Diagnostic Yield of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Detection of Superficial Colorectal Lesions.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of second-generation PillCam -COLON2 capsule endoscopy (CCE2) in detecting colorectal superficial lesions remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of CCE2 in the detection of colorectal superficial lesions. METHODS: We performed CCE2 in 60 consecutive patients between April 2011 and -December 2017. Lesions ≥6 mm in size were detected in 34 patients (25 males, average age: 60.5 years). We performed endoscopic resection and histopathological analysis of all resected lesions within 3 months after CCE2. We considered the optical colonoscopy (OC) findings as the gold standard and evaluated CCE2 sensitivity. RESULTS: Sixty-seven lesions (≥6 mm) were detected via OC, with 27 colorectal superficial lesions and 40 protruded lesions. CCE2 sensitivity for ≥6-mm-sized, superficial, and protruded lesions was 84, 78, and 88%, respectively. No significant intergroup differences were observed. CCE2 false-negative colorectal superficial lesions accounted for 31% of right-sided colon lesions and 50% of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps). The CCE2 false-negative protruded lesions accounted for 17% of right-sided colon lesions. CONCLUSION: CCE2 sensitivities for colorectal superficial and protruded lesions were not significantly different. However, flat-type SSA/Ps in the right colon, especially when the transit time is fast, have a risk of demonstrating CCE2 false-negative results.

Experience with Balloon Dilatation in Crohn's and Non-Crohn's Benign Small-Bowel Strictures: Is There a Difference?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) has been effective for small-bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, its efficacy and indication for small-bowel strictures in non-CD patients have not been established. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of EBD for small-bowel strictures in non-CD patients compared with CD patients. METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients (mean age, 53 years; average observation period, 45 months) with small-bowel strictures diagnosed by double-balloon endoscopy were retrospectively evaluated at Hiroshima University Hospital from August 2003 to April 2017. The average number of procedures, short-term and long-term EBD success rates, and safety profiles between the non-CD and CD groups were examined. RESULTS: Surgery was selected as the initial treatment in 44 cases (45%) (non-CD group, 27 (61%); CD group, 17 (39%)) as EBD is not indicated. Fourteen non-CD patients had strictures due to malignant tumors, while 13 patients had benign strictures. Twenty-three patients (non-CD, 12; CD, 11) underwent EBD. Forty-three EBD procedures were performed for 17 stricture sites (average: 2.5 procedures/site) in non-CD patients and 41 EBD procedures for 18 stricture sites (average: 2.3 procedures/site) in CD patients. The short-term success rate was 100% (23/23), whereas the long-term success rate was 92% (11/12) in non-CD patients and 82% (9/11) in CD patients. No significant differences in the surgery-free rate occurred between both groups. Furthermore, one adverse event, bleeding after EBD, was encountered in the non-CD group (8%, 1/12). CONCLUSION: EBD for small-bowel strictures demonstrated good clinical outcomes in non-CD patients.

Evaluation for the Clinical Efficacy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Detection of Laterally Spreading Tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The manner in which colorectal lesions are being detected with PillCam COLON2 capsule endoscopy (CCE2) has markedly improved in recent days. However, limited data are available on CCE2 for detecting laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). The aim of this study was to compare CCE2 with optical colonoscopy (OC), which is currently the gold standard used in the detection of LSTs. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-academic center study comparing CCE2 with OC in patients with LSTs diagnosed using OC, which was performed during the 3-month period prior to CCE2. We focused on the sensitivity and specificity of CCE2 for detecting LSTs. LSTs were classified into the LST-granular type (LST-G) or the LST-non-granular type (LST-NG). RESULTS: Thirty patients (mean age 59.5 years) were enrolled. Of them, 21 LSTs (7 LST-Gs and 14 LST-NGs) were evaluated in this study. The mean diameter of the LSTs was 27 ± 15 mm (range 10-60 mm). Histopathological diagnoses of the LSTs were as follows: tubular adenoma, 12 cases (57%); sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), 4 cases (19%); Tis carcinoma, 1 case (5%); and T1 carcinoma, 4 cases (19 LSTs were found in the following locations: cecum, 1 case (5%); ascending colon, 6 cases (29%); transverse colon, 6 cases, (29%); descending colon, 1 case (5%); sigmoid colon, 3 cases (13%); and rectum, 4 cases (19%). The colon cleansing level was adequate in all cases. The sensitivity and specificity of CCE2 for detecting LSTs were 81 and 100% respectively. For detecting LST-Gs and LST-NGs, the sensitivity and specificity were 71 and 100%, and 86 and 100%, respectively. There were 4 false-negative cases (LST-G (18 mm), cecum; LST-G (20 mm), sigmoid colon; LST-NG (25 mm), transverse colon; LST-NG (20 mm), transverse colon). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity for detecting LSTs is lower with CCE2 than it is with OC, especially for LSTs located on the right colon or for SSA/P.

Polidocanol injection therapy for small-bowel hemangioma by using double-balloon endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small-bowel hemangioma is a rare disease that often causes active bleeding. The standard therapeutic method for small-bowel hemangioma is surgical resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of polidocanol injection (PDI) for small-bowel hemangiomas. METHODS: This study included 12 patients with obscure GI bleeding (6 male; mean age 62 years) with 39 small-bowel hemangiomas; patients were treated with PDI by using double-balloon endoscopy (DBE). EUS with DBE was performed before PDI. The lesions were divided into 2 groups according to tumor size: Group A (size <10 mm; 20 lesions) and group B (size ≥10 mm; 19 lesions). The outcomes of PDI treatment for small-bowel hemangioma were evaluated between the 2 groups. Additionally, in order to standardize the amount of PDI injected, the total amount of polidocanol according to lesion size was calculated. RESULTS: There was no difference in the location of lesions and treatment times between the 2 groups. Group B had a significantly higher injection time per lesion (P < .05) and amount of polidocanol per lesion than group A (P < .01). Rebleeding occurred in only 1 case (8%). There were no adverse events related to PDI. The contribution ratio between the lesion size and amount of polidocanol showed a correlation (r = 0.77). The optimal amount of polidocanol for small-bowel hemangioma was determined to be 0.2 mL/mm. CONCLUSIONS: PDI is an easy, safe, and effective method to treat small-bowel hemangiomas.

Clinical usefulness of transabdominal ultrasonography prior to patency capsule for suspected small-bowel strictures.

OBJECTIVE: Patency capsule (PC) examination has made it possible to perform capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with a suspected small-bowel stricture. However, PC has some drawbacks, so we assessed the usefulness of transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) prior to PC in patients with suspected small-bowel strictures to avoid unnecessary PC examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients who underwent TUS prior to PC were enrolled in this study. TUS findings were classified as follows: intestinal narrowing and distension at the oral side (Type A); extensive bowel wall thickening (Type B); focal bowel wall thickening (Type C) or no abnormality detected (Type D). We evaluated the TUS and PC findings for the detection of small-bowel strictures. RESULTS: Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) revealed small-bowel strictures in 13 of 50 patients (26%). TUS yielded Type B or C findings in 12 of 13 patients (92%), while PC revealed strictures in all 13 patients. In Crohn's disease (CD) patients with Type B TUS findings, 8 of 9 (89%) had small-bowel strictures on DBE. However, only two of six non-CD patients (33%) with Type B TUS findings had small-bowel strictures. The incidence of Type B strictures was significantly higher in CD patients. CONCLUSIONS: CD patients with Type B TUS findings should not undergo PC or CE because of the high rate of small-bowel strictures. Non-CD patients diagnosed with Type B TUS strictures, as well as patients diagnosed with Type C or D strictures should undergo CE after confirming small-bowel patency using PC.