Medium-Term Outcomes of Concomitant Aortic Valve Repair in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to analyze the development of aortic insufficiency in patients who received central aortic valve repair when undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent HeartMate II or 3 (Abbott Lab) implantation between 2004 and 2022. Ninety-four patients were excluded from analysis for history of aortic valve procedures, a bicuspid aortic valve, baseline trace aortic insufficiency, or other concomitant aortic valve procedure. Patients who had ≥ mild aortic insufficiency had concomitant aortic valve repair. Clinical characteristics, serial echocardiograms, and outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Of the 656 patients who underwent HeartMate II or 3 implantation, 105 patients (59 HeartMate II and 46 HeartMate 3) met study criteria. Median age was 68 years [60-74 years], 91.4% [n=96] were male, 54.4% [n=56] were white, and 68.6% [n=72] received support as destination therapy. Preoperative aortic insufficiency degree was 54.3% (n=57) mild, 23.8% (n=25) mild-to-moderate, 20.0% (n=21) moderate, 1.0% (n=1) moderate-to-severe, 1.0% (n=1) severe. In hospital mortality was 5.7% [n=6]. Freedom from ≥ moderate aortic insufficiency was 96.4% (95%CI: 92.5%-100%), 93.3% (95%CI: 87.6%-99.2%), and 91.0% (95%CI: 84.1%-98.5%) at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year post-implantation, respectively. One HeartMate II patient experienced severe aortic insufficiency and was treated with a heart transplant. Three-year survival was 63.4% [95%CI: 52.9%-75.9%]. CONCLUSIONS: Central aortic valve repair may be an effective technique to mitigate aortic insufficiency in HeartMate II and 3. A larger cohort study with longer duration of follow up is warranted to further investigate the clinical impact.

Long-term outcomes after aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve-associated aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve often require root replacement. This study aims to describe their long-term rates of mortality and reoperation. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of 747 patients with bicuspid aortic valve who underwent aortic root replacement for aortic aneurysm between 2004 and 2020. Cumulative incidence curves for aortic valve and aortic reoperations were graphed. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the patient cohort was created alongside an age- and sex-matched curve for the US population. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine characteristics associated with long-term mortality. RESULTS: The median age of our cohort was 54 [43-64] years old, and 101 (13.5%) patients were female. In patients with bicuspid aortic valve dysfunction, 274 (36.7%) had aortic insufficiency, 187 (25.0%) had aortic stenosis, and 142 (19.0%) had both. In-hospital mortality occurred in 10 (1.3%) patients. There were 56 aortic valve reoperations and 19 aortic reoperations, with a combined cumulative incidence of 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23%-46%) at 15 years. In addition, there was comparable survival between the patient cohort and the age- and sex-matched US population. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), concomitant CABG (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.29-4.04), and bypass time (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01) were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo aortic root replacement with bicuspid aortic valve have an increased rate of aortic reoperation (35%; 95% CI, 23%-46%) while their survival appears to be comparable to the general US population (79%; 95% CI, 73%-87%) at 15 years.

Outcomes of Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons Analysis and Risk Model.

BACKGROUND: To provide patients and surgeons with clinically relevant information, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS-ACSD) was queried to develop a risk model for isolated tricuspid valve (TV) operations. METHODS: All patients in the STS-ACSD undergoing isolated TV repair or replacement (N=13,587; age 48.3±18.4 years) were identified (7/2017-6/2023). Multivariable logistic regression accounting for TV replacement versus repair was used to model eight operative outcomes: mortality, morbidity and/or mortality, stroke, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, short and prolonged hospital stay. Model discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration were assessed using 9-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The isolated TV study population included 41.1% repairs (N=5,583; age 52.6±18.1 years) and 58.9% replacements (N=8,004; age 45.3±18.0 years). Overall predicted risk of operative mortality was 5.6%, similar in repairs and replacements (5.5% and 5.7%, respectively); as was the predicted risk of composite morbidity and mortality (28.2% and 26.8%). Replacements were generally younger patients with a higher endocarditis prevalence than repairs (45.7% vs. 21.1%). The model yielded a C-statistic of 0.81 for mortality and 0.76 for the composite of morbidity and mortality, with excellent observed-to-expected calibration that was comparable in all sub-cohorts and predicted risk decile groups. CONCLUSIONS: A new STS risk model has been developed for isolated TV surgery. The current mortality of isolated TV operations is lower than previously observed. This risk prediction model and these contemporary outcomes provide a new benchmark for current and future isolated TV interventions.

Is surgical risk of aortic arch aneurysm repair underestimated? A novel perspective based on 30-day versus 1-year mortality.

OBJECTIVES: The decision to undergo aortic aneurysm repair balances the risk of operation with the risk of aortic complications. The surgical risk is typically represented by perioperative mortality, while the aneurysmal risk relates to the 1-year risk of aortic events. We investigate the difference in 30-day and 1-year mortality after total arch replacement for aortic aneurysm. METHODS: This was an international two-centre study of 456 patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement for aneurysm between 2006 and 2020. Our primary end-point of interest was 1-year mortality. Our secondary analysis determined which variables were associated with 1-year mortality. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 65.4 years (interquartile range 55.1-71.1) and 118 (25.9%) were female. Concomitantly, 91 (20.0%) patients had either an aortic root replacement or aortic valve procedure. There was a drop in 1-year (81%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 78-85%) survival probability compared to 30-day (92%, 95% CI 90-95%) survival probability. Risk hazards regression showed the greatest risk of mortality in the first 4 months after discharge. Stroke [hazard ratio (HR) 2.54, 95% CI (1.16-5.58)], renal failure [HR 3.59 (1.78-7.25)], respiratory failure [HR 3.65 (1.79-7.42)] and reoperation for bleeding [HR 2.97 (1.36-6.46)] were associated with 1-year mortality in patients who survived 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increase in mortality up to 1 year after aortic arch replacement. This increase is prominent in the first 4 months and is associated with postoperative complications, implying the influence of surgical insult. Mortality beyond the short term may be considered in assessing surgical risk in patients who are undergoing total arch replacement.

Utility of structured follow-up imaging after aortic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although postoperative follow-up after aortic surgery is recommended by guidelines, its clinical utility is not well documented. We hypothesized that structured follow-up imaging by an aortic program would improve outcomes. We then documented radiologic findings on asymptomatic postoperative imaging. METHODS: All patients who survived to discharge after open thoracic aortic surgery between January 2017 and July 2021 were included, excluding endocarditis. Patients who followed at our center and received scheduled imaging were compared with patients who did not. Survival was analyzed by the method of Kaplan-Meier, and reintervention was assessed using the Fine-Gray subhazard function. Routine imaging was reviewed for aortic growth, pseudoaneurysm, and perigraft density. RESULTS: After aortic surgery, the cumulative incidence of follow-up was 38.6% at 3 years postoperatively. Patients with follow-up were more likely to have a dissection and fewer comorbidities but were similar in regards to socioeconomic factors and distance to hospital. After matching and accounting for immortal time bias, patients with follow-up had a greater reintervention rate (26.0% vs 9.0%) with similar survival (98.7% vs 95.2%, P = .110) at 4 years. The cumulative incidence of pseudoaneurysm, significant perigraft density, and growth ≥3 mm/year on routine imaging was 49.7% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of structured follow-up imaging by an aortic program resulted in low clinical compliance. Follow-up was associated with increased rates of aortic reintervention. Clinically relevant radiologic findings were common on asymptomatic imaging and increased throughout 5-year follow-up rather than plateauing in the early postoperative period.

Mechanical Circulatory Support During Surgical Revascularization for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the use of perioperative mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and its impact on outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were undergoing surgical revascularization. METHODS: Patients with an ejection fraction <35% who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from 2015 to 2021 were identified (N = 378). Patients were divided into no MCS, preoperative MCS, and postoperative MCS groups on the basis of timing of MCS initiation, which included intraaortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or Impella device (Abiomed) use. The primary outcome of interest was operative mortality. RESULTS: The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 2.4%. Sixty-six percent (n = 246) of patients had a previous myocardial infarction, and 61.8% of these patients were within 21 days of CABG. Twenty-one patients (5.6%) presented in cardiogenic shock. The preoperative MCS cohort consisted of 31 patients (8.2%) who underwent CABG a median of 2 days after MCS initiation. Thirty (7.9%) patients required postoperative MCS. Independent risk factors for requiring postoperative MCS included the preoperative ejection fraction (odds ratio, 0.93; P = .01 and the presence of preoperative MCS (odds ratio, 3.06; P = .02). Overall, operative mortality was 3.4%, and 3-year survival was 87.0%. Operative mortality in patients who did and did not receive preoperative MCS was 7.7% and 2.9% (P = .12) with no difference in long-term survival (P = .80), whereas patients requiring postoperative MCS had significantly increased operative (16.7%) and late mortality (63%; P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: CABG can be performed safely in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with selective use of perioperative MCS. Despite advanced disease severity, patients requiring preoperative MCS demonstrate acceptable short- and long-term survival. Patients requiring postoperative MCS have increased postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Significance of isolated postoperative atrial fibrillation in thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Although postoperative atrial fibrillation has been shown to be associated with worse survival after thoracic aortic surgery, its effect on outcomes independently from other postoperative complications is not well understood. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent open thoracic aortic aneurysm repair between March 2005 and March 2021. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was defined as new-onset atrial fibrillation that developed during the index hospital stay. Patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation were excluded. Postoperative major complications included reoperation for bleeding, respiratory failure, acute renal failure, and stroke. Variables associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation were analyzed with multivariable regression. Survival of patients without major complications was compared between patients without atrial fibrillation and patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation after propensity score matching for baseline and intraoperative characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1454 patients, 520 (35.8%) were observed to have postoperative atrial fibrillation. Patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation had a higher rate of postoperative major complications than those without atrial fibrillation (20.2% vs 12.2%, P < .001). Ten-year survival was 82.0% in patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation and 87.0% in patients without atrial fibrillation (P = .008). In the cohort of patients without complications, 10-year survival was similar between patients with and without postoperative atrial fibrillation after propensity score matching (83.6% vs 83.8%, P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative atrial fibrillation is common after open proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Although development of major postoperative complications is associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation and decreased long-term survival, isolated postoperative atrial fibrillation does not appear to influence long-term survival.

Reintervention after valve-sparing aortic root replacement: A comprehensive analysis of 781 David V procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Studies of reintervention after valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) are limited by sample size and failure to evaluate all types of reinterventions, including distal aorta and transcatheter interventions. In this report, reintervention after VSRR using a large patient cohort was comprehensively analyzed. METHODS: In a series involving 2 academic aortic centers, 781 consecutive patients from 2005 to 2020 undergoing David V VSRR for aortic aneurysm (91%) or dissection (9%) were included. Median age was 50 years, and 23% had a bicuspid aortic valve (AV). Median follow-up was 7.0 years. Open or transcatheter reintervention on the AV, proximal, or distal thoracic aorta was identified. Cumulative incidence was calculated, and subdistribution hazard models identified factors associated with reintervention. Time-dependent incidence of reintervention was plotted using risk-hazard functions. RESULTS: Sixty-eight reinterventions (57 open, 11 transcatheter) were performed. Reinterventions were divided by indication into degenerative AV (n = 26, including 1 transcatheter aortic valve replacement), endocarditis (n = 11), proximal aorta (n = 8), and distal aorta (n = 23, including 10 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs). Risk of reintervention for endocarditis peaked 1 to 3 years after VSRR, whereas other indications had stable, low rates of occurrence throughout the follow-up period. The cumulative incidence of reintervention was 12.5% whereas the cumulative incidence of AV reintervention was 7.0% at 10 years and was associated with residual postoperative aortic insufficiency. In-hospital mortality after reintervention was 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention rates after VSRR are relatively low in long-term follow-up and can be performed with acceptable operative risk. The majority of reinterventions are performed for indications other than AV degeneration, with the timing of reintervention varying by the specific clinical indication.

Increasing waiting times for status 2 patients in new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system: Impact on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Since the heart transplant allocation policy change in 2018, there has been an increase in temporary mechanical circulatory support for Status 2 patients. We sought to examine the temporal pattern of waitlist and posttransplant outcomes for Status 2 patients. METHODS: Adult patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry who were listed as Status 2 from January 2019 to June 2022 were included. Temporal trends in waitlist time, waitlist events, and posttransplant outcomes were assessed. Probability of transplant or death after being listed was compared over time. Multivariable regression was performed to identify risk factors for mortality after transplant. RESULTS: A total of 6310 patients were included. From 2019 to 2022, the number of Status 2 patients listed increased from 4.2 to 5.9 per day. Microaxial ventricular assist devices at Status 2 listing increased over time (P < .001). During the study period, median waitlist time (18 days vs 23 days, P < .001) as well as Status 2 days (8 days vs 12 days, P < .001) increased. Waitlist mortality remained stable (5.5%); however, probability of transplant within 90 days of Status 2 listing progressively declined (P < .001). Finally, longer waitlist duration was independently associated with 30-day posttransplant mortality (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Since the allocation policy change there has been a steady rise in the number of patients listed for Status 2. This has led to increasing waitlist times and lower probability of transplantation for Status 2 patients, which may have negative consequences for posttransplant outcomes.

Influence of preoperative and intraoperative factors on recovery after aortic root surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of intraoperative factors relative to preoperative risk factors on recovery after aortic root replacement (ARR). METHODS: Retrospective review of baseline and intraoperative characteristics was performed of 822 patients at our Aortic Center from 2005 to 2019. Inclusion criteria were all patients age 18 and older who underwent ARR at our institution from 2005 to 2019. The primary endpoint was the aggregate outcome of "failure to achieve uneventful recovery (FUR)," as previously defined. RESULTS: In total, 207 (25%) patients experienced FUR. The following preoperative and intraoperative variables were significantly associated with FUR in the multivariable analysis: cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02) open chest management (OR 5.67, 95% CI 2.65-12.1), ejection fraction (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), chronic kidney disease > stage 3a (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.54-3.63), bicuspid aortic valve (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21-1.96), and female sex (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.61). Cardiopulmonary bypass time and open chest management were among the top three partial R2 contributors to the logistic regression model variance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest efficacy in using intraoperative parameters to predict postoperative outcomes after ARR.

Research Concepts and Opportunities for Early-Career Investigators in Cardiac Surgery.

Basic, translational or clinic, research is a key component of cardiac surgery. Understanding basic cellular and molecular mechanisms is key to improving patient outcomes, and cardiac surgical procedures must be compared with nonsurgical alternatives. However, guidance for early-career investigators interested in cardiac surgery research is limited. This opinion piece aims at providing basic guidance and principles based on the authors' experience.

Comparing 3-year survival and readmissions between HeartMate 3 and heart transplant as primary treatment for advanced heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 3-year survival and readmissions of patients who received the HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or underwent orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) as primary treatment for advanced heart failure. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 381 adult patients who received an HM3 LVAD or were listed for OHT between January 2014 and March 2021 at our center. To minimize crossover bias, OHT recipients with a prior LVAD were excluded, and HM3 patients were censored at the time of transplant. Cohorts were propensity score-matched to reduce confounding variables. The primary outcome was 3-year survival, and the secondary outcome was mean cumulative all-cause unplanned readmission. RESULTS: The study population comprised 185 HM3 patients (49%) and 196 OHT patients (51%), with 104 propensity score-matched patients in each group. After propensity score matching, there was no statistical difference in 3-year survival (83.7% for HM3 vs 87.0% for OHT; P = .91; relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-2.20). In the unmatched cohorts, patients age 18 to 49 years had comparable survival with HM3 and OHT (96.9% vs 95.9%; N = 91; P = 1.00; RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.09-9.78). Patients age 50+ years had slightly inferior survival with HM3 (75.0% vs 83.9%; N = 290; P = .60; RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.85-2.68). The mean number of readmissions at 3 years was higher in the HM3 group (3.89 vs 2.05; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis suggests that for similar patients, HM3 may provide comparable 3-year survival to OHT as a primary treatment for heart failure but may result in more readmissions.

Does lateral approach preserve the right ventricular function after HeartMate 3 insertion?

OBJECTIVES: Lateral thoracotomy (LT) approach may preserve the right ventricular (RV) function after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. This study evaluated the short- and long-term RV function using echocardiography after LVAD implantation via LT or median sternotomy (sternotomy). METHODS: The patients who underwent HeartMate 3 implantation were retrospectively reviewed. The RV function was assessed before and 1 month and 1 year after LVAD implantation. The primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and a composite of death or readmission due to RV failure, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 195 patients, 55 (28%) underwent LT and 140 (72%) underwent sternotomy. There were no significant differences in the preoperative RV geometry or function. One month after the LVAD implantation, the LT group had a smaller RV end-diastolic dimension [42 (29-48) vs 47 (42-52) mm; P = 0.003] and RV end-diastolic area [25 (21-28) vs 29 (24-36) cm2; P < 0.001] and a greater RV fractional area change [30 (25-34)% vs 28 (23-31)%; P = 0.04] and peak systolic tissue velocity [8 (7-9) vs 7 (6-8) cm/s; P = 0.01]. Twenty-four patients died and 46 met the composite end point. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis did not reveal significant differences between LT and sternotomy in the 2-year survival (93% vs 83%; log-rank test, P = 0.28) and adverse event rate (76% vs 71%; log-rank test, P = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: LT approach yielded a better-preserved RV function at 1 month; however, there were no significant differences in the 2-year survival and adverse event rates.

Re-Dosing del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: Perfusion characteristics and outcomes--Is there an optimal redosing strategy?

OBJECTIVES: del Nido cardioplegia is utilized for myocardial protection in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery; however, no standardized re-dosing protocol exists. We describe perfusion characteristics and clinical outcomes in adult cardiac surgery patients who were re-dosed with del Nido cardioplegia. METHODS: Chart review was performed for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery (specific inclusion/exclusion criteria below) who received exactly two doses of del Nido cardioplegia from 2012 to 2019; n = 542 patients. The main outcome was a composite endpoint comprised of operative mortality, myocardial infarction, post-operative cardiac support device (CSD), and postoperative decrease in ejection fraction (EF), which was analyzed via multivariable logistic regression (MVLR). A secondary analysis evaluated postoperative vasoactive-inotropic scores (VIS) via gamma log link regression (GLLR) as a more physiologic indication of myocardial recovery. RESULTS: MVLR demonstrated that increased total cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was associated with a positive composite outcome (p < .001), whereas time between doses (p = .237) and the volume of each dose was not (p = .626). GLLR also demonstrated that prolonged CBP, decreased EF, congestive heart failure at time of surgery, and low hematocrit at the start of the surgery were all associated with higher VIS. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, variations in re-dosing strategy for del Nido cardioplegia do not affect postoperative outcomes and increased CPB time is associated with increased operative mortality, myocardial infarction, need for post-operative CSDs, and reduced postoperative EF, and increased VIS, irrespective of the re-dosing strategy. Further studies are warranted to to identify additional patient and operative characteristics that predispose to complications.

Correlating state-specific and national trends in breast reconstruction after Medicaid expansion: A decade-long update on the Affordable Care Act's impact.

While disparities in access to reconstruction persist, a comprehensive analysis comparing state-based outcomes and national patterns in breast reconstruction as a result of Medicaid expansion has never been examined. In this study, we investigated how breast reconstruction rates changed as a result of Medicaid expansion and compared these state-based findings to national counterparts. Patient data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project among states that chose to expand Medicaid were compared with those from states that did not expand. The difference-in-differences estimate of expansion to nonexpansion states was 7.05 (p = 0.10) for implant-based reconstruction, -11.56 (p = 0.01) for autologous reconstruction, and -7.08 (p = 0.18) for overall reconstruction. Comparing rates of nonexpansion states to national trends yielded estimates of -0.06 (p = 0.04), 0.06 (p = 0.01), and 0.004 (p = 0.90) for implant-based, autologous, and overall breast reconstruction, respectively. Similarly, comparing rates of expansion states to national trends yielded estimates of 0.02 (p = 0.38), -0.05 (p = 0.03), and -0.02 (p = 0.44) for implant-based, autologous, and overall breast reconstruction, respectively. In this study on national health policy, Medicaid expansion was associated with a significant increase in autologous rates while state-specific trends alone did not appear to predict the national outcomes of sweeping legislative changes that were differentially applied among states.

Preoperative left ventricular diastolic dimension index is associated with outcomes after HeartMate 3 implantation.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association between indexed left ventricular diastolic dimension and clinical outcomes after HeartMate 3 implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients implanted with the HeartMate 3 at our centre between November 2014 and September 2021. Left ventricular diastolic dimension was assessed via preoperative transthoracic echocardiography and left ventricular diastolic dimension index was calculated as left ventricular diastolic dimension/body surface area. The primary outcome was a composite of death or readmission due to right heart failure or stroke. The cut-off left ventricular diastolic dimension index value most closely associated with outcomes was determined by receiver-operating characteristic curve and restricted cubic spline analyses. RESULTS: Left ventricular diastolic dimension index measurements were available for 252 of 253 (99.6%) patients. Using a left ventricular diastolic dimension index cut-off value of 33.5 mm/m2, the cohort was divided: left ventricular diastolic dimension index ≤ (n = 131) or > (n = 121) 33.5 mm/m2. While there were no significant differences in age, INTERMACS level and preoperative haemodynamics between groups, patients with smaller left ventricular diastolic dimension index were more likely to have a larger body surface area (2.1 vs 1.9 m2, P < 0.001), ischaemic cardiomyopathy [64 (49%) vs 40 (33%), P = 0.01] and smaller left atrium volume index [40.5 (32.3-54.0) ml/m2 vs 54.0 (43.0-66.8) ml/m2, P < 0.001]. Smaller left ventricular diastolic dimension index patients had significantly worse survival (74% vs 88%, log-rank P = 0.009) and freedom from adverse events (55% vs 73%, log-rank P = 0.005) at 3-year follow-up. Smaller left ventricular diastolic dimension index was independently associated with the composite outcome (Hazard ratio 2.24, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller preoperative left ventricular diastolic dimension index is associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing HeartMate 3 implantation.