Cold Exposure and Oral Delivery of GLP-1R Agonists by an Engineered Probiotic Yeast Strain Have Antiobesity Effects in Mice.

Advanced microbiome therapeutics (AMTs) holds promise in utilizing engineered microbes such as bacteria or yeasts for innovative therapeutic applications, including the in situ delivery of therapeutic peptides. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, such as Exendin-4, have emerged as potential treatments for type 2 diabetes and obesity. However, current administration methods face challenges with patient adherence and low oral bioavailability. To address these limitations, researchers are exploring improved oral delivery methods for Exendin-4, including utilizing AMTs. This study engineered the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii to produce Exendin-4 (Sb-Exe4) in the gastrointestinal tract of male C57BL/6 mice to combat diet-induced obesity. The biological efficiency of Exendin-4 secreted by S. boulardii was analyzed ex vivo on isolated pancreatic islets, demonstrating induced insulin secretion. The in vivo characterization of Sb-Exe4 revealed that when combined with cold exposure (8 °C), the Sb-Exe4 yeast strain successfully suppressed appetite by 25% and promoted a 4-fold higher weight loss. This proof of concept highlights the potential of AMTs to genetically modify S. boulardii for delivering active therapeutic peptides in a precise and targeted manner. Although challenges in efficacy and regulatory approval persist, AMTs may provide a transformative platform for personalized medicine. Further research in AMTs, particularly focusing on probiotic yeasts such as S. boulardii, holds great potential for novel therapeutic possibilities and enhancing treatment outcomes in diverse metabolic disorders.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The CHEERS Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 have improved the outcome for many cancer types, the majority of patients fails to respond to ICI monotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of ICIs. Objective: To assess the addition of radiotherapy to ICIs compared with ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted in 5 Belgian hospitals and enrolled participants between March 2018 and October 2020. Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (n = 52) or the experimental arm (n = 47). Of those, 3 patients (1 in the control arm vs 2 in the experimental arm) withdrew consent and thus were not included in the analysis. Data analyses were performed between April 2022 and March 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive anti-PD-1/PD-1 ligand 1 ICIs alone as per standard of care (control arm) or combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy 3 × 8 gray to a maximum of 3 lesions prior to the second or third ICI cycle, depending on the frequency of administration (experimental arm). Randomization was stratified according to tumor histologic findings and disease burden (3 and fewer or more than 3 cancer lesions). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as per immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Key secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, local control rate, and toxic effects. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, while safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. Results: Among 96 patients included in the analysis (mean age, 66 years; 76 [79%] female), 72 (75%) had more than 3 tumor lesions and 65 (68%) had received at least 1 previous line of systemic treatment at time of inclusion. Seven patients allocated to the experimental arm did not complete the study-prescribed radiotherapy course due to early disease progression (n = 5) or intercurrent illness (n = 2). With a median (range) follow-up of 12.5 (0.7-46.2) months, median PFS was 2.8 months in the control arm compared with 4.4 months in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; P = .82). Between the control and experimental arms, no improvement in median OS was observed (11.0 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; P = .47), and objective response rate was not statistically significantly different (22% vs 27%; P = .56), despite a local control rate of 75% in irradiated patients. Acute treatment-related toxic effects of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 79% and 18% of patients in the control arm vs 78% and 18% in the experimental arm, respectively. No grade 5 adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: This phase 2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that while safe, adding subablative stereotactic radiotherapy of a limited number of metastatic lesions to ICI monotherapy failed to show improvement in PFS or OS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03511391.

Exploring a New Entity of Single-Agent Pembrolizumab-Associated Hypophysitis.

Hypophysitis is the inflammation of the pituitary gland primary or secondary to local or systemic disease. It tends to occur more with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors (10-15% of cases), which is a different entity compared to that associated with anti-program death 1 (anti-PD1) inhibitors. We describe a case of pembrolizumab-associated hypophysitis and conduct a systematic review of the literature. A 55-year-old woman with stage pT3aN1a (TNM stadium IIIb) melanoma presented with headache, nausea and fatigue three and a half months after starting pembrolizumab. Blood analyses revealed secondary adrenal failure, thyrotropic insufficiency and defective gonadotrophin secretion. An imaging study showed an enlarged pituitary gland with a homogeneous enhancement of the gland and pituitary stalk. Interruption of anti-PD1 therapy and administration of hormonal supplementation lead to clinical, biological and radiologic improvement after eight months. We identified 17 studies (20 patients) on single-agent pembrolizumab-associated hypophysitis. Patients were treated for melanoma (n=7; 33.3%), urogenital (n=5 ; 23.8%), lung (n=4 ; 19.0%), larynx (n=1 ; 4.8%), pharynx (n=1, 4.8%), breast (n=1, 4.8%) and colon (n=1, 4.8%) neoplasia. The time to onset of pituitary insufficiency was most frequently six months (range 1.5-39.0 months) after treatment initiation. The most prevalent hormonal defect was isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency. Four cases were reported with multiple central hormonal defects. In those patients, an enlarged pituitary gland was also observed. Our case has distinct features, including early disease onset after single-agent pembrolizumab initiation, panhypopituitarism and increased pituitary mass. These findings are in contrast with the majority of other cases of pembrolizumab-induced hypophysitis, as most patients present an isolated ACTH deficiency. Whether or not this is a new clinical entity warrants further investigation.

A lead-in safety study followed by a phase 2 clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib and hydroxychloroquine in advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma patients previously treated with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma who progressed on prior treatment with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors and programmed cell death 1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors can benefit from retreatment with the combination of a BRAF- and a MEK-inhibitor ('rechallenge'). Hydroxychloroquine can prevent autophagy-driven resistance and improve the efficacy of BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors in preclinical melanoma models. This clinical trial investigated the use of combined BRAF-/MEK-inhibition with dabrafenib and trametinib plus hydroxychloroquine in patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma who previously progressed on prior treatment with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following a safety lead-in phase, patients were randomized in the phase 2 part of the trial between upfront treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib and hydroxychloroquine (experimental arm), or dabrafenib and trametinib, with the possibility to add-on hydroxychloroquine at the time of documented tumor progression (contemporary control arm). Ten and four patients were recruited to the experimental and contemporary control arm, respectively. The objective response rate was 20.0% and the disease control rate was 50.0% in the experimental arm, whereas no responses were observed before or after adding hydroxychloroquine in the contemporary control arm. No new safety signals were observed for dabrafenib and trametinib. Hydroxychloroquine was suspected of causing an anxiety/psychotic disorder in one patient. Based on an early negative evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio for adding hydroxychloroquine to dabrafenib and trametinib when 'rechallenging' BRAFV600mutant melanoma patients, recruitment to the trial was closed prematurely.

Mental Health and Quality of Life among Patients with Cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Results from the Longitudinal ONCOVID Survey Study.

PURPOSE: This longitudinal survey study aimed to investigate the self-reported outcome measures of COVID-19 peritraumatic distress, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life (QOL), and their associated factors in a cohort of cancer patients treated at a tertiary care hospital during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: Surveys were administered at four time points between 1 April 2020 and 18 September 2020. The surveys included the CPDI, DASS-21, and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires. RESULTS: Survey response rates were high (61.0% to 79.1%). Among the 355 participants, 71.3% were female, and the median age was 62.2 years (IQR, 53.9 to 69.1). The majority (78.6%) were treated with palliative intention. An important proportion of the participants reported symptoms of COVID-19 peritraumatic distress (34.2% to 39.6%), depression (27.6% to 33.5%), anxiety (24.9% to 32.7%), and stress (11.4% to 15.7%) at any time point during the study period. We did not find clinically meaningful mental health and QOL differences during the study period, with remarkably little change in between the pandemic's first and second wave. We found no consistent correlates of mental health or QOL scores, including cancer type, therapy intention, and sociodemographic information. CONCLUSION: This cohort of cancer patients showed considerable resilience against mental health and QOL deterioration during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Strategies to overcome relapse of immunotherapy-related hepatitis: dose reduction is not the key.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy-related hepatitis accounts for 3-6% of all immune-related adverse events (irAE). Reintroduction of checkpoint inhibitors after irAE is matter of debate, weighing the risk of a relapse of adverse events against the possibility of improving disease control. Pharmacokinetic modelling has changed the paradigm of weight-based dosing to flat dose for checkpoint inhibitors, however, it is currently unknown if this poses underweight (<80 kg) patients to a higher risk of toxicity. Weight-based dosing has been opted as a less dangerous and more economic option, especially for underweight patients. Is dose reduction dosing a strategy to permit checkpoint inhibitors reintroduction after immune-related adverse events? METHODS: We describe a case of checkpoint inhibitor reintroduction after immunotherapy-related hepatitis, with dose reduction based on weight-based dosing (nivolumab 165 mg Q2w) in a patient with metastatic renal cell cancer. RESULTS: After three cycles, he had a relapse of hepatitis leading to prolonged steroid use and opportunistic infections. CONCLUSION: Dose reduction in underweight patients is not the preferred strategy to permit rechallenge after immunotherapy-related hepatitis. Exploration of other secondary prevention strategies is warranted.

Immune Monitoring in Melanoma and Urothelial Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy and SBRT Discloses Tumor Specific Immune Signatures.

(1) Background: Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has revolutionized the oncology field in the last decade. However, the proportion of patients experiencing a durable response is still limited. In the current study, we performed an extensive immune monitoring in patients with stage III/IV melanoma and stage IV UC who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with SBRT. (2) Methods: In total 145 blood samples from 38 patients, collected at fixed time points before and during treatment, were phenotyped via high-parameter flow cytometry, luminex assay and UPLC-MS/MS. (3) Results: Baseline systemic immunity in melanoma and UC patients was different with a more prominent myeloid compartment and a higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in UC. Proliferation (Ki67+) of CD8+ T-cells and of the PD-1+/PD-L1+ CD8+ subset at baseline correlated with progression free survival in melanoma. In contrast a higher frequency of PD-1/PD-L1 expressing non-proliferating (Ki67-) CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells before treatment was associated with worse outcome in melanoma. In UC, the expansion of Ki67+ CD8+ T-cells and of the PD-L1+ subset relative to tumor burden correlated with clinical outcome. (4) Conclusion: This study reveals a clearly different immune landscape in melanoma and UC at baseline, which may impact immunotherapy response. Signatures of proliferation in the CD8+ T-cell compartment prior to and early after anti-PD-1 initiation were positively correlated with clinical outcome in both cohorts. PD-1/PD-L1 expression on circulating immune cell subsets seems of clinical relevance in the melanoma cohort.

Checkpoint inhibition in combination with an immunoboost of external beam radiotherapy in solid tumors (CHEERS): study protocol for a phase 2, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: While the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) as standard of care treatment for various tumor types has led to considerable improvements in clinical outcome, the majority of patients still fail to respond. Preclinical data suggest that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could work synergistically with CPIs by acting as an in situ cancer vaccine, thus potentially increasing response rates and prolonging disease control. Though SBRT administered concurrently with CPIs has been shown to be safe, evidence of its efficacy from large randomized trials is still lacking. The aim of this multicenter randomized phase II trial is to assess whether SBRT administered concurrently with CPIs could prolong progression-free survival as compared to standard of care in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS/DESIGN: Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive CPI treatment combined with SBRT (Arm A) or CPI monotherapy (Arm B). Randomization will be stratified according to tumor histology (melanoma, renal, urothelial, head and neck squamous cell or non-small cell lung carcinoma) and disease burden (≤ or > 3 cancer lesions). The recommended SBRT dose is 24Gy in 3 fractions, which will be administered to a maximum of 3 lesions and is to be completed prior to the second or third CPI cycle (depending on CPI treatment schedule). The study's primary endpoint is progression-free survival as per iRECIST. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response, local control, quality of life and toxicity. Translational analyses will be performed using blood, fecal and tissue samples. DISCUSSION: The CHEERS trial will provide further insights into the clinical and immunological impact of SBRT when combined with CPIs in patients with advanced solid tumors. Furthermore, study results will inform the design of future immuno-radiotherapy trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03511391 . Registered 17 April 2018.

Spatiotemporal Evolution of Radiation Myositis on 18F-FDG PET/CT Following Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Intramuscular Melanoma Metastases.

ABSTRACT: Radiation myositis is an infrequent late adverse effect of radiotherapy (RT), more commonly seen after hypofractionated regimens. We present the case of a 52-year-old woman with oligorecurrent metastatic melanoma who, several months after receiving local hypofractionated RT, developed a painful swelling at the irradiated site. As an integral part of routine oncologic follow-up, 18F-FDG PET/CT allowed accurate visualization of the affected region and when matched with RT treatment plans clearly illustrated their apparent overlap. This case demonstrates the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the early detection and monitoring of radiation myositis and highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in melanoma care.

Managing viral hepatitis in cancer patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors: should we take the risk?

More patients with chronic hepatitis B and C infection are being exposed to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the safety and efficacy of ICIs in patients with chronic viral hepatitis are still poorly described. To explore this interaction, we identified eight studies of cancer patients with viral hepatitis treated with one or more ICIs, formally assessed tumor responses and safety by grading liver dysfunction. ICIs appear to be relatively safe in HBV/HCV-infected patients, and hepatitis related to viral reactivation is rare. In some patients, viral load regressed during ICI treatment, so immune checkpoints may play a role in viral clearance. HBV/HCV do not appear to be a contraindication to ICIs, although careful clinical and biochemical follow-up is recommended and, whenever necessary, antiviral therapy commenced.

Selective Oral MEK1/2 Inhibitor Pimasertib: A Phase I Trial in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK) signaling cascade is frequently constitutively activated in human cancers. Pimasertib is a selective and potent adenosine triphosphate non-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitor. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to describe the results of a phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation trial of pimasertib that investigated the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase II dose, and safety, as well as other endpoints. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four dosing schedules of pimasertib (once daily [qd], 5 days on, 2 days off; qd, 15 days on, 6 days off; continuous qd; continuous twice daily [bid]) were evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Each treatment cycle lasted 21 days. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) evaluated during cycle 1, and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity. RESULTS: Overall, 180 patients received pimasertib (dose range 1-255 mg/day). DLTs were mainly observed at doses ≥ 120 mg/day and included skin rash/acneiform dermatitis and ocular events, such as serous retinal detachment. The most common drug-related adverse events were consistent with class effects, including diarrhea, skin disorders, ocular disorders, asthenia/fatigue, and peripheral edema. The median time to maximum pimasertib concentration was 1.5 h across dosing schedules, and the apparent terminal half-life was 5 h across qd dosing schedules. Pimasertib decreased ERK phosphorylation within 2 h of administration, which was maintained for up to 8 h at higher doses and prolonged with bid dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the safety profile and efficacy signals, a continuous bid regimen was the preferred dosing schedule and the RP2D was defined as 60 mg bid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00982865.

Selective Oral MEK1/2 Inhibitor Pimasertib in Metastatic Melanoma: Antitumor Activity in a Phase I, Dose-Escalation Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pimasertib is a selective, potent mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) 1/2 inhibitor. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of pimasertib at pharmacologically active doses in a cohort of patients with locally advanced/metastatic melanoma from a first-in-human study of pimasertib. METHODS: This was a phase I, open-label, two-part, dose-escalation study. Part 1 was conducted in patients with solid tumors and identified the maximum tolerated dose, while Part 2 was restricted to patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma. Endpoints included safety, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity. We present data for patients with melanoma only from both parts of the study. RESULTS: In total, 93 patients with melanoma received pimasertib, 89 of whom received pharmacologically active doses (28-255 mg/day) across four dose regimens in the two parts of the study. The objective response rate was 12.4% (11/89): complete response (n = 1) and partial response (PR; n = 10). Six patients responded for > 24 weeks. Nine of the 11 responders had tumors with B-Raf Proto-Oncogene, Serine/Threonine Kinase (BRAF; n = 6) and/or NRAS Proto-Oncogene, GTPase (NRAS; n = 3) mutations. Forty-six patients had stable disease (SD). In patients with ocular melanoma (n = 13), best overall response was PR (n = 1), SD (n = 11), and disease progression (n = 1). Phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) levels were substantially reduced within 2 h of treatment and inhibition was sustained with continuous twice-daily dosing. Treatment-related, recurrent, grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in eight patients, including diarrhea, and skin and ocular events. CONCLUSION: Results from this phase I study indicate that pimasertib has clinical activity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic melanoma, particularly BRAF- and NRAS-mutated tumors, at clinically relevant doses associated with pERK inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00982865.

A randomized controlled phase II clinical trial on mRNA electroporated autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells (TriMixDC-MEL) as adjuvant treatment for stage III/IV melanoma patients who are disease-free following the resection of macrometastases.

BACKGROUND: Autologous monocyte-derived mRNA co-electroporated dendritic cells with mRNA encoding CD40 ligand (CD40L), CD70 and a constitutively activated TLR4 (caTLR4) (referred to as TriMixDC-MEL) have anti-tumor activity in advanced melanoma patients. We investigated the safety and activity of adjuvant TriMixDC-MEL in stage III/IV melanoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to treatment with TriMixDC-MEL (n = 21) and standard follow-up (n = 20). "Cross-over" was allowed at the time of non-salvageable recurrence. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients alive and disease-free at 1-year. For a subset of patients, (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded), tumor tissue samples were available for mRNA expression profiling and PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced. One-year after randomization, 71% of patients in the study arm were alive and free of disease compared to 35% in the control arm. After a median follow-up of 53 months (range 3-67), 23 patients experienced a non-salvageable melanoma recurrence (TriMixDC-Mel arm n = 9 and control arm n = 14).The median time to non-salvageable recurrence was superior in the TriMixDC-MEL arm (median 8 months (range 1-6) vs. not reached; log-rank p 0.044). TriMixDC-MEL-related adverse events (AE) consisted of transient local skin reactions, flu-like symptoms and post-infusion chills. No grade ≥ 3 AE's occurred. The mRNA expression profiling revealed four genes (STAT2, TPSAB1, CD9 and CSF2) as potential predictive biomarkers. CONCLUSION: TriMixDC-MEL id/iv as adjuvant therapy is tolerable and may improve the 1-year disease-free survival rate. Combination of optimized autologous monocyte-derived DC-formulations warrants further investigation in combination with currently approved adjuvant therapy options.

Bilateral Corneal Graft Rejection Associated With Pembrolizumab Treatment.

PURPOSE: To report the first case of corneal graft rejection presumably associated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: An asymptomatic 85-year-old woman with a history of bilateral penetrating keratoplasty presented for a follow-up visit with bilateral diffuse keratic precipitates and subepithelial infiltrates. There were no anterior chamber cells. Bilateral subclinical corneal graft rejection was suspected. Three months previously, pembrolizumab immunotherapy was started for a metastatic urothelial cell tumor. Corneal graft rejection was managed with topical dexamethasone drops, which were tapered slowly. Pembrolizumab treatment was continued with careful ophthalmological follow-up. Unfortunately, recurrence of corneal graft rejection was observed 8 weeks after cessation of topical dexamethasone drops. After consulting the treating oncologist, pembrolizumab treatment was stopped to prevent recurrent corneal graft rejection. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case of corneal graft rejection presumably associated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy. Corneal graft rejection may be successfully managed with corticosteroid therapy. However, constant vigilance and follow-up are advised because of the risk of recurrence in case of continued pembrolizumab treatment. Given the subclinical presentation, baseline ophthalmological screening is advised in all corneal graft patients after initiating immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

To treat or not to treat? Managing comorbidities in cancer patients under immune checkpoint inhibition.

Objectives: Assessing the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in risky cancer patient subgroups: pre-existing organ failure, elderly, presence of auto-immune disease, transplanted patients and brain metastasis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Google scholar databases were searched for English articles published prior to February 2019. Search terms used were organ failure, dialysis, elderly, organ transplant, liver disease, auto-immune disease, immunosuppression, and brain metastasis. Results: Our literature data indicate that immune checkpoint inhibition in the majority of these subpopulations can be administered safely without any loss of efficacy. These data are mostly based on case-reports as only a minority of high-risk patients were included in (the earliest) clinical trials. Validation of these results is necessary on a larger scale. Conclusion: Future trials should not automatically exclude aforementioned patient groups but alter the study design and make their inclusion possible, since more data are needed to answer several remaining questions in these populations. Especially since ICI appears to be safe to administer in these patients.

Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Inoperable Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Nivolumab improves survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. Unfortunately, most patients do not respond to this treatment. Preclinical data indicate that radiation therapy could work synergistically with nivolumab and improve response rates. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a phase 2 trial in 20 patients with inoperable or metastatic melanoma with ≥2 measurable lesions (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of 3 × 8 Gy to the largest lesion was delivered before the second nivolumab cycle. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the nonirradiated lesions (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1). Secondary endpoints included toxicity. An exploratory endpoint was mutant BRAF and NRAS circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) on serial blood samples. RESULTS: An ORR of 45% was noted with 3 complete and 6 partial responses. Three patients experienced stable disease and 7 had progressive disease as best response. All patients with a complete response in the nonirradiated lesions exhibited a local complete response in the irradiated lesion. Grade 1 to 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17 patients; 3 patients experienced grade 3 AEs (lymphopenia, gastroenteritis, and bullous pemphigoid). No grade 4 to 5 AEs occurred. ctDNA was detected in 8 patients, and changes corresponded to clinical response and suggested that a subset of patients with a low programmed death ligand-1 score only started responding after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the combination treatment was well tolerated and led to an ORR of 45% in patients with metastatic or inoperable melanoma, similar to historical response rates of nivolumab monotherapy. Although underpowered, our data therefore do not indicate a substantial abscopal response. Nonetheless, serial ctDNA analyses suggest that a subset of patients responded only after the addition of SBRT.

Immune checkpoint blockade for organ transplant patients with advanced cancer: how far can we go?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) provide impressive response rates among immunocompetent patients with various solid tumors. So far, organ transplant recipients have been excluded from clinical studies due to the putative risk of allograft rejection however 48 cases of liver and renal transplant patients treated with CPI were already described in literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Here we discuss 19 cases of liver and 29 cases of renal transplant patients who received CPI for advanced cancer. Disease control rate [stable disease, complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) together] was 35% (21% for liver and 45% for kidney transplant patients). Graft rejection was seen in 37% of liver and 45% and kidney transplant patients. Significantly, our analysis shows that an 'ideal' response occurs in 21% of all patients (antitumor response accompanied with durable graft tolerance). SUMMARY: We believe that transplant patients can be treated with CPI in a controlled setting and for well informed patients. To obtain a durable antitumor immune response while avoiding rejection, to be able to adjust immunosuppression and to have the opportunity to develop biomarkers for tumor response and transplant rejection, these patients should be treated according to a clinical care path or a prospective clinical trial.

Throughput efficiency and service quality after process redesign at a cancer day care unit: Two sides of the coin?

This study was designed to focus on the patient perspective in a reorganisation of care processes at a cancer day care unit (CDU). The effects of dose banding and of taking blood samples one day (or more) before the day care treatment (on Day -1) are investigated in terms of throughput efficiency and perceived service quality. Data were collected by mapping patient processes in detail and surveying patients in two CDUs at a university hospital (n = 308). A univariate model was used to investigate the effect of these factors on patient throughput time, and perceived service quality was examined with multiple linear regression. Taking blood samples on Day -1 decreases patient throughput time and increases the perceived service quality by improving the patient's perception of technical expertise and the outcome. This has a globally positive effect on patients' perceived service quality. Dose banding affected neither patient throughput time nor perceived service quality. Taking the pretreatment blood sample on Day -1 can be considered an important process design characteristic, as it increases both efficiency and service quality.

Psoriasis Vulgaris Exacerbation during Treatment with a PD-1 Checkpoint Inhibitor: Case Report and Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of immune-related adverse events is growing as the use of checkpoint inhibitors is exponentially increasing. Cutaneous adverse events are among the most frequent immune-related adverse events. The purpose of this case report and literature review is to highlight psoriasis as a potential adverse event with need for early recognition. CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW: We describe the case of a 65-year-old woman with psoriasis exacerbation while treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) for a stage IV melanoma. She had a history of scalp psoriasis but she presented with psoriatic lesions on both lower and upper limbs. Our patient was treated with topical steroids. So far, 34 other cases with an exacerbation of psoriasis during treatment with anti-PDL-1 or PD-1 therapy have been reported in the literature. A broad range of therapies are described, without any available guidelines for this particular condition. CONCLUSION: Psoriasis exacerbation is an established side effect of PD-1/PDL-1 checkpoint inhibitors with 35 reported cases. Early recognition and management are challenging as there are no clear guidelines available. A close collaboration between oncologist and dermatologist is mandatory to manage this immune-related adverse event.