FGF-trapping hampers cancer stem-like cells in uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are a subpopulation of tumor cells responsible for tumor initiation, metastasis, chemoresistance, and relapse. Recently, CSCs have been identified in Uveal Melanoma (UM), which represents the most common primary tumor of the eye. UM is highly resistant to systemic chemotherapy and effective therapies aimed at improving overall survival of patients are eagerly required. METHODS: Herein, taking advantage from a pan Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF)-trap molecule, we singled out and analyzed a UM-CSC subset with marked stem-like properties. A hierarchical clustering of gene expression data publicly available on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was performed to identify patients' clusters. RESULTS: By disrupting the FGF/FGF receptor (FGFR)-mediated signaling, we unmasked an FGF-sensitive UM population characterized by increased expression of numerous stemness-related transcription factors, enhanced aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity, and tumor-sphere formation capacity. Moreover, FGF inhibition deeply affected UM-CSC survival in vivo in a chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) tumor graft assay, resulting in the reduction of tumor growth. At clinical level, hierarchical clustering of TCGA gene expression data revealed a strong correlation between FGFs/FGFRs and stemness-related genes, allowing the identification of three distinct clusters characterized by different clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the evidence that the FGF/FGFR axis represents a master regulator of cancer stemness in primary UM tumors and point to anti-FGF treatments as a novel therapeutic strategy to hit the CSC component in UM.

VEGF-Independent Activation of Müller Cells by the Vitreous from Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Patients.

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), a major complication of diabetes mellitus, results from an inflammation-sustained interplay among endothelial cells, neurons, and glia. Even though anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) interventions represent the therapeutic option for PDR, they are only partially efficacious. In PDR, Müller cells undergo reactive gliosis, produce inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, and contribute to scar formation and retinal neovascularization. However, the impact of anti-VEGF interventions on Müller cell activation has not been fully elucidated. Here, we show that treatment of MIO-M1 Müller cells with vitreous obtained from PDR patients stimulates cell proliferation and motility, and activates various intracellular signaling pathways. This leads to cytokine/chemokine upregulation, a response that was not mimicked by treatment with recombinant VEGF nor inhibited by the anti-VEGF drug ranibizumab. In contrast, fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) induced a significant overexpression of various cytokines/chemokines in MIO-M1 cells. In addition, the FGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor BGJ398, the pan-FGF trap NSC12, the heparin-binding protein antagonist N-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-Phe-Leu-Phe-Leu-Phe Boc2, and the anti-inflammatory hydrocortisone all inhibited Müller cell activation mediated by PDR vitreous. These findings point to a role for various modulators beside VEGF in Müller cell activation and pave the way to the search for novel therapeutic strategies in PDR.

Gene expression analysis identifies two distinct molecular clusters of idiopatic epiretinal membranes.

Idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERMs) are fibrocellular membranes containing extracellular matrix proteins and epiretinal cells of retinal and extraretinal origin. iERMs lead to decreased visual acuity and their pathogenesis has not been completely defined. Aim of this study was to provide a molecular characterization of iERMs by gene expression analysis. To this purpose, 56 iERMs obtained by pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed for the expression levels of genes encoding biomarkers of the cellular and molecular events occurring in iERMs. RT-qPCR analysis showed significant differences in the levels of cell population, extracellular matrix and cytokine/growth factor biomarkers among the iERMs investigated. Hierarchical clustering of RT-qPCR data identified two distinct iERM clusters, Cluster B samples representing transcriptionally "activated" iERMs when compared to transcriptionally "quiescent" Cluster A specimens. Further, Cluster B could be subdivided in two subgroups, Cluster B1 iERMs, characterized by a marked glial cell activation, and Cluster B2 samples characterized by a more pro-fibrotic phenotype. Preoperative decimal best-corrected visual acuity and post-surgery inner segment/outer grading values were higher in Cluster A patients, that showed a prevalence of fovea-attached type iERMs with near-normal inner retina, than in Cluster B patients, that presented more severe clinical and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features. In conclusion, this molecular characterization has identified two major clusters of iERM specimens with distinct transcriptional activities that reflect different clinical and SD-OCT features of iERM patients. This retrospective work paves the way to prospective whole-genome transcriptomic studies to allow a molecular classification of iERMs and for the identification of molecular signature(s) of prognostic and therapeutic significance.