Long-term quality of life of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients under surveillance or after operative treatment.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the long-term quality of life (QOL) in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) undergoing surveillance or after operative treatment. METHODS: 249 patients with AAAs completed the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) test and Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) survey: 78 patients with small AAAs under surveillance, 26 after ruptured AAAs (rAAAs), 47 after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and 98 after elective open repair. The results were compared with WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 standard values from a matched German population using the Student's 2-tailed t-test. RESULTS: Long-term results of the WHOQOL-BREF test showed that patients undergoing AAA surveillance had a significantly lower physical QOL (P = 0.04). Patients after EVAR or open repair rated their environmental QOL significantly higher than the age- and sex-matched general population (open repair: P = 0.006; EVAR: P < 0.001). Patients with rAAAs had the same QOL as the matched German population. Long-term results of the QOL SF-36 showed that patients undergoing AAA surveillance rated their QOL significantly lower in the subgroup of role-physical (P = 0.02) and role-emotional (P = 0.003). Patients with rAAAs rated lower scores for role-physical (P = 0.02) and had more bodily pain (P = 0.02). Patients who underwent elective open repair had the same high QOL as the matched German population, whereas patients who underwent EVAR reported significant improvement in vitality (P = 0.002) and mental health (P = 0.03) compared with the matched German population. CONCLUSIONS: Based on measurements from 2 independent QOL tests, the well-established operative treatment of AAAs provided patients with a QOL comparable to that of a matched German population. The electively treated AAA groups rated environmental QOL factors significantly higher than the control group. The impaired physical and emotional QOL of the AAA group under surveillance suggests that more intense patient education could be beneficial.

Comparison of survival rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment methods.

BACKGROUND: We compared relative survival rates of patients after various operative treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to those for the general population. We calculated a point of "recovery," defined as the survival rate equal to that of the general population. METHODS: Survival data were collected from patients who underwent open repair for a ruptured AAA (rAAA), elective open repair of an AAA (OPEN), and endovascular repair (EVAR) in our hospital between 1995 and 2005. The cumulative relative survival rate and time-specific relative survival rate were calculated for these patients compared to those for the general population. The point of "recovery" was defined as the cumulative relative survival rate equaling the survival rate for the population, and the time-specific relative survival rate reaching 1.0. RESULTS: The cumulative relative survival rate of the patients immediately after OPEN was lower than for the comparison group at the time the cumulative relative survival rate was regained. The time-specific relative survival rate of the rAAA reached 1.0 at 16 months following emergency surgery, and for OPEN after 10 months. The cumulative relative survival rate in the EVAR group had no impairment following intervention. The relative long-term survival rate in all three surgical groups was the same as that for the general German population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated successfully for AAA have the same relative long-term survival as the general population. The time required to reach the same survival, however, differs between the treatment groups and is longest in the group with a rAAA. The variable survival rates should be taken into consideration when treating patients with an AAA.