Opportunistic Screening: Radiology Scientific Expert Panel.

Radiologic tests often contain rich imaging data not relevant to the clinical indication. Opportunistic screening refers to the practice of systematically leveraging these incidental imaging findings. Although opportunistic screening can apply to imaging modalities such as conventional radiography, US, and MRI, most attention to date has focused on body CT by using artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted methods. Body CT represents an ideal high-volume modality whereby a quantitative assessment of tissue composition (eg, bone, muscle, fat, and vascular calcium) can provide valuable risk stratification and help detect unsuspected presymptomatic disease. The emergence of "explainable" AI algorithms that fully automate these measurements could eventually lead to their routine clinical use. Potential barriers to widespread implementation of opportunistic CT screening include the need for buy-in from radiologists, referring providers, and patients. Standardization of acquiring and reporting measures is needed, in addition to expanded normative data according to age, sex, and race and ethnicity. Regulatory and reimbursement hurdles are not insurmountable but pose substantial challenges to commercialization and clinical use. Through demonstration of improved population health outcomes and cost-effectiveness, these opportunistic CT-based measures should be attractive to both payers and health care systems as value-based reimbursement models mature. If highly successful, opportunistic screening could eventually justify a practice of standalone "intended" CT screening.

Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue.

The purpose of this study was to determine the lower limit of radiation dose required to measure visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) volumes when a fat quantification and noise reduction techniques (NRTs) are combined. For this purpose, we utilized CT colonography (CTC) images taken at low doses and manually segmented VAT and SAT fat volumes as ground truth. In order to derive the acceptable precision of the measurements needed to estimate the lower limit of radiation dose, we estimated the effect of different positioning during CT scanning on fat measurements using manually segmented VAT and SAT against normal dose. As a result, the acceptable accuracy of SAT and VAT was found to be 94.5% and 85.2%, respectively. Using these thresholds, the lower radiation dose limit required to accurately measure SAT using 5.25-mm slice-thick images was 1.5 mGy of size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), while the lower radiation dose limit required to accurately measure VAT was 0.4 mGy of SSDE. The lower dose limit for SAT and VAT combined was 1.5 mGy, which was equivalent to an estimated effective dose of 0.38 mSv. Alternatively, without noise reduction, SAT could not achieve acceptable accuracy even for images with a slice thickness of 5.25 mm, while VAT required noise reduction for images with a slice thickness of 1.25 mm, but could achieve acceptable accuracy without noise reduction for images with a slice thickness of 5.25 mm.

Association of sarcopenia with survival in advanced NSCLC patients receiving concurrent immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Background: Frailty, sarcopenia and malnutrition are powerful predictors of clinical outcomes that are not routinely measured in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary aim of this study was to investigate the association of sarcopenia, determined by the psoas muscle index (PMI) with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with concurrent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and chemotherapy (CTX). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from a cohort of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were treated between 2015 and 2021 at the University of Virginia Medical Center. The cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle was assessed on CT or PET/CT imaging prior to treatment initiation. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: A total of 92 patients (median age: 64 years, range 36-89 years), 48 (52.2%) men and 44 (47.8%) women, were included in the study. The median follow-up was 29.6 months. The median OS was 17.8 months. Sarcopenia, defined by a PMI below the 25th percentile, was associated with significantly lower OS (9.1 months in sarcopenic patients vs. 22.3 months in non-sarcopenic patients, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia (HR 2.12, P = 0.0209), ECOG ≥ 2 (HR 2.88, P = 0.0027), prognostic nutritional index (HR 3.02, P = 0.0034) and the absence of immune related adverse events (HR 2.04, P = 0.0185) were independently associated with inferior OS. Conclusions: Sarcopenia is independently associated with poor OS in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing concurrent ICI and CTX.

Radiologists' Increasing Role in Population Health Management: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Population health management (PHM) is the holistic process of improving health outcomes of groups of individuals through the support of appropriate financial and care models. Radiologists' presence at the intersection of many aspects of health care, including screening, diagnostic imaging, and image-guided therapies, provides the opportunity for increased radiologist engagement in PHM. Furthermore, innovations in artificial intelligence and imaging informatics will serve as critical tools to improve value in health care through evidence-based and equitable approaches. Given radiologists' limited engagement in PHM to date, it is imperative to define the PHM priorities of the specialty so that radiologists' full value in improving population health is realized. The purpose of this expert review is to explore programs and future directions for radiologists in PHM.

Patient-centered Reporting in Radiology: A Single-site Survey Study of Lung Cancer Screening Results.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess whether patients preferred traditional or patient-friendly radiology reports and, secondarily, whether one reporting style led to a subjective improvement in patients' understanding of their imaging results and next steps in their clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized study included patients who had previously enrolled in an institutional comprehensive lung cancer screening program. Three hundred patients were randomly selected from the program database to receive both traditional and patient-centered radiology reports. Randomization also occurred at both the risk level of the fictitious test results (low, intermediate, or high) and the order in which the reports were read by each participant. Participants completed a survey providing demographic information and indicating which report style was preferred and which report style led to a better understanding of screening results and future options. In addition, each report style was rated (from 1 to 5) for clarity, understandability, attractiveness, and helpfulness. RESULTS: A total of 46 responses for report preference data and 41 responses for attribute rating data were obtained. Overall, participants demonstrate a preference for patient-friendly reports (65.2%) over traditional reports (21.7%). On a 5-point scale, average ratings for patient-friendly reports were higher than traditional reports by 1.2 (P<0.001) for clarity, 1.5 (P<0.001) for understandability, 1.5 (P<0.001) for attractiveness, and 1.0 (P<0.001) for helpfulness. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that patients prefer patient-friendly reports over traditional reports and find them to be clearer, more comprehensible, more attractive, and more helpful.

Patient-centered Radiology Reporting for Lung Cancer Screening.

Medicine is slowly transitioning toward a more patient-centered approach, with patients taking a more central role in their own care. A key part of this movement has involved giving patients increased access to their medical record and imaging results via electronic health portals. However, most patients lack the knowledge to fully understand medical documents, which are generally written above their comprehension level. Radiology reports, in particular, utilize complex terminology due to radiologists' historic function as consultants to other physicians, with little direct communication to patients. As a result, typical radiology reports lack standardized formatting, and they are often inscrutable to patients. Numerous studies examining patient preference also point to a trend for more accessible radiology reports geared toward patients. Reports designed with an infographic format, combining simple pictures and standardized text, may be an ideal format that radiologists can pursue to provide patient-centered care. Our team, through feedback from patient advisory groups, developed a patient-friendly low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening report with an infographic format that is both visually attractive and comprehensible to the average patient. The report is designed with sections including a description of low-dose computed tomography, a section on individualized patient results, the meaning of the results, and a list of the next steps in their care. We believe that this form of the report has the potential to serve as a bridge between radiologists and patients, allowing for a better patient understanding of their health and empowering patients to participate in their health and health care.

Utility of 3-Week Follow-Up of Upper Gastrointestinal Study in Asymptomatic Patients Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: One day following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), routine practice has historically dictated that an upper gastrointestinal (UGI) study be performed to assess for staple line leak, clinically significant stenosis, or other complications requiring surgical revision. Recent literature has cast doubt on the utility of performing an UGI immediately following surgery due to its poor sensitivity in detecting leaks and hence referrals for this post-operative study have decreased. However, routine practice at our institution is to perform an UGI study at three weeks following LSG to assess for late complications despite a similar lack of evidence supporting the yield of this exam. The purpose of our study is to assess the utility and cost effectiveness of UGI exams in asymptomatic patients three weeks following LSG. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent LSG for obesity performed at our institution between January 2014 and October 2018 and subsequently had an UGI within two-four weeks following the surgery was conducted. RESULTS: A total of seventy three asymptomatic patients underwent an UGI study, of which no clinically significant stricture, leak or other complications were identified. Of the fifteen patients who were symptomatic between two-four weeks after surgery, twelve (80%) were found to have complications ranging from staple line leak or gastric narrowing. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of UGI following LSG in the absence of symptoms is doubtful. Additionally, the added cost and radiation does not add value to the patient's care. We recommend UGI study utilization when there is a clinical suspicion for a complication.

Impact of the Professional Component MPPR Policy on Interdivisional Finances in an Academic Radiology Department.

PURPOSE: The professional component (PC) Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) policy reduces reimbursement for two or more imaging services rendered by the same group practice for a single patient in a single session. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of the PC MPPR on interdivisional finances in an academic radiology department. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Medicare collections from imaging services rendered by a single academic radiology department in a tertiary care medical center for calendar year 2014 was performed. The impact of the PC MPPR on each division was calculated as the fraction of the total departmental PC MPPR, and as the proportion of the divisional revenue. RESULTS: The total decrease in Medicare collections as a result of the PC MPPR was 5.35%. The impact of the PC MPPR on each division as a fraction of the total departmental PC MPPR was: abdominal division (16.63%); thoracic division (23.56%); breast division (0.03%); musculoskeletal division (11.92%); neuroradiology division (34.40%); and noninvasive cardiovascular division (13.46%). The impact of the PC MPPR on each division as a fraction of the divisional revenue was: abdominal (2.82%); thoracic (11.83%); breast (0.66%); musculoskeletal (6.01%); neuroradiology (5.31%); and noninvasive cardiovascular (5.85%). CONCLUSIONS: The PC MPPR differentially affects divisions within an academic radiology department. The neuroradiology and thoracic divisions of our department were the most adversely affected, owing to the high frequency of combined examinations. We speculate that this impact has implications for divisional self-sufficiency, interdivisional relationships, and resident decision making regarding subspecialty training.

Initial experience with single-source dual-energy CT abdominal angiography and comparison with single-energy CT angiography: image quality, enhancement, diagnosis and radiation dose.

OBJECTIVES: To assess image quality of virtual monochromatic spectral (VMS) images, compared to single-energy (SE) CT, and to evaluate the feasibility of material density imaging in abdominal aortic disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, single-source (ss) dual-energy (DE) CT of the aorto-iliac system in 35 patients (32 male, mean age 76.5 years) was compared to SE-CT. By post-processing the data from ssDECT, VMS images at different energies and material density water (WD) images were generated. The image quality parameters were rated on 5-point scales. The aorto-iliac attenuation and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were recorded. Quality of WD images was compared to true unenhanced (TNE) images. Radiation dose was recorded and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Image quality and noise were better at 70 keV (P < 0.01). Renal artery branch visualisation was better at 50 keV (P < 0.005). Attenuation and CNR were higher at 50 and 70 keV (P < 0.0001). The WD images had diagnostic quality but higher noise than TNE images (P < 0.0001). Radiation dose was lower using single-phase ssDECT compared to dual-phase SE-CT (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: 70-keV images from ssDECT provide higher contrast enhancement and improved image quality for aorto-iliac CT when compared to SE-CT at 120 kVp. WD images are an effective substitute for TNE images with a potential for dose reduction.

Automated before-procedure electronic health record screening to assess appropriateness for GI endoscopy and sedation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopists are performing greater numbers of procedures, often on patients with complex conditions, in ambulatory settings because of changing patient demographics and referral patterns. To assist with the pre-procedure assessment of such patients, we deployed an advanced electronic health record tool, the Queriable Patient Inference Dossier (QPID), to review clinical histories and generate e-mail alerts to providers, based on clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVE: Study the feasibility of an automated pre-procedure alert system for outpatient endoscopy. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 5 physicians' use of the application and their responses to the alerts. SETTING: A hospital-based endoscopy unit and its two satellite outpatient clinics, Boston area, Massachusetts. PATIENTS: Adult outpatients referred for endoscopy with moderate sedation. INTERVENTION: Pre-procedure alerts automatically sent 7 days before the procedure, highlighting any conditions/clinical history that may affect management of the patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Physician use of the pre-procedure alert system and its effect on patient management. RESULTS: We studied 1682 procedures that met inclusion criteria for review by QPID and 364 alerts (1.6% of the eligible procedures). Nearly 80% of the alerts were reviewed and responded to by the physicians, and 70 total alerts resulted in a change in patient management (4.2% of eligible procedures). LIMITATIONS: The small size of the study group and the low rate of adverse events during the study period limit our findings. We thus plan to conduct a larger follow-up study to demonstrate changes in safety and efficiency. CONCLUSION: Use of advanced electronic health record technologies, such as QPID, may improve provider efficiency and patient outcomes in endoscopy units.

When does a radiologist's recommendation for follow-up result in high-cost imaging?

PURPOSE: To measure the proportion of high-cost imaging generated by a radiologist's recommendation and to identify the imaging findings resulting in follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, with waiver of informed consent. A recommended examination was defined as one performed within a single episode of care (defined as fewer than 60 days after the initial imaging) following a radiologist's recommendation in a prior examination report. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT), brain and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and body positron emission tomography were included for analysis. From a database of all radiology examinations (approximately 200,000) at one institution over a 6-month period, a computerized search identified all high-cost examinations that were preceded by an examination containing a radiologist recommendation. Medical records were reviewed to verify accuracy of the recommending-recommended examination pairs and to determine the reason for the radiologist's recommendation. For proportions, 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 1558 of 29,232 (5.3%) high-cost examinations followed a radiologist's recommendation. Chest CT was the high-cost examination most often resulting from a radiologist's recommendation (878 of 9331, 9.4%), followed by abdominal CT (390 of 10,258, 3.8%) and brain MR imaging (222 of 6436, 3.4%). The examination types with the highest numbers of follow-up examinations were chest radiography (n=431), chest CT (n=410), abdominal CT (n=214), and abdominal ultrasonography (n=120). The most common findings resulting in follow-up were pulmonary nodules or masses (559 of 1558, 35.9%), other pulmonary abnormalities (150 of 1558, 9.6%), adenopathy (103 of 1558, 6.6%), renal lesions (101 of 1558, 6.5%), and negative examination findings (101 of 1558, 6.5%). CONCLUSION: Radiologists' recommendations account for only a small proportion of outpatient high-cost imaging examinations. Pulmonary nodule follow-up is the most common cause for radiologist-generated examinations.

Pelvic applications of diffusion magnetic resonance images.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a powerful imaging technique in neuroimaging; its value in abdominal and pelvic imaging has only recently been appreciated as a result of improvements in magnetic resonance imaging technology. There is growing interest in the use of DWI for evaluating pathology in the pelvis. Its ability to noninvasively characterize tissues and to depict changes at a cellular level allows DWI to be an effective complement to conventional sequences of pelvic imaging, especially in oncologic patients. The addition of DWI may obviate contrast material in those with renal insufficiency or contrast material allergy.

Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer.

To examine whether there are any characteristics of women or their initial tumors that might be useful for tailoring surveillance recommendations to optimize outcomes. We followed 17,286 women for up to 5 years after an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or early stage (I/II) invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2006. We calculated rates per 1,000 women years of recurrences and second breast primaries relative to demographics, risk factors, and characteristics of initial diagnosis: stage, treatment, mode of initial diagnosis. Nearly 4% had a second breast cancer event (314 recurrences and 344 second breast primaries). Women who used adjuvant hormonal therapy or were ≥ 80 years had the lowest rates of second events. Factors associated with higher recurrence and second primary rates included: initial DCIS or stage IIB, estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative, younger women (<50 years). Women with a family history or greater breast density had higher second primary rates, and women who received breast conserving surgery without radiation had higher recurrence rates. Roughly one-third of recurrences (37.6%) and second primaries (36.3%) were not screen-detected. Initial mode of diagnosis was a predictor of second events after adjusting for age, stage, primary treatment, and breast density. A recent negative mammogram should not falsely reassure physicians or women with new breast symptoms or changes because one-third of second cancers were interval cancers. This study does not provide any evidence in support of changing surveillance intervals for different subgroups.

Screening mammography after breast cancer treatment: patterns in community practice.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for screening women post-breast cancer treatment are generally lacking. This study was conducted to review the literature on guidelines for this population and to evaluate whether there is a common practice in the community for following these women. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for presence of published or inferred guidelines. Data were then used from the Carolina Mammography Registry (CMR) to see if patterns exist in community practice. For the years 1995-1999, 3081 women with a new diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer and a post-treatment screening mammogram in CMR were included. Recommendations for initial mammographic examination and intervals of subsequent mammograms post-treatment were described and tested for patterns of follow-up time. RESULTS: The only evidence-based guidelines found for post-treatment mammographic examinations were from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. They recommend 6 month follow-up initially followed by 12 month follow-up if findings remain stable. Among the 3081 women included in the study, 17.4% were recommended to return at 6 months post-treatment following their initial mammogram. Of the women who had at least three post-cancer mammograms (1592/3081), 82.6% were recommended for 12 month intervals at all three visits; only 2.1% of women were recommended for 6 month intervals at all three visits. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that most community-based radiologists included in our study recommend following women at 12 month intervals post-treatment. Whether this 12 month screening interval is optimal for detecting recurrent cancers is not known and should be the focus of future research.