%) and false-negative IFSA in 1/205 cases (0.5%). Sensitivity was 83.3% and specificity was 98.6%. Analysis of optimal cut-off values showed no general need for larger resection margins in patients with risk factors. Cut-off values were slightly higher for patients with the risk factor alcohol consumption (7 mm for OS and DFS) or pN + ECS- disease (7 mm for DFS). Optimal cut-off values for tumour-margin-distance were around 6 mm. CONCLUSION: IFSA provides a valuable assessment method for intraoperative soft tissue resection margins. Risk factors seemingly do not significantly influence the extent of tumour resection.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Secções Congeladas , Margens de Excisão , Neoplasias Bucais , Humanos , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Estimativa de Kaplan-MeierRESUMO
PURPOSE: Compromised swallowing, speaking, and local complications are the major disadvantages of established approaches to the posterior tongue and oropharynx. The mandibular split involves an esthetically unpleasant bipartition of the lower lip and is prone to bony non-union or sequestration. The conventional pull-through technique on the other hand lacks the secure reattachment of the lingually released soft tissues. METHODS: The feasibility of a new modified pull-through approach was tested on three anatomical specimens. CAD/CAM cutting guides were used to design a retentive bone flap to properly refixate the genioglossus and geniohyoid muscles after the procedure. The radiographic assessment and treatment planning was performed on 12 cadavers. The entire procedure was tested surgically via dissection in three of those cases. This procedure was then applied in a clinical case. RESULTS: Precise repositioning and dynamic compression of bony segments was possible reproducibly and without injury to adjacent structures. In all dissected cases, a median lingual foramen was found and in two cases vessels entering it could be dissected Radiologic anatomical landmarks were sufficient in all 12 cases to perform the clinical planning procedure. Clinically, the osteotomized segment demonstrated good blood supply and plateless repositioning was verified postoperatively via cone beam scan. CONCLUSION: The method presented is safe and easy to perform. Individual cutting guides improve the safety and accuracy of the procedure, potentially eliminating the need for osteosynthesis. We provide the anatomical and radiologic basis for clinical evaluation of this pedicled bone flap procedure and present the clinical application of this modified pull-through approach.