RESUMO
The Rives-Stoppa (RS) procedure is a gold standard treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias. Comparability of pain control and outcomes to the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal prosthetic (eTEP) repair remain unclear. A single-centre retrospective surgical cohort was selected including 30 RS repairs (January 2019-November 2021) and 30 consecutive eTEP procedures (September 2021-August 2022) for midline abdominal wall hernia(s) with rectus abdominis diastasis. Postoperative pain and outcomes were compared up to 1 month. Presence and median duration of patient-controlled analgesia were, respectively, 90% and 3 nights with RS, versus 30% and 0 nights with eTEP. Median switch to only oral analgesics occurred at postoperative day (POD) 3 after RS and at POD 2 after eTEP. Postoperative analgesics and opioid prescription at discharge were comparable. Median length of hospital stay was six nights after RS versus 3 nights after eTEP. Median duration of surgery was 110.5 and 164.5 min for RS and eTEP, respectively. After RS, 30 patients had postoperative drain(s) compared to 3 patients after eTEP. Conversion was needed in 3 eTEP procedures. Postoperative complications were comparable. No early recurrences were observed. Minimal residual diastasis was seen at postoperative consultation in 11 patients after eTEP. Compared to RS, eTEP is a minimally invasive alternative treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias with rectus abdominis diastasis and is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain and a comparable risk of short-term complications. At 1 month after eTEP, minimal residual diastasis can be present. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05446675. Secondary identifying number: EC/EH/220608-SK. Date of Registration: June 24, 2022.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) masquerading as a recurrent inguinal hernia is rare. We report the case of a 73-year-old male patient who presented with a symptomatic bulge in his left groin. Medical history revealed bilateral preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, osteoporosis and atrial fibrillation. The patient's further history was not significant. METHODS: Sonography revealed recurrence of an indirect inguinal hernia (4.5 cm × 2.3 cm) on the left, with bilateral subcutaneous lymph nodes that were deemed unremarkable. We planned an elective left-sided anterior inguinal repair. Apixaban was stopped two days prior to surgery. RESULTS: During surgery we identified the bulge as a lump attached to the spermatic cord. No hernial sac was present. Together with the consulting urologist, we concluded a possible malignant etiology and performed an orchiectomy along with resection of the lump. CONCLUSION: Microscopic and immunohistochemical analysis revealed a DLBCL with non-germinal center phenotype and c-MYC rearrangement. Further staging confirmed stage IE disease with extranodal paratesticular involvement. The patient was subsequently treated with rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone and showed complete metabolic remission after two cycles. This case illustrates the broad differential diagnosis of inguinal swelling and (para)testicular tumors.