Bailout Options for Intra-operative Implant and Instrumentation Related Incidents and Complications During Arthroscopic Knee Surgery-A Retrospective Study.

Background: Arthroscopic knee procedures are one amongst the common surgical interventions for problems in the knee. It is technically more demanding than an open procedure and is associated with several potential complications. During arthroscopy procedures, several technical challenges may arise, and even experienced surgeons may encounter new issues. However, careful attention to the surgical technique can help prevent or resolve them. Methodology: The study was conducted on all patients who underwent knee arthroscopy procedure during study period. We recorded details of the implants used and any unexpected situations related to them, as well as how they were managed. Instrumentation-related parameters such as screwdriver issues, radiofrequency ablator issues, scope damages, shaver complications, probe complications, and meniscus suture passing devices were also assessed. Results: In total, there were 12 (3.73%) implant and instrument-related incidents and complications, of which 5 (1.55%) were implant-related and 7 (2.17%) were instrument related. Among the instrumentation-related incidents and complications, two (0.62%) were screwdriver breakage incidents, two (0.62%) were radiofrequency ablator-related incidents, one was arthroscopic probe (0.31%) related incident, one (0.31%) was meniscus suture passing device related complication and one (0.31%) was arthroscope related incident. Conclusion: Surgeons must be ready to anticipate and effectively manage any technical difficulties that may arise during the procedure, maintaining composure in the face of unexpected challenges and guiding the team. In most cases, incidents can be addressed intra operatively and may not have long-term effects on patient outcomes. It is crucial to have multiple implant and instrument backup options available for successful surgery.

Revision of Failed Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair: A Case Report.

Introduction: Meniscal root tear decreases the ability of the meniscus to convert the axial load to radially directed hoop stress. This leads to a decreased contact area and increased contact pressures, leading to early osteoarthrosis of the knee and eventually higher chances of undergoing total knee replacement. Meniscal root repair helps to restore normal knee kinematics; however, non-anatomical repair results in increased strain in the repair and causes early failure of the repair, leading to abnormal knee kinematics. Case Report: A 45-year-old female with a body mass index of 40.6, hypothyroid, and type II diabetes mellitus presented to the outpatient department with the complaints of left knee pain and difficulty in walking. She had undergone an arthroscopic medial meniscus posterior root repair 1 year back. Clinical and radiological examinations helped to diagnose a re-tear of the medial meniscus root with a non-anatomic tibial tunnel. She then underwent arthroscopic revision root repair surgery. Currently, the patient is at a 1-year follow-up and has resumed her activities of daily living. Conclusion: Anatomical repair of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus is important in restoring normal knee kinematics and for the ability of the meniscus to maintain the hoop stress. Non-anatomic repair leads to early failure and progression to rapid cartilage degeneration, resulting in early osteoarthritis and eventual knee replacement. Any revision surgery presents its own different set of challenges. The basic principles must be adhered to while addressing any failure of the primary surgery.

Operative stabilisation versus non-operative management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the mid-shaft clavicle are commonly encountered in clinical practice. These can be managed either by conservative method or operative by internal fixation. This study aims to compare the outcomes of conservative and operative management. METHODS: Forty patients with displaced and comminuted mid-shaft clavicle fractures were included in the study, among which twenty-five patients were treated conservatively and 15 patients underwent surgery and were followed up for a period of 1 year. Time taken for union, functional outcome, complications, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: In the non-operative group, 28% of the fractures took less than twelve weeks to unite, whereas in the operative group 60% of them took less than 12 weeks to unite. At the end of 1 year, there was no statistical difference in mean UCLA (University of California and Los Angeles) score and the mean DASH score of the non-operative group and operative group. There were more complications in the operative group. Re-operative rate in the operative group was 40%. Patient satisfaction was 80% in the non-operative group, whereas 48% of patients were satisfied in the operative group. CONCLUSION: Displaced and comminuted mid-shaft clavicle fractures treated conservatively have more advantages when compared to surgically treated fractures.

Cross-sectional assessment of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are prevalent in India. However, there is dearth of literature among Indians studying the relationship between the two. This study was carried out to assess various cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in patients with knee OA with an objective to investigate their association, screening and management.  Methods: In total, 225 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Participants were diagnosed with knee OA on the basis of the Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) classification of their radiograph. Participants were also assessed for CV risk factors; age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, smoking. Joint British Society QRisk3 calculator (JBS3) a comprehensive risk score calculator as well as a screening tool, which produces three more variables, namely 10-years risk of developing CVD, physiological heart age and life expectancy, was used. Chi Square, Fishers exact test and one-way ANOVA tests were used to compare the categorical and quantitative variables, respectively.. Multiple regression analysis was done to adjust the multiple con-founders and determine their significance. Results: Patients with severe knee OA had a statistically significantly higher prevalence of CV risk factors (p<0.05). Grade 4 knee OA patients were found to have a mean JBS3 risk of 38%, heart age of 82 years and life expectancy of 77 years as compared to grade 2 patients who had a mean JBS3 risk of 11%, heart age of 63 years and life expectancy of 82 years.  Conclusions: Our study concluded that there is a strong relation between knee OA and CVD, with CV risk score being positively correlated to the severity of OA.

Comparison of radiological and functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA-2 in patients with osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION: Presently, unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures are treated commonly with intramedullary nailing devices. Various designs of intramedullary nail are introduced. The conventional Proximal Femoral Nail has given diverse outcome. Complications have also been noted with this implant. Newer designs like Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 have been introduced for Asian population. The aim of our study was to compare the radiological and functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture treated with conventional Proximal Femoral Nail and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 in osteoporotic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture (AO classification) and Singh's index ≤ 3 were included. Patients were assigned to the groups based on the implant used for treatment (PFN and PFNA2 group). Post-operative radiographs were used to assess the quality of reduction, by calculating neck shaft angle. The quality of fixation was assessed, by calculating tip apex distance and Cleveland index. The duration of surgery, blood loss, number of fluoroscopic images taken and length of hospital stay were noted. Patients were followed up for 6 months, and complications were noted. The functional outcome was compared using modified Harris hip score. The data analysis was done using Student's unpaired t test/Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures and Singh's index < 3 were included. Thirty-seven were treated with PFNA2 and 41 with PFN. The average age in PFNA2 group was 69.51, and PFN group was 70.804. Nine patients in PFNA2 group and 10 patients in PFN group had tip apex distance more than 25 mm. Twelve patients in PFNA2 group and 14 Patients in PFN group had sub-optimal implant position as per Cleveland index. The difference in neck shaft angle between uninjured and operated side was more than 10° in four patients of PFNA2 group and seven patients of PFN group. The average Harris hip score was 74.55 for PFNA2 group and 69.88 for PFN group. Four complications were seen in PFNA2 group and 5 in PFN group. CONCLUSION: The functional outcome (p = 0.102) achieved with both the implants was similar. Good functional outcome can be achieved, when the radiological parameters are restored, i.e. TAD < 25 mm, Cleveland index in centre-centre position and neck shaft angle difference < 5°. The overall complications, in the set-up of osteoporosis, seen with both the implants were similar (p = 0.44). PFNA2 group showed better results in terms of perioperative morbidity.