Genomic Profiling of the Overlap Phenotype between Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis.

Clinical overlaps between psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) are sometimes undiscernible, and there is no consensus on whether to treat the overlap phenotype as psoriasis or AD. We enrolled 41 patients diagnosed with either psoriasis or AD and clinically re-stratified them into classic psoriasis (n = 11), classic AD (n = 13), and the overlap phenotype between psoriasis and AD (n = 17). We compared the gene expression profiles of lesional and nonlesional skin biopsy tissues and the proteomic profiles of blood samples among the three comparison groups. Global mRNA expression and T-cell subset cytokine expression in the skin and protein biomarker elevation in the blood of the overlap phenotype were consistent with the profiles of psoriasis and different from the profiles of AD. Unsupervised k-means clustering indicated that the best number of distinct clusters for the total population of the three comparison groups was two, and the two clusters of psoriasis and AD were differentiated by gene expression. Our study suggests that the clinical overlap phenotype between psoriasis and AD has dominant molecular features of psoriasis, and genomic biomarkers can differentiate psoriasis and AD at molecular levels in patients with a spectrum of psoriasis and AD.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: new insights into disease mechanisms and an evolving treatment landscape.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa, is a chronic disabling and debilitating inflammatory disease with a high unmet medical need. The prevalence of HS reported in most studies is 1-2%, although it is likely to be under-reported and estimates vary globally owing to variance in data collection methods, ethnicity, geographical location and under-diagnosis. HS is characterized by persistent, painful cutaneous nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels commonly affecting the axillary, anogenital, inguinal and perianal/gluteal areas. Over time, chronic uncontrolled inflammation results in irreversible tissue destruction and scarring. Although the pathophysiology of HS has not been fully elucidated, the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-17 pathways have an important role, involving multiple cytokines. Currently, treatment options include topical medications; systemic therapies, including repeated and/or rotational courses of systemic antibiotics, retinoids and hormonal therapies; and various surgical procedures. The anti-TNF-α antibody adalimumab is currently the only biologic approved by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for HS; however, its efficacy varies, with a clinical response reported in approximately 50% of patients in phase III trials. HS is a rapidly evolving field of discovery, with a diverse range of agents with distinct mechanisms of action currently being explored in clinical trials. Several other promising therapeutic targets have recently emerged, and agents targeting the IL-17 and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways are the most advanced in ongoing or completed phase III clinical trials. Alongside limited therapeutic options, significant challenges remain in terms of diagnosis and disease management, with a need for better treatment outcomes. Other unmet needs include significant diagnostic delays, thus missing the therapeutic 'window of opportunity'; the lack of standardized outcome measures in clinical trials; and the lack of established, well-defined disease phenotypes and biomarkers.

Tape strips detect molecular alterations and cutaneous biomarkers in skin of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has a high unmet need for better treatments. Biopsies are considered the gold standard for studying molecular alterations in skin. A reproducible, minimally invasive approach is needed for longitudinal monitoring in trials and in pediatric populations. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether skin tape strips can detect molecular alterations in HS and identify biomarkers of disease activity. METHODS: We performed RNA sequencing on tape strips collected from lesional and healthy-appearing (nonlesional) HS skin (n = 22) and healthy controls (n = 21). We correlated the expression of skin biomarkers between tape strips and a previously published gene-signature of HS biopsies. RESULTS: Tape strips detected upregulation of known HS biomarkers (eg, Interleukin[IL]-17A) in nonlesional and/or lesional skin and also identified novel clinically actionable targets, including OX40 and JAK3. The expression of Th17 and tumor necrosis factor-α pathways were highly correlated between tape strips and biopsies. HS clinical severity was significantly associated with expression of biomarkers (eg tumor necrosis factor-α , IL-17 A/F, OX40, JAK1-3, IL-4R) in HS lesional and/or nonlesional skin. LIMITATIONS: Sample size. Tape stripping is limited in depth. CONCLUSION: This study validates tape strips as a minimally-invasive approach to identify cutaneous biomarkers in HS. This provides a novel avenue for monitoring treatment efficacy and a potential step toward individualized therapy in HS.

Laser capture microdissection provides a novel molecular profile of human primary cutaneous melanoma.

Melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related mortality, highlighting the need to better understand melanoma initiation and progression. In-depth molecular analysis of neoplastic melanocytes in whole tissue biopsies may be diluted by inflammatory infiltration, which may obscure gene signatures specific to neoplastic cells. Thus, a method is needed to precisely uncover molecular changes specific to tumor cells from a limited sample of primary melanomas. Here, we performed laser capture microdissection (LCM) and gene expression profiling of patient-derived frozen sections of pigmented lesions and primary cutaneous melanoma. Compared to bulk tissue analysis, analysis of LCM-derived samples identified 9528 additional differentially expressed genes (DEGs) including melanocyte-specific genes like PMEL and TYR, with enriched of pathways related to cell proliferation. LCM methodology also identified potentially targetable kinases specific to melanoma cells that were not detected by bulk tissue analysis. Taken together, our data demonstrate that there are marked differences in gene expression profiles depending on the method of sample isolation. We found that LCM captured higher expression of melanoma-related genes while whole tissue biopsy identified a wider range of inflammatory markers. Taken together, our data demonstrate that LCM is a valid approach to identify melanoma-specific changes using a relatively small amount of primary patient-derived melanoma sample.

Intrapatient comparison of atopic dermatitis skin transcriptome shows differences between tape-strips and biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Our knowledge of etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) is largely derived from skin biopsies, which are associated with pain, scarring and infection. In contrast, tape-stripping is a minimally invasive, nonscarring technique to collect skin samples. METHODS: To construct a global AD skin transcriptomic profile comparing tape-strips to whole-skin biopsies, we performed RNA-seq on tape-strips and biopsies taken from the lesional skin of 20 moderate-to-severe AD patients and the skin of 20 controls. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were defined by fold-change (FCH) ≥2.0 and false discovery rate <0.05. RESULTS: We detected 4104 (2513 Up; 1591 Down) and 1273 (546 Up; 727 Down) DEGs in AD versus controls, in tape-strips and biopsies, respectively. Although both techniques captured dysregulation of key immune genes, tape-strips showed higher FCHs for innate immunity (IL-1B, IL-8), dendritic cell (ITGAX/CD11C, FCER1A), Th2 (IL-13, CCL17, TNFRSF4/OX40), and Th17 (CCL20, CXCL1) products, while biopsies showed higher upregulation of Th22 associated genes (IL-22, S100As) and dermal cytokines (IFN-γ, CCL26). Itch-related genes (IL-31, TRPV3) were preferentially captured by tape-strips. Epidermal barrier abnormalities were detected in both techniques, with terminal differentiation defects (FLG2, PSORS1C2) better represented by tape-strips and epidermal hyperplasia changes (KRT16, MKI67) better detected by biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Tape-strips and biopsies capture overlapping but distinct features of the AD molecular signature, suggesting their respective utility for monitoring specific AD-related immune, itch, and barrier abnormalities in clinical trials and longitudinal studies.

Multi-omics segregate different transcriptomic impacts of anti-IL-17A blockade on type 17 T-cells and regulatory immune cells in psoriasis skin.

Durable psoriasis improvement has been reported in a subset of psoriasis patients after treatment withdrawal of biologics blocking IL-23/Type 17 T-cell (T17) autoimmune axis. However, it is not well understood if systemic blockade of the IL-23/T17 axis promotes immune tolerance in psoriasis skin. The purpose of the study was to find translational evidence that systemic IL-17A blockade promotes regulatory transcriptome modification in human psoriasis skin immune cell subsets. We analyzed human psoriasis lesional skin 6 mm punch biopsy tissues before and after systemic IL-17A blockade using the muti-genomics approach integrating immune cell-enriched scRNA-seq (n = 18), microarray (n = 61), and immunohistochemistry (n = 61) with repository normal control skin immune cell-enriched scRNA-seq (n = 10) and microarray (n = 8) data. For the T17 axis transcriptome, systemic IL-17A blockade depleted 100% of IL17A + T-cells and 95% of IL17F + T-cells in psoriasis skin. The expression of IL23A in DC subsets was also downregulated by IL-17A blockade. The expression of IL-17-driven inflammatory mediators (IL36G, S100A8, DEFB4A, and DEFB4B) in suprabasal keratinocytes was correlated with psoriasis severity and was downregulated by IL-17A blockade. For the regulatory DC transcriptome, the proportion of regulatory semimature DCs expressing regulatory DC markers of BDCA-3 (THBD) and DCIR (CLEC4A) was increased in posttreatment psoriasis lesional skin compared to pretreatment psoriasis lesional skin. In addition, IL-17A blockade induced higher expression of CD1C and CD14, which are markers of CD1c+ CD14+ dendritic cell (DC) subset that suppresses antigen-specific T-cell responses, in posttreatment regulatory semimature DCs compared to pretreatment regulatory semimature DCs. In conclusion, systemic IL-17A inhibition not only blocks the entire IL-23/T17 cell axis but also promotes regulatory gene expression in regulatory DCs in human psoriasis skin.

Immunosuppression causes dynamic changes in expression QTLs in psoriatic skin.

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic inflammatory condition primarily affecting skin. While the role of the immune compartment (e.g., T cells) is well established, the changes in the skin compartment are more poorly understood. Using longitudinal skin biopsies (n = 375) from the "Psoriasis Treatment with Abatacept and Ustekinumab: A Study of Efficacy"(PAUSE) clinical trial (n = 101), we report 953 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Of those, 116 eQTLs have effect sizes that were modulated by local skin inflammation (eQTL interactions). By examining these eQTL genes (eGenes), we find that most are expressed in the skin tissue compartment, and a subset overlap with the NRF2 pathway. Indeed, the strongest eQTL interaction signal - rs1491377616-LCE3C - links a psoriasis risk locus with a gene specifically expressed in the epidermis. This eQTL study highlights the potential to use biospecimens from clinical trials to discover in vivo eQTL interactions with therapeutically relevant environmental variables.

Hyperactivation of the JAK2/STAT5 Signaling Pathway and Evaluation of Baricitinib Treatment Among Patients With Eosinophilic Cellulitis.

Importance: The pathogenesis of eosinophilic cellulitis (EC) is poorly understood, limiting available treatment options. The current treatment paradigm focuses on delayed type 2 hypersensitivity reaction to various triggers. Objective: To gain further insight into the nature of EC inflammation and into the cellular signal transduction pathways that are activated in the context of EC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series was conducted in Lyon, France, from January 2018 to December 2021. Analysis of archival skin biopsy samples from patients with EC and from healthy control participants was performed using histology, Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) immunohistochemistry, and gene profiling. Data analysis was conducted between January 2020 and January 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pruritus (visual analog score), percentage of body surface area with lesional skin, and RNA transcripts of inflammatory biomarkers from the skin (threshold cycle) were assessed in 1 index patient with refractory EC who received oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor baricitinib (4 mg/d). Results: This study included samples from 14 patients with EC (7 men and 7 women) and 8 healthy control participants (4 men and 4 women). The mean (SD) age of patients was 52 (20) years. Marked type 2 inflammation (chemokines CCL17, CCL18, and CCL26 and interleukin 13) with preferential activation of the JAK1/JAK2-STAT5 pathways in EC lesions was observed. In the 1 index patient with refractory EC, complete clinical remission of skin lesions was observed after 1 month of treatment with baricitinib. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that EC is a type 2 inflammatory disease with preferential activation of the JAK1/JAK2-STAT5 pathways. In addition, these results suggest the potential of treatment approaches targeting JAK1/JAK2 for patients with EC.

Single-cell transcriptomics suggest distinct upstream drivers of IL-17A/F in hidradenitis versus psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of the mounting evidence that type 17 T (T17) cells and increased IL-17 play a key role in driving hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) lesion development, biologic agents used previously in psoriasis that block signaling of IL-17A and/or IL-17F isoforms have been repurposed to treat HS. OBJECTIVE: Our research aimed to characterize the transcriptome of HS T17 cells compared to the transcriptome of psoriasis T17 cells, along with their ligand-receptor interactions with neighborhood immune cell subsets. METHODS: Single-cell data of 12,300 cutaneous immune cells from 8 deroofing surgical HS skin samples including dermal tunnels were compared to single-cell data of psoriasis skin (19,525 cells from 11 samples) and control skin (11,920 cells from 10 samples). All single-cell data were generated by the same protocol. RESULTS: HS T17 cells expressed lower levels of IL23R and higher levels of IL1R1 and IL17F compared to psoriasis T17 cells (P < .05). HS Treg cells expressed higher levels of IL1R1 and IL17F compared to psoriasis Treg cells (P < .05). Semimature dendritic cells were the major immune cell subsets expressing IL1B in HS, and IL-1ß ligand-receptor interactions between semimature dendritic cells and T17 cells were increased in HS compared to psoriasis (P < .05). HS dermal tunnel keratinocytes expressed inflammatory cytokines (IL17C, IL1A, IL1B, and IL6) that differed from the HS epidermis keratinocytes (IL36G) (P < .05). IL6, which synergizes with IL1B to maintain cytokine expression in T17 cells, was mainly expressed by fibroblasts in HS, which also expressed IL11+ inflammatory fibroblast genes (IL11, IL24, IL6, and POSTN) involved in the paracrine IL-1/IL-6 loop. CONCLUSION: The IL-1ß-T17 cell cytokine axis is likely a dominant pathway in HS with HS T17 cells activated by IL-1ß signaling, unlike psoriasis T17 cells, which are activated by IL-23 signaling.

Modulation of Inflammatory Proteins in Serum May Reflect Cutaneous Immune Responses in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Diphencyprone (DPCP), a topical contact sensitizer, has shown efficacy in treating cutaneous melanoma metastases, including at times beyond the directly treated sites, but biomarkers indicative of treatment response have not been characterized. Thus, we performed a proteomic analysis of the skin and serum of five patients with cutaneous melanoma metastases treated with DPCP on days 0, 63, and 112 of the treatment course. In the serum, we found a significant upregulation (P < 0.05) in 13 of 96 assessed immuno-oncology proteins after DPCP treatment. Upregulated proteins included those of the T helper 1 axis (CXCL9, CXCL10), immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1), and various proteins with roles in promoting tumor immunity such as CD80 and TNFRSF4/9. Given the positive clinical response to topical treatment noted in the five patients studied, these proteins may represent prognostic biomarkers in the serum for evaluating the efficacy of DPCP treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases. Because DPCP does not lead to nonspecific immune-related adverse events seen with immune checkpoint inhibitors, our study provides evidence for potential tumor-specific systemic immune activation and systemic antitumor effectors elicited by topical DPCP.

Unique protein signatures evolve during the course of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in human skin.

Diphencyprone (DPCP) is a hapten that causes a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction when applied topically. It has clinical uses in the treatment of various conditions such as melanoma metastases, warts, and alopecia areata, but the mechanisms are currently not well understood in humans. To further characterize the immunologic effects of DPCP, the authors performed a proteomic analysis of normal skin of eight healthy volunteers following a single application of DPCP and compared them with placebo-treated skin from the same volunteers. A total of 96 proteins were examined using the Olink immuno-oncology panel at 3 days (peak response), 14 days (partially resolved response), and 120 days (completely resolved response). Our analysis revealed significant upregulation of markers of immune cell activation (interleukin [IL] 8), vascular and tissue remodeling (matrix metallopeptidase 12 [MMP12], nitric oxide synthase 3 [NOS3]), antineoplastic markers (granzyme B [GZMB]), and the Th1 axis (interferon gamma [IFNG], chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand [CXCL] 9, CXCL10, CXCL11) at days 3 and 14 compared with placebo (p < 0.05). In addition, several negative regulators of immune function such as programmed cell death 1 (PD1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) (p < 0.001), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) (p < 0.05) were significantly upregulated at days 3 and 14. This induction of negative regulators may explain the seemingly paradoxical therapeutic benefits of DPCP in autoimmune conditions such as alopecia areata. The current analysis also indicated IL-4 upregulation only at day 3, followed by IL-12 upregulation only at day 14, suggesting a transient Th2 response followed by Th1 polarization. Overall, these data suggest a complex and evolving immunological delayed-type hypersensitivity response to a single application of DPCP over time. Future proteomic studies of samples from patients with melanoma metastases, warts, and alopecia areata treated long term with DPCP are needed to further evaluate its pharmacologic mechanisms.

Comparison of the Inflammatory Circuits in Psoriasis Vulgaris, Non‒Pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis, and Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis.

Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPPP) and non‒pustular palmoplantar psoriasis (NPPP) are localized, debilitating forms of psoriasis. The inflammatory circuits involved in PPPP and NPPP are not well-understood. To compare the cellular and immunological features that differentiate PPPP and NPPP, skin biopsies were collected from a total of 30 participants with PPPP, NPPP, and psoriasis vulgaris (PV) and from 10 healthy participants. A subset consented to a second biopsy after 3 additional weeks off medication. Histologic staining of lesional and nonlesional skin showed higher neutrophil counts in PPPP than in NPPP and PV and higher CD8+ T-cell counts in NPPP. RNA sequencing and transcriptional analysis of skin biopsies showed enhanced IFN-γ pathway activation in NPPP lesions but stronger signatures of IL-17 pathway and neutrophil-related genes (e.g., IL36A) in PPPP lesional skin. Serum analysis on the Olink platform detected higher concentrations of T helper type 1, IFN-γ‒inducible chemokines in NPPP, and higher neutrophil-associated cytokines in PPPP. Taken together, this evidence suggests more pronounced T helper 1‒mediated inflammation in NPPP than in PV and PPPP and stronger neutrophil-associated activity in PPPP than in NPPP and PV. These data support targeting inflammatory pathways associated with neutrophilic inflammation (e.g., IL-36 signaling) for therapeutic development in PPPP.

Proteomic profiling of a patient with cutaneous melanoma metastasis regression following topical contact sensitizer diphencyprone and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as pembrolizumab have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma, but many patients do not respond to ICIs alone, and thus there is need for additional treatment options. Topical immunomodulators such as diphencyprone (DPCP) also have clinical use in advanced melanoma, particularly in the treatment of cutaneous metastases. In a previous report, we characterized the enhanced clinical response to dual agent immunotherapy with pembrolizumab and DPCP in a patient with cutaneous melanoma metastases. To improve mechanistic understanding of this response, we analyzed proteomic data using the Olink immuno-oncology panel of 96 biomarkers from tissue and serum samples of this patient throughout his treatment course. Particular attention was paid to programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) given they are all targeted by ICIs in clinical practice. These proteins were upregulated during the period of DPCP monotherapy, then downregulated during pembrolizumab monotherapy, and then robustly upregulated again during dual therapy. Although not exclusively, the induction of checkpoint inhibitor proteins in the presence of DPCP suggests potential synergy between this agent and ICIs in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases. Large-scale investigation is warranted to further evaluate this potential novel combination therapeutic approach.

Ustekinumab reduces serum protein levels associated with cardiovascular risk in psoriasis vulgaris.

Psoriasis increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Biomarkers for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification in psoriasis are lacking, and the effects of psoriasis biologics on CV risk reduction remain unclear. The goal of this study was to identify biomarkers of CV risk in psoriasis blood that are reduced by ustekinumab. We quantified 276 inflammatory and CV-related serum proteins with Olink's multiplex assay in 10 psoriasis patients (vs. 18 healthy controls) and after 12 weeks of ustekinumab treatment. For each protein down-regulated after treatment, the literature was reviewed for studies assessing the protein's association with CVD. Data were collected from each study to calculate CV risk thresholds for each protein, which were compared with protein levels in psoriasis patients before and after treatment. Our results showed that 43 out of 276 proteins were down-regulated after treatment, 25 of which were initially up-regulated at baseline (vs. controls, all p-values ≤0.1). 8 down-regulated proteins were initially elevated above thresholds associated with enhanced CV risk in the literature (myeloperoxidase, C-X-C motif chemokine 10, E-selectin, interleukin-6, cystatin B, von Willebrand factor, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide). Treatment lowered these proteins to below their risk thresholds, except for IL-6, which was lowered but remained at its risk threshold despite successful psoriasis skin treatment. In summary, 12 weeks of ustekinumab treatment reduced serum proteins present at levels associated with CV risk in psoriasis patients. Further studies can evaluate these proteins as potential ustekinumab-modulated biomarkers of CV risk in psoriasis and the impact of ustekinumab on CV risk reduction.

Treatment Options and Goals for Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, severe neutrophilic skin disorder characterized by sudden widespread eruption of superficial sterile pustules with or without systemic inflammation. GPP flares can be life-threatening if untreated due to potential severe complications such as cardiovascular failure and serious infections. Currently, there are no GPP-specific therapies approved in the USA or Europe. Retinoids, cyclosporine, and methotrexate are the most commonly used non-biologic therapies for GPP. The evidence that supports the currently available treatment options is mainly based on case reports and small, open-label, single-arm studies. However, recent advances in our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of GPP and the identification of gene mutations linked to the disease have paved the way for the development of specific targeted therapies that selectively suppress the autoinflammatory and autoimmune mechanisms induced during GPP flares. Several biologic agents that target key cytokines involved in the activation of inflammatory pathways, such as tumor necrosis factor-α blockers and interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, and IL-12 inhibitors, have emerged as potential treatments for GPP, with several being approved in Japan. The evidence supporting the efficacy of these agents is mainly derived from small, uncontrolled trials. A notable recent advance is the discovery of IL36RN mutations and the central role of IL-36 receptor ligands in the pathogenesis of GPP, which has defined key therapeutic targets for the disease. Biologic agents that target the IL-36 pathway have demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with GPP, marking the beginning of a new era of targeted therapy for GPP.

Tyrosine kinase 2 and Janus kinase‒signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling and inhibition in plaque psoriasis.

Plaque psoriasis is a common, chronic, systemic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease. The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway plays a major role in intracellular cytokine signaling in inflammatory processes involved in psoriasis. Although Janus kinase (JAK) 1-3 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, safety concerns persist and no JAK inhibitor has received regulatory approval to treat psoriasis. Thus, an opportunity exists for novel oral therapies that are safe and efficacious in psoriasis. Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) is a member of the JAK family of kinases and regulates signaling and functional responses downstream of the interleukin 12, interleukin 23, and type I interferon receptors. Deucravacitinib, which is an oral, selective inhibitor that binds to the regulatory domain of TYK2, and brepocitinib (PF-06700841) and PF-06826647, which are topical and oral TYK2 inhibitors, respectively, that bind to the active (adenosine triphosphate-binding) site in the catalytic domain, are in development for psoriasis. Selective, allosteric inhibition of TYK2 signaling may reduce the potential for toxicities associated with pan-JAK inhibitors. This article reviews Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription and TYK2 signaling and the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in psoriasis to date, focusing specifically on TYK2 inhibitors.

The inflammatory proteome of hidradenitis suppurativa skin is more expansive than that of psoriasis vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Although hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) shares some transcriptomic and cellular infiltrate features with psoriasis, their skin proteome remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To define and compare inflammatory protein biomarkers of HS and psoriasis skin. METHODS: We assessed 92 inflammatory biomarkers in HS (n = 13), psoriasis (n = 11), and control skin (n = 11) using Olink high-throughput proteomics. We also correlated HS skin and blood biomarkers using proteomics and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: We identified 57 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in lesional psoriasis and 64 DEPs in lesional HS skin, compared to healthy controls. Both HS and psoriasis lesional skin demonstrated a significant upregulation of T helper 1 and T helper 17 proteins. Healthy-appearing perilesional HS skin had 63 DEPs compared to healthy controls. Nonlesional HS and psoriasis skin had 24 and 7 DEPs, respectively, compared to healthy controls. Tumor necrosis factor and 8 other proteins were significantly correlated with clinical severity in perilesional HS skin (2 cm from a nodule). LIMITATIONS: Inclusion of only moderate-to-severe patients and the cohort size. CONCLUSION: HS has a greater inflammatory profile and is more diffusely distributed compared with psoriasis. Proteins correlated with disease severity are potential disease mediators. Perilesional skin is comparably inflamed to lesional skin, suggesting the need to treat beyond skin nodules.

High inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa extends to perilesional skin and can be subdivided by lipocalin-2 expression.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease presenting with diverse manifestations ranging from nodules and abscesses to draining tunnels. Whether the underlying inflammation from lesions extends to relatively healthy-appearing adjacent perilesional and distant nonlesional skin has not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize lesional, perilesional, and nonlesional skin in patients with HS. METHODS: Skin biopsy samples were collected under ultrasound guidance from patients with active, untreated moderate-to-severe HS. Site-matched control biopsy samples from healthy volunteers were used for comparison. RESULTS: RNA sequencing demonstrated that HS skin clustered separately from healthy control skin, with perilesional and lesion skin clustering together and away from nonlesional skin. Immunohistochemistry analysis identified psoriasiform hyperplasia with keratin 16 positivity in both perilesional and lesional skin, with comparable levels of CD3+, CD11c+, and neutrophil elastase-positive cellular infiltration. There was a marked upregulation of IL-17 signaling in perilesional and lesional skin. HS samples clustered on the basis of expression of lipocalin-2 (LCN2), with samples characterized by high LCN2 expression in the skin exhibiting a differing transcriptomic profile with significantly higher overall inflammation than that of skin characterized by low LCN2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Perilesional HS skin has a transcriptomic and molecular profile comparable to that of lesional skin. HS can be grouped into 2 distinct subtypes based on molecular levels of LCN2 in the skin, with the LCN2-high subtype exhibiting an overall higher inflammatory burden and an upregulation of targetable cytokines. To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize a unique HS subtype (and a potential endotype) that may guide future therapeutic targets.