Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength.

INTRODUCTION: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a strong predictor and easily applicable assessment, indicating a person's physical condition and health. However, many dynamometers are available; therefore, it is essential to ensure that the results of HGS testing using different dynamometers can be used interchangeably. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-instrument agreement and criterion validity of the Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer in comparison with the Jamar electronic dynamometer (Jamar+). METHODS: Seventy participants, aged between 23-88 (five men and five women in each decade from 20 to 80+), performed three attempts with each dynamometer (30-sec break between attempts) in a randomized order and separated with a 5-minute break between dynamometers. Intraclass correlation coefficient (3.1), standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were used for comparison of the strongest and average strength measured with dynamometers. Jamar+ and Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer were new dynamometers and considered calibrated by the manufacturer. RESULTS: The overall Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). An average (SD) difference of 0.68 (2.2) kg (p = 0.04) was seen for the comparison of the strongest attempt for Baseline BIMS minus Jamar+, Correspondingly, for the average of three attempts, it was 0.37 (2.29, p = 0.2) kg. The standard error of measurement (%) and minimal detectable change (%) of the strongest attempt was 1.64 kg (4.2%) and 3.55 kg (9.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate low measurement error with high agreement and criterion validity for the comparison of Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer and Jamar+ and that results of the two dynamometers can be used interchangeably.

Association between additional weekend rehabilitation and functional outcomes in patients with hip fractures: does age affect the effectiveness of weekend rehabilitation?

PURPOSE: Rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery is crucial for improving physical function. Additional rehabilitation over the weekend or after working hours is reportedly associated with improved physical function; however, this may not apply to an aging population, including patients aged > 90 years. This study aimed to investigate the association between additional weekend rehabilitation and functional outcomes in different age groups. METHODS: This study analyzed a cohort of patients aged ≥ 60 years who had hip fractures and were operated on from 2010 to 2018. Data were extracted from a nationwide multicentre database. Functional outcomes at discharge were compared between patients who underwent rehabilitation on weekdays only and those who underwent rehabilitation on both weekdays and weekends. The patient groups were selected using propensity score matching analysis. Furthermore, a subgroup-analysis was conducted on patients in their 60 s, 70 s, 80 s, and 90 s. RESULTS: A total of 390,713 patients underwent surgery during the study period. After matching, each group comprised 129,583 pairs of patients. Patients who underwent weekend rehabilitation exhibited improved physical function in transferring, walking, and stair climbing at discharge, as compared with patients who did not (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.17 [1.15-1.19], 1.17 [1.15-1.2], and 1.06 [1.03-1.08], respectively). In subgroup analysis, except for stair climbing, the positive association between weekend rehabilitation and patient function was observed across all age groups. CONCLUSION: Weekend rehabilitation was significantly associated with improved physical function. Given the limited healthcare resources, high-demand activities such as stair climbing may be reserved for younger age groups to optimise rehabilitation therapy.

The relationship between extent of mobilisation within the first postoperative day and 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the extent of mobilisation within the first postoperative day and 30-day mortality after hip fracture. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Acute orthopaedic hospital ward. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 701 patients, 65 years of age or older, 80% from own home, 49% with a trochanteric fracture, and 61% with an American Society of Anesthesiology grade > 2. INTERVENTION: n/a. MAIN MEASURES: Cumulated ambulation score (CAS) (0-6 points) on the first postoperative day and 30-day postoperative mortality. A CAS = 0 reflects no functional mobility (bedridden), while a CAS = 6 reflects independent out-of-bed-transfer, chair-stand, and indoor walking status. RESULTS: Overall, 86% of patients were mobilised to standing or seated in chair (CAS ≥ 1) on the first postoperative day. A CAS of 0, 1-3, and 4-6 was observed for 97 (14%), 519 (74%), and 85 (12%) patients, respectively. Overall, 61 (8.7%) patients died within 30 days with the highest mortality (23.7%, n = 23) seen for those not mobilised (CAS = 0). Only one patient (1.2%) with a CAS of 4-6 points died. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, residential status, pre-fracture CAS, fracture type, and American Society of Anesthesiology grade, showed that a one-unit increase in CAS was associated with a 38% lower risk of 30-day mortality (Hazard Ratio = 0.63, 95%Confidence Interval, 0.50-0.78). CONCLUSION: Mobility on the first postoperative day was associated with 30-day postoperative mortality, with a lower risk observed for those completing greater mobility. National registries may consider extending collection of mobility on the first postoperative day from a binary indicator to the CAS which captures the extent of mobility achieved.

Intensified acute in-hospital physiotherapy for patients after hip fracture surgery: a pragmatic, randomized, controlled feasibility trial.

PURPOSE: Intensified acute in-hospital physiotherapy (IP) after hip fracture (HF) may enhance patient's ability to regain basic mobility at discharge. The primary objective was to assess the feasibility of IP. Secondary to estimate the effect of IP on regained basic mobility at discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a pragmatic, randomized, unblinded feasibility trial, 60 patients (mean age 79 years, 41 women) with HF and an independent pre-fracture basic mobility level were randomized (2:1) to IP with two daily sessions on weekdays focusing on functional training and weight-bearing activities (n = 40) versus usual care (UC) physiotherapy once daily (n = 20). Feasibility outcomes included physiotherapy completion rates, reasons for non-successful completion, and adverse events. The primary effect outcome was recovery of basic mobility (Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS)). RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of the sessions in the IP group were successfully- or partially completed versus 94% of the sessions in the UC group. No adverse events occurred. The main reason for not completing physiotherapy was fatigue. At discharge (median 7 days), 50% in the IP group had regained their pre-fracture basic mobility level (CAS = 6) versus 16% in the UC group; odds ratio = 5.33, 95%CI [1.3;21.5]. CONCLUSIONS: IP seems feasible for patients after HF surgery, and it may enhance recovery. Fatigue was the primary obstacle to completing IP.

Two daily physiotherapy sessions focusing on functional training and weight-bearing activities are feasible for patients after isolated hip fracture surgery, including subtrochanteric fracture, and may enhance recovery of basic mobility at discharge.During hospitalization, patient participation in intensified physiotherapy is mainly restricted by fatigue.Systematic assessment and management of fatigue may improve the completion of physiotherapy and recovery of basic mobility.

No effect of hydroxyapatite-coated sliding hip screw threads on screw migration in the femoral head/neck of pertrochanteric fractures: a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cut-out is the most frequently reported mechanical failure of internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine if hydroxyapatite-coated screw thread on a sliding hip screw (SHS) could reduce screw migration within the femoral head in patients with stable pertrochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a double-blinded randomized controlled study, 37 patients at mean age 78 (range 56-96), with pertrochanteric fracture (Evans I, II, IV) received surgery with a SHS with a hydroxyapatite-coated or a non-coated lag screw thread. Radiostereometry and standard radiographs were obtained 1 day, 6 weeks, 3- and 6 months post-operatively to evaluate screw and fracture migration and fracture reposition. The two groups were combined to describe fracture migration. RESULTS: There was similar and small screw migration in the femoral head between the two groups at 6 weeks, 3- and 6 months (p > 0.12). Fracture migration occurred predominantly in the first 6 weeks, where fracture impaction was 5.95 mm (CI 95% 2.87 to 9.04) and anterior rotation of the femoral head was -2.94° (CI 95% - 5.22 to - 0.66). Migration of the fracture (total translation) correlated to the post-operative fracture reposition (p = 0.002), but not significantly to screw migration (p = 0.09). Neither screw total translation (rho 0.06, p = 0.79) nor fracture total translation (rho 0.04, p = 0.77) correlated with bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: There was no clinical benefit of hydroxyapatite coating on lag screw migration in this patient cohort. Migration of the pertrochanteric fractures was higher with poor fracture reposition but fractures generally stabilized after 6 weeks follow-up. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05677061). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: Patient-blinded prospective randomized study. Trial registration number The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05677061).

Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery - analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility.

PURPOSE: To examine the association between physiotherapy access after hip fracture and discharge home, readmission, survival, and mobility recovery. METHODS: A 2017 Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Sprint Audit was linked to hospital records for 5383 patients. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between physiotherapy access in the first postoperative week and discharge home, 30-day readmission post-discharge, 30-day survival and 120-days mobility recovery post-admission adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Hospital Frailty Risk Score and prefracture mobility/residence. RESULTS: Overall, 73% were female and 40% had high frailty risk. Patients who received ≥2 hours of physiotherapy (versus less) had 3% (95% Confidence Interval: 0-6%), 4% (2-6%), and 6% (1-11%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 3% (0-6%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of exercise (versus mobilisation alone) had 6% (1-12%), 3% (0-7%), and 11% (3-18%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 6% (2-10%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of 6-7 days physiotherapy (versus 0-2 days) had 8% (5-11%) higher adjusted probability of survival. For patients with dementia, improved probability of survival, discharge home, readmission and indoor mobility recovery were observed with greater physiotherapy access. CONCLUSION: Greater access to physiotherapy was associated with a higher probability of positive outcomes. For every 100 patients, greater access could equate to an additional eight patients surviving to 30-days and six avoiding 30-day readmission. The findings suggest a potential benefit in terms of home discharge and outdoor mobility recovery. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Early intensive mobilization after acute high-risk abdominal surgery: a nonrandomized prospective feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND: Mobilization after emergency abdominal surgery is considered essential to facilitate rehabilitation and reduce postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of early intensive mobilization after acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective feasibility trial of consecutive patients after AHA surgery at a university hospital in Denmark. The participants followed a predefined, interdisciplinary protocol for early intensive mobilization during the first 7 postoperative days (PODs) of their hospital admission. We evaluated feasibility in accordance with the percentage of patients who mobilized within 24 hours after surgery, mobilized at least 4 times per day and achieved daily goals of time out of bed and walking distance. RESULTS: We included 48 patients with a mean age of 61 (standard deviation 17) years (48% female). Within 24 hours after surgery, 92% of the patients were mobilized and 82% or more were mobilized at least 4 times per day over the first 7 PODs. On PODs 1-3, 70%-89% of the participants achieved the daily goals of mobilization; participants still in hospital after POD 3 were less able to achieve the daily goals. Patient reported that the primary factors limiting their level of mobilization were fatigue, pain and dizziness. Participants not mobilized independently on POD 3 (28%) had significantly (p ≤ 0.04) fewer hours out of bed (4 v. 8 h), were less able to achieve the goals of time out of bed (45% v. 95%) and walking distance (62% v. 94%) and had longer hospital stays (14 v. 6 d) than participants mobilized independently on POD 3. CONCLUSION: The early intensive mobilization protocol seems feasible for most patients after AHA surgery. For nonindependent patients, however, alternative mobilization strategies and goals should be investigated.

Daytime and scheduled surgery for major dysvascular lower extremity amputation.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing a major dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA) often have a poor outcome with a high risk of complications and mortality despite improvements in care and perioperative programmes. We evaluated whether scheduled surgery would reduce the failure rate in patients with a major LEA. METHODS: A total of 328 consecutive patients undergoing a major LEA from 2016 to 2019 were enrolled at a single centre. Early failure was defined as re-amputation or revision within 30 days of the index amputation. In 2018, a new regime comprising two scheduled surgery days was implemented. The risk of failure comparing the two cohorts (2016-2017, n = 165 versus 2018-2019, n = 163) was calculated for amputation on scheduled versus non-scheduled days and for other potentially influencing factors. RESULTS: The median (25-75% quartiles) age of all patients was 74 (66-83) years, 91% had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≥ 3 and 92% had atherosclerosis or diabetes mellitus. The index amputee levels were 36% below-knee, 60% transfemoral and 4% bilateral transfemoral. In the intervention cohort, 59% were amputated on the scheduled days versus 36% in the control group (p less-than 0.001). Correspondingly, more patients (72.4% versus 57.6%, p = 0.005) were amputated during daytime and the 30-day failure rate was reduced to 11.0% (n = 18) versus 16.4% (n = 27) (p = 0.2). Risk of failure on scheduled days in the intervention group was 8.3% versus 14.9% on any other day (p = 0.2). Correspondingly, daytime surgery reduced the risk of failure (6.8% versus 22.2%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Daytime and scheduled surgery for major LEA may possibly reduce early risk of failure. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Achilles tendon gait dynamics after rupture: A three-armed randomized controlled trial comparing an individualized treatment algorithm vs. operative or non-operative treatment.

BACKGROUND: Individual treatment selection has been proposed as the key to optimized treatment. The purpose was to investigate if treatment selection using the individualized treatment algorithm Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm (CARTA) differs between patients treated as usual regarding gait dynamics and tendon elongation. METHODS: The patients were randomized to one of three parallel groups: 1) intervention group: participants treated according to CARTA, 2) control group: participants treated non-operatively, 3) control group: participants treated operatively. The primary outcome was ankle peak power during push off during walking at 12 months. RESULTS: 156 patients were assessed for eligibility. 21 were allocated to the intervention group, and 20 and 19 to the control groups. The results indicated no statistically significant differences between the intervention group and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized treatment selection based on CARTA did not demonstrate less affected gait dynamics or less tendon elongation than patients treated as usual.

Systematic assessment of physical function in adult patients across diagnoses.

Physical function (PF) is a strong predictor for length of stay, complications, readmission, and mortality among patients across different diagnoses. Still, systematic assessment of PF in hospitalised patients is not common, and if, only among the oldest. In this review, we suggest implementation of an easily applicable and validated test battery using the Cumulated Ambulation Score for basic mobility, Handgrip strength for general muscle strength, and the 30s Chair Stand Test for combined function and muscle strength for early identification and treatment of reduced PF in adult patients across diagnoses.

Validation of Two Activity Monitors in Slow and Fast Walking Hospitalized Patients.

To evaluate interventions to promote physical activity, valid outcome measures are important. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the ActivPAL3™ and the SENS motion® activity monitors with regard to the number of steps taken, walking, and sedentary behavior in hospitalized patients (n = 36) (older medical patients (+65 years) (n = 12), older patients (+65) with acute hip fracture (n = 12), and patients (+18) who underwent acute high-risk abdominal surgery (n = 12)). Both monitors showed good (≥60%) percentage agreement with direct observation for standing and no. of steps (all gait speeds) and high agreement (≥80%) for lying. For walking, ActivPAL3™ showed moderate percentage agreement, whereas SENS motion® reached high percentage agreement. The relative reliability was moderate for sedentary behavior for both monitors. The ActivPAL3™ showed poor (walking) to moderate (steps) reliability for walking and steps, whereas SENS motion® showed moderate reliability for both activities. For slow walkers, the relative reliability was moderate for SENS motion® and poor for ActivPAL3™. This trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04120740.

The Copenhagen Achilles Length Measurement Performed at Time of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture is Correlated to Tendon Elongation After 1 Year.

Elongation of the tendon has been proposed as the most important factor leading to poor outcome after acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). The aim of this paper was to investigate if Amlang's ultrasound classification (AmC) or the Copenhagen Achilles Length Measurement (CALM) when assessed in the acute phase after ATR could predict elongation 1 y after rupture. 107 males and 27 females, aged 18 to 70 y and treated nonsurgically were included. AmC and CALM were assessed at time of rupture and correlated to elongation measured with CALM and Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA) at 1 y. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine a cut off for acceptable elongation at time of rupture given that elongation at 1 y was not to exceed 10%. AmC showed no statistically significant correlation. CALM at baseline correlated to CALM at 1 y r = 0.214 (p = .02) and ATRA at 1 y r = 0.218 (p = .02). The ROC model had AUC = 0.67 for 7% elongation at baseline yielding a sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.50 for predicting elongation of 10% or more at 1 y. Elongation of the Achilles tendon at baseline measured with CALM was weakly correlated to elongation at 1 y. A cut off of 7% elongation at baseline caught 77% of patients who, when treated nonsurgically, ended up with an elongation above 10% at 1 y. A prospective trial investigating CALM as part of a selection algorithm for deciding between operative and nonoperative treatment is needed.

Validity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Ability of the Japanese Version of the Cumulated Ambulation Score in Patients with Hip Fracture.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to investigate the validity, the responsiveness, and the predictive ability for discharge to own home of the Japanese version of the Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS-JP). This was achieved by analyzing the CAS-JP after hip fracture surgery at multiple time points until patient discharge. METHODS: Patients who underwent hip fracture surgery were evaluated using CAS-JP, the Barthel Index, and walking ability on postoperative day (POD) 1, 7, and 14 and at discharge. Floor and ceiling effects, responsiveness, and correlations between CAS-JP and other functional outcomes were assessed at each time point. The predictive ability of CAS-JP for discharge to own home was also analyzed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included in this study. On POD7, POD14, and at discharge, strong correlations were observed between CAS-JP and the Barthel Index (r=0.81, 0.82, and 0.87, respectively), and between CAS-JP and walking status (r=0.82, 0.81, and 0.76, respectively). CAS-JP had a large effect size (1.64-2.25) and standardized response mean (1.49-1.81). The predictive ability of CAS-JP for discharge to own home, as indicated by the AUCs, were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.62-0.83) on POD7 and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.86) on POD14. CONCLUSIONS: CAS-JP has sufficient validity and responsiveness as a mobility assessment tool in postoperative hip fracture patients. Furthermore, this study showed that early postoperative mobility status evaluation using CAS-JP can sufficiently predict discharge to own home.

Frailty and osteoporosis in patients with hip fractures under the age of 60-a prospective cohort of 218 individuals.

Research on younger patients with hip fractures is limited. This study adds knowledge on patient and injury characteristics, and DXA was investigated at the time of the fracture. Risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures were numerous among young patients, and osteoporosis was markedly more prevalent than in the general population. INTRODUCTION: Knowledge on younger patients with hip fractures is limited. Common preconceptions are that they suffer fractures due to high-energy trauma, alcohol or substance use disorder but not associated to osteoporosis. We aimed to descriptively analyze the characteristics of young and middle-aged patients with hip fractures and examine bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the time of the fracture. METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study on adult patients with hip fractures below age 60 collected detailed information on patient characteristics regarding demographics, trauma mechanism, previous fractures, comorbidity and medication, and lifestyle factors. DXA results were compared to population-based reference data. RESULTS: The cohort contains 91 women and 127 men, median age 53 (IQR 47-57). Most fractures, 83%, occurred in patients aged 45-59. Two-thirds of all fractures resulted from low-energy trauma. Half of the patients had prior fractures after age 20. Thirty-four percent were healthy, 31% had one previous disease, and 35% had multiple comorbidities. Use of medication associated with increased fracture risk was 32%. Smoking was prevalent in 42%, harmful alcohol use reported by 29%, and signs of drug-related problems by 8%. Osteoporosis according to WHO criteria was found in 31%, osteopenia in 57%, and normal BMD in 12%. CONCLUSION: In patients with hip fractures below age 60, risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures were numerous. Moreover, the prevalence of osteoporosis was markedly higher than in the general population. We suggest that young and middle-aged patients with hip fractures undergo a thorough health investigation including DXA, regardless of trauma mechanism.

Mobilisation and physiotherapy intervention following hip fracture: snapshot survey across six countries from the Fragility Fracture Network Physiotherapy Group.

PURPOSE: Hip fracture guidelines recommend early mobilisation, multidisciplinary care, physiotherapy and fall prevention interventions. This study documents mobilisation practices and physiotherapy interventions provided post-hip fracture in six countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physiotherapists from orthopaedic wards in Denmark, Australia, Spain, Brazil, Norway and Ireland provided information regarding mobilisation and physiotherapy for 10 consecutive hip fracture patients (>60 years), between 2014 and 2018. RESULTS: Physiotherapists (n = 107) entered data on 426 patients. Two-thirds of patients (283, 66%) attempted standing 0-1 days after surgery (range: 0% of patients in Spain to 92% in Norway). Fewer patients (199, 47%) attempted walking on day 0-1 (range: 0% Spain/Brazil to 69% Norway). Physiotherapy to mobilise every weekday was provided to 356 patients (84%, range: 60% Ireland to 100% Spain). On weekends, physiotherapy to mobilise was limited (175, 40%, range: 0% Spain to 81% Brazil) but 298 patients (70%) mobilised with non-physiotherapy staff (range: 0% Spain to 96% Denmark/Ireland). Physiotherapy treatments included mobility, gait training, and range-of-motion exercises. Referral to fall prevention interventions was low (93, 22%, range: 0% Spain to 76% Ireland). CONCLUSION: Stronger compliance with guideline recommendations on early mobilising, weekend mobilising and referral to fall prevention interventions post hip-fracture is needed in some countries.Implications for rehabilitation This study provides a snapshot of mobilisation and physiotherapy practice for hip fracture patients in six countries. The results suggest a need to improve systems and approaches in some countries to enhance compliance with recommendations specifically relating to: • early attempts at standing and walking post-surgery. • opportunities to mobilise on weekends (with physiotherapist and/or other staff). • broader range of multidisciplinary care e.g., geriatric review, occupational therapy and nutrition advice. • use of standardised tests by physiotherapists post-surgery. • referral to fall prevention interventions.

Exercise Therapy Is Effective at Improving Short- and Long-Term Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, and Balance in Older Patients Following Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of exercise therapy on physical function, independence, and well-being in older patients following hip fracture and, secondly, whether the effect was modified by trial-level characteristics such as intervention modality, duration, and initiation timepoint. METHOD: Medline, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched up to November 2020. Eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of exercise therapy on physical function, independence, and well-being in older patients following hip fracture, initiated from time of surgery up to 1 year. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies involving 3 905 participants showed a small-to-moderate effect of exercise therapy at short term (end of intervention) on mobility (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.76); activities of daily living (ADL) (SMD 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16-0.46); lower limb muscle strength (SMD 0.36, 95% CI: 0.13-0.60); and balance (SMD 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.54). At long term (closest to 1 year), small-to-moderate effects were found for mobility (SMD 0.74, 95% CI: 0.15-1.34), ADL (SMD 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.61), balance (SMD 0.50, 95% CI: 0.07-0.94), and health-related quality of life (SMD 0.31, 95% CI: 0.03-0.59). Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation ranging from moderate to very low, due to study limitation and inconsistency. CONCLUSION: We found low certainty of evidence for a moderate effect of exercise therapy on mobility in older patients following hip fracture at end of treatment and follow-up. Further, low evidence was found for small-to-moderate short-term effect on ADL, lower limb muscle strength and balance. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020161131.

Early recovery of basic mobility under femoral nerve block after hip fracture surgery - A propensity score matched pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown better pain reduction utilizing femoral nerve block (FNB) in patients who underwent hip fracture surgery. However, few studies have focused on the recovery of physical function after FNB, and most studies excluded patients with dementia. We investigated the association between FNB performed in the operating room and the recovery of physical function after hip fracture surgery, including patients with dementia. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with a mean age of 87.4 years who underwent hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia between July 2015 and December 2017 (46 patients receiving a single injection of FNB and 57 standard care) were enrolled. Patients with FNB versus standard care were matched by a propensity score to adjust for patient characteristics. An anesthesiologist performed FNB with 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine, and the standard care group received intravenous 1000 mg acetaminophen or 50mg flurbiprofen once after surgery. After matching, 78 patients were analyzed. Our primary outcome was 3-day cumulated ambulation score (CAS, 0-18 points) and secondary outcomes were 1-day CAS on postoperative day 1-3 and length of hospital stay. We also stratified patient groups based on the presence of dementia and fracture type. RESULTS: Patients undergoing FNB had significantly better 3-day CAS compared to standard care (mean [SD], 8.72 [3.42] vs 7.33 [2.62]; mean difference, 1.38 [95%CI; 0.03 - 2.74]; p = 0.048) and 1-day CAS on postoperative day two (mean [SD], 3.10 [1.39] vs 2.56 [0.94]; mean difference, 0.54 [0.01 - 1.07]; p = 0.049). Length of hospital stay did not significantly differ among the two groups (p = 0.65). Larger positive effect was likely to be seen for patients with a femoral neck fractures and for those without dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent surgery with spinal anesthesia plus FNB had better ambulatory status early after hip fracture surgery compared to patients not offered FNB. The beneficial association between FNB and ambulatory status was likely to be observed especially in patients with femoral neck fracture and without dementia.

Orthopaedic physiotherapists' perceptions of mechanisms for observed variation in the implementation of physiotherapy practices in the early postoperative phase after hip fracture: a UK qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: to explore physiotherapists' perceptions of mechanisms to explain observed variation in early postoperative practice after hip fracture surgery demonstrated in a national audit. METHODS: a qualitative semi-structured interview study of 21 physiotherapists working on orthopaedic wards at seven hospitals with different durations of physiotherapy during a recent audit. Thematic analysis of interviews drawing on Normalisation Process Theory to aid interpretation of findings. RESULTS: four themes were identified: achieving protocolised and personalised care; patient and carer engagement; multidisciplinary team engagement across the care continuum and strategies for service improvement. Most expressed variation from protocol was legitimate when driven by what is deemed clinically appropriate for a given patient. This tailored approach was deemed essential to optimise patient and carer engagement. Participants reported inconsistent degrees of engagement from the multidisciplinary team attributing this to competing workload priorities, interpreting 'postoperative physiotherapy' as a single professional activity rather than a care delivery approach, plus lack of integration between hospital and community care. All participants recognised changes needed at both structural and process levels to improve their services. CONCLUSION: physiotherapists highlighted an inherent conflict between their intention to deliver protocolised care and allowing for an individual patient-tailored approach. This conflict has implications for how audit results should be interpreted, how future clinical guidelines are written and how physiotherapists are trained. Physiotherapists also described additional factors explaining variation in practice, which may be addressed through increased engagement of the multidisciplinary team and resources for additional staffing and advanced clinical roles.

Feasibility and preliminary effect of anabolic steroids in addition to strength training and nutritional supplement in rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture: a randomized controlled pilot trial (HIP-SAP1 trial).

BACKGROUND: Anabolic steroid has been suggested as a supplement during hip fracture rehabilitation and a Cochrane Review recommended further trials. The aim was to determine feasibility and preliminary effect of a 12-week intervention consisting of anabolic steroid in addition to physiotherapy and nutritional supplement on knee-extension strength and function after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1) during acute care to: 1. Anabolic steroid (Nandrolone Decanoate) or 2. Placebo (Saline). Both groups received identical physiotherapy (with strength training) and a nutritional supplement. Primary outcome was change in maximal isometric knee-extension strength from the week after surgery to 14 weeks. Secondary outcomes were physical performance, patient reported outcomes and body composition. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventeen patients were screened, and 23 randomised (mean age 73.4 years, 78% women). Target sample size was 48. Main limitations for inclusion were "not home-dwelling" (18%) and "cognitive dysfunction" (16%). Among eligible patients, the main reason for declining participation was "Overwhelmed and stressed by situation" (37%). Adherence to interventions was: Anabolic steroid 87%, exercise 91% and nutrition 61%. Addition of anabolic steroid showed a non-significant between-group difference in knee-extension strength in the fractured leg of 0.11 (95%CI -0.25;0.48) Nm/kg in favor of the anabolic group. Correspondingly, a non-significant between-group difference of 0.16 (95%CI -0.05;0.36) Nm/Kg was seen for the non-fractured leg. No significant between-group differences were identified for the secondary outcomes. Eighteen adverse reactions were identified (anabolic = 10, control = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Early inclusion after hip fracture surgery to this trial seemed non-feasible, primarily due to slow recruitment. Although inconclusive, positive tendencies were seen for the addition of anabolic steroid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03545347 .

Neither operative nor nonoperative approach is superior for treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a partially blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

AIMS: To compare the functionality of adults with displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures treated either operatively or nonoperatively and to compare the relative risk of nonunion and reoperation between the two groups. METHODS: Based on specific eligibility criteria, 120 adults (median age 37.5 years (interquartile range (18 to 61)) and 84% males (n = 101)) diagnosed with an acute displaced mid-shaft fracture were recruited, and randomized to either the operative (n = 60) or nonoperative (n = 60) treatment group. This randomized controlled, partially blinded trial followed patients for 12 months following initial treatment. Functionality was assessed by the Constant score (CS) (assessor blinded to treatment) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Clinical and radiological evaluation, and review of patient files for complications and reoperations, were added as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: At 12 months, 87.5% of patients (n = 105) were available for analysis. The two groups were well balanced based on demographic and fracture-related characteristics. At six weeks of follow-up a significant difference in DASH score (p < 0.001) was found in favour of operative treatment. The functionality at 12 months of follow-up based on CS and DASH was excellent in both groups (CS > 90 points and DASH < 10 points) with no significant difference (p = 0.277 for DASH and p = 0.184 for CS) between the two groups. The risk of symptomatic nonunion was significantly higher in the nonoperative group (p = 0.014), with a relative risk of 9.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 71.53) in this group compared to the operative group. The number-needed-to-treat to avoid one symptomatic nonunion was 6.2. Initial treatment and age were factors significantly associated with nonunion in a logistic analysis. There were 26% in both groups (n = 14 in operative group and n = 15 in nonoperative group) who required secondary surgery, with most indications in the nonoperative group mandatory due to nonunion compared to most relative indications in the operative group requiring intervention due to implant irritation. CONCLUSION: Superiority was not identified with either an all-operative or all-nonoperative approach. The functionality at short term (within six weeks) seems igreater following operative treatment but was not found at one year. The risk of nonunion is significantly higher with nonoperative treatment. However, an all-operative approach to lower the nonunion risk may result in unnecessary surgery and is not recommended. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):762-768.