RESUMO
PURPOSE: Preclinical and clinical investigation of the combination of the antiangiogenesis/anti-invasion agent carboxyamido-triazole (CAI) administered with the cytotoxic agent paclitaxel (PAX). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Colony-forming assays were used to test the activity of CAI plus PAX on A2780 human ovarian cancer. The sequence of CAI followed by PAX (CAI>Pax) was modeled in nude mice to test for potential additive toxicity. The Phase I clinical dose escalation schema tested p.o. administered CAI in PEG-400 (50-100 mg/m(2)) or micronized CAI (250 mg/m(2)) for 8 days followed by a 3-h infusion of PAX (110-250 mg/m(2)) every 21 days. Patients were assessed for toxicity, pharmacokinetics of CAI and PAX, and disease outcome. RESULTS: In preclinical studies, CAI>Pax was additive in A2780 human ovarian cancer cell lines when CAI (1 or 5 microM) preceded subtherapeutic doses of PAX. CAI did not reverse PAX resistance and collateral resistance to CAI was documented in PAX-resistant cells. CAI>PAX administration had no overt additive toxicity in nude mice. Thirty-nine patients were treated on a dose-escalation Phase I trial using daily oral CAI for 8 days followed by the PAX infusion. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that PAX caused an acute increase in circulating CAI concentrations in a dose-dependent fashion. No additive or cumulative toxicity was observed, and grade 3 nonhematological toxicity was rare. Three partial responses and two minor responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential combination of CAI and PAX is well tolerated, and the activity observed suggests that further study of the combination is warranted.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Interações Medicamentosas , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Concentração Inibidora 50 , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Nus , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neovascularização Patológica , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Células Tumorais CultivadasRESUMO
A mitochondrial DNA topoisomerase (type I, ATP-independent) can be biochemically distinguished from the nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I. This conclusion is based on the subcellular localization of the mitochondrial enzyme, its optimal reaction conditions and sensitivity to enzyme inhibitors. Unlike its nuclear counterpart, the mitochondrial DNA topoisomerase exhibits an absolute requirement for a divalent cation (Mg2+ and Ca2+ work equally well in vitro). In addition, it is slightly more sensitive to monovalent salts, with optimal activity obtained in 50-100 mM KCl. The mitochondrial enzyme is equally active at pH 7.5 or pH 9.5, but unlike its nuclear equivalent, is inactivated at higher pH values. The mitochondrial DNA topoisomerase is sensitive to coumermycin, berenil, camptothecin and 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-4-imidazolidinone, a chemical that has no inhibitory effect on DNA topoisomerase I. Immunoblotting studies show that mitochondrial DNA topoisomerase activity is associated with a polypeptide (M(r) approximately 79,000) that cross-reacts with the antiserum against DNA topoisomerase I. Thus, the mitochondrial DNA topoisomerase may be derived by the differential expression of the DNA topoisomerase I gene or from the expression of a gene that is homologous to the DNA topoisomerase I gene.